|
I like the daisy chain idea, but man those plugs are horrendous! haha, but i guess form over fashion
Danny
|
|
|
|
|
lol talk about a shameful plug!
CableZ is still making cables, get your ad out of here haha
|
|
|
|
|
agreed... got mine used for 168 shipped off ebay a few months back
Danny
|
|
|
|
Also I have found that the big resistors or capacitors or whatever they are that are close to the chips do not allow the heatsink to touch the chip next to them. So I added .016 of copper so that the heatsink is flush. I don't think it really matters just running scrypt but I did it for fun.  thermal pads.... how is your poolside hashrate #'s average comparing to your cgminer hashrate? I feel like all those units connected to one instance of cgminer is bogging you down in speed Danny |
|
|
|
|
solid ram! Have this in my X230 coupled with a Corsair SSD.... screaming fast
|
|
|
|
I sent you PM, but you not answer. How I can get it ? Good news everyone! Stable firmware for LightningAsic controllers is underway, it should be ready for public in the coming week and it will be possible to upgrade (from v1, v2, v2.1..) by uploading it to the upload page. The firmware .bin will be released for public, but it is compatible only with LightningAsic controllers. Upgrading from factory Tp-link 703N will not work and it might brick your Tp-link, so don't even try! its not out yet.... |
|
|
|
|
I performed the mod last night and i've ran it for 10 hours now...
It seems that YES it has no hardware errors running at a higher frequency, but the shares submitted noted on cgminer is significantly less then my other miners that are running on 850. They are running on the same instance/window if your wondering..
Anyone experiencing the same thing?
Danny
|
|
|
|
|
What connections are those? 6 pin PCIE --> 3 (6pin PCIE)? What gauge wires are those? 300 watts per pcie cable? (6pin/8)...?
|
|
|
|
Yes, up to 950 MHz would be stable, I am using cpuminer.
Hey sandor, i am wondering whats the diff doing the hardware mod vs the software mod you are coming out with? both are able to be overclocked to 950 stable. Does the software update somehow increase voltage? Just curious to see if i should perform the hardware mod |
|
|
|
Don't ask him, that's my duty, but it should be released in 1-2 weeks
sigh was under the impression it would be this week! |
|
|
|
|
spotswood did a nice job with those cases... Their perfect fit for your setup!~
|
|
|
|
lol, exact same hub as the etekcity |
|
|
|
was about to buy a power supply then a i realized it was contingent...  |
|
|
|
|
380 shipped for both... no escrow - LTC READY
thanks
Danny
|
|
|
|
|
wow nice... At 950, what does it hash at? 400 kh/s?
Running stable?
So just bridge the section you circled? is there a resistor in place you have to remove?
|
|
|
|
Why all say BTC mode is not proffitable ?
According to calculators, with Scrypt part I get about $10-$13 per day
BTC - $5 per day (power costs counted)
not
currently I don't want to stop DUAL mining.
because when you dual mine, you get lower scrypt hash rate and its extremely unstable, so you could be disconnecting every 20 minutes |
|
|
|
I can't answer your question but am curious about your configuration. I cannot get my gridseed 5 chip to run either dual or single without it crashing the Pi within 30 minutes. I've tried various compiles and what knot but no luck. I'm also headless so I can't see if there are any console errors. It works perfect in windows but the noise is too much for me to leave running in my room. Any information on your setup would be great. I used to have the Pi connected to two hubs with antminers. Now I just have the Pi connected directly to the Gridseed. Still crashes.
Another forum member told me about this, but what I did was: Download minepeon 0.2.4.6 the newest version, then image onto a SD CARD - ( figured this be the easiest, since it already has all the dependencies installed) then download the already compiled version of BFGMiner, and move the bfgminer binary and replace it in /opt/minepeon/bin/ . Then either sudo nano the miner.conf file or go to the browser and type in your minepeon IP ADDRESS and edit the start config there, with: #!/bin/bash
sleep 10
/usr/bin/screen -dmS miner sudo /opt/minepeon/bin/bfgminer --scrypt -S gridseed:all --set-device gridseed:clock=850 -c /opt/minepeon/etc/miner.conf and you should be good to go EDIT: check out this thread, step by step: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=168174.3000;topicseen |
|
|
|
for people using raspberry pi's and cgminer... Do you guys get lower hashrate poolside, then what it shows on the cgminer dash? Because with the TPLinks, i get 3500-3700kh/s on 10 units @850 but with cgminer on the Pi, I get 1600-2500 kh/s POOLSIDE, but the cgminer shows the same hashrate as what i am suppose to be getting
It's weird, but I also have 4 plugged into a different pi, same exact config, but it shows proper hash rate pool side and on cgminer.. I'm thinking either the Hubs or something is not fast enough to handle the load, i dont know
Any ideas?
Danny
The hashrate cgminer displays is nothing like your 'actual' hashrate, by far. If you aren't accepting any shares, the hashrate will remain the same. You have to look at the accepted difficulty and time running. Lightningasic dashboard displays hashrate calculated in that manner, or how pools would calculate it. What i mean is, TP -LINK shows: 3500 kh/s (PoolSide) 3300 kh/s (Webui) CGMiner shows: 1600 kh/s (Poolside) 3300 kh/s (SSH Screen) (thinking maybe a problem with RPi) so i plug in 3 gridseed units with the same config file and i get different results with lesser units on the Pi another RPi: (3 units only) 1080 Kh/s (SSH Screen) 1000 kh/s (PoolSide) |
|
|
|
|
for people using raspberry pi's and cgminer... Do you guys get lower hashrate poolside, then what it shows on the cgminer dash? Because with the TPLinks, i get 3500-3700kh/s on 10 units @850 but with cgminer on the Pi, I get 1600-2500 kh/s POOLSIDE, but the cgminer shows the same hashrate as what i am suppose to be getting
It's weird, but I also have 4 plugged into a different pi, same exact config, but it shows proper hash rate pool side and on cgminer.. I'm thinking either the Hubs or something is not fast enough to handle the load, i dont know
Any ideas?
Danny
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
