Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »
|
inputs.io looks like a total scam.
I've made several withdrawals from inputs.io to my offline wallet (and deposits from there, too). No problems what-so-ever.
|
|
|
Hello all i've created an inputs.io faucet Cuz i have only inputs.io faucet script Without time limit So you can claim infinitly http://www.lotusfaucet.uni.me/Enjoy ^__^. Thank you. page not available
|
|
|
If the goal is a simple way to regain anonymity, why are there counter-proposals to make regaining it more complex? Just curious.
I'm not sure what you're referring to, but in general I think a lot of people have not thought the fungibility implications through, and are also confusing privacy and anonymity because they are intimately related, especially where pseudoynmity is used to achieve privacy. Anonymity is fundamentally hard, and consider anonymity improvements a side effect of good privacy. If you want to go around telling someone which transactions are yours, you still can. And, an interesting point of that is that it's not at all incompatible with what is proposed here. Even if you're happy telling a particular set of people all about your transactions, that doesn't imply you also want the whole world to know. I'll accept that, but the counter-proposals/additions to your initial proposal do nothing to keep the complexity for the user down. As an end user who is looking for ease of use and decent privacy, some of the other schemes here, unless done transparently, are just too much to keep up with.
|
|
|
If the goal is a simple way to regain anonymity, why are there counter-proposals to make regaining it more complex? Just curious.
|
|
|
In order to further incentivize work in this space I'd like to create a multisignature escrow bounty fund.
Theymos has agreed to be a cosigner with me and I'm currently looking for a third party. (Unfortunately, many of the people I'd normally ask would like to be potential bounty recipients, and I'd rather reduce the possible conflict of interest)
The bounty fund would pay out of this fund as funds are available according to the signers best judgment for completed work proposed in this thread that furthers the goal of making improved transaction privacy a practical reality for Bitcoin users.
I'll update this post when I have it ready.
I'd like to help out with this if possible. I have little BTC to put into such a bounty fund, nor am I a programmer. Let me know what I can do to help.
|
|
|
Dropbox has this feature that lets you vote on their website for changes you want to see happen. Accepting bitcoin is about to make the all time most popular request page and already has 29,000 50,000 upvotes. Its worth mentioning that the other most popular request took 4 years to get there where as bitcoin has done it in less than a week (thanks reddit) Do you think it's likely dropbox adopts it (as theyve done to many popular request)? and if so, what do you think the effect on bitcoin price and economy will be? https://www.dropbox.com/votebox/6425/buy-storage-with-bitcoin-e-currencyEDIT: now 51,000 EDIT: now 100,000 Add three of my votes (the other 3 went to native FreeBSD support)
|
|
|
Thanks, I'm looking forward to it as well! Competition is good in any market. (:
|
|
|
The difference between abstinence education and "regular" sex ed should be that in abstinence education the CHILDREN are encouraged to wait until marriage.
Do people still do that? Wait until marriage? I thought that went out last century. Maybe we should bring back chastity belts and such. I guess we should throw out monogamy and sterilize everyone (therefore ending the abortion debate, too), huh? Just because you don't like abstinence or think waiting to have sex until marriage is old fashioned doesn't mean they are. There's nothing wrong with fisting if you think your fist was designed to fit into whatever orifice you are trying to shove it. However, since human sexual organs were made to compliment each other (and not random objects and body parts) there is quite a bit wrong with it.
Not the "X wasn't supposed to do that and so therefore it's wrong" argument. I suppose you think there's something wrong with homosexuality too? Do you own a bible? Well, it's a valid argument. The penis was meant to penetrate the vagina for both pleasure and reproduction in the manner in which it was created. Well yes, there is. Aside from the moral turpitude it demonstrates, forcing the penis into the anus sets up both people for health concerns. Any harmful bacteria that may be fomenting in the anus before or after excretion gets attached to the penis and passed on to the next partner and the individual whose penis is involved, it can cause a dangerous tearing of the lining of the anus (which is only cells-thick) which would allow the introduction of those bacteria into the bloodstream of the person whose anus is being penetrated. What about it is 'good' or even 'decent'? Is it moral to possibly infect a future partner with some disease just for a moment of pleasure? I think not. I own several, as a matter of fact. Have you even paid attention, though, to my sidebar info or my sig? I imagine not given the question (whether or not rhetorical).
|
|
|
The difference between abstinence education and "regular" sex ed should be that in abstinence education the CHILDREN are encouraged to wait until marriage. Teaching how the reproductive system works, though, could and should wait until a biology class or the parents teach the children.
There's nothing wrong with fisting if you think your fist was designed to fit into whatever orifice you are trying to shove it. However, since human sexual organs were made to compliment each other (and not random objects and body parts) there is quite a bit wrong with it.
If parents want to teach their kids anything at all, that is up to the parents. The government has no business teaching kids these things, especially without the consent of the parents. If you as a parent want to teach your kids to be perverts, that's your business.
|
|
|
This is the Alternate cryptocurrencies sub-forum, what's the issue?
|
|
|
Who said anything about not teaching them about sex? Abstinence education is more than "just don't have sex." If that is all you are teaching, then its no wonder it's failed. On the flip side of that, though, fisting has no place and is the real perversion. I'm not sure how anyone sees monogamy as being perverse, but whatever. Continue to drink the kool-aid and all will be well.
|
|
|
Better to teach how to do it properly, before the kids start biting and shoving fists into places and causing lacerations and tears.
Better to teach them abstinence and model monogamy instead. Such perverse sexual practices have no place being taught in schools to children.
|
|
|
You realize you are skewing your results by posting to a forum dedicated to Bitcoin, right?
If you'd really like good numbers on the subject, hire Gallup or Harris Poll.
|
|
|
If I had it, I would. I don't even have 1BTC at the moment. *is a poor bitcoiner*
|
|
|
I used to be of a mind that the Bilderburgs, CFR, or TLC (none of which I thought actually existed, I thought they were the fictional organizations from a conspiracy theorist's rantings) had no interest in such affairs, but why do you think even at the local level things seem to head in whatever direction they wish? They may not take direct action but they sure do set the stage for it.
|
|
|
I wouldn't mind having some more seeds for my garden, especially easy-to-care for items. Thanks!
|
|
|
I just read this article. I find it very encouraging and am happy to see more and more exchanges for physical (and edible) goods for cryptocurrency. For me, this is a sign of increased legitimacy and value that doesn't strictly depend on 'real world' fiat currency exchange rates.
|
|
|
Wwhat do you mean how does it get passed the rating system?
|
|
|
I don't have enough to send. ):
|
|
|
|