did someone contact the dev? I wonder if we even can get in touch with him...
supercoindev
Last Active: November 07, 2014, 06:09:17 AM
I don't have handles on twitter/facebook. supercointeam has them. Hope he will see this and provide you the related info.
I sent supercointeam a PM Hello with a link to the quote above, lets see what happens. . . he was logged in earlier today, so I am uncertain whether this thread was ignored or not.  This makes little sense. Supercointeam was active fairly consistently and then came October, where he has made 2 posts the entire month. Dev, if you could personally reach out to Supercointeam and prompt him to hand over the twitter handle or make a tweet himself, that would really help smooth along the process of moving forward... Before 11/07/14, Dev was last active on 10/29. Its not unusual for him to disappear for a couple of weeks at a time. Give it a few more days. FWIW, Supercointeam hasn't logged in since the above timestamp. |
|
|
|
lets see some numbers for coins donated to dev:
How many coins will you donate to a qualified dev if he/she steps up? As you post them I will keep a count. Might as well put it out there.
I have stated this before and I will say it again. I will donate super to qualified persons to review and verify the code if we can get a new dev team established and I know others were willing to do the same. I have no problem shelling out 20k super to support the cause. We need to act fast. We need buy support, we need an active dev team, we need marketing, and we need to come together as a community to support this coin, for better or worse...
I will donate 20k super too!!
I will donate 20k as well.
I would also donate toward hiring someone to create a complete installer for the wallet.
I will pledge 50k myself.
10k  Ticked - 50k Yurimir - 20k Fierce - 20k gnarl - 20k apojii - 10k Running Total: 120k BTC value at 200 sat: .240 BTC value at 2000 sat: 2.4 BTC value at 15000 sat (previous high): 18.04 All it will take for Super to surpass the previous ATH is capitalizing on the markets' desire for true ANON and setting up 1 or 2 beneficial partnerships. There is money to be made. |
|
|
|
super = no dev
correct?
Effectively; Yes. More precisely; there is a dev still attached to the coin and he is trying to step away.We are currently waiting/having a hard time searching for a new qualified dev to take over. I will give btc/super to a qualified dev to lead and maintain the coin So far I think we have at least 60-100K of super pledged. Also the wallet just needs the supercoinconfig file to be dropped into the appdata folder, it's an easy fix but you are right it needs to be complete for easy installation for new users ...
I really wish I new a qualified dev to take over, Is it possible to find another anon coin and merge with them? SUPER so far has not been disproved from the claim to be the only TRUE anon coin. And from experience I can tell you it is by far the fastest coin I've seen! Anyone have ideas?
Supercoin is still unbelievably fast, it certainly has that going for it. As for the pledges, I am willing to setup a publicly known wallet address for these pledges towards the future of Super. I will pledge 50k myself. I've made remakes to pledging for the future to Super on more than one occasion in the past. Now that there seems to be others feeling the same way, I feel it best to get this fund together to aid in our dev search. Unless the community feels that this fund should be in the hands of another, Ill set this up later this evening. (Pending I can sort out an issue I've been having with the wallet at the moment, heh.) |
|
|
|
|
Silk Road 2.0 has been seized. Hmm... I wonder if the use of multisignature addresses could have saved coins from forfeiture. . . There's a market waiting for us Dev, realize that although you have responsibilities, if Super is treated well, it will mean your retirement.
|
|
|
|
We are going to the moon and beyond. Buy this coin if you wanna be part of the next bitcoin  Real innovation Supercoin is legit Fuse. problem is I don't see it going to the moon or anywhere close with no dev team. It has the potential to be great but it's been suffocated and will likely die a slow and agonizing death. Market cap is so low now the coin has become completely irrelevant IMO With proof of claimed technology & a dedicated dev/promotions team, this coin still has a chance to rise, but in the mean time, Supercoin runs the risk of a competing true anon tech to catch on. |
|
|
|
|
Perhaps we should message devs with active coins in an attempt to bring them to the thread and take over?
|
|
|
|
Dev, do we find a new dev
Dev wants us to do the work to find a Dev. Post on all message boards, Talk in troll boxes, tweet, etc. Meanwhile, team is AWOL. We still need an official tweet. Patience is waning... |
|
|
|
|
+1
Just another vote of confidence for Kialara. I'm very pleased with the quality of my storage coin bar.
|
|
|
|
Dev, thanks for the appearance. In case you haven't read the pages back, I'll summarize. We're having a hard time getting the word out that we need a new developer. A tweet from the official handle will be the most visible method we have to convey this idea. From there, retweet and search on.
[snip]
I don't have handles on twitter/facebook. supercointeam has them. Hope he will see this and provide you the related info. I sent supercointeam a PM Hello with a link to the quote above, lets see what happens. . . he was logged in earlier today, so I am uncertain whether this thread was ignored or not. This makes little sense. Supercointeam was active fairly consistently and then came October, where he has made 2 posts the entire month. Dev, if you could personally reach out to Supercointeam and prompt him to hand over the twitter handle or make a tweet himself, that would really help smooth along the process of moving forward... |
|
|
|
If it is open sourced it can be copied and then we lose exclusivity.
This is exactly what I worried and that's why I did not release the code publicly. Reading the messages, I am disappointed. Several still ask if the code is real. Did you ever try the client? Do you think I would waste so much time writing whitepaper and for coding/testing? I am under no obligations to release the code. I tried to help the community but so far I don't even see a qualified dev coming up. In fact I don't see any dev said willing to take over. I got only one PM from a guy saying that he has a team including devs etc, but I get no details about these devs at all, and I get no impression that they will maintain supercoin (no plan, nothing). As I stated before, I will release the code only if there's a qualified dev willing to take over. What is "qualified"? well you need to know the coin code. We can chat 5 mins in a chatroom, it's very simple. Also I don't check the thread every day, I am very busy at work, so if I don't reply you immediately, please be patient. Dev, thanks for the appearance. In case you haven't read the pages back, I'll summarize. We're having a hard time getting the word out that we need a new developer. A tweet from the official handle will be the most visible method we have to convey this idea. From there, retweet and search on. I've requested that the person who PM'd you name these people & their accomplishments. Further, Although I have no coding expertise, I would love to talk to you in IRC to understand what it is you are looking for in a Dev and WHO if any are barred from consideration. Also, the way you state, "What is "qualified"? well you need to know the coin code. We can chat 5 mins in a chatroom, it's very simple." Does this mean that you will explain the coin code to the prospective dev, making them qualified once they understand what you are conveying? Meaning that finding any Dev may work? The reason for doubt among the community is because we believe that IF the technology works the way the white paper states (which I believe it does), then you have created a technology that there is a HUGE demand for in the market. This combined with the fact that you are willing to walk away from the project spells confusion among investors. It looks like a dev walking away from a guaranteed pay day. Whatever your reasons may be, it is your choice, so be it. We are individuals and make choices, but moving to another dev is difficult without visibility and requirements. -Ticked |
|
|
|
There is not any concrete proof that Supercoin is doing as stated in the whitepaper. Only with the source code being released to the world or the a trusted person or group to verify this we will have nothing to really brag about in the cryptocurrency world. I would love to brag if we had some tangible proof. Release the Source code by the end of the month like you said you were going to do Supercoindev please.
Fuze, After dev stated that, he then stated that he would release once the community had a worthy dev. As far as Im concerned the End of Month deadline is moot. Pestering this point over and over won't force it to happen. We need a bit more done before open sourcing the code. The risk of going straight open source is that another "dev" will create a copy cat coin. Why would they do that? The supply for super is only POS, by creating a new coin, the prospective copy cat "dev" stands to gain much more of the available amount for way less the cost, and then launch it on the marketing platform of truly anon tech. Super need be recognized as the original and gain some value of its own. THEN we open source, as when we have that market spotlight, copy cats will be known as such. As the market stands right now, a copy cat coin could easily bury super as our marketing presence and general presence in crypto is weak in comparison to many other teams with weaker tech. We can't flail for answers. We need a plan. |
|
|
|
If supercoin is the only true anon coin, and could easily be valued above darkcoin, do you think the dev team is ditching it because the code isn't legit? Are we really supposed to buy the "I'm too busy for this coin, even though it is legit" excuse. That is what concerns me...
That is the main problem, there is something fishy surely thats why developer trying to play game with innocent investor. Agreed entirely. We'd all love to have the tech verified one way or another. At the current point in time, it seems the best course of action to do this is to put together a new team and market/approach from there. Thing is, the way that the white paper is laid out is organized in a way that shows transfers happening in a way that other cryptos haven't yet mastered. If the code does as the paper presents, we do have a useful technology on our hands. If it doesnt do what the white paper says, lets hope new dev can make it so... |
|
|
|
Agree with a lot of the posts. At the very least change thread title to *Looking for developer*. Something to help the cause.
As with what BrookeFinancial said, my worth in Supercoin is very little now compared to my other holdings, I've learned a lot about the crypto scene, and how to 'play the game'. I still think there is great potential behind Supercoin, and I will check back often to see if new development has taken place. It's a shame, as a community there was great excitement before the release of Phase 2. I was hoping we'd all hit the crypto jackpot, and could celebrate our earnings.
I wonder though, should we create a thread in the main Alt-coin forum at least? I mean, there are plenty of new coins created, maybe a potential Dev would see this as opposed to creating a new coin. At this point is there anything to lose? I don't care about FUD, it's basically kicking a man while he's down at this point. I guess the main problem is having the Dev hand over code. But would we all be willing to trust a new Dev on the scene? Most already qualified devs have their own projects, so it may be a long waiting game..
Cheers all
I support this. I'd be willing to trust a dev with a previously proven track record. Not just any ol' shmoe. Though, when this eventually goes open source, trust will be less of an issue... ... so how are you planning to pay a dev with proven record? or you think they will come running to work for free? I'm not trying to be negative, just realistic. good luck!! Superdev said he would release the code quietly to the new dev, who would then have 1 week before the transfer is announced. During that week he could A)check make sure the code is legit B)once verified buy a ton of SUPER before anyone else knows whats happening. Makes it easily profitable and since the coin is already working properly, there isn't even any pressing work to be done. Review, buy, show your face, profit. Conversely, a renowned dev wants to release a new coin and own a lot of the total supply, they can't. If they do an unfair launch, no one trusts the coin and it tanks. If they try to buy during the initial selling phase, they'll blow their money on the inflated prices that come with a new coin. If they try to "go quiet" to lower the price for buying, it hurts their reputation, which hurts the coin. This is a unique opportunity actually. A known dev who wants to make some quick money, this is the place. There is also no risk. If they get the code and find out its a fake, they just walk away. +1000 Remi. On top of that, perhaps the community could make a fund for payment to the new Dev. Please weigh in if you are behind this idea... If the fund builds well, which shouldn't be too hard, it could make the job role more alluring. Right now, if the top 100 addresses donated 1% of their holdings, that'd net a little over 150k Super, placing the address in the top 30 on the Rich list. That's not an insignificant amount of super. The price of the coin is super cheap right now, new dev could easily stock up as well. At our previous high of 15880 sat, that bag is about 24btc. Pretty safe pay off for a competent dev as a more focused team would clearly take this coin to a new ATH. This market is primed for blast off, it just needs a little ignition. Though the coin is low, the dumps haven't been unreasonable. They've slowed now. Addresses holding a lot of coins do not appear to be liquidating, a good team could take this coin very far, I wish I had the expertise to do so frankly. That will not be enough for Supercoindev.  I have already offered him a full team of experienced Programmers, Designers and PR members with many years of Crypto experience. But he only accepts people who already have Coins released. That is upsetting to hear. I've sent messages to both dev & team with no response as well. It's frustrating for sure. A thought; perhaps could be to name these members and see if the community will get behind the prospective crew or not. That may make a difference. May not. But if they are what you say they are, they're worthwhile to look at. At the current situation what is the point to release the code? Release the code to other coins? release the code to imitators to create new coins with same exact features as supercoin? No thanks. I'd prefer supercoin be the only coin that does p2p anonymous transfers with multisig tech. The release of code makes only sense if there is a qualified dev willing to take over as the supercoin dev, as the original supercoin dev requested.
I agree with you. This is why I believe dev should send a tweet from the official handle as it has greatest impact & visibility as the community is having a hard time gaining traction in search. |
|
|
|
Agree with a lot of the posts. At the very least change thread title to *Looking for developer*. Something to help the cause.
As with what BrookeFinancial said, my worth in Supercoin is very little now compared to my other holdings, I've learned a lot about the crypto scene, and how to 'play the game'. I still think there is great potential behind Supercoin, and I will check back often to see if new development has taken place. It's a shame, as a community there was great excitement before the release of Phase 2. I was hoping we'd all hit the crypto jackpot, and could celebrate our earnings.
I wonder though, should we create a thread in the main Alt-coin forum at least? I mean, there are plenty of new coins created, maybe a potential Dev would see this as opposed to creating a new coin. At this point is there anything to lose? I don't care about FUD, it's basically kicking a man while he's down at this point. I guess the main problem is having the Dev hand over code. But would we all be willing to trust a new Dev on the scene? Most already qualified devs have their own projects, so it may be a long waiting game..
Cheers all
I support this. I'd be willing to trust a dev with a previously proven track record. Not just any ol' shmoe. Though, when this eventually goes open source, trust will be less of an issue... |
|
|
|
I agree! Supercointeam and SupercoinDev should be able to send at least one tweet every few days. It doesn't take much time to send a tweet. I send tweets while I am waiting for my food to finished heating up on the stove, while waiting on a line in a grocery store, during commercials while watching tv, waiting for my computer to load up when I turn it on, etc. Plenty of opportunities!
We don't need a tweet every few days. We aren't asking them to become fully active again. Dev left the future of the coin in the hands of the community by saying that we need to find a developer to continue the project. The fact of the matter is that the easiest way to complete such a task means taking advantage of the already established social media channels. Crypto is heavily twitter based, so it would be best to reach out from the official Supercoin handle, but we don't have access to that. The Dev/Team have been logging into their accounts, so, we can reasonably assume they are checking this thread. It'd be great if we could have a tweet spreading the owrd that we are looking for a dev to continue. THEN, we can all retweet this from our private accounts. It's really annoying to see, Supercoin thread is very inactive.
You guys still following Supercoin, there is no more hope left. Just move on guys and find better coin. Dev/team has been notoriously bad at communication. Nothing has changed, except their intentions. The last two times Dev made an appearance, there was an apparent need. We have that need again & FUD isn't going to help. We need our little twitter e-billboard to advertise our needs... |
|
|
|
It's really annoying to see, Supercoin thread is very inactive.
Dev/Team, this user is right. we need to prompt more activity in this thread. a great, simple way to do so would be to make a quick tweet from the Official supercoin twitter stating we are searching for a new Dev. Potentials out there still have no idea. The Supercoin official twitter has more followers who will care about such a post. Please, help us take another step forward here, you were both online today and have been checking into the thread daily. Please, hear this request: We need an official announcement from the official twitter.... |
|
|
|
Not bad, why not we tweet about developer, tweeter is best place to find developer Nobody has access to the coins twitter or Facebook Dev, although you are wishing to step away from Super, we need a little help with this aspect when you check the boards again.... |
|
|
|
ANONCOIN, STEALTHCOIN, CLOAKCOIN, SHADOWCOIN, ALL HAVING PROBLEMS
Practically all anon coins are suffering from problems. Developer delays, mass liquidations, dynamic price declines. These coins operate on inferior technology. Inferior to SUPERcoin.
WHY WOULD THE DEV GIVE UP ON SUPERCOIN? With all these other coins failing, the market is prime for an emerging anon coin. This community is holding a coin with massive potential, in a market that desperately needs to fill a void. But we cannot find a dev to take this over?
There is so much money to be made. Supercoin should be solidifying it's mark in altcoin history. The social media is completely inactive, the dev is inactive, and we, the community members, are left holding this proverbial bag.
This is sad. It is a shame the dev brought SUPER into the world and then took it out, killed it.
Super isn't dead yet. Although we've had our frustrations with the Dev, when he outlined the steps to Phase 2, they took place on schedule. A lot of BS has gone down since then, but the fact of the matter is, despite his flakiness and general absence, when Dev has made a statement about the future of the coin with a date, he's stuck to his word. That being said, Dev stated that he would open source the coin by month's end if there was a competent enough individual to take it over. This is difficult to find as Supercoindev has not stated who or what he believes that kind of person is, but it is not impossible. Dev's main complaint about the coin was that he didn't really have the time to develop for it any more. Well, Seeing as he stuck to previously laid plans; I, for one, would be happy if a new road map were released with Dev staying at lead, however; in this case I would also see it necessary to expand the management team to maintain a healthy level of visible activity. In this case, it would be reasonable for Dev to state goals deadline dates rather far apart as to be realistic and satisfy all portions of his life/time balance. Supercoin isn't dead. Its in a transition period. If this is handled well, the future for Super is bright. The market is begging for a next gen anon tech as you have laid out above. Don't say 'dead' yet, the potential upside to this coin is unreal. Strong stomachs, keep buying. |
|
|
|
|
If supercoin is looking for another Dev, there really should be a tweet from the official twitter stating so. Perhaps, also consider changing the header in the OP from "[ANN][SUPERCOIN] Unique Most Advanced Anonymous Trustless Multisig Technology" to maybe "[ANN][SUPERCOIN] TRULY Anonymous Trustless Multisig Coin Seeking New Dev." the only reason that we havent found someone yet is because the capable people don't know that the opportunity is available. . .
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
