I want to note that a very small amount of funds has been allocated to the bounty program of the project. Why was the distribution of funds on the project as follows?
I agree that, on average, the bounty program is allocated at least 15% of all the currency reserves. What is the reason for the decision to allocate only one percent? I think this decision is due to the fact that the project has a large number of tools available for distribution. In this regard, even 1 percent of the total currency is equated to a sufficient amount of funds for the bounty program As far as I know, this project has a standard currency, developers most likely want to attract investors in a different way I've heard that many projects close their bounty programs because they have low efficiency and conversion. Maybe this was the key decision for the project Very similar to the truth. As a result of the evaluation and analysis of the market for proposals for the advertising of the project, the project team decided to allocate funds, including within the bounty program Very similar to the truth. Perhaps there are people in the project team who are able to translate or create media content And now they pay more money for creating an information guide on various resources? Signatures and avatars can be equated to advertising signs, is not it? In this case, every information resource or social network is a continuation of the company's advertising window, and for this there must be a certain fee I believe that despite the low share of the total stock of funds allocated to the crypto currency market of the bounty program, program participants who deal with various social networks still should not receive less money This is far from exact! In the event that participants in poorly funded directions are recruited, then the salary is divided among them according to their achievements |
|
|
|
I want to note that a very small amount of funds has been allocated to the bounty program of the project. Why was the distribution of funds on the project as follows?
I agree that, on average, the bounty program is allocated at least 15% of all the currency reserves. What is the reason for the decision to allocate only one percent? I think this decision is due to the fact that the project has a large number of tools available for distribution. In this regard, even 1 percent of the total currency is equated to a sufficient amount of funds for the bounty program As far as I know, this project has a standard currency, developers most likely want to attract investors in a different way I've heard that many projects close their bounty programs because they have low efficiency and conversion. Maybe this was the key decision for the project Very similar to the truth. As a result of the evaluation and analysis of the market for proposals for the advertising of the project, the project team decided to allocate funds, including within the bounty program Very similar to the truth. Perhaps there are people in the project team who are able to translate or create media content I do not think that this is really so. In the description of the members of the development team there is no one who would be close to advertising or creating content. Especially as a rule for this work the developers do not have extra time |
|
|
|
I want to note that a very small amount of funds has been allocated to the bounty program of the project. Why was the distribution of funds on the project as follows?
I agree that, on average, the bounty program is allocated at least 15% of all the currency reserves. What is the reason for the decision to allocate only one percent? I think this decision is due to the fact that the project has a large number of tools available for distribution. In this regard, even 1 percent of the total currency is equated to a sufficient amount of funds for the bounty program As far as I know, this project has a standard currency, developers most likely want to attract investors in a different way I've heard that many projects close their bounty programs because they have low efficiency and conversion. Maybe this was the key decision for the project Very similar to the truth. As a result of the evaluation and analysis of the market for proposals for the advertising of the project, the project team decided to allocate funds, including within the bounty program |
|
|
|
I want to note that a very small amount of funds has been allocated to the bounty program of the project. Why was the distribution of funds on the project as follows?
I agree that, on average, the bounty program is allocated at least 15% of all the currency reserves. What is the reason for the decision to allocate only one percent? I think this decision is due to the fact that the project has a large number of tools available for distribution. In this regard, even 1 percent of the total currency is equated to a sufficient amount of funds for the bounty program |
|
|
|
The technical documentation provides information on coin holders. They have too many advantages over ordinary users of the project
Not at all! LocalCoinSwap is a democratic platform on which each participant has the right to vote, while each participant actually manages the policy of the platform! This is not true. The coining members of the project are whitelisted, get the right to vote and more opportunities to use the platform You are both right. developers claim that the platform is a model of democracy, but at the same time, democracy in the hands of patricians! All right. But nobody prevents buying coins and becoming patricians. Fortunately, it is not so expensive and difficult that everyone could not take advantage of this opportunity I agree. Is this the principle of democracy, which developers claim? If this is true, then this principle is far from democracy as a whole And where in general is written about the democratic nature of the project? you can quote these lines from white paper here on the forum? All those who wish to participate will vote in the proof-of-the-stake system of a voting asset, which can be used in a public and transparent democracy contract. The democracy contract is publically tallied Thank you so much. Well, indeed, after all, the developers took care that their project was the closest to the people and democratic as possible! No my friend! Unfortunately, there is no democracy in the form in which you read and wish. Unlike honest political struggle, this is the market |
|
|
|
The technical documentation provides information on coin holders. They have too many advantages over ordinary users of the project
Not at all! LocalCoinSwap is a democratic platform on which each participant has the right to vote, while each participant actually manages the policy of the platform! This is not true. The coining members of the project are whitelisted, get the right to vote and more opportunities to use the platform You are both right. developers claim that the platform is a model of democracy, but at the same time, democracy in the hands of patricians! All right. But nobody prevents buying coins and becoming patricians. Fortunately, it is not so expensive and difficult that everyone could not take advantage of this opportunity I agree. Is this the principle of democracy, which developers claim? If this is true, then this principle is far from democracy as a whole It is more like a large joint-stock company, in which the shareholder who has a controlling interest, that is, the most, manages. A great analogy! Indeed, this ICO is similar to a large stock exchange with shareholders. But there is no democracy in joint-stock companies, right? Where did she come from in the crypto-currency market? if these people had got the levers of management of the crypto-currency policy, then it would have collapsed |
|
|
|
The technical documentation provides information on coin holders. They have too many advantages over ordinary users of the project
Not at all! LocalCoinSwap is a democratic platform on which each participant has the right to vote, while each participant actually manages the policy of the platform! This is not true. The coining members of the project are whitelisted, get the right to vote and more opportunities to use the platform You are both right. developers claim that the platform is a model of democracy, but at the same time, democracy in the hands of patricians! All right. But nobody prevents buying coins and becoming patricians. Fortunately, it is not so expensive and difficult that everyone could not take advantage of this opportunity I agree. Is this the principle of democracy, which developers claim? If this is true, then this principle is far from democracy as a whole It is more like a large joint-stock company, in which the shareholder who has a controlling interest, that is, the most, manages. |
|
|
|
The technical documentation provides information on coin holders. They have too many advantages over ordinary users of the project
Not at all! LocalCoinSwap is a democratic platform on which each participant has the right to vote, while each participant actually manages the policy of the platform! This is not true. The coining members of the project are whitelisted, get the right to vote and more opportunities to use the platform You are both right. developers claim that the platform is a model of democracy, but at the same time, democracy in the hands of patricians! All right. But nobody prevents buying coins and becoming patricians. Fortunately, it is not so expensive and difficult that everyone could not take advantage of this opportunity |
|
|
|
The technical documentation provides information on coin holders. They have too many advantages over ordinary users of the project
Yes it's true, but what do you want? that the project was managed by all who wanted it? I agree with the developers in this solution! |
|
|
|
Is the role of electricity so great, as the project team and its developers tell us? I think they greatly exaggerate
No, the developers correctly and realistically considered the question of how the resources will be spent in the near future and concluded that electricity will be the leader Electricity is an important but far from the primary resource, it is impossible to challenge the decision of those people who chose this path of development of the project, but at the same time - electricity is not paramount without electricity, the production and extraction of other resources is impossible, after that it still can not be called its primary resource? If there were no such phenomena as water or fire, heat, compression and so on - there would not be those mechanisms that help produce electricity. Of course, electricity is a productive resource that does not occur in living nature, in its pure form, but still, in modern life, electricity plays a huge role That's it, does not occur in its pure form in living nature. Then what kind of primaryity are you talking about? Do you think that before the appearance of electricity a person could not get fire for example? Of course they could, but we now live in the 21st century, I tell you this for information. Now the production of lighters and matches takes place on a conveyor, which is automated and electrified At the same time, the project will not be able to provide electricity for production facilities, which means that the concept of production for this project is not applicable Well, but the electricity stored for the day can be accumulated and given to third parties for a certain amount of money, right? That's right! Approximately so the system also works. Watch the video on the main page, the battery is given for use to recharge another battery, or to power one house I saw these videos and read the full support of the site on the information. I still think that without electricity it is impossible to develop further to all mankind I agree that electricity today is a great force with which humanity is moving forward. I very much hope that in the future the whole life will be electrified anyway |
|
|
|
Is the role of electricity so great, as the project team and its developers tell us? I think they greatly exaggerate
Of course, the role of electrification in the modern world is colossal. Imagine a modern man without electricity? I'm not talking about completely removing all electricity from the modern world, just think how much electricity you really need for life? I'm not talking about how much I need now, I'm thinking about the future. It is not far off that time when we will fly on electric cars and provide ourselves a life filled with devices for electrification I do not think that this project will be very popular, since in order for serial cars with electric motors to really appear, If no one will do such projects, then electric cars will never appear in wide access. Now many companies are working at a loss, trying to build their prototypes of electric cars. So why not help them? The project is about selling electricity for electric cars. How many similar cars can now be found on the roads and is the project relevant? Not only for electric cars, but also for the electrification of houses, for example. Now many private companies sell electricity for residential sectors, with a very high premium In that case, where does the electricity come from? it is produced during the movement of electric buses? Well, electric cars in particular Now it is possible to equip the car with an advanced system with a powerful generator, as well as with the function of electricity recuperation. |
|
|
|
Is the role of electricity so great, as the project team and its developers tell us? I think they greatly exaggerate
Of course, the role of electrification in the modern world is colossal. Imagine a modern man without electricity? I'm not talking about completely removing all electricity from the modern world, just think how much electricity you really need for life? I'm not talking about how much I need now, I'm thinking about the future. It is not far off that time when we will fly on electric cars and provide ourselves a life filled with devices for electrification I do not think that this project will be very popular, since in order for serial cars with electric motors to really appear, If no one will do such projects, then electric cars will never appear in wide access. Now many companies are working at a loss, trying to build their prototypes of electric cars. So why not help them? The project is about selling electricity for electric cars. How many similar cars can now be found on the roads and is the project relevant? Not only for electric cars, but also for the electrification of houses, for example. Now many private companies sell electricity for residential sectors, with a very high premium |
|
|
|
Is the role of electricity so great, as the project team and its developers tell us? I think they greatly exaggerate
Of course, the role of electrification in the modern world is colossal. Imagine a modern man without electricity? I'm not talking about completely removing all electricity from the modern world, just think how much electricity you really need for life? I'm not talking about how much I need now, I'm thinking about the future. It is not far off that time when we will fly on electric cars and provide ourselves a life filled with devices for electrification I do not think that this project will be very popular, since in order for serial cars with electric motors to really appear, If no one will do such projects, then electric cars will never appear in wide access. Now many companies are working at a loss, trying to build their prototypes of electric cars. So why not help them? |
|
|
|
Is the role of electricity so great, as the project team and its developers tell us? I think they greatly exaggerate
Of course, the role of electrification in the modern world is colossal. Imagine a modern man without electricity? I'm not talking about completely removing all electricity from the modern world, just think how much electricity you really need for life? I'm not talking about how much I need now, I'm thinking about the future. It is not far off that time when we will fly on electric cars and provide ourselves a life filled with devices for electrification |
|
|
|
Is the role of electricity so great, as the project team and its developers tell us? I think they greatly exaggerate
Of course, the role of electrification in the modern world is colossal. Imagine a modern man without electricity? |
|
|
|
Without an application, it's much easier to organize protection and smooth operation, and what's there to say, the platform is ready to use, unlike some other platforms. Developers keep their records and notify the participants about new stages
This is not true, although the platform was originally conceived to transfer small amounts from the purse to the wallet. That's why the application would simplify the task |
|
|
|
Applications that write for the implementation of trading in the crypto currency market are generally poorly protected from hacker attacks and therefore are a vulnerable link in the transfer chain
This is not entirely true. Much depends on who writes this application. This can be either a good application with strong protection, or a bad one |
|
|
|
The developers did right when they updated the interface on the site, now it has become more convenient and beautiful, do you think?  I think that design is really not bad. But I think that for a project that raised $ 2.5 million - they do not have enough functionality What functional are you talking about? it seems to me that the organizers have included in the set of functions all the most necessary I think that it would not be bad to implement a mobile application, and it is desirable that it be cross-platform! This is too difficult for a project like locale coin svap, I think. In addition, why do you need a mobile application, if the platform works fine on the network? |
|
|
|
The developers did right when they updated the interface on the site, now it has become more convenient and beautiful, do you think? |
|
|
|
If he has an iPhone, then he has no reason to be afraid of something. It will not have viruses, which means that attackers can not perform brute force
At me just android, thanks for the offer. In this case, I will not store large sums in this purse, and transfer only easy money to it on transactions Install yourself applications for Windows and a good antivirus, and I think that you will not have problems. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
