Bitcoin Forum
May 09, 2024, 02:19:10 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 71 »
161  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Betcoin.TM -> Owe me over 10.5BTC on: April 20, 2016, 04:27:09 PM
Will you please post the terms of the bonus.  I'm not sure how else to ask this.

I have spoken to betcoin.tm for a significant amount of time & he has always been supportive & helpful.However, the multi account thing has been raised a lot of times in the past as well and it is not allowed for more than one person in the same house to play with the same IP's as there is no one to come & check them.The same applies for referral bonuses etc...It's common sense.

If you do as you like then the casino has the right to do as they like.This is if OP truly has several accounts.

Violating T&C and gaining an unfair advantage are not the same thing.  Please post the terms of the bonus you claim was abused.

I think we're not communicating this properly:

When you create multiple accounts we do not allow ANY player to take advantage of bonuses.

When I say 'take advantage of bonus offers' I mean use and benefit from them - not the definition you are thinking of.

Does this make sense?

Yes,It does.

It would make sense if it were possible for a player to benefit from the bonus.  Which is what I'm trying to figure out.

You have a history with these casinos's and i dont.I wouldn't even come online for this but because i know this guy from months & he never seemed fishy.he is smart though.

user not violting the terms of the bonus is not the issue here but he has violated a general casino rule applicable for each & every game.You might be allowed to have 50 accounts but you certainly aren't allowed to abuse the bonuses/referrals with all of them.

Stunna banned the faucet farmers some months ago & he also neg-tagged eal for abusing his giveaways in the past.It is way too simple for one to understand but i know what you are doing here.

Good Luck to you but this is no way a scam accusation cause the OP has been refunded his deposited coins.

read more there..

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1283187.msg13495319#msg13495319
162  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Betcoin.TM -> Owe me over 10.5BTC on: April 20, 2016, 03:42:06 PM
I have spoken to betcoin.tm for a significant amount of time & he has always been supportive & helpful.However, the multi account thing has been raised a lot of times in the past as well and it is not allowed for more than one person in the same house to play with the same IP's as there is no one to come & check them.The same applies for referral bonuses etc...It's common sense.

If you do as you like then the casino has the right to do as they like.This is if OP truly has several accounts.

Violating T&C and gaining an unfair advantage are not the same thing.  Please post the terms of the bonus you claim was abused.

I think we're not communicating this properly:

When you create multiple accounts we do not allow ANY player to take advantage of bonuses.

When I say 'take advantage of bonus offers' I mean use and benefit from them - not the definition you are thinking of.

Does this make sense?

Yes,It does.
163  Other / Meta / Re: [Suggestion] Removal of signature display for negatively rated users on: April 16, 2016, 05:24:15 AM
Theymos told it a million times that the reason for DT to be this complicated is only for it to be decentralized as far as possible and that means you do not hold any extra Powers than any other forum user but the weight a persons feedback has is just for guidance,it is now a weapon sadly.And because i have no problems with different opinions, I don't need to care about that shill but you CD is pissed & butt-hurt by him because he doesn't gives a fuck to your rating.

Why should someone lose their rights just because of your childish opinions ? why should someone not have a signature just because of your power hunt mentality ? you are not above anyone and nor anyone is above you.The neg trust you leave is just a warning for inexperienced or noobs based on your opinions of course and there is nothing more that you could do to troll him more Tongue

Because trust is not moderated,someone can tag me for staying alive and i cannot participate in signatures anymore ? loll

Trust is not shown in  " Politics & Society " because people wont be risking money and there is nothing to be cautious of.No one has to give a fuck to other persons opinions.In "Off-Topic" I would like to discuss with a random guy but why should i know what you think of him ? simply annoying and irrelevant.
Anyways, i dont think theymos is going to do anything childish like this.Good Luck Whining.

A quote for you "A thread full of whining a day keeps the open-mindedness & wisdom away".
164  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: ~PayPal-Trader~ is a scammer. Do NOT deal with him. on: April 13, 2016, 09:53:39 AM
Scam attempt by a guy who sent me transaction without fees.
Anybody please rebroadcast the transaction in my wallet.
https://blockchain.info/address/1Dr8UwGBdC58GKpVjuL3x2pMm1rAXTKvKP

He do sent me PDF written by egg.chalk for scam , vouch by ocean Thomas and chemy.
I googled all and found them alt of miningbuddy.
Refer PDF.

Please rebroadcast the transaction.
https://blockchain.info/address/1Dr8UwGBdC58GKpVjuL3x2pMm1rAXTKvKP
post more ....he is staff here.
egg.chaks is not staff he is scammer.

here is sample pdf.

http://www.mediafire.com/download/jkyihiwhkx4p8lo/sample.pdf
now as transaction is confirMed with 1 confirmation , he failed to fuck me , thanks to shorena to rebroadcast txn , now i am not going to give back his PSG.

but u said u googled & found them to be alt of miningbuddy ?
165  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: ~PayPal-Trader~ is a scammer. Do NOT deal with him. on: April 13, 2016, 07:58:29 AM
Scam attempt by a guy who sent me transaction without fees.
Anybody please rebroadcast the transaction in my wallet.
https://blockchain.info/address/1Dr8UwGBdC58GKpVjuL3x2pMm1rAXTKvKP

He do sent me PDF written by egg.chalk for scam , vouch by ocean Thomas and chemy.
I googled all and found them alt of miningbuddy.
Refer PDF.

Please rebroadcast the transaction.
https://blockchain.info/address/1Dr8UwGBdC58GKpVjuL3x2pMm1rAXTKvKP
post more ....he is staff here.
166  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][PULSE] Pulse | Hybrid (PoS/PoW) | SHA256D | 183% APR [PulseProject.pw] on: April 10, 2016, 12:24:32 PM
We are pushing for PULSE on Poloniex, Bittrex and some china exchange.

stay tuned.
https://twitter.com/PulseCrypto
www.pulseproject.pw

13 million coin supply & only 500k on sell .POS with much bag holders from POW.

find a way to distribute the coins among the crowd.It is already pumped alot from 3 sats.
167  Economy / Reputation / Re: Known alts of anyone: User generated on: April 10, 2016, 07:40:00 AM
I Second.You are the Timelord

who can have this much Time  Undecided
168  Economy / Reputation / Re: Am I Quickseller? on: April 09, 2016, 10:37:37 AM
I know that this sounds like literally the dumbest question here, but I am asking this on the behalf of my friend cryptodevil, who seems convinced that I am Quickseller.
He told me the same thing  Roll Eyes that's how trolling works and particularly when people know they are wrong & are only speaking emotional, illogical garbage  Tongue

Quote
I know that cryptodevil is a very respected person but here I believe he is wrong.

Respect & Wrong/Right has no connection and are also not proportional either directly or indirectly.
169  Economy / Services / Re: FortuneJack.com NEW Campaign – Earn up to 0.2 BTC A Month!!! Weekly Payments. on: March 29, 2016, 06:19:53 PM
It is funny cause they send payments to the casino accounts & not addresses. Grin Grin Good luck/bye.
170  Economy / Reputation / Re: user "mixan" trying to sell trust on: March 29, 2016, 06:14:25 PM
But I am not worried as I believe in karma, and it is a bitch that will bite you in the ass when you least expect it.

OP is a scammer because he continued the conversation with you and confirmed that you are not on DT & then made this thread.You are a selfish person cause you offered such a thing.Karma is a shithole and wont get any of you.People will laugh and see you die crawling cause they don't give a shit to it & just need to pass their time.Learn to survive cause you are already born.

also with the recent doo drama i dont think the system has any value left over now.It's over.
171  Economy / Reputation / Re: user "mixan" trying to sell trust on: March 29, 2016, 04:50:01 PM
I'm not sure how to interpret sardasa's question "Are you on DT?" but since it ended with a "I would better get it by trading honestly" then I'm not going to worry too much about that.
Well, A genuine person would have straight away said a NO and have opened this thread.The question "are you on DT" is shady in itself and of course the jealousy of unsuccessful deal on top of it.Like i said ,giving and asking trust are way too different acts.

Quote
mixan lied by promising to increase OP's trust rating and tried to get $50 for something he couldn't possibly deliver, even if you ignore the whole "trust sale" issue.

No.Clearly he is not having knowledge of the system.I would have agreed to this if he falsely claimed to be on DT, which he didn't.And that is what makes shorena's rating a lie.

Now you say that I attempted to scam in the false feeback that you just left.
Wow just wow  Shocked
The system here is broken. Full of lies just to pump up your credibility with what ever agenda you have in mind.
This is just sad  Undecided

System is full of shit and everyone knows that but in a situation of yours i wouldn't start venting on users who barely leave me a Neutral rating.



And I am solely posting here because of this.
unless someone can provide a solid reason why this isn't worthy a neg.
172  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Dooglus is supporting ponzis on: March 29, 2016, 09:47:24 AM
He is an obvious alt account which is solely made to troll or distract people from the point.It is also not a co-incidence that he is under doo.

I bet if someone else would have done such a thing then people would have made that person red in a matter of seconds.
173  Economy / Reputation / Re: My list of ignored members on: March 29, 2016, 08:40:38 AM
TBH it's no-one's loss.

Depends on the specific thread: in case the OP is missing some vital information because he's ignoring 80% of the forum, i could argue that the OP is indeed missing out... He'll never know he's missing out, but i still think he's missing something. That being said: i do know what you mean, but it's all a matter of perspective Wink

also his list not updated or is years old & just copy paste from others cause my last sig was months ago but still my name is in the list.But the point is if you start excluding spam then you would end up ignoring 99.99% of the worlds population.Not everyone should be constructive & it is senseless to expect the same from one and all.

It's jut time in the end cause the same bullshit sig poster will repeat the drama (OP is doing) after some years when he is experienced or has gained knowledge/skills.Redsnow,xiala and else used to reserve spots on campaigns (a.k.a sig whores)but now they think of themselves as angels and criticize the campaigns etc...

you know how people are or how they change  Undecided Undecided
174  Economy / Reputation / Re: My list of ignored members on: March 29, 2016, 08:13:57 AM
Altough you'll never ever see my response (since i'm on your ignore list), i am going to write something on your thread...

I have no problem with your ignore list. It's a free forum, i'm living in a free country, and if you chose to ignore me, it's your loss not mine. However, i do think there is one fundamental problem with your logic: i think it creates an even bigger mess than it solves.

Let me elaborate: A while ago, somebody asked a very good question (don't remember which one, i'm to lazy to go trough my complete post history to find the exact thread). I took a long time to give him a good answer (at least, in my eyes it was a good answer). Within the next couple of posts, DannyHamilton gave the same reply, repeating almost everything i said (but in completely different wording).
I was supprised, since DannyHamilton is an upstanding member of the community. Why would he just repeat my answer in his own words, just a couple posts after mine? I looked trough his post history, and found out it wasn't the first time this had happened. Then it struck me: he simply ignored me because i was wearing a signature, so he didn't even read my answer, he just gave the same answer as me because he didn't read a single reply in the thread. He was advertising his ignore list right in his sig. In other words: he made a bigger mess of the threat than i would have been if he had just seen the fact that the question was already answered, eventough it was by somebody wearing a sig ad.

Face it: if you're ignoring 80-90% of the people on a forum, you're going to give answers that were already given, you're going to answer to threads that are basically cold, and people are going to attack you for ignoring them (nobody likes to be ignored). In fact, your posts might be littering the forum by repeating the same thing that was already said by a sig-wearer.

That being said: imagine that you love swimming. Every day you go the the swimming pool, and you swim for a full hour. One day, a guy comes over and says to you: you love swimming, you're going to swim anyways, but if you wear swimming trousers with my logo on it, i'm going to give you $5 for every hour you're advertising my company. Would you refuse to put the guys logo on your swimming trousers? I know i wouldn't... I'd take the $5 and continue swimming.
That's exactly what i'm doing on this forum: i love posting, and since bit-x is giving me a little bit of money for every post i make if they can use my (otherwise unused) sig space: why not??? I'm not going to remove my sig add just because somebody would un-ignore me if i did... It's their loss, not mine.

Sorry for the rant: as i said, you're free to ignore me, and i'm not attacking you because if it. I just wanted to share my view on this topic.


Nicely explained Smiley

Quote
I'm not going to remove my sig add just because somebody would un-ignore me if i did... It's their loss, not mine.


TBH it's no-one's loss.
175  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Dooglus is supporting ponzis on: March 29, 2016, 07:49:58 AM
why is doo going insane levels to tag people who make a post in the ponzi section?

I'm not. I didn't post much feedback at all recently.

You may be thinking of cryptodevil?
No,doo if you dont stop the person in your list and say you completely agree with him then you both are one appeal on this context but with different bodies or color's.

Doo(a developer) helping an operator fix his script and let his site profit =  an MBA(marketing) expert helping an operator fix his business and let his site profit.

Klye was running an honest Ponzi, but using a crappy script to do so. He couldn't figure out what was going wrong with it, so I took a look. I fixed the first bug I found with it, then realised how crappy the script was and recommended that he should stop using it.

It's not what you think doo.The rule should be the same for one & all.Either you change your insanity on Ponzi or resign from the position you hold as you contradicted your own believes and principles. Doesn't matters if that was your interest or what but your action supported a Ponzi.

Everyone should do their due diligence before investing anything in anything is my opinion.

I agree completely.
No you don't.You would have removed CD if you did.

Either that policy needs to change or it needs to be applied to everything related to ponzis with no exceptions to it. It is either ok, or it's not ok, there can't be any loopholes or 'overlooked' things.

Going back to QS, it most likely wont end for his part but any validity that he may have had with this thread would be gone if the github repo was just removed. He was full of shit while on DT and is still full of shit to this day.

Exactly.It's not bout the OP saying but doo supported a Ponzi.No loopholes  Wink
176  Economy / Reputation / Re: user "mixan" trying to sell trust on: March 29, 2016, 07:14:22 AM
unless someone can provide a solid reason why this isn't worthy a neg.

1) because he did not lie that he is on DT.If he isn't lying for his benefits then he is not a scammer.

2)

cause if the exchange goes smoothly then you get my trust feedback and that will automatically give you a green trust rating, and with all your current positive feedback that should give you a +3 which will in turn get you more people wanting to trade with you.

Let me know what you think if not then we can work something out that we both can agree upon.

That above statement show that he is not completely selling trust or is a shady person.

3) The OP is an obvious Butt-Hurt cause if he was so honest or nice person to make this thread then his next reply would have been -- "Oh no dude,you are selling trust which i think is shady and i shouldn't deal with shady people"-- but instead he was interested to get a positive if he is on DT or not (by asking it openly) & i am certainly sure that the transaction haven't gone through which is why the OP made this thread.

4)User asking for trust and user giving trust is not the same.The first one has the intent to scam & in this case it is the OP but the latter one shows the carelessness or thinking to benefit oneself/selfishness but not shady or scammy.

You have no idea how the trust system works, do you?
Your rating is a complete LIE.He openly said that he is not on DT,of course he himself is confused but that doesn't changes the fact that your rating is false & nor it gives you the right to put it as you want & particularly when there is evidence against it.
177  Economy / Reputation / Re: My list of ignored members on: March 29, 2016, 06:45:26 AM
I don't generalize or paint members
Yes you do by Displaying this thread and creating that OP.Not reading the spam is way too different than ignoring those users.

This thread shows the Grudge you hodl.Why not throw it away for sometime and hodl some bitcoins Cool Cool

I know you cant see this.
178  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: Dooglus is supporting ponzis on: March 28, 2016, 06:21:03 PM
This completes the first part of my series of the transgressions of Dooglus
Part 1: Dooglus supporting ponzis  


This looks more like some kind of personal attack to smear Dooglus's reputation, especially with the last part of your comment.  I understand your overall point, but I don't believe that Dooglus's intent was to A) be part of a ponzi or B) make a profit from it.  I think you're mistaken and you need to consider the weight of the argument you're making with respect to the justification of it all.  I think you've made your point, nuff said.
People posting in those sections might also not have those intentions but he tags them ? all such things fall under "helping the operator"

Though ,I don't have anything personal with doo but i will never support the "abusive behavior".

Doo(a developer) helping an operator fix his script and let his site profit =  an MBA(marketing) expert helping an operator fix his business and let his site profit.

But he and his list members will tag the latter one which is simple manipulation and abuse.although ,I dont think he should be negged for this etc..but that is the shitty logic of some DT trolls on here ,so i am saying considering that.Everyone should do their due diligence before investing anything in anything is my opinion.

This completes the first part of my series of the transgressions of Dooglus
Part 1: Dooglus supporting ponzis  


This looks more like some kind of personal attack to smear Dooglus's reputation, especially with the last part of your comment.  I understand your overall point, but I don't believe that Dooglus's intent was to A) be part of a ponzi or B) make a profit from it.  I think you're mistaken and you need to consider the weight of the argument you're making with respect to the justification of it all.  I think you've made your point, nuff said.

Of course it is a smear campaign gainst dooglus, Quickseller wants to be on DT again while Doog who's currently in DT has crossed out QS... If Quickseller is known for one thing it's his smear campaigns.
No matter who says it.Observe what is being said.
179  Economy / Reputation / Re: My list of ignored members on: March 28, 2016, 06:00:20 PM
who would want to put bitcointalk on ignore ?
180  Other / Meta / Re: Q: Should Lauda *really* be a moderator of bitcointalk A: no on: March 28, 2016, 09:08:19 AM
You must not understand the concept behind free speech
So, we are still stuck with the free speech ? Kid there is no free speech.A nine year old Muslim girl being raped to leave her native country in Bosnian war was free speech.More than Ten million Jews getting killed in The Holocaust was free speech.Killing the innocent citizens in Baghdad and raping their women was free speech.

Get the supporters,Get the weapons & then we will see who should stay and who should be gone.

Dang dude.. This is a troubling to see you go down this path of logic. To make a point its best to stay on the task at hand then venture off on emotional hijacking. I tend to enjoy reading your posts but this one is stretching it out.

Lauda is cool people in my books,its the other assholes! Wink
Im joking..
The on or off topic drama might be helpful while solving urgent problems but Critical thinking is very important while having a discussion.Something written on papers or books is not free speech.It just a paper where anything can be written and which is gazillion miles way from reality.

You don't tend to enjoy my posts cause you never pmed me when i wasn't posting for more than 3 weeks.Yes,you proved you are joking Cheesy

anyways ,what makes you think i am against laude ? in actuality i am in love with laude  Kiss Kiss but yes, i m always against the behvior's not the person.Someone said me that laude is saying retarded,fuck off  Angry etc... to people who are asking her help.I cant agree that is helpful but i m in love with laude anyways.  Cheesy Cheesy

A Reality Check is needed.   Sad
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 71 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!