i2p filesharing is also kinda "closed".
but i see what you mean.

can you recommend any filesharing service inside the i2p service ?
i heard about i2pshark a while ago, but not sure if its the best/most common solution.



EDIT: ok I gave i2p a try, but seriously, it's terribly slow.
I tried iMule, I2PHex and I2Psnark and I really prefer my darknet solution.

So, if anyone's interested ... the offer for a filesharing darknet is still open

Hi,

I'm trying to find people for a F2F filesharing network for quite some time now, and I think here, in an forum with members who care about anonymity, I might think I could find some people who are interested in such a thing.

I prefer AllianceP2P for the software, because it has the ability to encrypt the traffic, is open-source and easy to use, but if you persist to use another software, feel free to tell me to use that instead.

http://www.alliancep2p.com/

I`d like to see anonymous vServers.

I hope you will have fair exchange rates, because there is hard competition in this business. Mainly because the gold sellers are running bots or chinese children lol!

Simple answer because it's 2:38am here:
hashing

Hi, since many people are having problems with Microsoft Security Essentials, why not making a thread about good anti-virus alternatives.

I'm currently testing the free version of PandaCloud Antivirus.
It's an anti-virus tool based on cloud computing so information about newly recognized malware gets instantly streamed to all peers, so its up to date at any time. And it doesn't interfere with bitcoin

As far as I can judge now, I will keep PandaCloud on my system.


I had Avira Antivir Personal Edition before, but with every new version they released it got more and more bloated and slower (personal impression). It still is a good tool which I used for many years now, so, if you don't trust the new "cloud-technology-antivirus-systems" it's a good choice for you. Didn't have any problems with bitcoin either.


Now its your turn:
Which antivirus solutions can you recommend ?
Which are no-gos ?

Is it possible to get more ports? maybe with a low one-time payment per extra port ?

And what transfer speeds can a single user expect ?

Is there any limit ?
For example: Will you exchange 50000 BTC to 500 USD ? Or is this too much ?

I don't think their is any renicing under Windows.

I guess you are still at the initial download of the current block chain.
until your blockcount is around 66k you still have to download the blocks and verify them. this takes quite some hard-drive performance, so maybe thats what is slowing down your system.

I think posting all of that data is a bit useless now, afaik the threadstarter has canceled paused his project.

I recommend to remove the download links at the bottom of the main page.
As you can see the links on the English page points to the new 0.3 release, but the other languages only contain links for the old 0.2 version.
There's a download box with the current releases on the right anyway, so why not remove the links from the translated pages.

C:\Users\USERNAME\AppData\Roaming\Bitcoin

That's where the wallet.dat and the block database is stored.
Maybe you can find the bug there.

Win7 64-Bit here and no problems with running Bitcoin 0.3.

Lovers gonna love

Does it really say, that the bitcoins could not get received or does it say the transaction is still unconfirmed ?

Don't worry about the second case, it just means that the bitcoins have to get confirmed by the other nodes.
This happened after 120 blocks in the old bitcoin version (0.2). I`m not sure about the amount of block on 0.3.

If they really couldn't get received I can't give you an advice, this is above my knowledge, but I'm sure the other forum members are able to help you with that

Yeah, it sounds like a heat problem, but without further information about your system and the bitcoin version you are using we can't provide exact advice.

yeah, usually you just forward the inbound port to the same destination port.
that only differs if you run a service locally with a certain port, but you want people to connect to the service via another port.
this scenario wont really apply to the normal computer user.

oh, didn't know that.
thanks for the info!

Total agreement here.

basically the advantage of making a new address every time is anonymity.

when you don't want anyone (who knows your old address, typically customers or, if you made it public potentially everyone) to recognize you that is a basic step you have to do.

In my opinion there's no disadvantage except for the minimum raised work for clicking "new address".
The only exception here is if you want to run a static account (like when you post the address to get donations), because afaik you can't reuse an address once you got a new one.