Have $213 Avaliable for Exchange, Escrow welcome

That is  not fair.
The value of the held bitcoins (approx 200.000) should be valued the day of the distribution or as an average of the last N days before the distribution.
It does not make sense to value bitcoins according to a value of some day randomly chosen.

Best regards,
ilpirata79

So how much will we receive?
20% of the bitcoin lost?
Maybe less considering that the price of bitcoins has increased? (so the ones who had money will get more)

As I said I cannot access my mtgox page anymore.

I have seen, though, that my request got accepted.

I have made my claim through Kraken.

Will I automatically receive my bitcoins on kraken or do I have to confirm or do something in order to get them?

Thanks,
ilpirata79

Thanks a lot!!

ilpirata79

I cannot verify the claim, as I have changed the password and don't remember it.

How can I verify my claim ??

Anyone in the same position?

Watched the first two episodes of Bloodline on Netflix, last night, and it was not bad.

Time to bell

10k$ at least

This is something, as someone pointed out, that can be easily done in an ethereum-like platform.

In bitcoin, you might need a new opcode that restrains the spendability of an output in the following way: it is spendable only togheter with other outputs that refer to the same address and so that the total amount to be spent is equal or greater than the required sum... or something like that.

I think this is an interesting use case, so maybe it could be worth a new opcode.

best regards,
ilpirata79

I am trying to understand if there is a way in Bitcoin to perform a trustless crowdfunding campaign.

I mean: establish an amount of bitcoin, let the people send bitcoins to an address until a certain date. If before the date the established amount of bitcoin is reached, all the bitcoins are unblocked and spendable, otherwise the go back to the senders.

Is that possible?

best regards,
ilpirata79

No offence, buy you don't really know what you're talking about.

Don't forget BTC has a reasonable network effect at its advantage and can incorporate ethereum features through merge-mined sidechains. I bet that this will be the outcome:
Bitcoin used for monetary transactions and a sidechain used for smart-contracts/bots.


Best regards,
ilpirata79

Suppose I want to pay someone by passing through an escrow guy.
I want to use multisig.
I want to be able to send money to the multisig that can be redeemed if 2 out of 3 agree (either I and the seller, I and the escrow guy, the escrow guy and the seller). You get the point.

Is there an *easy* way to do that today with bitcoin? I mean, without being required to use the command line to prepare the addresses, and the what...

Thanks,
ilpirata79

Hi,

I am looking for an expert on Moodle who could port a website based on moodle 1.15 to the latest Moodle version.

It would work like this: I send the moodledata directory, the config.php and the database dump and I receive the same things updated to work with the latest Moodle version.

Escrow, if requested.

Payment in bitcoin.

Best regards,
ilpirata79

I think that the halving is already well factored into the price (which has recently doubled).

But, despite of that, because I am long and leveraged and under the parity, I am still hodling my positions...

Best regards,
ilpirata79

So the "question" now might be:

is it better to have to different chains, i.e. bitcoin and rootstock, with the second being a superset, in terms of functionalities, of the first, or is it best to just have the second (so just ethereum)?

I tend to think that is better to split them, but I don't have any real evidence to support that assertion.

Some thoughts however:
pros (for splitting): two different chains can be tweaked differently (e.g. block time) to achieve different objectives.
cons (for splitting): one single chain is easier to mantain, to debug, to develop, to upgrade compared to two (this may be a strong cons).

What do you guys think however?

Maybe a sidechain which is merge-mined with bitcoin. I don't see that like an impossible outcome...
at that point, what would the usefulness of Ethereum be?



By the way, it already exists. It's called rootstock. How is it that some people see it as a joke?

I know about two ongoing efforts:

1) the first by blockstream who hired Rusty Russel;
2) another by Poon and other 3-4 developers

Both projects are on github.

Best regards,
ilpirata79

If ethereum technology becomes fondamental and useful, would it be wise to modify bitcoin to incorporate its fundamental changes which are the turing completeness and the possibility for contracts to have a state? (as well as a easier scripting language as serpent).

Best regards,
ilpirata79