Short version: you have a signed transaction with lock time, and the private key of the address where the funds will be sent. To reduce the risk of foul play, you want to sweep the second address the moment the lock time expires.
Is it possible to already create the transaction that sweeps the second address? That would make sweeping the funds faster, once the lock time expires.
I posted this in another topic:

I'm hoping you can create a transaction based on the (still unconfirmed) timelocked transaction.

Let's test this:
My (testnet) address on my made-up card is tb1qqngm2k9hpc4skrhxf5zl7m0p3m6tm9m0k3jv89. The private key is p2wpkh:cSSznAdAjUnBrL4EtkT1kPkygatqFhv8KrkiBUAY5j8iHcZW9uii.

From address tb1q7cevguh0kvpux8y9x9fczfuz2gxtlxrzvetfx4, I create a time-locked transaction to tb1qqngm2k9hpc4skrhxf5zl7m0p3m6tm9m0k3jv89. LockTime is 2428815 (1000 blocks from now). I can't broadcast this transaction yet:

Code:

02000000000101e0837ed3bfb89e4491c5cbcedbeda8b5a5e46254c23ad17a0c0bca027a39100e0100000000feffffff01ba7313000000000016001404d1b558b70e2b0b0ee64d05ff6de18ef4bd976f02473044022014954d7969c9ec9a61de472920645e4eff766d4e1e564ee536680e973904943102204f0601b7acc8e4b58ba27fb355029d3a20b8245080699d123e65d3c4ca8d6004012103cf78237d0e6a8bbe2829535515a504721651d8d65d2c5ef8e6b483c77db896a68f0f2500

With this information, I continue in an offline Electrum wallet, and import the private key (the one mentioned above).
I was hoping it would allow me to use the signed transaction and build a second transaction from there, but it knows the block height isn't sufficient yet so it doesn't work.

I tried again with Bitcoin Core, and I can create the raw transaction, but it doesn't let me sign it:

Code:

"error": "Input not found or already spent"

I really thought this must be possible, but I can't figure out how So never mind this plan

I couldn't get it to work. Maybe I'm doing something wrong, or maybe it's really not possible.

[My sales pitch]

My Signature is for rent I can make a deal per post, per week, per month, per quarter or per year, payment in Bitcoin. Payment can be fixed in Bitcoin or dollars, but has to happen in Bitcoin. I prefer to be paid upfront, but I'm flexible if you're trusted enough.

At the right offer, my personal text can be rented too, but I prefer to keep that personal.

I only advertise services that I like. I reserve the right to reject offers I don't like. If the service I'm advertising turns into a scam, I reserve the right to stop advertising it without returning payment.

My sales pitch
I was part of the ChipMixer Signature Campaign since September 2017, until it ended (March 16, 2023). This campaign was generally known for accepting only high-quality posters. After that, I've been wearing Coinslotty's signature for 3 months, until it ended.
I've created many data projects, varying from my Trust list viewer to Bitcoin block data. Here's a list of all topics I created.
Many of my topics are highly appreciated by the community, my Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system for instance got translated into 16 languages.
At the moment of writing:
I have made 23,571 posts (and almost all of those posts show a signature).
I'm the 2nd most Merited user and 1st most generous merit sender.
I'm the 6th Most Recognized user on BPIP.org.
I'm the 2nd most included DT1 member and the second most included user when counting inclusions from users with 250+ Merit.
I make no promises for the amount of posts I'll create in the future. but my weekly post count is usually around 50-100 posts (some of those posts (mostly bumps) are deleted the next week). Historic records can be found in my list of unedited posts.

History
1. Rollin.io: February 2016 - September 2017.
2. ChipMixer: September 2017 - March 2023.
3. Coinslotty: April - June 2023.
4. AgoraDesk: July 3, 2023 - October 1, 2023.
5. eXch: October 2, 2023 - April 28, 2024.

Signature history (starting only in May, 2023): loyce.club/signatures/459836.html.

Self-moderated against spam.

[TL;DR]

This post made me curious: how many private keys have been posted on Bitcointalk?
To find out, I searched all downloaded posts (which took hours) for anything that could be a Bitcoin private key. That resulted in 9375 potential keys (not all of them are valid, and no, I won't post the list).
Yesterday, I imported the private keys into a new Bitcoin Core wallet (this took only a few minutes), and did a rescan. This took forever, but was mesmerizing to watch: the balance went up and down by many Bitcoins, and this kept going for hours! I left it to finish overnight.
This morning, Bitcoin Core was hanging. I killed it, restarted it, and it took forever to load the wallet (which had grown to 2.2 GB during the rescan). Eventually, it worked! It's up to date, and the total balance is 0 (as expected). Every few minutes, Bitcoin Core is unresponsive for a few minutes, most likely because of the large wallet combined with a lack of processing power. It's not very nice to work with, and consumes 1 full CPU core.

Scrolling through the transactions, it's obvious any incoming transaction instantly gets sweeped, usually at a high fee. I assume many people have systems monitoring all compromised private keys, and they're competing against each other to steal the funds before someone else does. Back in the days, it happened to large amounts of Bitcoins, but the more recent transactions are mostly small. Except for last month (January 24): this address received 0.84362383BTC, which was instantly sweeped. The private key was posted 2 months earlier:

according to my notes the private key for that address can be: 5JgC6gcHCkyBqmgbyarpFHBHzpfNkZYKNJA3piM42ZYbvCUc1fW

Someone made a very expensive mistake funding it. I'm hoping pbies can tell me where the private key comes from.

TL;DR
Don't post your private keys! Don't post your seed phrases! Don't try to be smart by creating a brain wallet!

No spam
Self-moderated against spam. Discussion is of course allowed.

This is new:


This morning, I received 2 PMs, both with this warning. One of them links to BPIP.org, the other has an URL within code-tags. I'm not sure what triggers the warning, but if it's added to "normal" PMs too, users will just dismiss it after seeing it many times.

[Now the good part]

I found HostVDS on Lowendtalk.com and thought I'd share it because I've seen people in need of cheap servers.
Note: I'm not endorsing the service and from the reviews I know they've had quite a lot of downtime. It also was impossible to register with a Protonmail email address, and after I registered with my Gmail, I couldn't create a New Instance until a day later (customer support said there was a problem and they fixed it). So it's definitely not recommended for any production environment, and I wouldn't trust them with any sensitive data nor send them anything more than a dollar. Also, it looks like they charge 20% more on crypto payments.
It's not even a real Virtual Dedicated Server, it's just a VPS:

This is burst VPS, we guarantee 1/4 of CPU
~
Usually, you can use all 100%, but if you will run some high CPU usage things, like miners, you will be dropped to 50% for these plans, but after a few days only...

Now the good part, and the reason why I posted this: the value for money is amazing! $0.99/month gets you 1 vCPU Core, 1 GB RAM, 10 GB NVMe storage and 50 Mbps bandwidth. Usually, you'd only get these specs at this price when you buy an annual subscription on Black Friday and pay for the year. Now, you pay $0.001333 per hour for this, and can turn it off (wipe it) when you're done!

So I deposited $1 with a low-fee altcoin.

To test, I've setup Ubuntu 18.04 in Dallas. It's been 56 minutes since I created the VPS Instance, and after some testing I started syncing the latest version of Bitcoin Core (pruned). It has downloaded 6.4 GB already, while CPU steal mostly around 1-2%.

After another 8 minutes, it downloaded 7.6 GB. That's 9 GB per hour, and if it keeps going like this, it will be synced in 2.5 days. I'll update this thread on my progress. At a cost of $0.032 per day (about the same price range as the energy consumption of a Raspberry Pi), I'm impressed

No spam
Self-moderated against spam.

Just after I reported 4 incoherent offtopic shitposts (1, 2, 3, 4, although now it lacks context without the topics) from hasan21, I found Umaiya:

They're both bounty spammers, and now found the serious boards. The posts look almost random.

The first 4 posts were deleted quickly after I reported them, but I feel like it's not enough. Considering the recent hype on text-spinning AIs, and considering how easy it is for shitposters to produce massive numbers of posts that take some time to read through to realize it's bogus, I'd like to see them banned quicker. Maybe we can still stop this before it reaches massive volumes.

If you find more of this, please post them here as examples.

Today, Cloudflare was blocking scraping bots again. For 8 hours and 24 minutes, my scraper wasn't working. Anything between posts 61513760 and 61515614 (1853 posts) is missing, and amongst others my notification bot wasn't working. I already delayed my Merit and Trust data updates (which normally start on Friday and Saturday morning).
This happened 18 days ago too.

Public request to theymos: Is it possible to get an exception from Cloudflare for popular scraping bots? I'm thinking of BPIP.org, Ninjastic.space and loyce.club, but there are probably a few others that provide useful features for the Bitcointalk community. It would be really nice if DDOS-protection doesn't interfere with features.

[Man arrested on suspicion of money laundering of cryptocurrency worth tens of millions of euros]

Man arrested on suspicion of money laundering of cryptocurrency worth tens of millions of euros

In the early morning of September 6th 2022, the Dutch police arrested a 39-year-old man from the village of Veenendaal on charges of money laundering of cryptocurrency worth tens of millions of euros. The police identified the man after tracing bitcoin transactions. The funds were  stolen by making use of  a malicious software update purporting to be from  the open source Electrum wallet.

Investigation showed that the man converted bitcoin into the privacy coin monero [vice versa], which makes the trail of transactions more difficult to track. His service was provided via the anonymous online network Bisq. It is suspected that the man earned a lot from laundering in this way.

When the man was arrested, his home was searched and several data carriers were seized. The police investigation into  the data carriers and the virtual currencies held by the man is ongoing. The expected profit that the man made from money laundering was seized in cryptocurrency by the police. The man was released on Thursday 8th of September and remains a suspect.

The investigation is being carried out by the Dutch Police Cybercrimeteam of the Central Netherlands in collaboration with the Cybercrimeteam of the Eastern Netherlands.

If this guy "only" laundered the money, I expect he earned "only" a few percent of the tens of millions of euros. I guess the real malware makers are still far from getting caught.

It's a good Dutch police tradition to quickly let criminals go. This guy was held for 2 nights!

I couldn't find back the topic about the malicious Electrum "update popup", so I choose Press.

[loycev]

D@rkBASIC created this: loycevu3e75xlfrdxqueln6mk2dl2ditaqohpxgc35k2jezww6sxs4qd.onion! It's a mempool.space clone on the Tor network.
For unknown reason, the "Total sent/received" amounts aren't showing.

I'm just sharing it here, the more block explorers out there, the better you can hide your private data from prying eyes.

Self-moderated
Self-moderated against spam.

[The first chip]

ChipMixer started in 2017. It provides privacy by dividing Bitcoin into indistinguishable chips of the same size, starting with 0.001 BTC, and doubling the size up to 4.096 BTC (and since 2018 up to 8.196 BTC).
Chips existed long before ChipMixer, and anyone can create them on their own. For a while now, I've been curious how many chips are out there. The more there are, the better privacy they offer. So I collected the data

I took Blockchair's Bitcoin data, and used the following assumptions:

• Any address with a deposit of 0.001, 0.002, 0.004, 0.008, 0.016, 0.032, 0.064, 0.128, 0.256, 0.512, 1.024, 2.048, 4.092 or 8.196 BTC can be a chip.
• Any address that received more than one deposit is not a chip.
• Any address that sent more than one transaction is not a chip.
• Chips are counted if they're still funded at the end of a day.
• Chips are not counted from the day they're emptied.

The first chip
The first chip was created on April 29, 2011, with a size of 0.016 BTC.

Full data
As far as I know there are no false positives or negatives in my data. If anyone's interested in the full data (27 GB of "which chip exists on which day"), let me know.

Graphs
To keep the number of graphs manageable, I'll limit myself to Legacy addresses (starting with 1: solid lines) and native Segwit addresses (starting with bc1q: dotted lines).
Note: check the scale for each graph, I zoom in on the vertical axis to better show the larger chips.


















(0.001/4.096 and 0.002/8.196 have the same color, but it should be obvious based on the numbers which line is which)

No frequent updates
Currently, my data ends on August 20, 2022.
Processing the data takes a while, and updating the graphs is a lot of work. So don't expect too frequent updates, maybe in a few years, or maybe when Taproot becomes more popular.

No spam
Self-moderated against spam. Discussion is of course welcome.

[5]

Considering how Royse777's casino promotion ended in him being tagged by several DT-members, I'm curious what the community thinks of the following:

A week ago, Gianluca95 (Trust: +5 / =1 / -0) created a signature campaign with "Trusted and Safe BTC Mixing" in the title. That's a very strong vouch, without any proof whatsoever. Gianluca95 refers to their ANN thread, in which it was mentioned 5 days before the signature campaign was started that there's no reason to trust this site.

The user (Shaker_finance) who promotes the site shows red flags that I've seen many times before. Typically, this is how a scammer respond when someone doubts their legitimacy.

Some examples:

Trusted and safe bitcoin mixing solutions

I don't trust sites that claim to be trusted. That's up to the users to decide.

Unlimited max amount: Send any amount and mixing will go smoothly

For unlimited amount - we have reserves and able to serve big amounts

It sounds like they don't want to share yet at what amount they'll pull an exit scam.

Those are stats from our tests. Try to make mix you will see that they're dynamic. The problem is that we almost don't have users yet that's why stats are fixed atm

Hardcoded "live mixing", I've seen that before. Needless to say: that mixer pulled an exit scam.

Sgning is not safe

He's either hiding his lack of funds, or he found a massive vulnerability in Bitcoin! My money is on the former.

we will deposit soon around 40-50k$ on forums deposits, including wwh-club, exploit, xss and some others where we have advertisement or planning to have it, arranging this moment with project investors

Right. Some third party future action is supposed to convince us now that the site is safe.

For unlimited amount - we have reserves and able to serve big amounts

Sgning is not safe

Combining those two statements is a very big red flag. Signing a message is an established method to provide proof of funds. Claiming you have "unlimited" amounts and refusing to prove even a tiny 10BTC balance doesn't inspire confidence.

signing is not safe that's correct

Bitcoin mixers rely on trust. Lying is the one thing a Bitcoin mixer should never do. I've seen signed messages from addresses holding thousands of Bitcoins, and they didn't get stolen.

claiming unlimited and 20 BTC was actually the same to us

Right....

Speaking for exploit, if you think it's not trusted that doesn't mean it's not trusted, people have 0.5-1 mln $ deposits here

I've seen this before too: using large numbers to convince people, instead of a simple signed message. Anyone can make up a large number, not many people can sign a message from such an Bitcoin address.

I can't say how much time to wait, summer at the moment and part of the team at the vacations.

There's the excuses, always nice to see the team goes on vacation right after launching.

And there's the character attacks:

I understand that you are serious guy trying to make 1$ advertising chipmixer with your signature but we can do good without your advice

only you lie here, I say how it works
~
you won't even go and check it because it's easier to flame on my topic and get 1-2$ for advertising chipmixer lol...

what's not clear here ??!!!!! You lie here only and try to interpret my words absolutely other way for some reason

You are piece of shit spamming on my topic, ~ I try to be polite with people but not with assholes
~stop this bullshit flood on this topic
~you start behaving aggressive

This kind of language typically comes from scammers who see their "business model" evaporate. I've seen it so many times.

I don't care what you think at all and I'm professional until people start behaving way aggressive. ~ Toxic commentators are nowhere welcomed

And there's Trust abuse:


When this site scams someone, which I think is quite likely to happen, will Gianluca95 take the fall for them and get tagged?

Just 3 days ago (4 days after Gianluca95 started the signature campaign), he left Royse777 the following positive feedback:

Trustworthy user that have always worked correctly. A great signature campaign manager and a great communicator. I like his style. Forum needs more member like him.

I don't know what to make of this.

[This user is engaging in homophobic hate speech against the wider LGBTIQQ community as evidenced in the referenced "satirical" thread. https://archive.vn/vgDQzI now know why alts hilariousandco u=164822 / hilariousetc u=397737 / hilarious* u=1424594 are Trolling me with their constant threatening behavior.]

On 2020-08-26, Timelord2067 gave hilariousandco, hilariousetc and hilarious* this negative feedback (Reference link):

This user is engaging in homophobic hate speech against the wider LGBTIQQ community as evidenced in the referenced "satirical" thread. https://archive.vn/vgDQz

I now know why alts hilariousandco u=164822 / hilariousetc u=397737 / hilarious* u=1424594 are Trolling me with their constant threatening behavior.

Just recently, Timelord2067 reached DefaultTrust (again).

I think this is Trust abuse:

Negative (shown as -1)

• If you believe someone is a scammer, or someone is likely to scam, that deserves negative feedback. Please provide evidence.
• If you really hate someone and he's a terrible troll, that does not deserve negative feedback.

"The forum" shows this is Trust abuse as it has nothing to do with trade risks:


Theymos thinks this is Trust abuse:

The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas.

Negative feedback isn't your diary.

Now why this topic, I hear you ask? And why not just add Timelord2067 to my list of Trust exclusions? Because I like some/many of the feedbacks he sent! If only he'd omit the diary part, the remainder could be useful.
It also helps I'm currently not on DT1, and Timelord2067's DT2-strength is (1). That means he'll need 2 Trust exclusions to be removed from DT2. I'll exclude him if this feedback is still negative by the time I win the DT1 lottery again.

My earlier more subtle attempts didn't help:

I'm surprised Timelord2067 is on DT again. That's a good moment to clean up bad ratings made in the past, and this is one of them.

@Timelord2067: what's with the trust abuse on hilariousandalt?

The system is for handling trade risk, not for flagging people for good/bad posts/personalities/ideas.

It's ironic Timelord2067 accuses hilariousetc of Trust abuse.

[Flag]

User lazygurumaster posted a no doubt fake mixer as "the best". Post archived. The domain advertised as "the best mixer" was created only a week ago:

Code:

Domain Name: foxmixer.org                                                                                                             
Registry Domain ID: da3a19ae782e457eb3ed965d7a8e8c16-LROR                                                                             
Registrar WHOIS Server: whois.namecheap.com                                                                                           
Registrar URL: http://www.namecheap.com                                                                                               
Updated Date: 2022-05-23T08:34:31Z                                                                                                    
Creation Date: 2022-05-23T08:34:17Z

A topic about the .com site was created 5 years ago, but it closed. I'll Flag this Newbie as a warning.

Flag: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=2977

Well, that's useless: the Newbie Flag doesn't show up in Bitcoin Discussion.

[No spam]

I've said before that I think tagging Newbies for "bounty abuse" is futile. Accounts with high Activity and 0 Merit have nothing to lose, because they can easily create new accounts. Worse: it makes negative feedback very common instead of reserved for scammers, which leads to more and more people (including bounty/campaign managers) ignoring the warning. So I don't think tagging them makes the forum better.

The bounty scams don't even care about the duplicate accounts: they pay with made-up tokens created out of thin air, designed to make the creator rich. There's no way all of them are unique projects, and I'm pretty sure a couple of teams are behind most of the ICOs, Defi and other useless "disrupting" pump and dump BS that gives crypto such a bad name. They don't care: the more spam, the more they earn!

But if you do insist on tagging bounty spammers for bounty abuse, why not just tag them all? There's no way thouse bounty spammers all have thousands of real followers. All they do is spam Twitter and Facebook, and they exchange followers with other bounty spam accounts. So even if a bounty spammer uses only one account on Bitcointalk, they're still cheating with fake followers on social media!

The way I see this entire "business": there are a few multi-millionaires at the top, and there are a few (maybe hundreds or even thousands) of bounty spammers at the bottom. Together they produce millions of useless posts all over Bitcointalk and social media, hoping to convince more greedy gullible victims to hand over their money. It's a terrible concept and the entire business model is deceitful.

Yes, the topic title was clickbait, but I'm trying to make a point here. If tagging them doesn't work, if the forum doesn't ban their low-quality posts, and if they don't bring anything good at all, can't we just ignore them completely? Don't mention them in Reputation (sorry, I'm guilty too), don't mention them in Scam Accusations, don't look for "alts" as long as they have nothing to lose, don't tag them, but just ignore them completely?

No spam
Self-moderated against spam. Discussion is of course allowed.

This post reminded me the forum doesn't have a "Split Quote" button.

There's "Insert Quote", which does this:

Code:

[quote][/quote]

(and I never use this button)

I have no idea if it's easy to implement, but I'd like to see a "Split Quote" button that does this:

Code:

[/quote]

[quote]

On a PC, I don't really need it, but on mobile, typing this is slow. This could also help less experienced users to use proper quote tags.

The topic title comes from Security bounties:

$1 000: If you can move or delete a post that you are not supposed to be able to

The Auctions board has this description:

Auctions may optionally be placed in this section. Topics and replies in this section can't be modified or deleted.

There's a long known "bug", which I've just tested and confirmed: if I move a topic from Auctions to another board, I can edit or delete my own posts, and then move it back to Auctions. This shouldn't be possible.

Proposed solution: users shouldn't be able to move topics into or out of Auctions.

I broke the bounty requirements:

You must report the bug to the bugs email address listed on the contact page. You must not publish it elsewhere or share it with anyone else.

This was on purpose because this bug has been mentioned before. I'm only posting it now because it's explicitly mentioned on the bounty page.

Someone asked me to sell Forkcoins: 500 BCD (Bitcoin Diamond) (worth about $128) and 50,000,000 XEC (eCash) (worth about $3565). The coins were mined in 2010 and only recently moved.
Is anyone interested? I don't trust most of the exchanges that trade those Forkcoins. Binance trades eCash at .com, not at .us, but requires KYC.

Update: I no longer need this.

I just found out Electrum can't handle "send to pubkey" inputs. If you for instance import 1PTYXwamXXgQoAhDbmUf98rY2Pg1pYXhin (to create a new watch-only wallet), it shows all the spam transactions it received and a total balance of 0.00181009 BTC. The real balance is 3,233.17181009 BTC.
I can't really find much information about this, searching on keywords give completely different results. Is this a bug? Does Electrum simply not care about the few (but highly funded!) old addresses out there? Or am I missing something?

Until a week ago, I didn't even know "send to pubkey" exists. I clearly joined Bitcoin late.

[Warning]

I like simple (Linux) commands that process a lot of data. A console is much more powerful than a GUI.
I've posted them in various topics, but from now on will collect them here. Use them at your own risk.

Warning
Don't just copy paste anything you find online into a console! Try to understand it first.

Self-moderated
No spam please. Questions are of course okay. Adding content is appreciated.

Overview

• Get pubkeys out of Bitcoin block data

[Suggestion:]

I found spam again that advertises a Website in the user's profile. Out of 3460606 users, I've downloaded 1000 random profiles to check how often this happens:

Code:

1039992
2422300
1666856
3061865
658409
381375
802656
248733
3213211
2719500
225008
1762845
2250583
753199
1536038
205840
1282236
422785
3243646
2134169
3120460
2883000
3100270
1203644
1205398
2908950
992326
1566819
1788303
2100856
2251367
2329634
2562521
1891330
2487039
1793705
1324746
805555
2627435
1540013
153700
874245
2237356
990794
410776
2813480
924786
2440207
232539
602372
1320291
1440446
1666874
636887
1950493
410436
1174982
2768347
1748879
3432809
896669
3057595
3066764
2139259
1399102
2023447
2916818
671676
3021038
2056382
1134557
1788820
1097227
289115
3262381
1152261
2974027
1189361
499640
3415263
101509
3307332
1406769
2722892
867094
2800053
881425
406811
1049982
74740
2650262
932152
2010973
2201991
1381034
1678582
1370796
3105841
3357280
3029379
605240
1697860
1616165
521425
655098
1052162
18351
2626867
1521485
2958209
976146
16823
593627
995456
119577
395520
1583034
1535982
1724310
2420927
793012
2485652
1478173
2148108
1882052
602837
664350
2870687
3210373
1602495
579825
2137561
792557
1286632
802452
991399
1555999
990649
3410585
2268655
1928492
3450444
877519
55348
1596809
2708305
2387532
2969706
2457131
606517
277652
2428189
2741504
1465086
2413998
432174
2376497
2701223
1132370
2640294
435796
1930918
297956
2169502
460957
2605083
304704
946443
3107030
3198288
3244236
1376037
2315868
2139648
2806074
240029
2121380
1430843
1704125
1217814
3151034
800703
1445407
1431305
230405
789894
26519
377789
1103845
1001775
968136
2656319
3354487
1542193
323351
1496192
1618861
1925953
1474723
2175248
1005355
2309616
2001868
858
1880329
1527228
3351270
2888629
1695329
1197546
1019917
339205
2651396
1490727
1399225
102487
156871
2684410
1168306
1013510
2901221
2892963
3334614
546081
550000
2551077
378910
2505507
1387386
3315667
2338195
1759920
1870370
1277993
2194057
1583108
2647939
3333831
1090341
2589969
101204
1786702
1569253
351080
275780
2580025
3060743
624884
2245013
783796
378237
1415969
2319535
963372
3111122
1836145
824074
2265019
2036770
723516
803732
170322
2275216
995499
139548
551436
1095877
1725617
20356
1021509
3210399
28923
587445
1600811
2761652
287484
2439546
1527072
3440567
1997946
1276814
830583
2552232
427161
1985886
500476
3400453
2494346
2814654
1733120
2896040
1507146
1858593
3175091
1671797
1051893
3218733
2789462
3379068
863330
1658428
153576
2953930
629082
166765
1821764
1424144
3105416
3322168
1024206
3278061
2402348
2802798
2248008
1259367
2390631
2975349
2785883
662347
1732755
2156934
3138286
461299
2194886
1284810
1774919
1220832
1772918
149747
2867528
2727506
1147945
2165796
327689
3010933
3254358
2568833
773444
1403347
1478527
651931
2174722
1833665
2490977
1306799
11162
3452653
1697934
785153
2517242
2173899
597287
88723
3279812
459882
2952501
816135
790221
1851479
858844
2719634
3310072
2276167
2341908
2254054
1765601
428375
2446509
2655374
2196785
772595
2857789
630347
2230370
834376
3246162
1682755
2202995
1854270
1812606
3293901
2694198
1313922
3239481
3290958
1094318
2512126
2663229
1980566
2765066
2548865
1383783
978158
1193693
3164138
3324226
1278303
878859
2036616
934214
1984465
3211181
1786287
1377872
3100836
1595518
1203245
460332
1825883
2588956
2818559
2674674
2913567
1519199
3330377
313037
1282685
2053277
2364178
140249
1950406
2414894
1473985
1183327
2416935
2827506
1842907
225909
2394487
1444569
2814690
1409028
1741932
2794012
968049
1273331
1510680
1422247
127488
3200556
2505951
365587
2247703
1218634
1302687
1792004
527067
430778
3315810
1002934
917823
1034292
919547
743212
418328
711084
1050919
3108743
966488
789918
959525
3264923
1500176
3182512
2051328
3148651
845572
2814157
1332959
3341613
1124709
2351549
450853
1226304
1919512
1146692
2618204
3103938
1716838
3253968
2831851
3084634
3052121
1366649
3089489
565261
244190
1229296
2531550
2268027
1996775
778241
2272411
588883
2338690
521200
935033
1924876
2369774
1708549
1337134
1744207
2811122
539930
1151202
2505804
2818318
793517
2358760
3291570
2432381
2956067
1861022
3389152
605954
925754
906963
2602635
1161112
17190
723777
1197600
1106698
2373820
919109
3233316
1805669
525313
2333513
1821823
73195
2132985
2604716
2588952
1314234
2643523
2749345
2214194
1502384
1231385
2658248
548353
2318096
43887
75352
768667
3098760
2492952
2609830
485108
1011153
2801124
1012334
3052452
615091
547293
751003
3088251
169766
861505
3233965
601283
173330
877082
2770632
130936
3412429
2934944
202915
1778942
2466472
889147
398881
2530750
1505228
2787131
2103922
1320770
830137
546958
906798
2434396
1782533
3188387
2989380
114979
793771
2954413
2081257
128666
3387921
1968532
3229719
381428
1056774
3329451
1621886
1044341
777293
3233150
1211752
2471254
827030
1376328
2139485
2123808
2340147
2338462
1236252
1026460
1685630
116750
1691439
1263638
1523014
810724
2704433
1031308
649257
1239605
1983985
536754
3416756
818799
1209957
465415
1912208
498526
2124781
1090547
2656467
541358
1647273
1069154
100985
546488
3360013
1565377
1643311
2171795
1906561
1560861
132294
777207
2034520
3331901
1874789
370315
3443572
1164703
2171693
2681917
2537794
2016506
1726812
2550750
2751604
2088046
2119695
318283
3144835
2881607
18298
2192964
2505574
1201673
1111297
3381805
3146539
1019660
2230184
2417309
862908
371666
649534
3432804
1530668
1415618
196608
3244
997538
3172428
2007284
946270
3403052
1353831
928668
313747
2065406
3328636
2405951
2619877
2002752
2298350
1778412
2171774
2749874
1101942
2968834
3401311
3310558
2718600
39751
2369034
1695600
1319968
1408703
1090148
2669979
1873993
1466984
2053748
536108
2446834
1450427
454874
505281
3132854
699323
2575795
3186375
998318
252136
817976
2346264
999297
2040962
2266619
2877606
799528
430897
604663
1475259
1861236
357391
2974964
2005760
1992508
643919
1842388
558367
1070940
1181274
2487802
816999
1647172
2308184
2860998
940267
2866381
551232
1261832
743329
3130556
49809
1588899
1286983
374633
495508
3354847
1608695
930589
1690052
283588
327420
160813
2957775
917749
1438927
55673
3232935
3340885
1078293
878776
993705
2790779
1216287
2460149
1166030
868068
826631
582401
1781537
2021162
1215297
2292339
1388669
2677342
393439
1617030
1340542
1639437
1866132
3199341
959663
1724354
50549
1845062
2364666
331889
217935
3243884
1375507
3205308
3097159
1898388
747891
1283551
3431464
1315305
1832488
1337037
2211086
3393169
331325
913924
1492471
1775975
1973176
2408408
1802373
108068
3362586
3400510
2531587
2805877
1061876
546318
216891
2516529
610019
2567550
1295810
108979
2551276
961481
1897755
16842
103088
2586466
309480
1537553
2399466
349068
2282879
639965
1922435
2680091
2204740
213706
2920696
2679034
3164250
1726400
1213374
1184414
2773752
2017478
3240485
1788487
534149
1103765
3405586
766435
395935
1394774
1136134
1384624
1133732
1845222
1069590
2774124
391530
893217
2498464
2282415
1001284
469501
523430
2249025
2475439
542097
99569
2630449
3182233
3069934
2588104
1765797
1312800
1462793
887446
1032588
2682320
3286992
1248216
1400590
2970682
2543383
3278385
2786050
2036867
2790635
1478467
1578614
845735
3194124
2397145
2313021
344394
1074820
276916
995505
543083
1612877
2238626
3220129
1808853
3212625
594428
2512695
3138619
874822
687323
2475976
2776598
1220488
187908
3337732
1518538
1070228
1428893
1672287
3078614
1052790
256391
1576177
2433703
1430907
352775
2049957
4596
2528783
3278407
620417
1529066
2280752
1717577
41574
2826070
2422236
380519
1629214
817329
1614128
722134
3280947
1577927
422469
2095579
306886
2987383
2898482
1725472
2752449
2585702
1786703
359650
1963715
161352
873271
2099532
905493
2651836
3013376
2362739
1788833
1138992
526124
2421082
2625416
3247547
2743072
226633
1641941
65441
2838247
251343
77619
1786717
2269507
1685289
228986
3095120
48973
1393342
2276950
2201854
2999866
2091709
3362396

64 of those profiles contain a Website link:

Code:

0 posts - userID: 1019660 - username: turjoabedin@gmail.com - URL: https://www.coinbase.com/join/591ef8a6bb71781aa7da82d5
0 posts - userID: 1166030 - username: atexfun07 - URL: http://spasandhottubs2.simplesite.com/
0 posts - userID: 1583108 - username: ragilsurya12 - URL: https://twitter.com/Ragilsurya2
0 posts - userID: 2010973 - username: Lias - URL: https://bountyhive.io/r/Lias
0 posts - userID: 2338462 - username: ananyashetye - URL: https://www.dhflinsurance.com/
0 posts - userID: 2531550 - username: incap22 - URL: https://bestgoodcaptions.com/sassy-instagram-captions/
0 posts - userID: 2627435 - username: architex6 - URL: https://i13.co.in/services/kitchen-design
0 posts - userID: 2680091 - username: ydevyv - URL: http://flexa-plus-optima.eu/gr/
0 posts - userID: 2701223 - username: mentemillonaria - URL: https://mentemillonaria.com.mx/
0 posts - userID: 2741504 - username: inheritance1Ukraine - URL: https://nasledniki.com.ua
0 posts - userID: 2768347 - username: larry7036 - URL: http://kvinnoshop.eu/
0 posts - userID: 2790779 - username: Salty_Endeavors - URL: https://cozumelscuba.com
0 posts - userID: 3198288 - username: iris_brown_62 - URL: https://hampton-hill-pest-control.co.uk
0 posts - userID: 3330377 - username: WEN LAMBO - URL: http://www.wen-lambo.com
0 posts - userID: 3331901 - username: Executeriodejanerio - URL: https://www.execsecure.com/locations/rio-de-janeiro-secure-transportation-services/
0 posts - userID: 378237 - username: Rodez72 - URL: http://www.probioticsforweightloss.net/
0 posts - userID: 418328 - username: HollieWYDB - URL: http://fb.bia2fars.ir/index.php?a=profile&u=dawnzmdqhmp
0 posts - userID: 422469 - username: RosauraLem - URL: http://fly.ryousoft.com/913737
0 posts - userID: 422785 - username: MichellMas - URL: http://Tupalo.com/en/irvine-california/gold-ira-rollover-pros
0 posts - userID: 427161 - username: IndiraShaf - URL: http://kayleeyacdbcif.pen.io/
0 posts - userID: 430778 - username: JaniWithne - URL: http://bluepacificmobilehomes.com/gta5/car-cheats-for-gta-on-xbox-360/
0 posts - userID: 430897 - username: AutumnQQML - URL: https://Helpdesk.Salvationarmy.ch/entries/88103848-How-Does-Acid-Reflux-Diet-Work-
0 posts - userID: 432174 - username: HildreWinf - URL: http://akuhanyagadiskampung.blogspot.fr/2013/12/segmen-kenapa-aku-jadi-blogger-by.html
0 posts - userID: 435796 - username: Ben66Ylniz - URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A4NiEiCwUA0
0 posts - userID: 450853 - username: JodyNerlik - URL: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vUBMPKVko1E
0 posts - userID: 454874 - username: LeoAiello - URL: https://www.facebook.com/kimkardashianhollywoodcheatshackupdated
0 posts - userID: 460957 - username: DarinHoule - URL: http://filedb.goodsoft411.com/resites.php?url=http://www.grossirdesfesses.com/
0 posts - userID: 461299 - username: JillDaniel - URL: http://functionalbigot74.sosblogs.com/The-first-blog-b1/3D-Textured-Diamond-Claws-b1-p7.htm
0 posts - userID: 465415 - username: LuigiCalli - URL: http://Www.Dressesclub.biz/
0 posts - userID: 469501 - username: MauriceG70 - URL: http://minecraftpremiumacc4free.blogspot.com/
0 posts - userID: 49809 - username: gillingham - URL: http://www.hefitshefit-personaltraining.com
0 posts - userID: 551232 - username: RaynaHenrry - URL: https://cityraven.com
0 posts - userID: 55348 - username: ame l30 - URL: http://games151144.info
0 posts - userID: 565261 - username: jamybtcbank - URL: http://mmmglobal.org/?i=jamy2002kimo@yahoo.com.tw
0 posts - userID: 624884 - username: aruva - URL: http://mmmglobal.org/?i=pramodaruva@gmail.com
0 posts - userID: 630347 - username: zhongxia - URL: http://mmmglobal.org/?i=2633659904@qq.com
0 posts - userID: 636887 - username: mewah - URL: http://mmmglobal.org/?i=autobit
0 posts - userID: 65441 - username: rosaclinic - URL: http://www.bellarosaclinic.com/
0 posts - userID: 664350 - username: corablack9 - URL: http://mmmglobal.org/?i=corablack9@163.com
0 posts - userID: 766435 - username: Kitsana2535 - URL: http://mmmglobal.org/?i=lalitaray7071
0 posts - userID: 768667 - username: Mouwin - URL: http://mmmglobal.org/?i=mouwin07
0 posts - userID: 773444 - username: yohanes kurniawan - URL: http://http:mmmglobal.org/?i=yohanesk3699@gmail.com
0 posts - userID: 777207 - username: anitabudmmmg - URL: http://mmmglobal.org/?i=lex
0 posts - userID: 777293 - username: mee lay - URL: http://http//mmmglobal.org/?|=lex
0 posts - userID: 783796 - username: Lanni - URL: http://mmmglobal.org/?i=1651425284@qq.com
0 posts - userID: 785153 - username: alice494949 - URL: http://mmmmgloball.org/?I=alice494949
0 posts - userID: 793012 - username: Ashn - URL: http://mmmglobal.org/?i=ashnashnn@gmail.com
0 posts - userID: 793771 - username: amritpal - URL: http://mmmglobal.org/?i=amritestate33@gmail.com
0 posts - userID: 830137 - username: starvps7854 - URL: http://starvps.ru/
0 posts - userID: 845572 - username: robustreproduct - URL: https://disqus.com/by/ProfitSEOBrisbane/
0 posts - userID: 995499 - username: lillianacroxen - URL: https://www.onlinetrafficeducation.com/Michigan-Driver-Improvement-Course-Online.php
1 posts - userID: 2091709 - username: hsrppankaj - URL: https://www.fifaworldcup2018schedule.org/
1 posts - userID: 3310558 - username: Generate Free Btc - URL: http://www.generatefreebtc.com/
3 posts - userID: 2036616 - username: GAIA-Projects - URL: http://gaia-projects.org/
3 posts - userID: 378910 - username: salojc2006 - URL: http://www.wideexchange.com
4 posts - userID: 968136 - username: alexisasia6 - URL: http://bountyhive.io/r/alexisasia
7 posts - userID: 2272411 - username: Ohab09 - URL: https://smmaim.com/
24 posts - userID: 1211752 - username: Veenom - URL: https://bountyplatform.io?code=29628
28 posts - userID: 406811 - username: BigTiger - URL: https://www.btcdlc.com/shop/reisen-hotels
74 posts - userID: 1324746 - username: NlaakStudios - URL: https://www.nlaak.com
85 posts - userID: 11162 - username: btcLottery - URL: http://www.btclottery.com
139 posts - userID: 1873993 - username: BitcoinRM - URL: https://www.bitcoinrm.org/
254 posts - userID: 2298350 - username: HealthNet - URL: https://up.hc-net.online/
318 posts - userID: 1842388 - username: prettymargaux - URL: https://bountyplatform.io?code=13807

Suggestion:
To take away one of the incentives to create spam accounts, I suggest to hide the Website link in the profile of users with 1 or less posts.
This would hide 53 of the 64 websites above, and none of them will be missed. If I extrapolate to 3460606 posts, this will remove approximately 180,000 spam backlinks from Bitcointalk.