2014-09-09.14:40:10: Set Initial Send Info.
2014-09-09.14:40:11: Service nodes confirmed available. Start transaction...
2014-09-09.14:40:11: Mixer accepted request.
2014-09-09.14:40:11: Set Mixer Address = SbLgRtaTnydxTgK9mrJESFEv1CRQR11YQn, PublicKey = 02496bc3e536942a6d8a5a17fa2075.
2014-09-09.14:40:12: Guarantor accepted request.
2014-09-09.14:40:12: Set Guarantor Address = SPJhHBmpVsXauranVfKdLXocbSAw3CGBm9, PublicKey = 0296f38b1e586b384bb038c15371ee.
2014-09-09.14:40:16: Received 2-of-3 Multisig Address. Address = CWY5aYpGZn3kCT1wwerqe42y9mfQ4KdBbf.
2014-09-09.14:40:16: Received Redeem Script = 522103e1988d8fab0713121f854b71...
2014-09-09.14:40:16: Deposited to Multisig address. TxID = 917bac88b89fe6468cb01e67ac85084b9435c8503993564b25d613b21aa28afe.
2014-09-09.14:40:17: Received deposit TxID from mixer. TxID = dd2ca954d127df13e2ba5d33e4fa16537f23515228ca6b02b917cadb263d8f6d.
2014-09-09.14:40:20: Received deposit TxID from guarantor. TxID = 3c40d00e09598dc8b42b7ba5bf1d861369d3b78dbf318fc07026b1ba67d2f170.
2014-09-09.14:40:38: Received multisig distribution transaction. TxID = 010000005cf50e5403fe8aa21ab213...
2014-09-09.14:40:38: Received TxIns information.
2014-09-09.14:40:40: Received Mixer send coin TxID. TxID = d2de8e9923387fa06616a94449fbfa70bc35f3ca51465d2720b69133535ac899.
2014-09-09.14:40:40: Received multisig distribution TxID after Mixer signed. TxID = 010000005cf50e5403fe8aa21ab213...
2014-09-09.14:40:46: Verify Mixer's sendcoin TxID. This is verification No.1.
2014-09-09.14:40:46: Unable to verify Mixer's sendcoin transaction... will try later.
2014-09-09.14:40:51: Verify Mixer's sendcoin TxID. This is verification No.2.
2014-09-09.14:40:51: Mixer's sendcoin transaction is verified.
2014-09-09.14:40:51: Sender successfully signed the multisig distribution transaction. TxID = 010000005cf50e5403fe8aa21ab213...
2014-09-09.14:40:51: Multisig distribution transaction is fully signed.
2014-09-09.14:40:52: Multisig distribution transaction is successfully posted to the network. TxID = 862ef718c995c411b0805fc403451bbd72565547f8dd2cb1f395357fc0fff692.
2014-09-09.14:40:52: Escrow's fund is refunded to each parties.
2014-09-09.14:40:52: Anonymous Send is successful.
It looks it is working...
Yes it's amazing. journey starts here at this time 2014-09-09.14:40:10 and ends 2014-09-09.14:40:52 (42 seconds) It's a living whitepaper each step you can see whats happening and compare with whitepaper schemes  At Phase 1 type, you were sending your coins directly into our mixer wallets and we were mixing and reaching the coin other parties. We were collecting the SuperSend fees and Now all SuperCoin app network collects these fees randomly as it should be. We practically lost income potentials there... But our network is stronger than all others in this way. see more... Supercoin app network is only network you can gain randomly some coins (SuperSend fees currently min. %1 and min 0.25 Super). It will hit those open SuperCoin QTs randomly. This is cool is not it? We expect in the long future there will be some companies or individuals only running many Supercoin app network nodes to gain these fees more effectively. This will start a chain reaction, more online nodes means much faster network and transfers. Moreover all these Supercoin app network nodes will have to hold minimum 500 SUPERs so we will have less coins left for trades... (Just imagine these companies reach 4000 active Supercoin app nodes network with min each 500 Supercoins makes over 20m SUPERcoins become out of the game) This is another secret & nice detail most of you unaware. And probably that company will collect most of SuperSend fees min %1 of each SuperSend transactions. So he can keep the nodes online. It will be like minting competition within the network. I hope you all now more aware of the differences of SuperCoin App node network and others. You can not run the command above in other networks or expect to play mixer role and get some easy coins. Also we are the only network has PoS SuperBlocks that i am aware of. We understand. Rather than self fellate your accomplishments and distract readers with illusions of grandeur, why not let a third party verify and be amazed? I do hope you are right with your above projection, but we'd be a lot more likely to get there if the technology was verified. ....What else are we, the masses, unaware of? Hmm? The answer is either frightening or will help Super gain public traction. Your constant misdirection is alarming, not to mention consistently ignoring posts critiquing your actions. I've made my money with Super. It can crash. I lose nothing. I still hold a lot of super. I'd like to see more gains. So I critique. Dev/team, your posts are not inducing faith. Listen to your community. Please. |
|
|
|
Price is not going up, because we need to bring confidence here.
And investors too.
And methodes of achieving that are common and well known...
We could write it down, if necessary.
Its already been written out, but Dev/team is more concerned with useless "keep pushing" posts in this thread. As if that's supposed to bring more people here... SupercoinTeam, we don't need john to put funds together to advertise more, we need you to face your critics and do something out of the ordinary for your cryptic self. Transparency sells Dev. You've been pushing your 'tech' this whole time, rightfully so, but if you really stand behind it, give others a factual reason to as well.... Also, if we (Supercoin) are to progress we can't sit back idly and assume everything is already good enough. Nothing will happen, and we will float around 2000 sat for as long as we already have been. If everyone is happy with that, then by all means lets sit back and continue to watch.
Supercoin will NOT "fly to the moon" simply by posts in this thread saying "moon time" "ready for liftoff" "keep pushing" etc etc. I've made posts like these early in the posting history. But I've realized it doesn't accomplish anything at all. What does it willingness of developers to GO OUT OF THEIR COMFORT ZONE. Start considering what community members have been asking. Consider doing a POD (proof of dev)!, consider letting a professional audit the code! Considering hiring a professional marketing guy! Why? because these are what will actually help Supercoin get off the ground, let alone to the moon. The only way it will not help supercoin is if developers are shady, and the code is fake. If it is real and they are real, then what is the hold up? Not doing it, is basically as bad a failing right now.
Sadly the problem is other coins (newer then supercoin) are utilizing new fads (POD etc) and they are surpassing supercoin while we sit back on the launchpad.
POD - as others say, would be a real asset, it is IN right now and what many people want.
Code audit - also would create major value. Everyone will remember supercoin as the FIRST coin with anonymous trust-less multisig transactions. THAT ADDS TREMENDOUS VALUE, look at bitcoin.
As it stands in simple terms:
Trustless Anon + bad marketing + sitting idling as other coins develop past = 2000sat
Trustless + POD + better marketing making use of POD = Higher
Trustless + Code audit = Even higher
Trustless + POD + Code Audit + marketing = TO THE ACTUAL MOON.
Edit: and I'm basically reiterating what other members are saying. As I agree, we need to continue moving forward and catering to what the cryptoworld wants.
|
|
|
|
Supercoin - world 1st true peer-to-peer decentralized trustless anonymous wallet using multisig technologies!
It means before Supercoin there were no trust-less real anonymous system in any altcoin.
The coin still has some serious issues that won't simply go away because you've chosen to ignore them. Cryptsy wallets are still Offline and coins can't be withdrawn. I haven't tried depositing to Cryptsy, but I've no intentions of doing so until the issues are resolved. Instead, I've dumped my remaining coin on Cryptsy. I've had several attempts at transferring coins to a second wallet using Supersend without any success. With a minimum of Three nodes available the sending icon turns brown for a while and then nothing. The coins remain in my sending wallet. I've mentioned Forging issues previously and received no reply. Forging works successfully, but each day the number of transactions doubles and the amount of stake halves for each transaction. The total amount of reward remains steady, but the fragmentation will surely lead to more blockchain issues if it continues indefinitely. I agree with others who've said that the Supersend feature needs independent verification to assure users that it is indeed Trustless and Anonymous. In the meanwhile it's essential that All Exchanges are functioning correctly if you want Investors to trust this coin. Why was my comment earlier about getting a review of SuperSend Trustless taken down? Anyways, you are correct. The sooner the developers of SuperCoin fix the wallet issues, the sooner we can get a REAL review of the SuperSend Trustless. Seriously the only reason why people aren't investing in this coin is because the developer is spewing broken english and just spam posting "SUPERCOIN WORLDS FIRST ANON COIN" which is NOT TRUE. If you are the developer, stop spamming nonsense it makes people think that you're trying to hide something. Here is my comment from earlier that was erased by the forum moderator of SUPERCOINTEAM ___________________________________________________________________________ you guys should 1000% (one thousand) make sure SuperCoin SuperSend trustless is working, then get Dan Metcalf from XC to review it. every other coin that has done this has enjoyed rapid growth so long as their anonymous protocol solution actually delivers. People just do not know about supercoin seriously. just secure the wallet release; then get Dan Metcalf to review the code, when he publishes it supercoin will get huge volume. +1 This. All of this. Dev, I'm a long time Super investor and believer, but what he says above is accurate. Occasionally someone like me is shaken by your actions or lack thereof. I've mentioned the English issues before. Take the above suggestion to heart. please. We all want Super to succeed, but half-assed marketing will never get us there. |
|
|
|
@Richie i want you to understand, we as dev team are not trying to lose you. I told this also at irc chat. After your first post, i posted my answer and came to IRC in less than 2 hours I speak about myself i am not the all dev team but decisions taken like fork or extra coin minting together as team. I said you what i can do like putting in front of others more ads and future business. This is not a way of saying go away. We still hold bittex in OP and want to keep so. So i wait from you the decision please do your best to handle, i am not an exchange manager. and certainly you are a good one. So you do your job and allow me i do mine. thx. for post and hope you give our community some good news So, if I read this right, you're rejecting the proposals already on the table, and waiting for the exchanges to propose something that you find acceptable. In the meanwhile investors are facing the prospect of being left heavily out of pocket with a coin operating on Two (or more) forks. If this isn't resolved very soon the coin will be Dead and the matter will be academic. No other exchanges will trust a coin in terminal decline with developers and exchanges fighting over who's to blame. It's not just the job of the exchanges to monitor the health of the coin. The developers have a responsibility to monitor it's progress and ensure that it is working without issues. Other coins have weathered similar storms through Hard Work, Hard Forks, Cooperation and Compromise. Pleas make it happen while there's still some goodwill left in the community. The fact that this post leads off with "So, if I read this right...." furthers the point that the largest trouble here is communication and understanding. Dev, if you are working for the good of the coin, team, & community, you will be more fluid with your ideas for conflict resolution. Working through this whilst opposing exchanges will breed contempt and distrust from the investors. Working through this cooperatively with exchanges will show solidarity and build trust amongst investors. Your counter proposal of 'I said you what i can do like putting in front of others more ads and future business.' speaks in terms of potential future payouts. Your asking the exchange to take on more potential risk for one of many possible outcomes. In short, you're demanding respect from the exchange that isn't yet entirely deserved. There has to be a more neutral solution. Why cant we just roll back trades & blockchain to before the fork and restart from there? [I'm not technical, so if this is absurd, excuse me.] |
|
|
|
This situation is becoming a problem.
Both sides need to come to an agreement soon. And also supercointeam, exchanges are a must. In business you need to often set aside differences for the good of making money. A coin without exchanges like bittrex, mintpal, cryptsy, is like a car without an engine, it won't go anywhere. Please do not say we are simply going to dump these exchanges and move on. That would be a terrible business move for supercoin. Everyone must settle their differences an be on the same page so we can all move on.
Exchanges should update their wallets so we can move coins that are just sitting there. Its quite hypocritical of bittrex to say "dev provided no plan for aiding those impacted in recovering lost funds" when the main reason we have lost funds is because exchanges aren't updating their wallets and many of us have coins at exchanges or in transit waiting to arrive to or from exchanges once a wallet is updated. Where is bittrex plan in aiding lost funds? A simple update would be a good plan.
Also where is mintpal? They haven't even disabled trading or supercoin transactions. Not every holder is able to check this thread daily, mintpal should be aware enough to not let people withdraw thousands of Super on an old chain, pretty irresponsible.
Can some third party translate me from english to english?
I am non-native english speaker , so there is slight chance i didn't understand well...
Exchanges had terms like this: Today 100 coins, tomorrow 200 coins, the day after tomorrow 400 coins... 100% daily is that?
It is no different that a usual wallet staking... Super has %100 yearly PoS rewards for the first year then it will drop to %50 and the following years %1. In your previous post you claimed that Exchanges have a DAILY 100% pos scheme. Now you are saying that they're no different to Investors, who have a YEARLY 100%pos scheme. Which is it? You are not helping the situation with this confusion. It will be better for all concerned if this is cleared up immediately. +1 and +1 This is my point exactly. Piss poor communication breeds piss poor confidence, breeds confusion, and dissolves coins. Dev, Team, we know your mother tongue is not English. PLEASE work with someone for PR who can competently communicate with all parties. If your business sense was as well thought out as your tech, we'd be much more likely to have serious trading volumes. It happened once - it can happen again, but not when you put up walls with anyone who doesn't see it exactly your way. Successful business is work & compromise, not defensive aggression. |
|
|
|
All,
After evaluating the situation, we will most likely not take the new fork of the coin and allow everyone to withdraw on the old fork. We are waiting to hear from the other exchanges on their position.
We are basing our decision on the following:
* dev failed to notify any exchanges of an update
* the official block explorer was not updated leaving everyone in the dark
* dev provided no plan for aiding those impacted in recovering lost funds
As mentioned earlier, we are waiting to hear from the other exchanges to see where they are at.
Best solution here though is that the dev team make all the exchanges whole for this situation
Thanks
richie@bittrex
Supercointeam, You can't keep saying that the exchanges haven't responded. This post, in this thread, is a response. As of yet, I dont see a response from super to work out this difference. Drawing a line and saying, 'well, guess we go to new exchanges' is beyond unwise. There must be a cohesive plan for all exchanges & holder wallets. Going to a new exchange will only further damage the reputation of Super. Pulling it from the leading alt exchanges will not look favorably in the eyes of potential investors. Dev, you have been able to meet deadlines, produce well, and innovate technology, but your general manner of communication frightens me. Suck up the ego, come up with a plan that doesn't leave anyone high and dry. YES, your tech is solid, but the coin can't afford another public blow to its ecosystem. BTER and BTC38 have less combined volume than bittrex, Mintpal, & cryptsy. Make the choice for your coin & community, not for your stubborn nature. Sorry if this is harsh, but its how I see it. This is not FUD. I am a heavy handed holder of Super & believe in the technology/community, however, your PR needs serious work. |
|
|
|
|
+1 more for the snake and scorpion wine. the $50 bottle please. Too WTF to not own.
|
|
|
|
|
Is there somewhere one can see more of your work?
|
|
|
|
A new thread on Reddit has started regarding trustless online transactions using BTC. I think the Super model is superior to any idea being thrown around in this thread. Frankly, I'm not articulate or well-informed enough on the subject to pitch/explain/defend SuperSend in a mass forum, but I definitely think someone who is should be making an appearance here: http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/2e6d9m/trustless_online_transactions_with_multisignature/Just a thought. Dev, keep up the good work. There was a point in time when you were absent from the BCT Super thread, since you've been more active, FUD has absolutely decreased. To the future! |
|
|
|
|
Prices & US shipping quote? I'd be interested in a few packs.
|
|
|
|
I deposited 1.5btc in this transaction: 17999f5d3db03170e9330f1f8dfb2c5aef600a148cc6ab10a1bd116ade69e7fc
The money was transferred out of my wallet in this tx: 4cc148ef0add4c1c06e6cc99220d7ca368c40c855ffa851991a6d360b53cd0f0
I did not initiate this transfer. I am currently waiting for BTC owed to me. Where's my money? I see no other issue of this nature listed in this thread.
First of all, your deposit address is not your wallet. No user on coinmarket.io has a wallet with fixed addresses where funds stay. Its not how exchanges work. Users have deposit addresses and balances in a database, thats it. The default bitcoin daemon automatically selects inputs for any outgoing transaction, from all avalible unspent outputs. Any coins you deposit are free to be used for withdrawing coins by other users, at all times. So, the fact that the coins moved after you deposited them means absolutely nothing. Now to your issue, its not relavant to what you tried to explain. Its a different and rare bug that you experienced, sorry. We have added 1.499 BTC to your coinmarket.io balance.Thank you for the explanation and solving the problem. Good luck with the remaining issues. |
|
|
|
|
8 Days. Deposit still never showed up in wallet on your site. Never confirmed. Doesnt appear anywhere on coinmarket.io deposit history.
This is the wallet listed on your site: 1DnLR9KGmRCMtzLV7g1DFa7o7pvGeoKCUB
I deposited 1.5btc in this transaction: 17999f5d3db03170e9330f1f8dfb2c5aef600a148cc6ab10a1bd116ade69e7fc
The money was transferred out of my wallet in this tx: 4cc148ef0add4c1c06e6cc99220d7ca368c40c855ffa851991a6d360b53cd0f0
I did not initiate this transfer. I am currently waiting for BTC owed to me. Where's my money? I see no other issue of this nature listed in this thread.
How can you go adding new coins when you haven't sorted out all of the on-going problems?
Please address.
|
|
|
|
Credited all stuck deposits that we found. Anyone else has stuck deposits?
We would like some people to test BTC withdrawals (using small amounts).
Do they appear on blockchain.info right away (in 10 seconds)?
Yes I do have stuck deposits... This transaction: 17999f5d3db03170e9330f1f8dfb2c5aef600a148cc6ab10a1bd116ade69e7fc to this Wallet: 1DnLR9KGmRCMtzLV7g1DFa7o7pvGeoKCUB Never credited, though the funds appear to have been transferred out of the wallet address. I sent a PM prior to funds being transferred out, but didn't receive a response. Please advise. What's going on? It's been days now.
Its perfectly normal for the funds to move after you deposited them - its up to the bitcoin software to decide which inputs will be spent next. Your 0.07 BTC seems to be credited a while ago. This isn't quite right. This is my wallet address on your site: https://blockchain.info/address/1DnLR9KGmRCMtzLV7g1DFa7o7pvGeoKCUB That 1.5 does not appear in my wallet, never showed as pending, and is not listed in my deposits/withdrawals - though it clearly went somewhere.... Not intending to push an individual issue, I understand that there is widespread problems at the moment, but you haven't responded to my quote above, nor have any of your responses addressed deposit issues. My transaction occurred before the malleability issue was widespread. Please address. |
|
|
|
This transaction: 17999f5d3db03170e9330f1f8dfb2c5aef600a148cc6ab10a1bd116ade69e7fc to this Wallet: 1DnLR9KGmRCMtzLV7g1DFa7o7pvGeoKCUB Never credited, though the funds appear to have been transferred out of the wallet address. I sent a PM prior to funds being transferred out, but didn't receive a response. Please advise. What's going on? It's been days now.
Its perfectly normal for the funds to move after you deposited them - its up to the bitcoin software to decide which inputs will be spent next. Your 0.07 BTC seems to be credited a while ago. This isn't quite right. This is my wallet address on your site: https://blockchain.info/address/1DnLR9KGmRCMtzLV7g1DFa7o7pvGeoKCUB That 1.5 does not appear in my wallet, never showed as pending, and is not listed in my deposits/withdrawals - though it clearly went somewhere.... Not intending to push an individual issue, I understand that there is widespread problems at the moment, but you haven't responded to my quote above, nor have any of your responses addressed deposit issues. My transaction occurred before the malleability issue was widespread. Please address. |
|
|
|
This transaction: 17999f5d3db03170e9330f1f8dfb2c5aef600a148cc6ab10a1bd116ade69e7fc to this Wallet: 1DnLR9KGmRCMtzLV7g1DFa7o7pvGeoKCUB Never credited, though the funds appear to have been transferred out of the wallet address. I sent a PM prior to funds being transferred out, but didn't receive a response. Please advise. What's going on? It's been days now.
Its perfectly normal for the funds to move after you deposited them - its up to the bitcoin software to decide which inputs will be spent next. Your 0.07 BTC seems to be credited a while ago. This isn't quite right. This is my wallet address on your site: https://blockchain.info/address/1DnLR9KGmRCMtzLV7g1DFa7o7pvGeoKCUB That 1.5 does not appear in my wallet, never showed as pending, and is not listed in my deposits/withdrawals - though it clearly went somewhere.... |
|
|
|
|
This transaction: 17999f5d3db03170e9330f1f8dfb2c5aef600a148cc6ab10a1bd116ade69e7fc to this Wallet: 1DnLR9KGmRCMtzLV7g1DFa7o7pvGeoKCUB Never credited, though the funds appear to have been transferred out of the wallet address. I sent a PM prior to funds being transferred out, but didn't receive a response. Please advise. What's going on? It's been days now.
|
|
|
|
|
WTB: 6000 UTC for 1 BTC. PM me with offers
|
|
|
|
|
The website reads '1 item in stock' for each listing. Is this correct or could you accommodate larger orders?
|
|
|
|
|
Interested in details. please PM. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
