|
Hmm I couldn't find any trading history of you, so I guess I will ony sell BTC worth 50USD with if that's ok with you.
I just want to be cautious.
What about 45 BTC for 50 USD ? That makes 0.9 USD/BTC. (current lowest ask at mtgox = 0.9193)
|
|
|
|
I think restricting religion will only produce a more negative result than letting people surrender their freedom on their own.
Sure, but it should be avoided/restricted in education and politic and all other "opinion/decision making" bodies. |
|
|
|
|
Once created addresses are permanent.
You will receive payments on the old addresses even if you "select" a newer one in the client.
|
|
|
|
Maybe it's you, ribuck  Ok, so as I thought, his absence was planned. So probably he's still alive. That's good. But haven't he mentioned anything when he will come back ? Will he ever ? And what were his intentions to go "undercover" ? Not a "leader person" ? Afraid of consequences ? Other projects/real life ? |
|
|
|
|
Religion is by fact evil and should be avoided at all cost.
|
|
|
|
I was looking for an exchanger, but he is a SCAM guy, don’t trust this guy. He rob me 28 bucks, I give you some details and don’t be fool. He is in various forums, I open a dispute in PayPal, now you know. His MSN: v1l1r@hotmail.comName: Martti Koppel PayPal Account: tsrkus@hotmail.comJust for the case you will not be able to reach the site. |
|
|
|
|
From my experience the best way to cash out prepaid cards is to trade the codes with people directly.
A firend of mine buys himself a rapidshare account with paysafe card from time to time.
If you are interested in exchanging I can contact him. I guess you will get about 9 EUR per 10 PSCEUR.
|
|
|
|
Any honest traders selling?
I am. Interested ? |
|
|
|
The lack of chargeback forces merchants to be more honest, in the long run anyway.
With chargeback, there's no incentive for the merchant to differentiate themselves as being more trustworthy than other merchants, because the customer's ability to chargeback is identical for every merchant.
Without chargeback, customers will eventually get used to thinking about trustworthiness, and merchants will have to cultivate their trustworthiness to survive.
In the short term it will be a rocky road, as consumers learn (the hard way) about the new way of doing things.
I like your point of view, ribuck. |
|
|
|
what if
1. The owner of the bitcoin dies and does not leave his bitcoin to anybody
2. Someone's wallet is lost
Use the search function next time. These question have come up several times now. |
|
|
|
|
Maybe we should come to serious talking again.
I mean, has anyone seen any life sign of satoshi ?
Accidents happen all the time ...
|
|
|
|
When organizations like Openleaks and Anonymous begin accepting bitcoin, it's impossible to ignore that bitcoin has successfully taken root and will not die. This year is going to be big. How shall Anonymous be able to accept donations ? |
|
|
|
What about for the identity theft portion? What if someone hacks your computer and steals your BTC wallet? Seems like it would be possible I could prove I was hacked and wallet was stolen, so under the current system the bank would refund my money. I guess we would create this with BTC through some sort of wallet insurance business?
With Bitcoin you are your own bank, so it is your responsibility to keep the money safe. |
|
|
|
|
Online payment without chargebacks maybe.
|
|
|
|
Kriminelle Aktivitaeten sind immer schlecht und sollten verurteilt werden.
Falsch, nur schlechte und verurteilenswerte Aktivitäten sollten kriminell sein. |
|
|
|
From: https://www.bitcoin.org/smf/index.php?topic=3927.msg56043#msg56043Hmm, it comes pretty close to BitLaundryBitLaundry Explanation
BitLaundry is designed to help unlink accounts from each other. It does that by providing a well-known, and hopefully popular service. Here's how it works:
1. Imagine that Alice wishes to send BitCoins to Bob.
2. Bob, sadly, is not well liked. Alice would rather not have anyone know that she sent Bob BitCoins.
3. So, Alice puts Bob's address in the form at BitLaundry.
4. Alice gets a one-time-use address from BitLaundry.
5. Alice sends the money to that address.
6. BitLaundry sends money out to recipients every 30 minutes.
7. (But, it doesn't send out Alice's money immediately, that might be suspicious..)
8. So, a random number of 30 minute segments later, BitLaundry sends the money out to Bob.
9. BitLaundry then deletes the database link between the one-time-use address and Bob.
10. Alice has sent money to BitLaundry, but people do this all the time. She's one of many.
11. BitLaundry has sent money to Bob, but BitLaundry has sent money out to a whole bunch of other people as well.
12. Alice and Bob are much less linked than they would have been otherwise.
But as I understand it, you can track Alice by looking at the block chain and look for the amount that Bob received by BitLaundry. Then you check which address sent this amount to BitLaundry (probably one of the one-time-use addresses from step 4) and then check which address sended that amount to the one-time-use address. Is that correct ? |
|
|
|
Hmm, it comes pretty close to BitLaundryBitLaundry Explanation
BitLaundry is designed to help unlink accounts from each other. It does that by providing a well-known, and hopefully popular service. Here's how it works:
1. Imagine that Alice wishes to send BitCoins to Bob.
2. Bob, sadly, is not well liked. Alice would rather not have anyone know that she sent Bob BitCoins.
3. So, Alice puts Bob's address in the form at BitLaundry.
4. Alice gets a one-time-use address from BitLaundry.
5. Alice sends the money to that address.
6. BitLaundry sends money out to recipients every 30 minutes.
7. (But, it doesn't send out Alice's money immediately, that might be suspicious..)
8. So, a random number of 30 minute segments later, BitLaundry sends the money out to Bob.
9. BitLaundry then deletes the database link between the one-time-use address and Bob.
10. Alice has sent money to BitLaundry, but people do this all the time. She's one of many.
11. BitLaundry has sent money to Bob, but BitLaundry has sent money out to a whole bunch of other people as well.
12. Alice and Bob are much less linked than they would have been otherwise.
But as I understand it, you can track Alice by looking at the block chain and look for the amount that Bob received by BitLaundry. Then you check which address sent this amount to BitLaundry (probably one of the one-time-use addresses from step 4) and then check which address sended that amount to the one-time-use address. Is that correct ? |
|
|
|
 this way recipents would only see the "mix proxy address" and transactions can't be assigned to the users since neither timing attack nor checking for amounts would work. is this correct ? EDIT: image is not online anymore |
|
|
|
Hmm, I'm looking for something like this:  But with the original logo and a smaller "Bitcoin" text beneath or aside. Has anyone made something like this ? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
