You're repeating the same argument that I've already invalidated in my previous post. Please read my previous post again. (The face value is not a meaningful measure for the purpose of collecting, otherwise Casascius coins would be sold for their face value only. Collecting does not equal investing.) I'm offering real world coins to those who are interested. You don't seem interested - that's perfectly o.k.. The success of my offers here is actually better than anticipated. This indicates that there are indeed collectors of real coins in this forum who appreciate my offers and are aware of the collector's value of my coins. The benefit of collecting Casascius coins is that not only do the have great collector value (as evidenced by the activity on this forum and eBay), but they also carry a face value...a guarantee of value, literally. If someone believes the numismatic value has deteriorated they actually can redeem the loaded value, it's a floor on the loss of the investment. Totally agree that some may prefer your French Francs to Mike Caldwell's Casascius coins, but you are trying to sell your French Francs (and others) to the physical bitcoin crowd here. I think you need to offer something greater to generate real interest from people here. Why are these coins worth collecting? Give us some examples of "diamonds in the rough" that are possible to obtain through your batches. Why are French Francs worth something now in the age of the Euro? Just trying to help. Good luck. I collect fiat and Casascius coins, I may be a unique one in this group. About what kind of guarantee are you talking here? It's basically collectors being interested in buying Casascius tokens. Nobody can guarantee that the high amount of interest in physical Bitcoins will be equally present in the future.
So physical Bitcoin tokens in no way offer any better guarantee for lasting collector's value than the coins I'm offering here. In fact - outside of this forum - the community with an interest in real coins is much larger.
For collecting coins, the face value is basically meaningless. In fact the most valuable coins are quite old and their face value can no longer be redeemed. Would you say that a Casascius token is sold just for the loaded Bitcoin value? No! There are even empty coins that are sold for significant amounts and there are other DIY Bitcoin tokens which are sold without any Bitcoin loaded.
This alone already shows that collecting is not done with the motive of a value gain. It is done for enjoyment and has an aesthetical and social dimension.
For the price you're paying here you get more than 10 times the number of real collector's coins than you would pay for a typical Bitcoin token. I'm selling here for much less than I could, because the sheer number of coins would require too much work to put in each coin separately.
|
|
|
|
Daher wäre es sinnvoll mit dem nächsten Hard-Fork auch den Mining Algorithmus zu ändern und so die erpresserischen Poolbetreiber loszuwerden.
Das wäre sicherlich eine interessante Lösung. Vor allem was das inzwischen bestehende Problem der Monopolisierung der ASIC Technologie angeht. |
|
|
|
SEGWIT wird nie KOMMEN es war eine TOTGEBURT Totaler Blockstream Crap Code . Das ihr das immernoch nicht checkt hier  Kurze Frage: Wieviel bekommst Du von Ver für Deinen Crap Talk hier? |
|
|
|
Strange.
Why would the largest miner on the network be stifling the capacity we already have? The owner of AntMiner claims to support the on-chain transaction model. This news seems to contradict that position.
The owner is pro Unlimited Coin and wants to artificially create the impression of capacity problems to force a shift in public opinion towards bigger blocks. It's the same old strategy the Andresen/Hearn/Ver crowd and their shills is using since months. |
|
|
|
|
I very much agree with this quote. Banks will be forced to evolve, because their traditional core business will no longer be profitable because of Bitcoin.
I imagine that banks will either concentrate more on (risky) investment banking or become financial insurance companies (insurance against data theft for example).
You have to keep in mind that postal service is not dead. The downturn almost exclusively applies to traditional letters. In contrast, parcel services are booming because of the growth of online shops.
|
|
|
|
100€ Fee ist natürlich auch ne Art der Selbstregulierung. So überlegt sich jeder drei mal ob er die Coins einfach mal so hin und her schiebt. Weniger Spam, kleinere Blöcke und alles ist gut. Schlauer Satoshi  Eben nicht, wenn der Wert steigt, werden die nominalen Beträge an Bitcoin kleiner also fraktioniert das ganze noch mehr(ganz normal da die Welt da draußen eben anders tickt und das Brot morgen nicht 100EUR kostet), dann sende ich nur noch 0,01BTC, dann müssten aber 0,01 schon mal 1Mio Wert sein damit 100"EUR" lohnen. Der Bitcoin begrenzt sich zunehmend dann auf die Elite mit ihren Milliarden. Absolut nicht durchdacht in meinen Augen, in 10Jahre spielt man das Spiel mit Potenzen mehr? In 20Jahren wieder? Endlos?=Sinnlos! Nicht natürlich, ganz einfach. Und das dies so nur möglich ist, denn nur so ist dieses System attraktiv sollten einen doch mal zu denken geben. Und ich muss ganz ehrlich sagen, ich fand den Bitcoin handlicher als ich mit 240EUR einsteigen und senden konnte. Ich freu mich natürlich über meinen Gewinn aber ich selbst kann mit meinen verbliebenen "paar" Satoshis fast gar nix mehr machen. Bitcoin ist sehr wohl durchdacht und eine herausragende Innovation. Wenn irgendjemand hier eine bessere Idee für ein dezentrales Währungssystem gleicher Sicherheit aber ohne Blockchain hat, steht es ihm frei, es umzusetzen. Die Erfolgsaussichten wären bestimmt sehr gut. Bitcoin ist überhaupt nicht beschränkt auf Milliardäre. Das träfe nur zu, wenn man idiotischerweise darauf besteht, jede Minitransaktion einzeln On Chain abzuwickeln anstatt dies gebündelt zu tun (wie z.B. Lightning es vorschlägt). Der Plan, den Ver und seine 30+ bezahlten Trolle vorhaben, würde durch extrem steigende Ressourcenanforderungen für den Betrieb von Fullnodes zur Zerstörung von Bitcoin als dezentraler Währung führen. |
|
|
|
|
Für Käufer aus Deutschland gebe ich die Shell-Sammelmünze nun gratis dazu, wenn irgendein anderes Angebot gekauft wird.
|
|
|
|
Wie wäre es zur Abwechslung mal mit einer einmaligen Erhöhung der Blocksize? Dann steht man früher oder später wieder vor dem gleichen Problem und die ganze Diskussion beginnt von Vorne... Weder SegWit, noch eine einmalige Erhöhung der Blockgröße sind eine Lösung des Scalability-Problems und bringen damit nur vorübergehende Linderung. Für die Zukunft wäre es wünschenswert, irgendeine Form von automatischer Skalierung zu haben. SegWit bietet sehr wohl die Grundlage für eine Lösung, indem es Lightning möglich macht. Die Idee, Bitcoin vollständig "On Chain" skalieren zu wollen grenzt an Wahnsinn. Der Grund, warum Bitcoin wertvoll ist, besteht nicht darin, dass möglichst viele Transaktionen möglichst kostengünstig abgewickelt werden können, sondern besteht in der Dezentralität des Systems, die Eingriffe Dritter verhindert. Bitcoin war nie als Ersatz für Kreditkartensysteme geplant. Bitcoin ermöglicht finanzielle Selbstbestimmung und Unabhängigkeit. Das ist das Hauptfeature, welches auch dann noch attraktiv sein wird, wenn eine Transaktion umgerechnet 100 EUR oder mehr kostet. |
|
|
|
It's a better one, but it's still not K-Series. Anyway, international shipping for this offer costs 8 EUR. If you add that to the offering price, it's not cheaper, because shipping is already included in my price. |
|
|
|
Obviously the note in this offer is in very bad condition. And it's from the more common M-series. |
|
|
|
|
PRICE DROP! Now only 0.025 BTC, including international shipping!
Grab this unique collector's item at a very fair price!
|
|
|
|
Seems to be some of the old collections of coin. Actually quite inquisitive that how did you manage to get this old coins from ? And why you would not like to keep it to yourself as a souvenir rather than selling it?
These coins have been acquired through many years of my numismatic hobby. I bought entire collections and also did a lot of swaps with other collectors. Over the years however, the collection grew out of proportions and lacked a clear focus. For that reason I've finally come to the conclusion that it would be better (time and money-wise) to specialize on a few areas of collection only and to sell those coins that do not fit in or are duplicates. Because I've amassed so many coins, I'm willing to sell them in lots at cheaper prices. The alternative - selling each coin individually - would just be too much work given their sheer number. |
|
|
|
they are not so "rare" in fact ... i'm France based , an i can tell you there is a lot easily available in fact ..  This note is from 1995. There are other years of the same note which are more common. I consider the pricing fair. If you see an international offer for this note at a lower price, please point me to it and I'm willing to match that price. |
|
|
|
|
Preissturz auf 0.025 BTC, inklusive Versand!
|
|
|
|
|
Price lowered to just 0.015 BTC!
That's very fair for this quite rare collector's banknote (most of these banknotes have been exchanged for Euro before the deadline, so only few have been kept).
^ up ^
|
|
|
|
^ up ^ Great collectible for any gambler. Also a great gift for your girlfriend... haha, I think my girlfriend would throw it at my head... When acquiring girlfriends, it's good to analyze their risk profile first... |
|
|
|
^ up ^ Great collectible for any gambler. Also a great gift for your girlfriend... |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
