|
how to receive real NEMCOIN?
|
|
|
|
Why not use Counterparty
Counterparty is real business. |
|
|
|
|
when to receive real NEMCOIN?
|
|
|
|
Sidechains are highly theoretical and still have major security concerns. However, if these problems can somehow be overcome, we'd certainly consider moving to a sidechain [...] but there is a major security advantage to running on mainnet, especially for the lower-frequency, higher value type financial transactions that are our target.
 Question: what is " the lower-frequency, higher value type financial transactions"? |
|
|
|
Is there a site where you can check the redeemed addresses? I think I recently saw a reference to such a site but didn't make a note of it and now can't find it. Thanks.
are you talking about this page? https://chain.nem.ninja/stakes/registeredAlmost 550 stakes were registered. |
|
|
|
PHASE 2 FOR BTT HAS STARTEDWe'll update OPs here and on forum.nemcoin.com soon but i didn't want to let you guys wait. register address and token here -> chain.nem.ninja/stakes chain.nem.ninja/stakes/registered shows all registered with address AND token + all received NEMStake assets from the NXT AE. Everyone please check if your are there after you've registered or sent your assetRemember to read up on how to create a REAL address https://forum.nemcoin.com/index.php?topic=2488.0 and in other threads on that forum. thanks! i registered successfully! as to those unclaimed and sock coins, i hope to burn them! |
|
|
|
I haven't receive any message from patmaster about token  me too! |
|
|
|
Important announcementWe are very pleased to announce that Phase 1 of the official NEM redemption process starts now. Patmast3r will begin sending the tokens via PM on bitcointalk as of tomorrow.
Please check the following link for detailed overview of the whole redemption process(Phase 1 and Phase 2):
Phase 1 Redemption Guide Note: A special thanks goes to Patmast3r for preparing things and to amytheplanarshift for the simple and useful infographic.
nice! cannot wait any more! |
|
|
|
IPO Update
The IPO cannot work the way we originally intended. There is no way to cap the number of Bitcoin per person that can participate in the IPO.
Browser finger printing does not work. It cannot reliably detect which users are bots and which are not. Bot nets and even proxies still get through.
Then we were going to do IPO over Bitmessage, but with validation of Bitcoin talks username. However, there are people who have several thousands Bitcoin Talks accounts registered. These users would be able to participate in the IPO multiple times, but normal users would be unable to.
The other frustrating thing,
1> The bitmessage library for golang we were using does not actually work. We had to rewrite the IPO script into python. Ideally, we would have used JSON/HTML requests on Bitmessage and use golang, but the Bitmessage API implements XMLRPC... (There is a massive effort underway to rewrite Bitmessage on C++ and create language bindings for each language, so these problems should decrease over time)
2> When building the exchange for doing the IPO, we had to use bitcoind. There is no RPC in bitcoind to check the balance of the unspent transaction output set for an address. We originally intended to generate a list of private keys and addresses on a computer never connected to the internet and move the address list to the server running the IPO. These offline addresses were to be used for receiving IPO funds and their balance queried by the server. This would prevent bitcoin from being stolen if the IPO server was identified and hacked. However, this is impossible under the Bitcoin API, for the same reason that Bitcoin makes building mobile thin clients very frustrating. We have to do the IPO with a hot wallet and move the coins into the cold wallet over time instead of just receiving the coins into a cold wallet address. We thought there was some way to get the unspent outputs for an address with bitcoind, but this is apparently very difficult.
3> Some git accident happened and the deterministic wallet input feature in the Skycoin wallet GUI seems to have disappeared. This feature is used in the IPO for importing the wallet the addresses coins are received into.
4> The server running bitcoind for the IPO, is taking over four days to download the bitcoin blockchain. I keep deleting peers.dat and restarting it and it goes for a few hours and then stops. Slow peers are slowing down the download.
Good News
The whole project scope is being laid out in a document. It describes at implementation level, each component and what is required. This should enable project development to escape the existing bottlenecks. We are close enough now, that running out of new things to develop is on the horizon. The darknet design is substantially done. It ended up being very simple.
The consensus algorithm is has been simplified. Implementation will be 150 lines, instead of ten thousand. Everything was stripped out that was not needed for operation. If a chain fork successfully propagates (very restricted conditions), the client will replicate both chains and defer to the operator of each node to choose manually which chain to prune. All the honest nodes should end up on the same chain and the attacker nodes will split into a separate network.
Bitcoin is vulnerable to netsplit attacks, but the conditions required are difficult to achieve and have not been observed. Theoretical netsplits may not be a threat we should be focusing on at this point of development. Especially if handling this edge case was 90% of the complexity in the consensus algorithm.
IPO Timeline
The IPO script is in progress. I dont want to give a date, when it will be ready because it will probably take longer.
Thanks for your update. |
|
|
|
|
Hi, NEM community. I am so glad to see NEM achieving grate success in a short time. I am a stakeholder of NEM. How can I get my NEMcoin? Fogive mine failure in catching up NEM info.
thanks.
|
|
|
|
Your behaviors totally betray the key spirit of Cryptocurrency: openness! Shame on you, and again, your rude words! I think Koop's approach is diplomatic and fair. Most of the detected socks will simply accept their fate especially if they are blatant socks and the evidence is against them. If there are exceptions where a user can show they are not a sock, they just have to present their case and the community can decide.
What else can we do that is both fair and protects the integrity of Node? This is the best approach to take.
I'm very much for eliminating socks but the problem here is that sometimes there is no real evidence. "experimental calculation", "the secret method". That for me doesn't count as real evidence unless it's abundantly clear how it was generated. Some socks are obvious, others aren't. How is anyone to argue against a secret method ? It is secret! The thing is that we know! And can proof it! But we won't go out loud on the forum! Cause it contains sensitive information! Thus why we will push the committee build up! We will show the proof only to them and they will convey the final word! If only that will be necessary! At the moment there is no arguing necessary, especially for those that are in the safe zone! The thing is that the more we are arguing on this behalf the more time we loose! Time that could be spend for more important issues! If someone has anything to hide, they will make everything possible that it remains hidden! But what i desire, is that those that have puppets, to pm us and confess! I don't want as much as you, to argue in vain and try to point out the obvious! We know the reason why you made a puppet! And if you believe that we won't find you, or you have a chance to slip trough, you are being naive! I will put all my trust in the community, and i hope that there are people that share my thinking! |
|
|
|
"I don't agree! And we do respect our Members! If we din't we wouldn't make it this far!" Come on, dude! Your rude words sell out yourself! I found no RESPECT in your historical words but arrogance and rudeness! That is why i did not invest in this project! poor team!
We stated that our method of identification is 98% accurate leaving for an error margin of 2%! To cover for those 2% we are building a committee of Honest Node Members that will act as judges and will make the final decision upon certain situations: For instance the "rockhill" situation. (with no offense)
May I ask what exactly that method is and how you come to such exact percentages ? As a bystander, the NODE team is short of profession and making a self-traping! Anyway, you should respect your investors, otherwise no one trust you! I don't agree! And we do respect our Members! If we din't we wouldn't make it this far! You received a pm 1 day before, but how many times did you check the thread?? There was an announcement going for a month!
I've deleted, a few posts for inappropriate attitude and language! It makes me proud and sad at the same time, guys the only way we can get you to cooperate, to express your ideas, thoughts and opinions is to create a conflict situation! Why there is no activity besides having someone to blame or to criticize?! I know this is internet, and who gives a fock... but seriously... that is all that you can do?!... :/ Ok, so for many of you who don't know, we are in a different time zone! And FYI yesterday we had our President Elected! Cheers for Ukraine! So in the future don't expect to get a reply in a few seconds! And if you have something to say, do it in a nice, constructive, way, so that other members could discuss it! Don't be a bully, or a troll - it doesn't make your life easier :/ You should know that we check every comment, and take in consideration every opinion! If you don't see measures taken at the moment, it doesn't necessarily mean that nothing will happen in the future.
I have to admit that we had problems with our threads being knocked down, and our reputation fading! But look at us, we are still holding our position!
We decided to pursuit our goal, and get as much members as we can!
A member mentioned, that our dev team is to soft! So, if you don't like the way our ship is floating, we can refund you anytime! It is up to you!
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=498662.msg5662759#msg5662759 |
|
|
|
We stated that our method of identification is 98% accurate leaving for an error margin of 2%! To cover for those 2% we are building a committee of Honest Node Members that will act as judges and will make the final decision upon certain situations: For instance the "rockhill" situation. (with no offense)
May I ask what exactly that method is and how you come to such exact percentages ? As a bystander, the NODE team is short of profession and making a self-traping! Anyway, you should respect your investors, otherwise no one trust you! |
|
|
|
3) I donot think koop4u's screening way is good: you cannot make a judge just with your intuition or vague indications(like similar name) and without any directive proof!
4) koop4u: What you are doing is hurting the NODE communities' faith in your executive ability and reputation.
5) You should delete any information destroying my reputation. I retain my rights to report to the BTT supervisors to defend my reputation and to refund me.
hill
I really didn't want to get into this whole thing, but seriously? Rockhill used " donot" twice in his last few posts. I remember, because I found it unusual. He wanted to report to " BTT monitor", he was worried about his reputation, and wanted his stake returned. That is pointless. I use "donot" too! @koop4u Can I buy some NODE puppet stakes? |
|
|
|
I'd like to announce CinniCoin, a cryptocurrency based on Bitcoin paradigm.
Cinni improves different features of Bitcoin, removes some disadvantages (e.g. massive inflation) and resolves a big environmental issue.
HOW HOW TO GET YOUR COINS:
there is a slip of a pen: you should delete one "how". good luck! |
|
|
|
Buyers, please read
I usually do not do this. I need to sell a share of my EMC2 to fund my mining fees, but buying support is lacking on AllCoin.
For those who have seen me, I'm a 170mh/s whale miner on hashrapid.
I'm ready to sell 110,000 EMC2 for 1 BTC. This is a rate of 900 satoshi/EMC2!! You won't ever see an offer like this anytime soon.
You would own 5% of all mined EMC2 for 1 BTC. This is a killer deal
PM me if interested. Escrow.
LOL, i bet no one would buy your coins at 900 satoshi. there are no characters of EMC. you said you have 5%, which just means that just few miners are mining EMC! you should dump your coins ASSP. ANOTHER DIEING COIN! lol |
|
|
|
|
AMu2y4Az6f92Js1rAuNcCCtnhXuFQZzLQt
lol！
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
