Yes, kicks and bans do happen, but only for blantant violations of rules.
And what "rule" is creating an invite a "blantant" violation of?  Holy cow, you're still trolling this thread? Get a life, man. |
|
|
|
Like i've told, you are wastin your time creating fake messages. Anyone can do that with photoshop. You spam something in ZMS channel, about your Sentinel, then i call you private. I've answered you and you went offline. I've only sent this one real message, all your pictures are fake mate.  Nope, I have both conversations with you. I was about to consider that maybe someone else was impersonating you when they had that conversation with me but then I noticed something. You blocked me from both accounts -- which would only happen if you indeed are the one who scammed me.   Now, why would both the conversation that you shared as well as the conversation I shared show that you blocked me, unless both conversations are from the same person? Thank you for confirming! Honestly, It doesn't matter. I've already sold all my ZCR and told everyone I know to be careful with this project. You can keep trying to defend yourself but I've said all I have to say and shown all I have to show. I have no interest in continuing to argue with you. |
|
|
|
Total fud. But ZCore is greater than any fud with fake content. An fud, where anyone can say anything without real content. You were answered properly. What fake content? Can you show proof it's fake? Also, explain to me how asking for private keys in my local wallet would help in any way with setting up sentinel. Also consider that I run a shared masternode service and host 85 masternodes in addition to being a BTCZ dev and an advisor to Safecoin. None of this is new to me. I wish you had proof to say it's not. You write a ficction chat text. It's not even the way i send messages. Also, why would you use your private keys so set your sentinel? And I never ask anyone to do that, not even to help in wallet. I'm sorry for your service users, but man, you are waistin your time here with this fake news. Best wishes; You can call me a liar, claim I am spreading fud and that this chat is fiction but I'm the only one with proof of what you tried to do.        Since you're the one who asked me for the private keys, why don't you tell me why you asked for them when someone is asking questions about sentinel? |
|
|
|
Total fud. But ZCore is greater than any fud with fake content. An fud, where anyone can say anything without real content. You were answered properly. What fake content? Can you show proof it's fake? Also, explain to me how asking for private keys in my local wallet would help in any way with setting up sentinel. Also consider that I run a shared masternode service and host 85 masternodes in addition to being a BTCZ dev and an advisor to Safecoin. None of this is new to me. |
|
|
|
@Zminer777 I use the same command I use for EWBF: ➜ ./gminer --server mine-genx-na.equipool.1ds.us --port 50131 --user ADDRESS.rig0 --pass minpayout=5000 --algo 192_7 --pers GENX_PoW --pec +----------------------------------------------------------------+
| GMiner Equihash Miner v1.02 |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
Algorithm: Equihash 192_7 "GENX_PoW"
Stratum server:
host: stratum://mine-genx-na.equipool.1ds.us:50131
user: ADDRESS.rig0
password: minpayout=5000
Power calculator: on
Color output: on
Watchdog: on
Log to file: off
Selected devices: GPU0 GPU1
Temperature limits: 90C 90C
------------------------------------------------------------------
07:35:41 Connected to mine-genx-na.equipool.1ds.us:50131
07:35:41 Subscribed to Stratum Server
07:35:41 Set Nonce: 70000053
07:35:41 Set Target: 0050000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
07:35:41 New Job: 13399
07:35:41 Authorized on Stratum Server
07:35:41 Started Mining on GPU0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
07:35:41 Started Mining on GPU1: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
07:35:44 New Job: 1339a
07:35:48 GPU1 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:36:08 GPU0 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:36:11 Temperature: GPU0 69C GPU1 69C
07:36:11 Speed: GPU0 35 Sol/s GPU1 34 Sol/s
07:36:11 Accepted Shares: GPU0 1 GPU1 1
07:36:11 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:36:11 Power: GPU0 175W 0.20 Sol/W GPU1 166W 0.20 Sol/W
07:36:11 Total Speed: 69 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 2 Rejected: 0 Power: 341W 0.20 Sol/W
07:36:27 GPU0 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:36:39 Set Target: 0058e38e38e38e38000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
07:36:39 New Job: 1339b
07:36:39 GPU1 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:36:41 Temperature: GPU0 69C GPU1 71C
07:36:41 Speed: GPU0 33 Sol/s GPU1 35 Sol/s
07:36:41 Accepted Shares: GPU0 2 GPU1 2
07:36:41 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:36:41 Power: GPU0 171W 0.19 Sol/W GPU1 167W 0.21 Sol/W
07:36:41 Total Speed: 68 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 4 Rejected: 0 Power: 338W 0.20 Sol/W
07:36:44 New Job: 1339c
07:37:11 Temperature: GPU0 70C GPU1 70C
07:37:11 Speed: GPU0 35 Sol/s GPU1 35 Sol/s
07:37:11 Accepted Shares: GPU0 2 GPU1 2
07:37:11 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:37:11 Power: GPU0 172W 0.20 Sol/W GPU1 167W 0.21 Sol/W
07:37:11 Total Speed: 70 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 4 Rejected: 0 Power: 339W 0.21 Sol/W
07:37:22 GPU0 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:37:39 New Job: 1339d
07:37:41 Temperature: GPU0 70C GPU1 68C
07:37:41 Speed: GPU0 36 Sol/s GPU1 36 Sol/s
07:37:41 Accepted Shares: GPU0 3 GPU1 2
07:37:41 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:37:41 Power: GPU0 171W 0.21 Sol/W GPU1 167W 0.22 Sol/W
07:37:41 Total Speed: 72 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 5 Rejected: 0 Power: 338W 0.21 Sol/W
07:37:49 GPU0 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:37:50 GPU0 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:37:57 GPU1 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:37:59 GPU0 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:38:11 Temperature: GPU0 70C GPU1 68C
07:38:11 Speed: GPU0 34 Sol/s GPU1 36 Sol/s
07:38:11 Accepted Shares: GPU0 6 GPU1 3
07:38:11 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:38:11 Power: GPU0 170W 0.20 Sol/W GPU1 166W 0.22 Sol/W
07:38:11 Total Speed: 70 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 9 Rejected: 0 Power: 336W 0.21 Sol/W
07:38:23 New Job: 1339e
07:38:39 GPU0 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:38:41 Temperature: GPU0 70C GPU1 69C
07:38:41 Speed: GPU0 35 Sol/s GPU1 35 Sol/s
07:38:41 Accepted Shares: GPU0 7 GPU1 3
07:38:41 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:38:41 Power: GPU0 173W 0.20 Sol/W GPU1 166W 0.21 Sol/W
07:38:41 Total Speed: 70 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10 Rejected: 0 Power: 339W 0.21 Sol/W
07:39:06 New Job: 1339f
07:39:10 GPU1 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:39:11 Temperature: GPU0 70C GPU1 69C
07:39:11 Speed: GPU0 35 Sol/s GPU1 36 Sol/s
07:39:11 Accepted Shares: GPU0 7 GPU1 4
07:39:11 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:39:11 Power: GPU0 173W 0.20 Sol/W GPU1 168W 0.21 Sol/W
07:39:11 Total Speed: 71 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 11 Rejected: 0 Power: 341W 0.21 Sol/W
07:39:12 GPU0 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:39:23 GPU0 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:39:28 GPU0 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:39:30 GPU0 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:39:35 GPU1 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:39:41 GPU0 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:39:41 GPU1 Share Accepted 1 ms
I waited until 07:45 and no more shares or updates were printed to the screen. I restarted the miner and got: +----------------------------------------------------------------+
| GMiner Equihash Miner v1.02 |
+----------------------------------------------------------------+
Algorithm: Equihash 192_7 "GENX_PoW"
Stratum server:
host: stratum://mine-genx-na.equipool.1ds.us:50131
user: ADDRESS.rig0
password: minpayout=5000
Power calculator: on
Color output: on
Watchdog: on
Log to file: off
Selected devices: GPU0 GPU1
Temperature limits: 90C 90C
------------------------------------------------------------------
07:45:26 Connected to mine-genx-na.equipool.1ds.us:50131
07:45:26 Subscribed to Stratum Server
07:45:26 Set Nonce: 7fffffac
07:45:26 Set Target: 0050000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
07:45:26 New Job: 133ab
07:45:26 Authorized on Stratum Server
07:45:26 Started Mining on GPU0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
07:45:26 Started Mining on GPU1: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
07:45:26 GPU0 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:45:47 GPU0 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:45:54 GPU1 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:45:56 Temperature: GPU0 69C GPU1 69C
07:45:56 Speed: GPU0 35 Sol/s GPU1 34 Sol/s
07:45:56 Accepted Shares: GPU0 2 GPU1 1
07:45:56 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:45:56 Power: GPU0 173W 0.20 Sol/W GPU1 166W 0.20 Sol/W
07:45:56 Total Speed: 69 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 3 Rejected: 0 Power: 339W 0.20 Sol/W
07:46:04 GPU0 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:46:11 New Job: 133ac
07:46:14 GPU1 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:46:22 GPU0 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:46:26 Temperature: GPU0 69C GPU1 69C
07:46:26 Speed: GPU0 35 Sol/s GPU1 35 Sol/s
07:46:26 Accepted Shares: GPU0 4 GPU1 2
07:46:26 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:46:26 Power: GPU0 171W 0.20 Sol/W GPU1 166W 0.21 Sol/W
07:46:26 Total Speed: 70 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 6 Rejected: 0 Power: 337W 0.21 Sol/W
07:46:28 GPU1 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:46:33 GPU0 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:46:47 GPU0 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:46:51 GPU0 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:46:56 Temperature: GPU0 69C GPU1 69C
07:46:56 Speed: GPU0 36 Sol/s GPU1 35 Sol/s
07:46:56 Accepted Shares: GPU0 7 GPU1 3
07:46:56 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:46:56 Power: GPU0 173W 0.21 Sol/W GPU1 166W 0.21 Sol/W
07:46:56 Total Speed: 71 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 10 Rejected: 0 Power: 339W 0.21 Sol/W
07:46:59 New Job: 133ad
07:47:14 GPU1 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:47:26 Temperature: GPU0 69C GPU1 69C
07:47:26 Speed: GPU0 38 Sol/s GPU1 35 Sol/s
07:47:26 Accepted Shares: GPU0 7 GPU1 4
07:47:26 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:47:26 Power: GPU0 170W 0.22 Sol/W GPU1 165W 0.21 Sol/W
07:47:26 Total Speed: 73 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 11 Rejected: 0 Power: 335W 0.22 Sol/W
07:47:44 GPU1 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:47:44 GPU1 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:47:54 New Job: 133ae
07:47:56 Temperature: GPU0 69C GPU1 69C
07:47:56 Speed: GPU0 37 Sol/s GPU1 36 Sol/s
07:47:56 Accepted Shares: GPU0 7 GPU1 6
07:47:56 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:47:56 Power: GPU0 175W 0.21 Sol/W GPU1 166W 0.22 Sol/W
07:47:56 Total Speed: 73 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 13 Rejected: 0 Power: 341W 0.21 Sol/W
07:48:00 GPU0 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:48:04 GPU0 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:48:26 Temperature: GPU0 70C GPU1 69C
07:48:26 Speed: GPU0 34 Sol/s GPU1 36 Sol/s
07:48:26 Accepted Shares: GPU0 9 GPU1 6
07:48:26 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:48:26 Power: GPU0 172W 0.20 Sol/W GPU1 165W 0.22 Sol/W
07:48:26 Total Speed: 70 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 15 Rejected: 0 Power: 337W 0.21 Sol/W
07:48:38 GPU0 Share Accepted 0 ms
07:48:49 New Job: 133af
07:48:53 GPU0 Share Accepted 1 ms
07:48:56 Temperature: GPU0 70C GPU1 69C
07:48:56 Speed: GPU0 35 Sol/s GPU1 34 Sol/s
07:48:56 Accepted Shares: GPU0 11 GPU1 6
07:48:56 Rejected Shares: GPU0 0 GPU1 0
07:48:56 Power: GPU0 172W 0.20 Sol/W GPU1 166W 0.20 Sol/W
07:48:56 Total Speed: 69 Sol/s Shares Accepted: 17 Rejected: 0 Power: 338W 0.20 Sol/W
07:59:26 Miner terminated, watchdog will restart process after 10 seconds
After which I stopped the miner and switched back to EWBF. The whole time, power consumption was high as when mining. |
|
|
|
Either the Linux version needs some work or you really love your dev fee.  After switching back to EWBF:  |
|
|
|
|
I'm so tired of scammers. It's people like you that give crypto a bad name.
Go back and fix SLTC.
|
|
|
|
"cryptorex: No they’re not kidding - they did the same shit for winter break and it can really fuck a project up. This exchange is pure shit. Thankfully we have many many more since winter of 2017"
everyone who does something against you guys is a scam and thief..... Id rather say that its your fault that you did not plan changing the algorithm and did not check the agreement with c-cex. I think C-CEX has a point in contract that is obliging them to make one algo. After change they want next 4 BTC. It's natural. I would rather see ideas on how to adjust to this rather than calling the biggest exchange that this coin is listed at - a scam... With all respect but this is not how mature people run business guys. You just close every door this way. It is just sad to see this project being hurt by such bad management.
What do you mean on this? "I would rather see ideas on how to adjust to this rather than calling the biggest exchange that this coin is listed at - a scam..." Are you kidding us? C-CEX is far not the largest exchange where BitcoinZ is listed. Its 24 hour volume was only 144 USD: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/bitcoinz/#markets -------------------------- BitcoinZ: It's time to buy: https://exmo.com/en/news_view?id=2244
Thank you for BTCZ tips: t1QLuHkEigtkEtsLxENCosJ1YaKHzB2keH7@Trafo, bartekhl_2 is just a troll. Don't bother responding to him as it's a waste of energy.  |
|
|
|
Thanks man, do you know if I'll lose my coins prior to the fork? You should always keep backups just in case something goes wrong. No, you won't lose your coins. You may need to reindex if you opened the old wallet after the fork (reindex.bat in the tools folder of the zip file). |
|
|
|
Egyptianman once compared himself to CHarlie Lee of LTC..............how a pushy guy you are. He said this coin does not need to be lead by managers because e.g. LTC was founded by coder). DO not comapre to him. You are quite at different level.And this project is a totally different project. Another time , place and space. You dont have a clue about business.
Considering I had to look up who Charlie Lee is, I highly doubt I said what you claim I said. Where do you come up with these lies? |
|
|
|
Hi Bartekhl_2, Egyptianbman, Crypt0r3x and Renuzit!
Please stop this conversation on this forum. This is not the space for chatting about how it was and why it was, who has right and who doesn't. If you would like to continue, please do it in private.
If somebody is coming for the first time to this forum he/she will see only complains and quarrels, instead of new features and development process. This is damaging the image of our project.
Bartek, if you really care about the future of BitcoinZ, than accept that is currently working this way, otherwise you hurt more and destroy the reputation of BitcoinZ. You do not want that, otherwise you are an untrue and dummy supporter of the BitcoinZ Community.
Peace be with you guys!
--------------------------
BitcoinZ: Innovation for a Better World
Thank you for BTCZ tips: t1QLuHkEigtkEtsLxENCosJ1YaKHzB2keH7
Thank you for your words of wisdom. I agree with you. No more responses from me. Ignoring him is the only way to get him to stop. |
|
|
|
Thanks for helping prove that you stole the video. You clearly gave permission to use the video **and your music** when you accepted the 100k BTCZ payment.
The video is there, present on youtube. The contract was to make a video and publish it. 100% done. Can you explain what do you mean by "stole"? This is only your choice that you do not use it. a choice against the community will. I said to you that if you call me this way again I will contact your employer. I will ask them how they feel about being represented by a man doing hate speech in the internet. Have a good night. Please call my employer. The hours of laughter we will have about your call will be very enjoyable. |
|
|
|
Using my music was a part of a voted contract. As well as using Fiverr. I confirmed every step with other developers before proceeding. Here is the part of my contract. "1 minute 30 second video Script written by a professional writer from Fiverr (most of the cost) Additional graphics from creativemarket.com Adding voice recording Video edition and music from my (bartekhl @slack) collection " here is the link to the contract: https://docs.google.com/document/d/13OspN1gfxOTO1Ek-TtSOvpjowS3a-x4DnJTDODZ_t_w/editThanks for helping prove that you stole the video. You clearly gave permission to use the video **and your music** when you accepted the 100k BTCZ payment. |
|
|
|
By "crap" I would rather treat phrases like "GTFO" or "you stole from us" . I never used that kind of name-calling. It is just unprofessional.
That is the language used by the ones who decide over community money. This coin deserves better than this. This is not representative for the community.
Yes, "you stole from us" meaning you stole from us. Now give us our video back or GTFO thief! "you stole from us" and "gtfo" is name calling. What a thief and a liar.   bartekhl, go away. Literally, nobody in this community has any respect for you. You can't demand respect, you earn it -- and you've done everything you can to make sure nobody does so with you. Don't come back. Neither bartekhl, nor bartekhl_1, nor bartekhl_2, ... bartekhl_n --- the responses will always be the same. You are a selfish brat that has stolen from this community. The evidence is out there and no matter what lies you try to spread, it's always obvious. |
|
|
|
" I am Arab, I will ban you quick if you dont do what I say: Mr Beshoy Girgis of Research Square Company I bet not everyone laughs at your jokes. If you were hacked - means you have many enemies. It is just a matter of time when your way goes up your ass. You are not anonymous. Considering my 7 year old son can google that information in five minutes, it's obvious that I'm not trying to be anonymous.  Good attempt at being threatening though. What are you going to do, report my name for copyright infringement? |
|
|
|
" I am Arab, I will ban you quick if you dont do what I say:  |
|
|
|
bartekhl!!!!!!!!! Haha, I have to admit, I'm surprised you're back for another round. Did the community not embarrass you enough in the last round of your pathetic complaints? Let me respond to some of your pathetically false claims: I was a developer who brought this coin to the awareness by leading communication throughout first months Can you link me to at least one line of code that you wrote as a "developer"? Then I was ousted by so-called leaders, because I did not agree with mr Equipool, who used my work for the communit , without a note it was mine. Let's say you buy a new computer from Dell. Can Dell come to you and say "HEY, you have to leave my logo on the computer or else!!!"? No. When you buy something, you are free to do with it whatever you like because it's your property. The community paid for your video and therefore are not required to give you credit. If you had donated the video then yes, by all means, we'd advertise your name all over. We actually did advertise your name all over. There was an intro video that you helped with and put your name in the video itself. We also gave you credit in the description. Unfortunately, your greed and demand for acknowledgement led you to report both videos, and you lost the credits you so badly wanted. I'm sorry man, but you did this to yourself. The next time you want public credit for something, donate your time. I have not asked for a penny for the months I worked 24/7 believing in this project. This is a lie. You received 100,000 BTCZ for the video. https://docs.google.com/document/d/13OspN1gfxOTO1Ek-TtSOvpjowS3a-x4DnJTDODZ_t_w/editI got a ban from all the channels behind my back, without even noticing me Also a lie. The reason you were banned had nothing to do with the video and everything to do with the days of harassing the developers in chat. You literally would not stop complaining for hours on end. I'm sorry, but we have stuff to do. Several of us asked you to stop several times and you just wouldn't. After this they decided that they rather delete the video Also a lie. We didn't decide to delete the video, you reported it as copyright infringement and YouTube took it down. The video you paid for is available, but they don't promote it in any way despite you all paid for this The video you have posted is not yours to post. You've stolen 100,000 BTCZ from the community and have posted the video on your own YouTube channel (denying the community from being able to post it) so you can get publicity. major donation for 10 BTC is being kept by the ones who hold the key to our coin Being kept from the community? It's quite public on the info site: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QndLq2kXHIu9BbYd1c_wHOzryAKxCSqzzDodPOqVQnM/editEGYPTIANMAN - HOW ABOUT YOU GIVE YOURSELF BAN Dude, if I could ban myself from ever seeing your comments again, I would. Hey, by the way, why is your new screen name bartekhl_2? Did your original get banned on bitcointalk for annoying someone else? |
|
|
|
So I am having a weird issue. The pool I am using is saying I have been paid x amount, but my wallet is not showing the same thing. Yes I do have the upgraded wallet and have had no issues since overwinter got implemented. Any ideas on what the issue might be? I did notice the difficulty drop dramatically yesterday. So wondering if that had anything to do with my issue.
You should visit Votecoin explorer, pasting your txid of these transactions or your receiving address to check what's really happened. Let's check it first, then come back to ask if you can not find answers for your issues. I did visit the explorer and there is still a difference in the amount I have been paid and the amount in my wallet. It is possible that you have some inconsistency in wallet cache. In your wallet, go to Settings and click Cleanup button. It will reread all data from blockchain. Lets see if that fixes your issue. -Tom The reason why the pool is showing profit while the wallet isn't is because the pool likely hasn't applied the most recent update. Unfortunately, most pool owners aren't able to watch the ANN threads of all the coins on their pool. I would consider this update while major, very silently rolled out. I wasn't made aware of this update until someone reported the exact issue to me that you're reporting. This update has caused a fork that some pools are still mining on. With that being said, https://equipool.1ds.us is updated on all three stratums (North America, Europe and Asia) and blocks are being found again. You're welcome to join us! Yeah, after I realized what was going on, I switched over to your pool and hashing away. Thanks We're happy to have you! |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
