Hi All, Good news for who has invested in CMT(Cybermiles) that Billionaire Mark Cuban (3.7 billion $ in his hands) say that he will support CMT to be the first crypto accepted via his payment gateway. more details as bellow: “I’ve always tried to be two steps ahead,” Cuban added. “We’re going to be accepting [CyberMiles Token] for merchandise, we’ll be accepting [CMT] for tickets. Once we get [our] payment gateways all up and running, I think there will be a platform that we can take https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0YvZO8QmlELet me know your points of view.. My point of view is that he made this statement over 3 weeks ago. |
|
|
|
|
pointless pump piece from non-dev
|
|
|
|
|
Why a second ANN in two days?
|
|
|
|
|
I'm pretty high on this. Dev has shown amazing coding ability. Marketing is a little weak, but I hope community will help there. ROI will start out low because this currency is already 3 months old so supply is high, but hopefully that will avoid pump and dump scam of many MNs recently.
|
|
|
|
Can you explain a little more about relationship between VIC currency and the exchange?
The currency is needed to pay for listing on exchange, right? What happens when they pay you in VIC? Do you burn it? Sell it?
Are VIC holders entitled to receive any exchange fees?
I'm wondering what the value is of holding VIC. If VIC is used to pay for listings then burned, it will create upward buy pressure on VIC. But if VIC that is paid for listing is then sold by exchange owner back into BTC, it makes no difference to anyone whether the payment is in VIC or BTC.
Edit: the idea is that, if you want to be a truly different currency, and not just another random ETH coin trying to be a "usable" currency, there has to be a source of upward buying pressure creating value. Using exchange fees for buyback/burn of VIC is one way to create value. Using VIC to get listing is another example IF the VIC collected is burned. If the VIC collected is simply sold by the exchange, then there is no upward buy value (the VIC buy pressure from the coin trying to list on your exchange is cancelled out by the VIC sell pressure from the exchange owner just dumping those VIC back into the market).
the admins said that they will burn payment for the listing coin holders will be able to receive a percentage of the COMMISSION on Vic pairs/*** cool thx. how will commission be allocated and paid to holders? or is it buyback? |
|
|
|
|
Can you explain a little more about relationship between VIC currency and the exchange?
The currency is needed to pay for listing on exchange, right? What happens when they pay you in VIC? Do you burn it? Sell it?
Are VIC holders entitled to receive any exchange fees?
I'm wondering what the value is of holding VIC. If VIC is used to pay for listings then burned, it will create upward buy pressure on VIC. But if VIC that is paid for listing is then sold by exchange owner back into BTC, it makes no difference to anyone whether the payment is in VIC or BTC.
Edit: the idea is that, if you want to be a truly different currency, and not just another random ETH coin trying to be a "usable" currency, there has to be a source of upward buying pressure creating value. Using exchange fees for buyback/burn of VIC is one way to create value. Using VIC to get listing is another example IF the VIC collected is burned. If the VIC collected is simply sold by the exchange, then there is no upward buy value (the VIC buy pressure from the coin trying to list on your exchange is cancelled out by the VIC sell pressure from the exchange owner just dumping those VIC back into the market).
|
|
|
|
Hi All,
Besides SwanSeaHost accepting CHRC Token as one way clients can pay for services we now have 2 others confirmed:
Prologica Technologia and KCN (Koles Coin News). Now if those who are hell bent of selling low to gain nothing, and loose all the hard work mining that they did prior, we can get even more commercial avenues and more things happening for CHRC. If those in the community that actually support (not just typing you do), we can start growing the way that everyone who does support (bounties, social media mentions etc) believes we can.
Much more news to come. This is not the CHRC that always had issues, this is the CHRC going places. You may not like tokens, but how many got into a coin, started not liking it and dumped and than a few months or year later it came back to bite you in the butt.
It is only Monday, but more news to come next 2 weeks.
CHRC
Grats bro. I ain't sold any of my charna yet. |
|
|
|
Finally the signature campaign and airdrop holders btc will finish in a few hours! Will Semux be in some exchange in the next 14 days? Being that the role of Semux be distributed to the community will be partially completed! I'd like to buy some SEM, but the OTC is not reliable, at least I don't have confidence.
At least, in terms of signature campaign and airdrop distributions, devs of SEMUX have managed campaigns very weel, fairly and transparent. There are also some good news, products as shown in its website. I really hope that SEMUX will be listed on exchanges as soon as possible. Being listed on first exchange will change attitude of community about SEMUX a little bit  Yeah I'm not an OTC trader either, don't like having to deal with escrow. |
|
|
|
|
I don't see a way to deposit BCL on the bitshares exchange. Am I missing something?
|
|
|
|
My wallet can't sync any nodes plz?
There's a whole list of nodes at the bottom of the OP. |
|
|
|
|
Just curious, why are there 2 charna assets on Stellar? How do you decide whether to convert someone's old CHRC coin to one asset or the other asset? How will buyers know which charna asset they should be buying?
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah I'm not a big fan of the "early pyramid" structure. You see this with a lot of the recent MN coins too. Some whale drops 5 BTC to get an early MN, and then gets 4000% ROI while others scramble to mine enough to join some MN share, eventually buying the remainder from that early whale. Hope you can build toward something more sustainable.
|
|
|
|
|
reserved
Any bounty for explorer?
|
|
|
|
|
When are the compensation payments for the old chain being processed?
|
|
|
|
|
I appreciate the responses, thank you. It's a bit heavy on trusting total strangers, but I think that is up to everyone's appetite for risk. I'm sure you will find some investors. Good luck.
|
|
|
|
the picture is too large to read
on Phone or Computer? On computer its still too big. These are genuine questions, please don't take it as FUD: Are people just supposed to trust that you will run the MNs fairly? Like, you're going to buy a Lizus MN? Investors should trust that you will properly set up and run it? And fairly make payouts? This sounds very centralized, and it sounds like a lot of money to trust you with. Decentralization will require this to be sustainable even if you were to one day leave the project. Can that be achieved? What is the advantage of using your service over me spending my money to buy 5% of the collateral of each of those MNs (e.g. Lizus and Spark), and investing in well-established MN share groups? Those groups pool together masternode collateral and pay out shares to the individuals. So the investment return should be the same as your service, except 1) I am using a more established service, 2) I can control my investment better, and 3) I can pull out my investment whenever I want and 4) I am not contributing my money to inflate your dev fund. When you say 100% will be paid, 100% of what? You're going to pay Marco MN holders in Lizus? |
|
|
|
I've been using mine2gether which has been ok so far for a few days. Mine2gether pool worked fine for me too. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
