 The Official Telegram group (in English) has surpassed 5000 members! How great is that?  The ICo has achieved good results, analyzing the investments initially applied, external campaigns such as youtube and video channels, are seeking new members outside Crypto, and this will bring good results, in other Countries there are other forms of invitation |
|
|
|
80$ per year would be a good price for family and friends 99$.
Yes, that would be a good price where lots of people will come. Hope there are annual prices lince amazon prime and not only monthly fees. Where did you get these numbers from? It of course depends on where you live. And I think you should be able to choose between subscription per month/year and pay per view scheme. It is necessary that the Project study certain regions and its competitors in this, in order to evaluate the fair and competitive values, surely they have this in mind, values fixed in a single currency may not be the best option for the project to take off |
|
|
|
It would be cool if we could hear a bit about private investors, how many joined and what kind of investors these are  Maybe Vitalik Buterin is investing in eHealth too? Who knows  The existence of private investors should be notified to the public to maintain openness. Maybe they'll tell us later. Hold on there a bit longer, the end of the private sale is close, I'm sure they gonna disclose some information after it ends. Hope for some big news. I also hope on good news. Until now the eHealth project looks intersting. When does the public sale starts? Any requirements? Public Pre-ICO will start in a few weeks, on March 18th. I am not sure if there are any requirements. But I hope they'll lower the minimum investment. 2 ETH or 0,2 BTC like in the private sale would be too much for a lot of people. Not sure about it, for a pre-ICO I think 2 ETH is a fair amount. We are talking about a bigger bonus, so people should also be willing to invest something for it. For the normal main sale I agree, 2 ETH is a too high minimum for it. The first official ICO round will begin in June iirc. The minimum investment will most likely be lower if not gone completely then. That'd be great. I'm ready to invest as a private person but I dont want to invest 800$ (a.k.a. 1eth limit) on the spot. Maybe I'll invest some time later more but currently I just want a "quick glance". [/quote] Ehealth can adopt a more inclusive policy than other active projects, there are many initial investments of exorbitant amounts there, searching for 1 large whale, while thousands of small fish are looking for a project for application, I think it would be fair and profitable, a minimum low investment without bonus, and a bonus for larger values, would provide opportunity to all |
|
|
|
Yes reputation management is an industry where all can be build. There is some things already on the market but I don’t think it’s enough or even use full, repu can offer something new, if the team handle the project well it can work.
The Repu Team, besides having a promising project in hand, is sure of better days ahead for cryptography, these days can enable them to implement their platform with the most different types of services for evaluations of several species, and everything will depend exclusively on their continuous work |
|
|
|
Counter on the site working? Im just curious, because few days ago counted showed same % of raised amount  Either way its a problem. They should fix that counter bug if its a bug if its not, i think we need something to boost on sales. At least in etherscan can look at their contract address, now there balance ~78 eth. Early investors are not so many, but they will receive the maximum bonus 45% I once said that big bonuses are not always good! Usually they alarm and scare off investors. You are right about this and you can look at many coins which suffered a lot from doing this. It only creates fud when the price dumps a lot at the beginning. Aside from the fact that it creates people to buy early on dump regardless of the price because they would've profited with the bonus already, I think it is a good practice to sign people up and create some buzz. Bonus that are usually higher that 35% is not a good practice though. I have seen ICOs failing to make use of the early momentum because there are fewer rewards for the investors who may come in late. The excess bonuses really always bring unwanted evictions that madly take the price down, until all the dumpers have come out, that comes down far below. For projects like Sphere, there is still hope that this would happen, as they have a good script and a lot of interest from the community, continuous work will lead to success |
|
|
|
Yes i also think that some partnerships could be very good for cryptoflix, like mainstream studios. There is a lot to do with movies industry, it will be a brand new concept to use crypto to watch and fund film.
Maybe they can have a partnership with some potential companies/people that missed a chance to have partnership with Netflix. there are no guarantee at the moment this is going to be a huge success like netflix you are right, but also it could be bigger than netflix ? I don't think that this is even remotely possible. Netflix is huge company It is impossible to say what will be better in the future, today we live in a world that is slowly knowing the chain of blocks, not everyone has worked this tool lately, but be sure that in a new era, imminent, by the way, Cryptoflix has its place at the top, yes |
|
|
|
Please reserve to Portuguese Translation.  |
|
|
|
Really long time ago to realize the idea of the project, Team still has a lot to present and make many partnerships for a good ending, I think we will have many things before we see a complete demonstration of Ehealth and its functionalities
Yes but Rome wansn't build in a day I believe in the project although it does seem very ambitious when you read everything. This is a big project because its a new innovation to the world, i think there is no an exist example to be followed/duplicated and customized a bit, so more time and energy for this. Judging by the number of pages in its whitepaper, we could say that this project have been seriously thought of by its developers, and that is one characteristic that sets this project apart among any other crypto projects. Imho. Yes, the high number of pages from the whitepaper shows us that this project is different from any other projects and it means this project is being treated seriously by the developers. Not always the quantity can be compared with the quality. And in such a large amount of information it is very easy to lose the very essence of the project. And its main goal, rather it is how these goals will be achieved! But I believed that the more there are pages in a whitepaper, the more likely it will give much detailed information about the project as compared to at least 20 pages summarized whitepapers which are obviously done with haste. I asked several times about the size of the pages and all the complexity that surrounds WPP, but Team seemed focused on summarizing, although everything is still big and laborious. The more investors become interested in Ehealth, the more often this question will return to the topic, so they really need a smaller version that addresses only the main points. Of course this will lead to more and more questions, but that nourishes the Wire |
|
|
|
Airdrop or not what really matters is that they will deliver on the product and show they are on the right path to do so when the mvp/demo comes out
So no mvp now ? even those with a demo is struggling to get funded Well, it is what it is. Besides, the closed beta testing is not that far away. Not many projects can afford to make a platform or a demo before the end of the token sale. yeah but it's becoming a requirement these days to have a demo. Sure, the market is in bear mode and people want to see demos or working products but you can't really speed up development at will. Yeah, I mean we cannot generalized one project after another with regards to its development. We only need to hope and pray that the project road map will be implemented as planned by its committed devs. True that. It would help the ICO if they showed some working footage of the platform. On the other hand, risk loving investors can expect a bigger growth if they don't sell out. Despite a bit of laziness in certain media, I see a Team committed to achieving what they have idealized, this seems good to me, partnerships must emerge over time, and those who ask for a platform test need to be patient, Repu has certain complexity that requires time and dedication to show something ready |
|
|
|
That 's why with decentralizing, Sphere can compete with Facebook for sure. We have seen Blockchain technology fight against traditional ones in many aspect, finance, data storage, science research, etc. Now it's time for social network.
Agree. Facebook is control by #Mark and his team/company. We all want freedom and Sphere social may be the answer! decentralization and not controlled by any one!! If facebook stuck with their current system, for sure it will be easier for sphere to beat it. Blockchain technology is better than the traditional one! It depends. Dont wanna draw the devil to the wall but what will happen with Sphere when they ban blockchain and its products? In these days, there should be a backpu plan for such scenarios Why would they ban blockchain and its products? The technology has spread enough already and I don't think anybody has powers enough to just ban it. They might have done it in early stages, but now I think it's already too late. The government can find loopholes and implement new laws to restrict the users. crypto laws need to be in place to protect users from scam projects.. but complete blocking is a bad move for every government. The countries banning crypto are the ones that did not find a way yet to earn money on it The thing they could do with this one is blocking the use of it.. To forbid it is already impossible. In any case, people will use crypto-currencies. And, for example, if Facebook has taken a position of confrontation with crypto-currencies, this will eventually cause an outflow of users to other social networks. Not only for social networks, but for any other actor in any segment, opposing Blockchain today will be like trying to prevent progress already accepted by a large mass, no one will want this kind of problem, and if you do, it will be with the intention to be a pioneer in the future, implementing the same |
|
|
|
The first time I see such a site. It seems to me that placing on any small sites does not give anything to promote the ICO. It is necessary to post information about ICO on sites where there is high attendance. Many of the evaluations of the great sites are bought, biased, not generalized, but I know that much happens nowadays, we must give the opportunity of demonstration also to those who are starting, and who are still trustworthy, I hope to see new sites coming up, competitiveness generates quality |
|
|
|
i ask myself and you guys, has anyone here really read the full whitepaper from start to end?
 I believe that 20% of stakeholders really have done so, WPP is perhaps the biggest challenge along the length of the project for investors to follow it to the end, there is a huge chance of project success and good profits for everyone, with certainty of the research and continuous follow-up of each one |
|
|
|
I might be reaching out a bit far here.. but ... Compatitors are only compatitors when their product has on most part similar aspects. So.. depending on how wide the scope is looked at.. all projects are competing with each other. example : - scope blockchain = all compatitors - scope VR = some compatitors - scope virtual shoppingmall = few compatitors I hope this is somewhat clear on what I want to say i guess there are nearly none competitors but only a few on the vr scope and nearly none and a few too in the virtual shoppingmall, for mark.space. Given the success achieved by ICO and the great evolution of VR, it will not be long before similar projects emerge, copying the business models and scripts followed by Mark.Space. It will actually be a nice competition that will bring to the world of Crypto those not reached by Mark.Space, but I do not think any project will be ahead of you in the segment |
|
|
|
Exactly, basically there's no ready platform, it has to remain interesting for your existing users as well as attract new ones. This can only be done by constantly improving and adding new features.
I think it shouldnt be called not ready since it can already be used and even its already being used, the rest is only the maintenance. The team is organized and its platform will only depend on adjustments in joint support of the community, so that it can reach its objectives, there is not a long work to be done, but they will go through fundamental adjustments to the success of Sphere, let's be together in this journey |
|
|
|
I just noticed now there are already more than 11k people in it, not bad the popularity of the project is growing every day. Telegram clear confirmation of this. But you need to consider the fact that some people came because of Airdrops Before the airdrop they had around 700 people in the channel, now almost 13k, so it's more than 'some' people who joined because of the airdrop Anyway, if it helps to become more known and popular it's a good thing. I did not know about airdrop but I still have joined because I see this project as an interesting and promising one. Airdrop is ok of course, still, that was not the main reason Crazy how many people are now on the airdrop train. I think with this high numbers an individual person will not get that much from the airdrop. That's the idea, I think. But it's good for the project, more people get to know about it. Airdrops are still very effective in spreading the word. I said it many times and I said it one more time - airdrops means token dumps On the one hand it might be true that airdrops lead to dumps, but distribution is also very important. The more people participate in an airdrop the better the distribution becomes. You also do not want all the tokens concentrated in a few people's wallets. I know that whales can be dangerous for projects and everything should be decentralized but there were many projects where bounty hunters just after ico dumped tokens so hard that it caused fud and further dumping In fact, large dumps can often be previously thought of by ICOS teams, many projects have had desires in recent times and then have had enough time in a well-designed roadmap to recover, no matter how many whales are dumped, there will always be whales to insure and buy more from time to time, and new followers, depending on the quality of the project and Time |
|
|
|
Having a virtual space for yourself is a dream of many people recently and the project is giving people what they want. The investments are showing the value of the venture. More success to the team.
Totally agree with you. It seems to me that today it seems a luxury, but thanks to such projects it will become affordable and ordinary. Do you really think that a lot of people already dream of a virtual space for themselves? I am not sure. In the future that might be true but right now the virtual reality technology isn't spread widely enough. It's still a niche. Among the projects that work today in ICOS, the most admired and successful are those involving VR and its technologies, surely all dreams are valid for the VR right now, there is a lot to be developed and all the projects that try to implement it, will certainly be the trigger for a continued evolution of this technology |
|
|
|
think better if partnership established with some studio even begin with developing country like india. originality of contents and right is going to be important steps otherwise to many legal issues.
Would be great if they could make some partnerships with Bollywood movies. If they can achieve this the audience would be huge. Indian film industry is the largest producer of movies in the world with lots of languages and regional content, it would give a heavy body for the investments of they can get a partnership here. I think India is not the best option to start - in this region many poor people who are busy with work, and they don't have time to watch movies. In regard Bollywood - in my opinion they make films with very specific genres in which are very few fans. Bollywood movies are extremely popular right now and most of all it is extremely cheap to make that kind of movie Actually they use small budgets and reveal great hidden talents, they make success and money from practically nothing, I'm a fan of the Bollywood films, although they act on a completely different platform and system, they can serve as models and inspiration for Time cryptoflix |
|
|
|
|
Really long time ago to realize the idea of the project, Team still has a lot to present and make many partnerships for a good ending, I think we will have many things before we see a complete demonstration of Ehealth and its functionalities
|
|
|
|
I like the Youtube videos with introductions from the different team members, but i would also like to see a video that describes a bit more concrete what the goals are. The whitepaper is so big so a lot of people don't take the time to fully read through it.
I must agree upon this, the white paper is just huge . +I don't think a lof of people will actually read this. Well that's true. Some videos to explain the project more accurate would of course be nice too. Maybe they are planing such videos after the introduction videos? Actually im waiting for some of the youtuber to review this ICO and expect a good summary from them, or maybe it could be from a member of ehfirst team. There are some crypto youtubers out there that do great jobs with summarising projects and are also able to do great interviews with project reps But at the ent you don't know if they are independent or paid. I linke these youtube videos but I allway watch out if there were changes or if another source reports the same I think decent youtubers usually say or write if video is sponsored or not, at least I've seen some of them clearly stating sponsored videos. The Wpp as well as the project is long and complex, many people dodge things that give them a lot of work, and this approach people project patients and studies who do their own research to make good profits. Ehealth is the type of project that requires dedication and continuous determination of both the Team and its followers |
|
|
|
Thanks for the link, a rewards program is always good for fans of the project and to reach new Members in the current Community, there is a considerable growth of Repu fans and suggestions for partnerships for the Project, I hope the Team has goals set against and can keep us informed at every step. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
