O boy, another account created just to join this fud party. Typical.

Mandica is totally right. The scam accusations against someone with so little stake in the coin, who barely scrapes by with donations, I just don't know what to say but isn't there a real scam you guys could be going after? So much time and energy here and damaging the price with your fud has done little to damage the people you think are scammers. The real financial damage has been done to the investors you claim to be trying to protect. If you're wondering who has lost money due to your inflammatory posts, its just good regular people, that's who. Does the coin not work? Was it not the first crypto with in-wallet TOR and then with in-wallet OBFS-4? Does it not have a roadmap containing even more firsts in the industry? Yes it was and yes it does! Go after a real scamcoin, for Christ's sake.

I totally don't care what you think about my account. I've been a member since 2014, but my name was Doge related so I dropped it. Who cares? I'm not trying to score points to get Deep Onion airdrops and shill points for bounties so I don't care how old my current "name" is or if I have Bitcointalk Emperor Wizard Cowboy status or whatever. I don't hang out here that much anymore, as you pointed out.  And absolutely YES, the new member thing for just today for just one post is suspicious as hell, of course. I mean, of course, my man.

Please re-read my previous posts where I clearly state I will address only what I know, which I clearly state is not your code assessment, but there are other, glaring untruths happening in this thread that should be addressed. If you can't back up claims other than yours, simply do not defend them. Then you won't look like you are trying to be deceitful.

As far as the code, I have seen the Slack and Discord channels busy for a year with discussions including the dev about all kinds of aspects of the code I have no understanding of, so I'm hoping someone from those discussions will shed some light on it from another perspective.

 

New member. Literally joined today. Posted this single message, which is complete made up bullshit. Please no more pretending there isn't a calculated FUD campaign in play.

This, along with the claim that Spectrecoin has tried in any way to shield the fact it was based on Shadowcash, is a total and complete lie. Spectrecoin investors were reasonably upset when newcomers came along with an ICO of a confusingly similar name (see Bitcoin Cash), but no one is trying to get money from Spectre.ai and if they are they are a rogue agent who has nothing to do with Spectrecoin.

Show me proof, Cabellos.

As an ICO participant in Xspec, it was most certainly clear to us that Shaadowcash was the basis for Spectrecoin. I'm not speaking to any of the code yet, I am responding to the first problem I saw, but the accusation this was hidden from investors is a complete lie right out of the gate. It is even on the Spectrecoin wiki, created by the Spectrecoin community, one of the very first statements on it, not hidden in tiny print somewhere. No one has ever tried to hide the Shadowcoin connection. Ever.

Here we have a new account with two posts in total. In the first, he lazily and clumsily misspelled the word "scamcoin" on a Spectrecoin tread. This bullshit thread is his second. We're dealing with an anonymous loser with no integrity or intelligence enough to back up his claims here. Not much to do with a sad person like this but hope they realize they are just petty time wasters and go away.

Any threads that claim "scam" without attempting to back it up with a single fact should be, if not totally removed, totally scrutinized along with the original poster, who has done nothing here to convince anyone.

Modifications made to the menu side of the wallet on Tokenpay were made by Spectrecoin team and are not the same in the Shadowcash wallet. This strongly suggests to me that Tokenpay used the Spectrecoin code as their base, not the Shadowcash code.

Show of hands!

Who here honestly believes this crummy attempt at an airdrop on the bitcointalk forum was actually the work of executives from JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs?

I want to know! WHO ACTUALLY REALLY GENUINELY BELIEVES THAT?

It is impossible. There is no way on the planet that the people operating this were ever executives for either of those firms. They simply 100% do not do business this way. Not in a million years!

It is time to get real about what is going on here. Scammers should not be tolerated.

The best part is people like this ^ who think these are "guys from JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs" who have come over to bitcointalk to do a lousy version of an airdrop. I mean they really actually believe that some legit dudes from the ranks of those organizations would even have to come to bitcointalk  to appeal to ^ this guy to support their coin!! It is time to get real about what's going on here.

I'm sorry about all the negativity that surrounds your project over the name, however: This is totally your fault.

If you knew beforehand this was someone else's name in the cryptospace, a freshman error was made and all the negativity that now surrounds your project is pretty much on you or whoever made that decision. Bashing the people you intentionally created this confusion for is totally poor form.

I think not understanding the ferocity with which a community will defend its coin from possible harm from blundering outsiders shows pretty much what bumbling outsiders you are.

Jesus, it is so damned confusing they ripped the name spectre from an already existing project! I can't even tell what I'm reading about anymore! Looks like they blew this airdrop like the amateurs they are. F this project.

Haha! How many Spectrecoin ripoffs do you need to be a part of?

This is total bullshit. You know a Spectre already exists in the cryptoverse, so what exactly the hell are you doing? I don't think anyone should even remotely consider participating in this clear scam perpetrated by outsiders who will not be able to deliver a single thing to their investors. This scam needs to stop right the fuck now and either change its whole name and strategy or fuck back off to the scammy corner of shitville it came from. What a joke.

Glad to be back and see this new thread. Its unfortunate the tiff between Spectrecoin and its obvious and inferior copycat, Deep Onion. I'd love to see the topic here stay on Spectrecoin because, frankly, I don't even take Deep Onion or its developer seriously. Its cute that you got some for free because of your status on Bitcointalk, but that isn't a legitimate airdrop in my opinion, and there are plenty of other issues with Deep Onion, not to mention inferior tech that very plainly and simply doesn't work where it is needed the most. I find Deep Onion a more annoying distraction than a coin with a real future. Of course, this is cryptoland, and anything can happen, but, seriously, take it to the Deep Onion thread.

Nice to stroll over to github and see some commits happening!

https://github.com/spectrecoin/spectre/commit/c4b2c5e875894ab177dadfeab30baad716c0a4e1

Join the Slack. Bitcointalk is not where Spectrefolk hang out.

Sorry, but we all watched deep onion's "airdrop" It is nice for the naive, in retrospect, to believe that it was a legitimate and well dispersed airdrop, but nothing could be further from the truth. Even several of us Spectreheadz attempted to participate to no avail.

Incredibly good news for Spectrecoin and for anonymous transactions in TOR blocked countries! This is monumental, Spectrecoin!