Why do you have 1,680,400,000 AMP but then someone says there was only like 200,000,000 AMP? Actually the OP says there should be 1 Billion.. but in fact there are 1,680,400,000
|
|
|
^ You should listen to this guy, he knows what he's talking about. If you know what I mean..
|
|
|
Any clue about future price, let's say 1-2 months?
4.5K - 5K satoshi..
|
|
|
0.6618684 - 0.00005248 (fee) - 0.1 = 0.56181592
|
|
|
Cloak team don't want to answer the questions about development progress. We see only bla-bla-bla updates like: Bla-bla-bla we are big family!!! Bla-bla-bla we have a bright future!!! Bla-bla-bla we work hard!!! Bla-bla-bla Donald Duck is our new main developer! Bla-bla-bla we concentrate on final wallet! Bla-bla-bla peace & love & HNY & Merry Christmas! Cloak team, if you are really worked - please show investors a results, reports, useful information updates etc. Now Cloak looks like bla-bla-bla shitcoin with incompetent dev team. I hope i'm wrong... Peace and love! Here ya go ! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VXPKWQHolk
|
|
|
Look at Ether, pumped without any visible reason.
But the 'pump' is not followed by the usual dump. Thats not a contrived pump. Thats a rotation of funds from BTC, because of people speculating that ETH now has a better chance of real-world adoption than BTC, while BTC's blocksize/scalability/consensus problems continue. ETH is being pumped by a few..
|
|
|
Radium is a very valid competition to other currencies that offer blockchain based services. I don't understand why the marketcap is so low, probably because it's only listed on C-Cex so far. From reading the Radium SmartChain thread, their blockchain utility includes username-address linkage, id verification, asset transfer, text notes, file hashes, and file verification. What did you expect when a project is being led by two anonymous devs?
|
|
|
so in order to rent out disk space, you need to invest 13/14 btc, ok.... on to the next one, cuz this is ridiculous man....
Actually 0.6btc at the current price, and 0.3btc a month ago.. but who counts, right ? goodbye
|
|
|
Sia, the only coin without a mining pool.
|
|
|
Have been sharing storage for over a month now, yet no reward whatsoever. Am I doing something wrong, because my disk space is getting used You have to have at least 10K SJCX coins in the wallet you're mining to in order to get rewards. For real!? I've read alot before starting, where could I have found this? hmm.. on the main website.. where is says "Early Access" ? - http://storj.io/earlyaccess.html
|
|
|
Entering shapeshift.io just popped an adblock notification saying it blocked a download from a site known to host malware..
|
|
|
Hello Factom community. Back during the factoid crowd sale, I heard about this tech and bought some factoid on a whim (good choice ). Now with the recent surge in price I have been researching Factom and I have some questions: 1. First I need to get something straight. As far as I can tell, Factom is not for storing data. Is this correct? It seems to me that one could store data in entries, but it would only be stored on the Factom full nodes and it would supposedly be expensive, and so rather than storing data, users are intended to store hashes of data. Please correct/validate/enlighten me. 1.1 I couldn't find in the whitepaper how much space 1 entry credit purchases. How much space does it purchase? I'm trying to figure out how realistic it is to store data. 2. If Factom does not store data, but more likely data hashes, how does Factom secure information? In one of Factom's YouTube videos a use case for Factom is described as preventing the Sony hack; however, I fail to see how Factom could prevent such a hack. Sony's data is still on their servers and if a hacker breached those servers he would still be able to acquire sensitive information and do with it as he pleases. 3. Another question about data. If I lose the data that I have secured with Factom, I, nor anyone else, can prove whether or not it existed. Correct? 4. Related to the last question. As far as I understand it, anyone can submit entries into a chain, correct? If so, data loss becomes an issue again. I watched another YouTube video where Paul Snow is speaking at a conference in Dubai I think. In this video he explains how Bank of America could have reviewed a Factom chain to insure all the records were present and correct. I don't understand how Factom can prove if all the records were there. If all the records were hashed into "Countrywide Mortgage Records" and after review there were hashes that were unaccounted for, how does Bank of America know if these unaccounted hashes are important records or just spam? 5. It seems that Factom becomes successful and widely used it will be storing impressive amounts of data. In a world where millions or billions of entries are being submitted every year I can't help but think that the amount of data a full node will have to store will simply be too much. This is especially true when one considers that Federated servers are not being rewarded for their storage; they are only being rewarded for further entry submissions. This means that as time passes the ratio of the amount of data being stored compared to the reward will get bigger and bigger. While normal data centers, say Amazon Cloud Services, receives constant compensation for the continued use of storage, Factom Federated Servers don't. Please help me better understand the economics of Factom and how this problem (if it even is a problem) will be overcome. 5.1 It also seems inevitable that data centers will be the only ones capable of being full nodes. Is this correct? intended? 6. How come the amount of Federated Servers and Audit Servers are fixed? It seems to me that the more there are, the better. So why not just have all full nodes be in the pool of possible Federated and Audit Servers and then split the group in two according to the mentioned voting system? 7. After reading the whitepaper, it is still unclear to me whether directory blocks are made after every one minute or after every 10 minutes. The whitepaper states they are made after every minute, but on examination of the protocol through the block explorer, I get the idea they are made every 10 minutes. Please elaborate. If answers to these question are posted somewhere else, forgive me. I couldn't find any. I also hope that this isn't overbearing, I just want to better understand how Factom works as I really hope it succeeds. Thank you for your time. EDIT: One more question 8. How is the decentralized Federated Server model better than a centralized company that does the same thing? Since everything is validated client side, Couldn't a central entity assemble hashes and stamp them into the blockchain? I hope you've read these - http://factom.org/faq
|
|
|
i'm mining at 80 MH/s (4 x 280x) and I earned 78 EXP in the last day, I did not recreate DAG though
With .15$/kw that means you are paying more for electricity.. The price of exp should be higher.. *just saying*
|
|
|
Thanks , knowing that they are safe now and will be safe in the future is enough for me at the moment , will there be an easier way of withdrawing somewhere in the future , i also do not want to loose any coins in that pretty complicated withdrawal process
You can deposit them directly to poloniex using your 12 word passphrase.
|
|
|
|