So can you give examples of "real world" coins that you offer? You can't just sell 200 coins in bulk from 50 years ago for half a bitcoin without stating their rarity, material, how many of each were in circulation, etc.
I used to believe this was a free market where people are free to offer anything (legal) at any price that seems reasonable to them... Perhaps you should try to read and understand the first post in this thread which explains why I'm not listing single coins here. (There are some single coins/sets available in my other threads.) My pricing reflects the uncertainty. I believe that my prices are reasonable based on the coin quality criteria I use for compiling the lots. If you do not agree, there's a simple solution: Don't buy! |
|
|
|
What are these made out of?
PM me if interested in trade
All coins are made of cupronickel alloy. PM'ed. |
|
|
|
For sale from my own collection: Polish Commemorative CoinsVery decorative pieces in mostly XF and better condition; all coins Cu-Ni alloy. I've made a list with linked pictures: Pricing & ShippingPricing as indicated for each individual coin. Free international shipping available if total value of coins in a single purchase is >= 0.015 BTC. A 10% discount on total price if all of the coins on offer are purchased. Shipment order: - Established hero members and above with no negative trust or users with significant positive trust and no red flags: I ship first. - All others: You pay first or propose a trustworthy escrow (fees paid by you). |
|
|
|
For sale from my own collection: Polish Commemorative CoinsVery decorative pieces in mostly XF and better condition; all coins Cu-Ni alloy. I've made a list with linked pictures: Pricing & ShippingPricing as indicated for each individual coin. Free international shipping available if total value of coins in a single purchase is >= 0.015 BTC. A 10% discount on total price if all of the coins on offer are purchased. Shipment order: - Established hero members and above with no negative trust or users with significant positive trust and no red flags: I ship first. - All others: You pay first or propose a trustworthy escrow (fees paid by you). |
|
|
|
This is a note form 1995 from the K-series (K.276, the note I'm offering here is K.277 - I didn't find a note matching the same exact series number):
Can you explain to us how the difference in K-series (K.276 vs. K.277) influences the collectibility and perceived value of these notes? Thanks. The K-series is more rare than other series. Please read my previous posts again. K.276 has a similar value like K.277 (it's the 'K' that matters), this means I'm referring to K.276 as a value comparison, because I could not find K.277 in similar condition in other offers. |
|
|
|
Haha, gerade eben wurde ich mal wieder daran erinnert das Gavin (für alle Noobs hier Gavin hat damals das Projekt direkt von Satoshi übergeben bekommen) ja seinen Github-comit-access verloren hatte da er sich anmaßte die Meinung zu vertreten C.G. wright wäre Satoshi.
So geil, da hatten Maxwell und Co nur auf irgendeinen Furz gewartet um einen der unbestreitbar wichtigsten Mitenwickler des Projekts rauszuschmeissen.
Dass Gavin Andresen das Projekt damals allein von Satoshi übergeben bekommen hat ist ein Mythos, der auf der Eigendarstellung von Gavin Andresen beruht. Gavin Andresen ist mitnichten der wichtigste Entwickler von Bitcoin Core (gewesen), er war nur derjenige mit den meisten Presseauftritten. In jüngerer Zeit gab es gar keine Beiträge mehr von ihm. Kein Mythos ist hingegen, dass Gavin Andresen eine Einladung der CIA angenommen hat und mit der Bitcoin Foundation kurz darauf ein (glücklicherweise gescheiteretes) Projekt zur Zentralisierung des Entwicklungsprozesses von Bitcoin Core angestoßen ist. Kein Mythos ist auch, dass Gavin Andresen die Dezentralisierung des Netzwerkes nicht als einen der wichtigsten Grundpfeiler von Bitcoin angesehen hat. Ebenfalls kein Mythos ist seine Zusammenarbeit mit Mike "ragequit" Hearn und seine entweder völlig inkompetente oder aber bewusst korrumpierende Behauptung, Craig Wright sei Satoshi. |
|
|
|
|
Preissenkung für Bestellungen innerhalb Deutschlands: 0.01 BTC inklusive Versand!
|
|
|
|
Wer nach dieser Enthüllung in diesem Forum allen Ernstes noch weiter BU promoted, verdient definitiv negativen Trust.
Ich, ich! Ich finde weiterhin, dass Bitcoin Unlimited die derzeit einzige nachhaltige Lösung des Blocksize-Problems ist, die zur Debatte steht! Auf geht's, gib' mir negativen Trust dafür, eine andere Meinung zu haben! Wie nicht anders zu erwarten, wenden die BU-Promoter hier wieder eine klassische Täter-Opfer-Umkehr an. Negativen Trust hast Du nicht wegen einer anderen Meinung verdient, sondern weil Du derartige Geschäftspraktiken befürwortest. Das kann mich nur dazu veranlassen, um alle von Dir angebotenen Dienstleistungen einen weiten Bogen zu machen. |
|
|
|
Ja, das ist richtig. Der BU-promoter Jihan Wu hat Asicboost (patentgeschützt) auch nicht lizensiert, sondern hat es allem Anschein nach bisher im Geheimen für seine eigenen Pools genutzt, während die Hardware, die er verkauft, mit Software ohne Asicboost-Unterstützung (und weiteren Optimierungen) ausgeliefert wird. Seine betrügerische Energie ist erheblich und eine echte Gefahr für die Dezentralisierung des Netzwerkes. Kein Wunder, dass er jetzt wie wild seine Twitter-Posts löscht... Wer nach dieser Enthüllung in diesem Forum allen Ernstes noch weiter BU promoted, verdient definitiv negativen Trust.Vielleicht sollte man BTC echt auf POS switchen lol
POS hat andere Probleme. Ein Switch ist nicht nötig, Maxwell hat ja schon einen einfachen, kompatiblen Fix vorgelegt. Edit: Wohlgemerkt unabhängig von Segwit, was die BU-Propaganda mal wieder Lügen straft! |
|
|
|
Nur zur Info: Jetzt ist Saatzeit.  Ich habe auch noch Samen, die trotz ihres Alters (inzwischen 3 Jahre) offensichtlich noch gut genug keimfähig sind (meine Aussaat war erfolgreich). Bei Interesse PM. |
|
|
|
Do you still offer sets of URSS coins for sale ? That's an interesting part of history. I'd love to have a set of these coins. PM'ed |
|
|
|
(3) What kind of returns can an investment in "real world coins" have year over year?
This question is not addressed in posts #5 or #8 (as you directed)...can you answer this question? It is (collecting != investing). Your resistance to learning is quite strong. I offer my coins to collectors, not to investors. My prices are dependent on current collector price estimations (minus substantial discount). I make no claims of future value, because it is impossible to know the future. You are obviously not a collector of real world coins. So please stop trolling my thread. |
|
|
|
man ... as you have choose to advertising here , you should respect a bit what the user on the post just above try to explain you mate ..please dont take this kind of rude tone.. he 's just try to explain you what are the motivations ( generaly ) of physical crypto collectors ..  there's no offence here.. I completely understand and respect the motives of physical crypto collectors. It would be nice if the motives of regular coin collectors would be understood and respected as well. HabBear did not read my explanation and continues to raise the same invalid objections over and over again. My offers are directed towards regular numismatists (who may be crypto collectors as well or not). Nobody is forced to buy coins from me. Therefore I don't feel a need to justify my offering here. The people who buy from me know why they do it. |
|
|
|
(1) Please read #5 and #8 again, thanks. (2) Please read #5 and #8 again, thanks. (3) Please read #5 and #8 again, thanks. I'm not going to waste my time arguing with people who repeat the same "arguments" over and over again despite being invalidated more than once. Are you actually interested in purchasing coins from me? If the answer is "no", please don't clutter this thread with your contorted ideology. Sir, I don't think you understand what I'm saying. (1) For the loaded physical bitcoins the face value does have value, because it represents a gauranteed minimum value for the coin being purchased. (2) Please share why "real world coins", and let's be clear that you're selling discontinued currency so there is no face value any longer only numismatic value, are something that will gain appreciation in the future? (3) What kind of returns can an investment in "real world coins" have year over year? Casascius coins are literally the most profitable coin investment in the coin collecting world for the past 4 years or so. The real world is where ever the market is. You're repeating the same argument that I've already invalidated in my previous post. Please read my previous post again. (The face value is not a meaningful measure for the purpose of collecting, otherwise Casascius coins would be sold for their face value only. Collecting does not equal investing.)
I'm offering real world coins to those who are interested.
|
|
|
|
BU nodes go offline. but the diversity of other nodes kept going..
however if everything was just core.. expect another 2013 event.
diversity and more then one codebase is GOOD for the network
relying on one team that has one king is no better than fiat. and that is bad.
BU, xt, classic, and many others (including some core tweaked version, will all run happily together.
but blockstream(core) only want blockstream approved code running which if one goes down. they all go down.
So far only BUCoin Nodes went down (for the 2nd time) due to amateurish coding skills. There's no benefit of multiple implementations that disagree on the protocol / roadmap. The Core implementation process is democratic. BU is an extremely dangerous hostile takeover attempt by a centralist minority group. It's the third one after XTCoin and ClassicCoin. BU taking over would mean the end of a decentralized Bitcoin network. BUCoin is Paypal 2.0. Ver can pay as many shills he wants - it's not gonna happen. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
