They did? Can you link to said promise?

Is there any confirmation that that site is legit? Going by the replies to that tweet, the only people making such confirmations seem to be owned by one person who hadn't posted in years.

Then stop with the ad hominems.


To an extent, yes. I first contacted Fran to confirm he was an escrow with the presupposition that he would immediately shoot down any association with them immediately. That failed. I applied for the beta with the presupposition that there was nothing to offer, that has clearly failed.


I will admit that this Byzantine person (who I'm assuming is the one that uploaded those images on twitter) seems to have a knack for taking things out of context. And yes, he is promoting another exchange which makes doing that very convenient.

That's the fourth one with a "competitor exchange" so far. It's as if this thread has become a hotspot for everyone with an "upcoming exchange".

Did you even bother reading the thread before uploading the image on Twitter?


You realize calling everything FUD isn't helping your case, right? "FUD" is not an argument and is no more thought out than the "scam" claims on this thread.

I don't think so. He has so far refused to respond to my PM I sent him days ago and has not posted any update (or post for that matter) despite coming online everyday. Perhaps he's still trying to get the other thread restored but no update for more than a week? Meh.

Do you anything to back this up? Like a screenshot of your email/telegram/slack/discord/x convo where he says that exactly? You clearly didn't use Skype or any other video platform since you're still anonymous to even him so it has to be one of those and I doubt he was calling in to Hong Kong everytime he wanted to communicate with you guys.

I'm asking this since this side of your story has so far not been corroborated.


Sure, they never claimed to be a team from every eye-catching establishment there is but they're anonymous nontheless and that is one issue a lot of people in here seem to find very hard to look past. And ELIX/TME did attract money in their brief ICO, however small.


I do agree with this for the most part but your claim that they're a scam right now is just that, an opinion.

That's the same kind of blanket statements that was thrown around in the beginning of the ELIX/TME project thread you just posted on (with anonymous devs no less) so perhaps it is you who should try harder.

Evidence? Surely you realize I can't take your claims at face value.


That's a non-sequitur.



Both Newbie accounts with < 5 posts registered within hours of each other now saying much the same thing. Apart from the fact that you are most likely alts of the same person, there's no evidence for that claim.

Is that so? I will of course be confirming this just to ensure it's accurate.

The email was sent some minutes prior to when I posted the screenshot here but I posted an earlier screenshot where he confirmed he was their lead escrow so yes, he was (past-tense) briefly working with them but as the screenshot above shows, isn't anymore (and would love it if he isn't associated with them henceforth).

I get wanting to be anonymous (certainly from a different perspective from WCX) which is why their anonymity was hardly ever an issue for me but this, this isn't right.

I just received this email from Fran Strajnar:



Take from it what you will. In case you think this is just FUD, feel free to contact him personally to confirm.

I'll admit I haven't been following BB new as much as I was before the last airdrop but I'm certain I never saw any announcement "more than a whole full moon" ago about an intention to cancel the September airdrop here or on slack.

---

Two things that were different for this airdrop compared to the last 3 I witnessed:

- s1lverbox stopped posting his usual updates about BTC linked and the much helpful graphs. I'm not sure why.
- GB didn't rise by at least $200. In fact, it's been on a downtrend since the 1st of this month. I didn't expect that.

Not quite.


You can but it doesn't change the fact it did.


I said "more likely a scam than not".



I elaborated well enough in the reply you quoted and you've clearly already started seeing it.


My intentions for applying has already been met with your video so whether I got in or not has little to no effect.

Did you even read my post?


This doesn't affect my post one bit and I really couldn't care less if you paid $25K.


Based on this post, no, no you wouldn't.


That explains why I got in contact with Fran Strajnar before anyone else in this forum.  

Are you done with your exceedingly inane assumptions or should I expect more?


It actually doesn't. It needs people who can look at things with a critical eye, whether they be believers or not. It's clear you fancy yourself a "non-believer with a critical eye" which would explain that flub.


For the second time, did you even read my post?

Oh I don't know, perhaps because virtually all your posts in the last month on this thread had a "more likely a scam than not" vibe to it yet you get invited and end up using said "most likely a scam" product while, AFAIK, polkacoin whose posts had a "this is definitely legit" vibe didn't.

Although the biggest irony would be mangaroooo who seems to call everything that doesn't fit him exactly a scam, getting invited to use it.


Shouldn't the question in the current year be "Who is still using flash?"? That aside, ask Google, specifically the Chrome team why they are dumping all that is flash.

Kinda ironic huh?


Really great but can you use a service that didn't have to show this:



That aside, it was a nice "review". I appreciate the fact that you actually spoke, makes it more human than the previous one that was posted.

You can't carry out any transaction on the Eth network if you can't pay the gas fee, and you need Eth to do that. Apart from that, MEW has a, IIRC, 0.01 Eth minimum balance requirement for any transaction.

You gotta stop with those inane assumptions, but, of course I'm assuming marketing isn't the first thing on your mind when you post in this thread.


You must be daft if you think I was going to acknowledge that puerile insult.


It does look a lot like Coinigy, which uses TV's engine.

Of course you are. 


That's like the 10th time you're posting "coinr_". The first time I ignored it as a mistake but I'm starting to wonder if you ever bothered to check who you're responding to.


If you make any further unsubstantiated claims you can be sure I'll be there to ask for evidence.

How many ELIX did you get for that batch?