I logged in today as I always do to check what's new in the bit coin world to find I have negative trust. Funny since I'm a very trustworthy person. Negative trust is there for scammers and theives. It now says "trade with caution" my negative trust is for not reading. So apparently not reading means you can't be trusted or you a scammer. Perhaps I'm not the one that can't read but rather the person giving negative trust should learn to read.

One post and one mistake is all it took. My hero account I've worked on very hard is now worthless and pointless and I have a nasty red mark next to my name. I've never stolen in my entire life but ya ok now I have an untrusted red thing by my name.

People steal from others. Campaign managers sometimes steal and they receive nothing so what I learn is that being a thief is ok but spamming or not reading is not.

One post I was not concentrating with and wrote something silly. I want to see who never makes any mistakes? They act like all I do is spam when I actually try make good quality posts for my campaign manager who I've been with almost an entire year.

No problems about me just one post one random person didn't like and now years if working getting this account ranked up is gone.

I'm now done with this forum. There are not very nice people here and I really needed that money. I know noone cares and I'm expecting Boone to care because that's the impression this forum has given me. No respect and no kindness at all. It's a good place and I don't recommend this forum to people honestly don't.

Someone just needs to not like you and boom job and account gone.

My manager who I have worked with for a year didn't even speak to me so like I say there is no respect. You can try and you can try and you can help people and be a good member then have your account destroyed in seconds.

So I'm done. If you want me gone then good job I'm done. Thing that makes me the saddest is these people don't care that I'm actually a person behind this account and I'm a good person. I help people all the time. I have got people involved in the forum with irl people but I'll no longer be doing so because this is how the appreciation is shown. It makes me really sad that someone doesn't even think that perhaps this person really needs this money. Just bullies.

Good luck to you all and stay away from d2 members they will nail you for whatever reason they feel because someone decided giving them that power was appropriate. One person can mess your career up here.  


They we're talking about rain in a casino and I was silly and make a mistake like I sometimes do because I am a human. So I thought they mentioned the currency rain.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1895018.0

Rain the currency had come out 2 months before I had posted the post that got me red trust. I was an investor in rain so when I was rain I thought of the currency. I don't understand why I must get red trust for making a mistake.

Here is the silly post I made one day when I was not concentrating properly and made a mistake:
https://archive.is/VtFbG#selection-5025.0-5029.100

It was a post made in June. I'm confused I don't know why I must get red trust for that post? Surely someone can pm me and ask what's up? They can make sure I'm not a spammer then? I find it insulting being called a spammer.

If they haven`t accept your apologize, try to accept the fact that you have a negative trust. If you dont really want to have a negative trust in your profile i think you should create a new account and try to start fresh and take your experience in having a negative trust as a lesson.

I recently reply at the topic about merits points, and no one clear to me if there is still a chance for me: "the post is quoted below"

I just want to make it possible to get any attention that might give me some words for this kind of matter

So let me get this right,
after you sent several PMs to the user, and didn't get an answer, you decided to follow them around the forum, spamming your questions in threads they post in?
And at no point did you realize that your actions were only going to make things worse?

Patience is a virtue.

What did the avatar say?

Also, your post is a bit confusing.  You seem to realize you did something wrong because you turned another member in.  So why the complaint?

Only hilariousandco can remove it.

If you bothered me with multiple PMs, I wouldn't respond to you either.

I understand what you guys mean, and it is good to hear from you that you did not mean anything bad, but I still think it would be good to quote the original posts, and I do not think just quoting our two posts makes your post difficult to read.
In particular after introduction of Merit system people (maybe including me) are sensitive.
In any case this discussion itself may be wasting the board, I do not claim more but hope you get my point.
* To avoid a long quote I replaced some part by ~.

I don't see you have bad purposes but it's the rules of the forum. You want to help others but you also put you at risk. I don't think it's a smart choice. Admin or moderators might not consider about your situation. They might simply ban your account permanently.

Right, I am sorry to see this kind of plagiarism due to the Merit system.
wwzsocki, you should edit your post appropriately to quote ilpipita's post as well as my post below.

I jest w tym dużo racji, bo nabijanie postów gdzie był tekst" no tak fajnie super lub, dzieki za wiadomosc itp" było połową tego forum, może teraz bedzie to troche ograniczone i umiarkowane pod względem treści a nie tlyko ilości.

I checked your post history and your an altcoin person. I’m not handling that. There’s a guy in that section that is awarding merit for altcoin supporters.

The thread is here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2833111.msg29044855#msg29044855

You are quite the class act (I was the person, who received the 10 merits from TheQuin)!
I´m also happy that we all agree that a forum particularly benefits from discussing conflicting viewpoints.

Instead of spending the 5 new sMerit that I now have due to your generosity for various good
posts, I´d like to dedicate them to the same purpose.

If anyone of you fulfills the following three requirements, I´ll give 5 merit to one of your constructive posts:
1. You were close to ranking up before the introduction of the merit system (1-2 activity periods away from a new rank)
2. You are an asset to the community that makes good and constructive posts regularly
3. You don´t exclusively post in the Altcoin subforums and care about Bitcoin

Does anyone actually believe that the merit system will "improve the quality of posts"? You guys think that a bunch of people (not to mention certain national groups, but it will happen in that way, for sure) won't start to give each other merits for posts like "good sir, when airdrop"? I don't believe that the system was designed for the improving of the overall quality in the first place: it was designed for the slowdown of the forum activity. Quality will more or less remain the same, it's obvious. But what worries me is the existence of these "Gods of Merits" who can show their merit mercy upon their lobby champs, and rage upon the sinners. Was that really necessary? Couldn't that be done in some other way, without showing the muscles? Would someone from the management explain us why that title was introduced, maybe I've missed a philosophical idea that exists in the background of that act (which I won't call the act of absolutist power, although the resemblance is stunning)? Do you think that the act is in line with the very essence of the decentralized Bitcoin nature and everything else that blockchain technology represents, comparing to the banks, states, companies and other bs creations? Will any of these Gods give me 150 merits, so I can move to the next rank? I don't believe so. Will they deny merits to Satoshi because they don't know that it was Him who has written a "low quality" post? Will they give him merits if they learn that it was He who has written the "good sir, when airdrop" thing? Do we really need to associate personalities with the addresses/nicks and to introduce such a state-like central power to Bitcoin and communities that surround it? If management was concerned about the quality of posts, I think a lot simpler and more repressive system of, for example, some negative merits or something similar could be introduced. So, please, don't talk about "quality of posts" anymore 'cause it hurts intelligence. Hail to the Gods ('cause they give merits)! And cheers to everyone else ('cause they make the Bitcoin and the existence of Gods possible)!

This thread has been posted not even 3 days ago.
In these 3 days, "22,265 merit has been sent in total."
I would say that refutes your point, wouldnt you agree?

You are missing a point by misunderstanding one of very fundamental characteristics of merit. You cannot send your merits to anyone, the ones you can send is sMerits (sendable merits). You won't lose your merits by sending sMerits to others. Please donate 1 merit if my thread is contributive and useful (at least for you)

THIS is how I feel as well.

Do you guys really believe that all people who deserve to be merited will be merited?

A like system will be better. Only higher rank people will be able to like posts, will be easy to filter out multi accounts and spammers.

You see, this right here is why we need a 'Like' button..
Folks like me, with limited sMerits will be less likely to give them to someone of higher rank, even for a quality post.

(gave you my last)

I can confirm it, the minting of POStokens still works. I always check the gas price on ethgasstation.info and set the gas limit to 250000 before I mint the tokens, so far no problems.

When I try to send some tokens to Etherdelta I am getting an error message: there is exception added to contract or something similar.

Is this token closed for trade on ED? Please explain to avoid burning ETH for gas.