Please answer my question. Is this reward significant, will this be an additional reason for keeping the token? Or is the amount so small that it can be neglected?
The significance of the reward will be significant but dependent on:
1. A number of curators participating in the curation process. There is a minimum cap but not an upper one
2. Count of majority decision makers - Denominator for the split
Consider a scenario where the number of curators us very little, let's say 10 and 6 is the count of majority stakeholders. Hypothetically, applicant stakes 1000 tokens and curator stakes 100 stakes reach, so the return to the majority decision maker ( the one who gets rewarded) for a yes decision is = (1000+ 10*100)/
6 = 333.3
for a no-decision: (600+ 10*100)/
6 = 266.6
Now Consider, if there are 100 and 51 is the count of majority stakeholders. Hypothetically, applicant stakes 1000 tokens and curator stakes 100 stakes reach, so the return to the majority decision maker ( the one who gets rewarded) for a yes decision is = (1000+ 100*100)/
51 = 215
for a no-decision: (600+ 100*100)/
51 = 207
Thanks for the detailed explanation. I realized that this is a good reason for keeping the token and voting on the transaction. Obviously, if a person does not hold tokens, he can not be called to vote.
Show Posts
