Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 11:10:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 »
21  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: mcxNOW Fee shares : Cryptocurrency daily earnings on: February 14, 2014, 02:13:39 AM
I doubt Doge will be added this week.  They're not done taxing Max believers yet.
22  Economy / Securities / Re: [petahash] Biggest private mining operation looking to go partially public on: February 09, 2014, 12:57:20 AM
I don't understand why you guys thought i was going straight for an IPO, i titled the post accordingly "looking to go partially public", specifically meaning that this is just a test for interest.

Re-read the article linked by MPOE-PR about starting a business.  Say you had read it six months ago and took the advice to hold and just watch the forums for six months.  In that time you would have seen countless posts just like yours.  100% of them are scams.  A few of those scams created contracts and got listed on Havelock so they could scam you "legally."

Quote
This is by no means a "fly by night" operation, i am here to build a viable business and a profitable company for both investor's and personal gains.

The contract you'll likely end up with will resemble some manner of Perpetual Mining Bond.  (One of those contractual scams designed from start to finish to ensure no investor makes money).  

I was watching the forum during the past rough months and lost money on some of these scams. This venture begs to differ, for example it will have a real datacenter stuffed with mining hardware shortly and all investors interested will be free to visit whenever they want, amongst the other things. We will demonstrate with facts that this is a genuine opportunity.

From what I've read so far I doubt very much you will prove to be the exception.

Good luck.
23  Economy / Securities / Re: [petahash] Biggest private mining operation looking to go partially public on: February 08, 2014, 10:36:08 PM
I don't understand why you guys thought i was going straight for an IPO, i titled the post accordingly "looking to go partially public", specifically meaning that this is just a test for interest.

Re-read the article linked by MPOE-PR about starting a business.  Say you had read it six months ago and took the advice to hold and just watch the forums for six months.  In that time you would have seen countless posts just like yours.  100% of them are scams.  A few of those scams created contracts and got listed on Havelock so they could scam you "legally."

Quote
This is by no means a "fly by night" operation, i am here to build a viable business and a profitable company for both investor's and personal gains.

The contract you'll likely end up with will resemble some manner of Perpetual Mining Bond.  (One of those contractual scams designed from start to finish to ensure no investor makes money). 
24  Economy / Securities / Re: [Mpex.co] The Scientology of Bitcoin Finance? on: February 05, 2014, 03:23:30 PM
I forgot scamming retards takes skill. A skill ron l popescu has mastered.
sigh, still nothing new
just more hate for popescu
get trolled by haiku
25  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated] on: February 04, 2014, 02:21:55 PM
Minerpart: Ken's main responsibility is to his shareholders. Period. The investment you speak of is an extension of this responsibility, but not all encompassing of it. I think that (*regardless of the reasoning behind why*, because I do think Ken's in the right to sell Ukyo's shares) the act of using the market to retrieve company credit while withholding trading from shareholders is just straight up unethical. As shareholders, we have shares on an open market for a reason - to express our confidence in the company. This is just a big "fuck you" to shareholders from Ken.

Basically, I think it's a moot point to argue what's in our best interest when we lack the ability to express our opinions in a meaningful way: by trading our shares on an open market.


Ken: Why. The. Fuck. Do. We. Not. Have. Our. Shares.

The only possible answer is readily obvious to those willing to face it.  Set aside the distraction of Ken stealing Ukyo's shares, it's useless information.  Look at the price that he's selling for.  Look at the volume of buys.  Look at Ken's pile of nothing to show for the thousands of BTC you've given him.
26  Economy / Securities / Re: [HAVELOCK] Mintspare (MS) Bitcoin Electronic Trade-in Service - Official Thread on: February 04, 2014, 09:26:44 AM
Your crypto isn't going to work for you if you invest in pretty much anything Havelock offers.  They've designed it to make sure that won't happen.

I had you on ignore not too long ago, but I'm going to venture out on a limb here and entertain you.

Explain how Havelock is designed to fail.

I didn't say havelock was designed to fail.  I'm saying their offerings are generally designed to ensure that no investor will see a return.  The only people capable of winning here are The Panama Fund S.A. and asset issuers. 
27  Economy / Securities / Re: [HAVELOCK] Mintspare (MS) Bitcoin Electronic Trade-in Service - Official Thread on: February 03, 2014, 08:52:48 PM
All good, I appreciate it and I know others do too - there's a bunch of scams out there. I like Havelock listed companies because they have a decent vet process it seems like. That doesn't mean it's even close to fail proof, but I feel comfortable enough to diversify some of my btc holdings and make some of my crypto work for me....at least I feel like I have a better chance than playing satoshi dice lol. It's all a gamble at the end of the day. I have my reservations, but I like the fact I too have found myself wanting to sell my old iphone 5 after I got the note 3 and I listed it on coingig and bitmit for btc and it was a shitty experience. I like knowing I can sell it immediately in a non-auction/instant offer process now...I think that has value. Whether or not he can execute is a whole other story and is going to be debatable until failure or success.

Your crypto isn't going to work for you if you invest in pretty much anything Havelock offers.  They've designed it to make sure that won't happen.
28  Economy / Securities / Re: [Direct] RentalStarter - A Midwest Real Estate Investment Company on: February 03, 2014, 05:31:13 PM
We're supposed to go live on Havelock today as per my last conversation with those in authority at HL.

Congratulations.
29  Economy / Securities / Re: [Mpex.co] The Scientology of Bitcoin Finance? on: February 03, 2014, 04:29:25 PM
so much luls for you
cult of L. Ron Popescu,
Jimmothy confused







30  Bitcoin / Legal / Re: labcoin lawsuit on: February 03, 2014, 03:43:00 PM
How far off are we? I said to the lawyer I would donate .4BTC if I could confirm that I was included in the complaint, but that was before I understood the nature of the case (ie not a class action - more preliminary than I thought). I am happy to send 0.2 though now.

Goal is 3.7.  We need approximately .3444954 to reach it.  https://blockchain.info/address/1PHDaiUMq5u3WTAwmYv7ioNnKfEGYXBtmT
31  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][RIC] Riecoin, new prime numbers POW coin, launches Feb 11, 2014 on: February 03, 2014, 03:36:37 PM
  • PoW: new idea, prime numbers, not Cunningham chains
Any technical details?
Details of how the PoW algorithm works will be released this week, but the source code will be provided at launch time.

What is the utility of hashing prime numbers?  Or are you searching for large primes (as opposed to cunningham chaims of Primecoin)?
32  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: February 02, 2014, 06:17:14 PM
Ken very rarely gives figures and information...

I would take that as a huge red flag as well.
33  Economy / Securities / Re: [SOLB-SOL] Sollar Bond World's First Crypto-Bond [PRE-SALE THREAD] on: January 31, 2014, 08:36:07 PM
  • Sollars and Sense is NOT "Anonymous", but instead a PRIVATE currency. A superior philosophy that achieves the same FREEDOM objective while appealing to a wider demographic of individuals.
  • Sollars is private, its distributed, and its privately distributed with no central points of failure BUT a central point of value and accountability (our company & community).

"Investors" in this will take a 100% loss.  

Quote
(4) Provide our Early Believers/Adopters/Investors a Chance to make a Fortune for a Great Cause

Are you doing this from the United States?

Federal law, and recent history (e-gold, e-bullion) aside, why would any Bitcoiner want to invest in your video game currency?  You're offer is WoW Gold, but worthless since you don't have a game to spend it in.
34  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Margin Trading Exchange Software on: January 31, 2014, 03:25:46 PM
Sounds promising so far. 

Following.
35  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: January 30, 2014, 03:35:03 AM
Entropy we know* that the price on Crypto-Trade is unreal. Like an actually unreal price point that we won't be seeing anytime soon, if at all. Trying to convince the main people who try to pump the price isn't really a good use of time or effort.

No one is going to buy a share for over .0005, and I will not be putting up bids (if any) till we go down to .00005 or .00007 as I think this is a reasonable place for me to get in more than I have. Now I know this is overvalued in your opinion but I am factoring in the chance that this company my succeed, and the spare BTC I have laying around due to the lack of other stuff to do with them.

You keep them.  How is that even a decision you need to think about?  Please.  I'm begging you, you've made me beg.  Keep them.
36  Economy / Securities / Re: [SOLB-SOL] Sollar Bond World's First Crypto-Bond [PRE-SALE THREAD] on: January 30, 2014, 03:09:46 AM
Hodor.

#HODOR COIN.

IPO.

GROUND FLOORR!!!!1112345


HODOR,
HODOR
37  Economy / Securities / Re: [HAVELOCK] Mintspare (MS) Bitcoin Electronic Trade-in Service - Official Thread on: January 29, 2014, 10:47:54 AM
Your concern in regards to our valuation is your rightful opinion, and I will not touch base on that.

You've been able to scam 127BTC by not talking about your valuation so why start now..

Quote
However I will note that 40% of Mintspare's profits will be directed to 20% of public shares until all shares have been paid out 0.005 BTC each.

I suspect that you bloody well know repayment, let alone profit, can't happen (at least not for "investors").  Or if you have projected it to happen your ROI for investors timeframe extends beyond the projected lifetime of this "business."

Quote
Our prospectus was created over a long drawn out process that took many months of thoughtful consideration.



Quote
...we hope that the community can understand us making a single mistake...

I have but one keyboard, I must lawl.
38  Economy / Securities / Re: [HAVELOCK] Mintspare (MS) Bitcoin Electronic Trade-in Service - Official Thread on: January 29, 2014, 10:11:57 AM
Mintspare are you taking a salary?  Are you paying yourself, or anyone (partners, silent partners, pre-ipo investors, employees etc..) in Bitcoin?
39  Economy / Securities / Re: [Mpex.co] The biggest scam in bitcoin history? on: January 28, 2014, 12:54:56 AM

Explain to me why the fee to keep people out was only 200 usd a year ago?

For the same reason the amount Mircea pays MPOE-PR is the same amount today as last year: the value of the service is still worth x amount of BTC.

The forum needs people to give them a large dose of: "you're doing it wrong, don't be an idiot, you're going to lose all your money."  Invaluable advice for those that pay attention (and don't want to lose all their BTC).

40  Economy / Securities / Re: [Mpex.co] The biggest scam in bitcoin history? on: January 27, 2014, 11:39:22 AM
It has been repeated several times by PR that the cost of entry is there to specifically keep people out.  The insult she intended was obvious, but it was more than a simple insult; see past it to the fact she was being literal.  Apparently they don't want the patronage of those who don't understand it and/or can't afford it.

Edit:
I like that you've noted PR's fees.  Mircea Popescu is paying a considerable amount of money, monthly, for your education.  Please have a little respect.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!