Show Posts
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 »
|
hehe you are right around 3 times more efficient i can see 6.23mh per 280X checkout the deep web Could you share it? i tried to find anything like that, but i probably used not as deep web as you did He's just trolling. nahuh I got nearly 6mh per 280x here you gotta use some crazyass tor search but sersly x11 is like how bitcoin was this time last year, kinda exciting, no body knows whos doing what where how whyyy?!
|
|
|
Nothing has happened. This fork was planned beforehand. BCX you have lost credibility by spreading FUD. You probably gained through this by buying low?
On the matter of miners voting against it. If all you (miner) care about is people should buy from you because in theory you will always be the first ones to get the coin. Then, to be truthful, game is over for you. These are early days for cryptos. Everyone involved has some technical background. You will never see any one group holding power like this. And if they do, they will be removed from the equation.
I wish 'one group holding power' was 'removed from the equation' ....... LOL MONEY TALKS
|
|
|
so NXT is more secure NXT to the Moon Well, maybe it will...but we'll have to wait a long time. That's actually better than a quick bubble. There's enough time to poke around with the nuts-and-bolts and see how it works. Standalone POS coins have many advantages over NXT - plus they far less resemble a bullshit hyip pyramid scheme (which after the initial POS influence on other developers NXT had - that is all it deserves ever be)
|
|
|
^ that is one POV the other is that there are a lot of scrypt miners and they used their GPUs to vote against aur
So you think mercenary scrypt miners willing to screw any scrypt blockchain to grab a few coins on some new scam out-hash the actual dedicated scrypt miners who mine to protect (secure) their holdings of scrypt based coins? Do you also think that mercenary SHA256 miners who have no SHA256 coin wealth to secure out-number SHA256 hashes that exist for the purpose of securing the SHA256 coin holdings they own? -MarkM- Yes, the majority of miners have turned mercenary (sometimes unbeknown to them) and all they want is ROI .... they decided that AUR wasn't going to give them the security they want so they voted against it, through that process they allowed all you greedy bitcoin holders an opportunity to 51% attack AUR's BC. as for your second sentence - care to rephrase?
|
|
|
^ that is one POV the other is that there are a lot of scrypt miners and they used their GPUs to vote against aur
|
|
|
what do u guys think about verticoin, ultracoin and blackcoin? are those in whitelist, blacklist or greylist? can u give the reason why also?
what about fatecoin? is it scramcoin also?
forget it, its a terrible list !!
|
|
|
Hey guys, been mining for over a year so had a good stint on BTC and now the alts as for every ASIC looks like as much a scam as the next coin(just my risk is much lower)... so I've had time to learn a few things and gain some perspective & much more advanced technical understanding. To the point...... I have an idea for a coin thats block numbers are based on the work of humans, I know it sounds a bit crazy but the technology is already there and used successfully EVERYDAY, so the idea is not flawed, and sorry I won't give my idea out just like that as I would really like to develop the idea a little more with a developer, say even if the ideas stolen I'd like to be involved as I do bring some other very useful professional skills with me This is a totally new perceptive that if its pulled off correctly will grow crypto astronomically so please don't click the back button without introducing yourself if you think you have the relevant experience. thanks
|
|
|
hmm, so moon, such far
|
|
|
first time using sha-3, my work utility seems to be very low, it says 96.5/m while my hashrate is 430Mhps(I=14), tried a couple of pools already, am I doing something wrong?
yea I fine wu is 25% of the overall hash on sha-3
|
|
|
just send my whole .dat backup folder to you in a PM please get back to me ASAP as I'm loosing money mining DOGE atm and failover pool isnt failing over to failcoin
|
|
|
My virus detector found no problem at all.
same 38 connections though nice distribution v quickly
|
|
|
As there's no such thing as an absolute or 'verified time', a time-stamp can be set as anything by the signer, just like Alice can pre-or-post-date a handwritten letter to Bob to appear to have been authored at any time she likes.
correction * was * until the blockchain came along ! these are the kind of things that could be solved ... poor guy, had such norml life before the media started going wild
|
|
|
Guys... long time lurker, had to make an account today!
just wanted to say..at this point, GPG, PGP, cryptography is not going to prove shit! All you can say is that Yes, this was signed with the proper key! Unless you were watching Dorian at his house and hitting f5 to see a new comment from Satoshi is being posted or not you wouldn't know! That is of course minus the possibility of him scripting it or just giving his key to someone else..... stop saying "sign it brahhh". That's not how it works!
the whole idea of us trying to figure out who he might be and chasing him down is all desperately interesting because the truth is its impossible, typical floored human instincts
|
|
|
Good to know that he's alive... but also bad to know that he's still active as that means 1,000,000 BTC are not gone forever...
hence my faucet rant
|
|
|
looks legit
|
|
|
Right, good work bud, p.s can I have some of that premine? just incase 1aDc1eWYydpi8vmfhx3woYKd459Hdqz43 Fuck off you greedy begger there is no premine in Bitcoin Bitcoin has such a soft launch the amount amassed by any one person with a normal computer mining even months after the launch would be in excess of any other common 'pre-mines' so in effect there kinda is, if you wanna get into the depths of it ......... The majority of bitcoins are so densely spread amongst the early adopters that if some % of this stash was given away now (like how the faucets were in 2012) it would probably be quite beneficial for bitcoin economy and growth in general. no problem and have a nice day
|
|
|
We really need more nodes. I've gotten 3 rejects so far and 10 accepted that disappeared from my wallet.
Yes, nodes were probably hammered at start... Can't believe this shit... yeah from my pov looks that way as well, bloody coin pirates
|
|
|
3 rejects on a 2.4mh rig.... node pls
|
|
|
|