 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1]
|
You made yourself the judge of me, according to you its cos I am a forum multi. No one else said that. according to my view of the forum Im hitting and over the post count.
But some posts the last 3 or 4 are not counting now I know because the forum time and date I see is not the one he is counting.
That's a mistake not nefarious?
Wtf is that link? I think I heard enough did you even read my post.
Goodbye
You can't say he is "your judge" while there have already been discussions about your abilities and your legitimacy to join a signature campaign few months ago here and in the META section. And it appears you mostly posted on the WO thread at that time. So it seems you've strangely changed your habits now if Timelord2067 is right. I posted on page 2 its irrelevant to getting picked
Trust me it not always about merit because posts also play a vital role and looking at your post history youre much of one liner poster which you also get merited for it. The merit system was implemented by the forum mod in other to force and increase post quality by this forum users which is the reason why some campaign managers also included it as one of the major requirements when selecting campaign participants. But merit misuse is so many these days especially in the Wall Observer BTC/USD (Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion) and some local thread where people would post absolutely nothing worth to be merited. Note : I understand that I'm not the first person to complain about merit been abused. But the question is, what are the forum mods doing about all this? If campaign managers are selecting participants based on merits alone then this is wrong and not much-reputed bitcoin signature campaign managers were doing this.
What actually brings out this subject was a user of this forum that applied for a campaign and expected to be selected due to the amount of merit he earned. I went through his posts, all i can see for almost more than a week duration post was one-liners messages. |
|
|
|
What is your solution to the "problem" then? Let's hear it.
This thread doesn't need to have half a dozen merit sources almost fully dedicated to it, that's not obvious for you? |
|
|
|
Signatures do not appear in the wall, so many campaign managers ignore “no-payment” for posts in that section, and most of the Merits that go to that section are people who like publishing (not forced paid posts.)
BS, in the other sections where signatures are hidden (like Serious Discussion, Ivory Tower, etc) shitposts are not merited like that. Over the forum many users don't wear signatures or paid signatures and fortunately, they don't receive merits just because they post for free, moreover many sections are excluded from campaigns and we don't see those merit abuses there. Secondly: I think that users are free to how them sMerits are distributed "especially those that they acquired" @theymos was not strict in exchanging Merits between alternative accounts, so unless there is any abuse from a Merit source, your grievance will not be valuable.
Wrong. Shitpost is prohibited by the rules, but you reward it in your Wall observing thread. |
|
|
|
No one's forgotten how fucking hilarious the Gl0bbster is, but thanks for the reminder.
Perhaps when you little twats grow up you'll be able to follow along.
Very hilarious for sure...  but what's more hilarious here, is your explanation  |
|
|
|
What actually brings out this subject was a user of this forum that applied for a campaign and expected to be selected due to the amount of merit he earned. I went through his posts, all i can see for almost more than a week duration post was one-liners messages.
I've looked at your posts and you're talking about this guy as I understand : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=244243Well you're right, he seems to only post one liners however he has earned as much as 150+ merits during the last 120days...  ... for one liners Of course 99% come from the Wall Observing thread For example he had received 2 merits for this post : Another hat I actually want irl. Its my steam picture too.
3 for this one Put the blockchain in a bag of rice on a radiator.
1 for this one Plus it will become your favourite subject matter and pop up in every list
Another one for this one Thanks Yoda
2 for this Fuck off
4 merits for Lambo SV
etc etc The rewards are going to the people who should get them.
It might not improve the quality of the hopeless. There's now enough merited posters for them to read and learn what does attract it. How do you explain the case above then? |
|
|
|
I think you have no idea about the WO culture. This is an unmoderated thread by forum officials. Yes we have info who take cares of unwanted posts and he is doing very well. Regarding merits in WO, once you will get to know with our culture then you will realize we are not just handing out merits for no reasons. There are reasons to send out merits and we understand humors very well. Do visit us sometimes to know aobut us more, it's hard to explain. By the way, I think this is a meta topic not for Bitcoin Discussions. If it doesn't belong to the main board why merits are allowed there then? The thread is so long that you can't retrieve any old post there, so it's fully irrelevant to merit any post overthere... except if you just want to exchange merits between friends... |
|
|
|
LOL the guy has already a reputation thread where he wants all people to post their complaints about him, but it's self moderated by himself! And guess what? He deleted my post there.... So it's just a fake reputation thread, just another scam from him... "Krogyan" what does it mean in this language by the way, it's a name? It's a first name or a last name? For the james.lent case I think it's a plagiarism, so he should be reported to moderators for plagiarism, no? There is also a thread on him in the scam accusations board for another scam and plagiarism case https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=202979.0 |
|
|
|
New scam and plagiarism accusations there : So, my other thread was moved to investigations due to a couple of pictures I posted: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5175731.0Let's stick to pure reputation here then. This foul-smelling, nasty looking, satoshi munching pacman (Legendster) has been around this forum for long enough and seems to be constantly getting embroiled in scammy shit, following which he writes pages of dribble to defend himself when caught, and finally has to resort to large fonts and bold letters to try and have the last word on any topic. Well, it all ends here. Please stay away from this character LEGENDSTER and any projects he promotes. Most are fraudulent.I give you a chronological history of India's biggest oldest bitcointalk shitposter / carpet muncher: 2013: Car Sales Scam: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=202979In 2013, Legendster claimed to be selling exotic cars from Porsches to Ferraris on the other side of the planet. Our delusional cryptocunt lives in a smelly part of India, yet was advertising cars for sale in America. As expected, he wasn't able to sell a windshield wiper, let alone a car, yet the forum had to suffer many many pages of nonsense in this regard. User legendster claims to be an exotic car broker representing an unnamed friend in the USA. 1. legendster makes a claim of having recently sold a car for $36,000 in an "offline sale" (the car is a 911 Porsche turbo with California (US) plates -- user lives in India). 2. legendster offers us a series of photos of exotic cars he is currently offering in this post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195234.msg2107280#msg21072803. legendster posted a photo of an Aston Martin with visible licence plate here: https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn1/560832_523780937656648_1588410876_n.jpg, making the match to images here: http://teamspeed.com/forums/automobiles/70436-2006-aston-martin-db9-volante-black-black-scottsdale-az.html irrefutable. The match proves photos presented by legendster are harvested from the web, having no other connection to legendster. While the scam is absurdly juvenile and obvious on its face, and the odds of legendster successfully scamming anyone are laughable, mere presence of such low-grade cons on the Marketing/goods forum casts a shadow on the legitamacy of Bitcointalk.org as a reasonable place to conduct commerce. User legendster has been accused of scamming by several users within just the thread i've linked to above. User legendster is a Hero Member. Though "Hero Member" does not actually denote trustworthiness, the wording unquestionably implies it to new users. It's time to give legendster a scammer tag. MODS: Even if you think it's a 13yr-old boy, and i'd say that's more likely than not, don't let these forums become a known hangout where 13yr-old boys can hone their scamming skilz. Without fearing anything, not even a scammer tag, when they're caught. Legendster decides he can get rich quick by owning a Bitcoin faucet. But his broke ass can't buy it outright so he comes up with a good scam to fund his purchase: Almost anyone that is not outright offering/willing to use escrow is almost certain to be 100% scamming, period. Even the most trusted members of the forum offer the use of a neutral third party escrow service when soliciting trades with others.
The faucet that you claim to want to buy is not worth 60 BTC, which is the amount you are requesting, it does not matter that the loan will fund at a lower amount, if enough lenders are stupid enough to lend you 60 BTC then that is how much you will receive.
The seller of the faucet was trying to get a scammy loan using his faucets as collateral. His faucets are not worth .1 BTC altogether, let alone whatever amount he was claiming they were worth. I am not even going to try to do the math to determine how many users would need to visit the faucets every day for it to potentially have that much revenue, however the numbers are just not realistic. It is a well known fact that running faucets are simply not profitable, especially not to that scale.
Asking for collateral upfront when lending funds is a trend that scammers try in order to steal from their potential borrowers. Anyone who has legit intentions of actually lending should have no problem with a trusted escrow holding collateral, and when other lenders neglect to include this option in their OP, I have never seen any lender having any issue with either myself or someone else making the statement that all collateral should be held by a trusted third party. The fact that this person has negative trust is an indication that collateral is likely to be stolen in the event it is sent directly to him.
For the record the OP has a self moderated thread and deleted my comment about the importance of all collateral being held by a third party, and the only reason why I did not give him negative trust for such deletion is that he quoted my post and agreed that he would not have an issue with having collateral being held by escrow (although he did make a snide comment that my suggest was the stupidest thing he has ever heard)
Additionally I have seen this person, on numerous occasions tell potential trading partners to modify their trust settings to have a trust depth set to "4" in order to get a "more accurate" reading of his trust. Having a trust depth of this much is not reliable and is very easily to manipulate, and this suggest is in itself scammy.
edit: I see that he has since deleted his post agreeing to have all collateral held by escrow 2016: Offering MultiMedia Services by fraudulently claiming others work as own https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1380870.0Offerred Multimedia services by showcasing his 'updated portfolio' which are actually random images grabbed from google and he slapped trademarks on them. Let me tell you how.
You TELL your client that you have years of experience under your bag, which - I admit- is a LIE, you show them a portfolio which has a LOT of work. Mostly that aren't yours. Because nobody wants to hire a noob.
But when you GET that job, you work! You work like there's no tomorrow and you MATCH that fake portfolio's quality.
That is how THAT 17 year old green rookie turned into THIS 24 year old "professional".
And guess what? That student portfolio with an awful content quality is now filled with work that pleases a LOT many people and why don't I share my portfolio online? because I don't want a rookie like I was, to find my portfolio and do what I have done.
Do I understand right that you try to explain its absolutely normal to deceive someone in order to get a job? You would also write in your CV that you worked for NASA and tell some fantasy story in a 1:1 job interview just because you think you would get that job? In your head you excuse that lie because you think you are the best astronaut in the world? Thanks for telling how things works - what the fuck is going on here? In case I misunderstood, im sorry, but if that shit there is supposed to be real, I believe you are still stuck at 17 in your head. Let me tell you "how" this will end up when you, one day, enter the real world. You pull that shit and something goes wrong, you end up with a fine for fraud, pretence and misrepresentation. Following your logic, why dont you call yourself Salvador Dali Jr. and claim you are some long lost son who actually painted some of the stuff his father was credited for, then you get the job and you MATCH that work. I do understand your logic (I think) but...that is so so so wrong, and people here shouldnt take this serious. The day one of your clients find out about the lying part, no matter how good you are, they can legally just tell you to fuck off with no pay and any court will confirm it. Everyone is prepping up his cv with some nonsense, everyone who speaks 3 sentences of french writes crap like "French Language: Advanced" etc, but this is an outright fraud. Its like, Sony and Pioneer are 2 companies and I want a Sony, you show me pictures of Pioneer with a Sony logo and tell me its 100% a Sony...but then you better make 1000% sure I dont notice you sold me a Pioneer. You just try to speed up your career by deceiving because you wasted 4 years in some shitty school and argue with some weird form of necessity. Dont really care about the topic and claims itself but this little explanation .....S U R R E A L ... An example of a post containing extremely valuable information not at all related to racking up post counts for any sig campaigns. ^ This dude is stupid. But he is consistently stupid. And I respect that. I wish he was consistently trying to better himself though.
2019: Promoting fraudulent projectsJustifying promoting fraudulent projects and taking no responsibility for the same. Advertising a business on your advertisement space does not imply that the owner of the advertisement space is in any way liable or condoning any shady shit the advertiser is engaging in.
Getting off topic here, but when you accept money in exchange for advertising for a business, you absolutely do bear some of the responsibility if that business is a scam. You're helping them scam people. Very basic logic here. I wouldnt have come in and commented if the issue wasnt already being raised here. And yes, I partly agree with you, which is why I think it is completely fine for Fortunejack sig campaign participants to show eagerness in busting or proving any scam accusations that is being made against the very entity that they have rented their signature spaces to. I don't see the problem here. Guys please ignore this imbecile Legendster, he obviously bears absolutely no responsibility for any project he promotes. Pls have a looksie here: EXHIBIT A: Bragging about misleading investors to the tune of $575m in an exit scam project, and feeling tickled by getting "a good feeling to be mentioned" in an article where the headline states A Wannabe Netflix Raised $575 million On Ethereum Then Ditched Crypto. Talk about a sane and grounded individual!  Yes, he feels good to be mentioned there since it's a prominent publication. He fails to see the context in which it was mentioned, hell, he probably failed to see the title of the article. When you offer a few sats to this greedy toad, all morals and ethics dissappear right quick!
That's fucked up.https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195234.msg2082258#msg2082258I'm not going to lie, fucking with you is a lot of fun. But thats not the [main] reason I do it, and I can vouch for everybody else you mentioned and say their case is probably the same. You say one thing, you contradict it with another. You have sketchy written ALL over you. You have scam on you almost as much. Its people like you who give bitcoins and bitcoiners a bad name. Please beware of any projects being promoted by Legendster as many turn out to be frauds or exit-scams.
To be updated...
|
|
|
|
Wow, really surprised about the move. Judging how the number of participants went up from 80 to 180 and then to over 300 probably by the time theymos look into it they were close to 500? Would be interesting to see how many posts they have made during these days and how much merit they've earned,I'm putting my bet on a 1:1000 ratio at best. I'm also wondering if the guys behind stake are getting the message  Because of the hostility of other members, maybe many bounty participants used an alt account for this campaign. In addition there had been a big debate about the campaign, and they participated to defend their views (which is not illegitimate IMO) so I don't think there had been 3500 useless or spammy posts. the yobit signature discussion came and stole the show
|
|
|
|
Could be looking good, at least on the short term. Look at the circle that I made every time we touched this line (RSI), with a beautiful red candle it's time again for a bullish move...? Hmmm not sure what I'll do right now, perhaps wait in case we have a new slow down to $6200.  The price is very stable indeed. I don't see any big move. |
|
|
|
Cryptos are not very well, we don't know what is it coming for them in the near future. So it's risky to do a job with them I think. IMO |
|
|
|
For now, cash much better than bitcoin taking into account the fact that one bitcoin transaction produces as much heat as one car in the city for 1 week.
one car for one week?  You have source to confirm that? If it's true proof of work must be banned by UN |
|
|
|
|
if you want.
