|
It was him; if you follow it back on blockchain.info it leads to 1JUurq3m... (the generation address for the 3 blocks) in two steps. The 'not yet' is in reference to finding another block.
EDIT Damn, really need to type faster
|
|
|
|
nice donation to ckpool ads! For a moment there I thought you found another one  |
|
|
|
lol, when it rains it pours. Just don't count on that luck continuing!
congrats again! |
|
|
|
|
lol, when it rains it pours. Just don't count on that luck continuing!
|
|
|
|
That would be (0.4^13)*100% ~= 0.000671% so quite unlucky
But if someone tries hard enough(for example: by trying to make endless money with martingale) it will not be too unlikely to happens at least once. Then the loss will be bigger than the total profit. So better don't try endless money with martingale and be prepared for the worse and for unlucky too Agreed. As a single occurence it's unlucky but you're right that if you make enough bets, for instance using the robot roll feature, then eventually it will happen and you'll bust. EDIT: @micro Making a post at the same time saying basically the same thing  |
|
|
|
|
lol, really? People are trying to help you and explain it and now we're part of a cult? You're the one who seems to have a problem with a concept as simple as 'average'. Furthermore, btc price has nothing to do with mining and mining difficulty but you won't get that either I'm guessing. I'm done and welcome to my ignore list.
|
|
|
|
|
As a sidenote, when we're talking about hashrate we're actually talking about observed hashrate. The blockchain doesn't know the hashrate and neither does the algorithm that calculates difficulty. All it uses is the time that was needed to generate 2016 blocks and if the average time between blocks was lower than 10 minutes diff goes up and if it was higher diff goes down.
EDIT: Galdur, if you still don't understand I suggest you open a new topic about it the mining subforum; it's a bit offtopic here.
|
|
|
|
|
The average hashrate over 2016 blocks is NOT FLAT..........
If your looking at the average hashrate reported by bitcoinwisdom (grey line) then you need to know that it is calculated over only the last 504 blocks but diff is calculated over the last 2016 blocks (green line) and then the average hashrate is not flat.
|
|
|
|
|
Because the difficulty is calculated over the entire 2016 block period! Your only looking at the begin and end points of the hashrate but diff as said is calculated over the entire period and thus the average hashrate in that period.
An analogy would be to think of a car going 60 mph and the diff is the distance travelled in a given timeframe. If the car keeps steady at 60 then diff will be x but if the car speeds up in between to say 100 mph and then goes back to 60 mph at the end of the timeframe the distance travelled will be larger because the average speed over the timeframe was higher and thus the diff wil be >x despite the begin and speeds being 60 mph.
|
|
|
|
|
That would be (0.4^13)*100% ~= 0.000671% so quite unlucky
|
|
|
|
Congrats ads2003uk! Nice to see a payoff for gambling (renting hash)  And good luck with the new rented hash! EDIT: How much did it cost you and where do you rent this much? Pool showing 919TH  . Is this the highest ever?  Not if you count the big farm that found the first few blocks for the pool. It was a couple of petahash i'm guessing but it ran on a separate instance so not sure if you can count it. 919TH is definitely the highest from regular users as far as I'm aware. |
|
|
|
He means he won 0.04 on a 9900x odds bet so the bet was something like 400 satoshis. Don't need a very high level I believe to get that much |
|
|
|
Ik verwacht eerlijk gezegd niet zoveel van vandaag of morgen. Chris en zich aan zelf gestelde deadlines houden is als water en vuur als ik de forums zo lees. Ook de updates aan de website die eigenlijk vrij weining tijd zouden moeten kosten, zoals 2fa en https, zijn nog niet doorgevoerd. Ik hoop daarom dat hij het meeste van zijn tijd besteed heeft aan het opschonen van de db maar zoals gezegd ik verwacht er niet veel van in de komende dagen. Kan het alleen maar meevallen als er wel wat gebeurt |
|
|
|
|
No surprise there! From the very first moment a thread was opened about them here most people called it a scam as the signs were obvious.
offtopic: Zeta, you should run a spell checker on the english text (insolvet ==> insolvent, view ==> few and visit ==> visited)
|
|
|
|
|
nog geen roi maar ik zit er ook niet al te ver van af dus mocht het misgaan dan verlies ik niet zoveel.
|
|
|
|
os2sam is right, the 1024 difficulty of accepting shares is just a way of 'accounting' if you will. It's just a way to measure your hashing speed at the pool side as well as limiting the amount of shares needed to be processed by the pool (instead of processing 1024 diff 1 shares the pool only has to process 1 share). edit: need to type faster  ; basically what os2sam says above my post |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
