Hi together, a question about mining with 5 jupiters, with stratum proxy or better without, i have an upload limit of 5 Mbit/s. And what do you think about this psu: Enermax Platimax 1200W, 12V Multiple Rail, 80 Plus Platinum, Full Modular ATX Power Supply EPM1200EWT http://astore.amazon.com/zwilla-20/detail/B006WSBHTMthx very much for feedback. fubly |
|
|
|
Go back to 0.98.1, it's more reliable for many. Most people abandonded 0.99 as a lame duck.
98.1 beta seems to be the best in my book.. I run that on both of my 5 board Neptunes (or whatever we want to call them) the newer cgminers are starting to have better features though, so hopefully we will be able to take those and run them on 98.1 beta (unless there are some new files in .99 that I needs that I am not aware of) The file waas is new, i thing it does nearly the same what the old wasd does, but i have no knowledge, which files handles this in fw 0.99. We have to wait for the tuning suite, I think it will do this what happened with our RMA boards. Reprogramm the eeproms on it. |
|
|
|
Capitalising on the fact that I saw that dud cores are better disabled, here's an experimental binary that tunes things fairly aggressively: http://ck.kolivas.org/apps/cgminer/kncminer/cgminerFirst it enables all cores on startup (so it can take a while before it starts mining!) Then it will disable cores after only 3 hw errors in a row, but staggers disabling of cores 5 seconds apart. Then it tries re-enabling cores after only another minute, but staggers re-enabling them. If the cores fail 3 times in a row, they're decommissioned at that point. Can you include an option like: -dcrsp "a72, b191, c18, e88" (dcrsp = disable cores permanent) a = Asic-Board 1 b = 2 .. f = 6 because some cores are really death, and enabeling them will be an problem for current work on shares! You can put this array to the cgminer code where also the enablecores is pointed. What do ypu think about this? What I not understand is why inside the monitor script is also included the enabeld cores. One time yes, but not so often. Like Orama said: "Running through the floor and opening and closing the doors" I think it´s too much opening and closing the dors. |
|
|
|
|
Networking problems,too.
I m in car for some hours now, have a look to my post before about the
give them a kick.
I figured out that stopping this, its better. Because every kick confuses the
spm bus also the hole system.
You can also make an dump throu, to see if there where will i2cset set an 1 2 and 3
is something other the 00.
I think this an be an solution.
|
|
|
|
|
Out there are people on ebay, which pay atm 15000 usd for an knc miner.
So many people want these machines.
They will pay double or treble also in dec jan feb aso.
And we have no other things in our burned brains then to kill the ponies,
Eduardo and the hole hf company.
Can anyone make an thread for this kind of people.
Shure, I also feel better when i hear something sometimes.
All will be nice
no more ponies! Vote for the 31. dec.
we have learned on day to install an printer driver.
p.s. I got 0.5 btc paid for this post.
|
|
|
|
I´m missing an official statement on the website about the psu,
customers which are here not at home, have to know which psu (power) they need.
Why not e-mail them? From https://www.kncminer.com/pages/faqWhat specs do I need for the powersupply? ▾
- A power supply (PSU) certified as 80+ Gold (high quality power with low variations).
- for October Jupiter’s, an 850 Watt PSU with a minimum of four separate PCI-E adaptors (6 pins or 6+2 pin).
- for October Saturn’s, a 600 Watt PSU with a minimum of two separate PCI-E adaptors (6 pins or 6+2 pins).
- for Mercury models, a 400 Watt PSU with a minimum of one PCI-E adaptor (6 pins or 6+2 pins).
To maximise the performance of your November shipment orders, we recommend the following:
- for November Jupiter’s a 1200 Watt PSU with a minimum of four separate PCI-E adaptors (6 pins or 6+2 pin).
- for November Saturn’s an 850 Watt PSU with a minimum of two separate PCI-E adaptors (6 pins or 6+2 pin).
SORRY. That´s me!  |
|
|
|
|
I´m missing an official statement on the website about the psu,
customers which are here not at home, have to know which psu (power) they need.
Or not?
thx
order 102x paid.
And please knc, test the miners before sending, my first batch comes with four death boards. I start mining on the 14 Nov.
of 25 th oct. delivery.
thanky very much.
You can send my miners with the ultra last ones, but please working machines.
Edit: next diff change in 7d 5hr 52m 14s to est. 676538597 + 11%
|
|
|
|
I have an other question, what is better:
a) delivering shares with an diff of 1024 (on my Jupiter) or shares with an lower diff (on eligius my shares mixed 128 / 256 / 512 but no 1024)
Will the shares with higher diff paid better?
The higher the difficulty, the higher the variance. Over days, weeks, years, decades, it all should average out. Simply, if your choice is 1024 or 128, the 1024 shares will pay 8 times more than the 128 shares, but you will find the 128 shares 8 times as often, on average. I will switch to 128 with 1024 i have an avg. of 360,000 shares per shift. Is is to low or ok. I will see it when the next shift is filled. Is it correct, that I will be paid for every delivered / accepted share inside the shift? Thanx for feedback. Is there any other thread about btc gulid? Or why we here have not so no much traffic / posts? I found this: https://www.btcguild.com/index.php?page=support§ion=howamipaidWith PPLNS, each open shift is paid the following: ((Block Value + Transaction Fees) / 10) - Pool Fee (3%) And with PPS this: (1 / Network Difficulty * 25) - Pool Fee (7.5%) where can i see what you wrote? |
|
|
|
|
Pools yesterday 21. of nov. 2013
GHASH.io = 21 Blocks with avg. 1.250 Th/s
Eligius = 17 Blocks with avg. 600 Th/s
Bitminter = 7 Blocks with avg. 300 Th/s
BTCGulde = 38 Blocks with avg. 1.350 Th/s
Fee or not to fee, this is the question? Or not?! I say i will pay an fee but i can earn
some more with 38 found blocks as with 17 found blocks. I´m on btcguilde since yesterday evening 09:30 pm.
I will post my stats (1 x Jupiter) this night.
I have an other question, what is better:
a) delivering shares with an diff of 1024 (on my Jupiter) or shares with an lower diff (on eligius my shares mixed 128 / 256 / 512 but no 1024)
Will the shares with higher diff paid better?
|
|
|
|
Pools yesterday 21. of nov. 2013 GHASH.io = 21 Blocks with avg. 1.250 Th/s Eligius = 17 Blocks with avg. 600 Th/s Bitminter = 7 Blocks with avg. 300 Th/s BTCGulde = 38 Blocks with avg. 1.350 Th/s Dear KNC Fans, sorry for this post, I know it is not the right thread, but i life here, sorry. Can we talk a litte about this? Fee or not to fee, this is the question? Or not?! I say i will pay an fee but i can earn some more with 38 found blocks as with 17 found blocks. I´m on btcguilde since yesterday evening 09:30 pm. I will post my stats (1 x Jupiter) this night. I have an other question, what is better: a) delivering shares with an diff of 1024 (on my Jupiter) or shares with an lower diff (on eligius my shares mixed 128 / 256 / 512 but no 1024) Will the shares with higher diff paid better? EDIT: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=49417.msg3672196#msg3672196 |
|
|
|
PM to me at KNCFORUM: Did you see my previous PM to you about overclocking? I would like to know more if you will share. ME: It would be the same as inside the upcoming knc tuner suite, and yes that file what you mean before it is an part of it, but now called waas, you can find it inside the monitor script. And no, i can´t share this information, because it works only short and now i have four brand new (not so good) boards inside the machine. For this i will do no more tests. make a cat to waas or execute it. You can found more infos from me on bitcointalk. ( https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg3597963#msg3597963) Controlling the SPM bus and adjusting the voltage to an physical possible near the maximum of 2.0, adjuste frequency of the en-/disablecores, shutoff permanent the death cores, work with the spi_frequency (max. 300.000), enable queue >1 it needs an micro-sd-card (hurry-up and buy on 4 GB its ok or max 32GB It is not more. -> orama, did i forgot something? (p.s. i talked never with him about this!!!) |
|
|
|
BiG IFs!
would be unicorns and rainbows for KNC in that they could run this out till Feb 2014 w/o real asic competition..... What a luck for us KNC customers  |
|
|
|
|
who want to sell me an HF batch one preorder?
|
|
|
|
Well, I've got 5 modules running now and I'm getting about 660GH/s. Adding only 110GH/s to my old 550GH/s seemed slow, so I used bertmod and see that I've got the dreaded Die 0 issue! I'm running firmware 0.98.1 and blocked the airflow to raise the temp without success (reached 80 degrees C before I lost my nerve and started the fan again).
Are there any other tricks before I decide to RMA it? My 2nd module arrives tomorrow and I'm hoping for better luck.
It's not the ASIC that needs to get hot, it's the VRMs. I know this cause I used the water cooling to test it. I had no fan on the radiator, and a fan blowing on the VMRs, the temp never raised and the die never came back on. Switch to a fan cooling the radiator and no fan on the VRMs, the temp shot up and the dead die came alive. YES: See here: my last two posts https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=323116.msg3522722#msg3522722 |
|
|
|
Now that I've got a steady power feed, I'm going to give 0.99 another try.... Just flashed it.... *edit... one didn't seem to jump up like the others, even tho bertmod showed all is ok... rebooted & reflashed it, and it then reacted like the others... jumped right up to speed.... so far, so good... We'll see what Long term does...  if you have no DC/DC 0 problems, then you can disable this .. here vi /sbin/monitordcdc # Give them a kick!
i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 0 >/dev/null 2>&1
usleep 300000
i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 1 >/dev/null 2>&1
usleep 300000
i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 2 >/dev/null 2>&1
usleep 300000
i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 3 >/dev/null 2>&1 like this: # Give them a kick!
#i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 0 >/dev/null 2>&1
usleep 300000
#i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 1 >/dev/null 2>&1
usleep 300000
#i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 2 >/dev/null 2>&1
#usleep 300000
i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 3 >/dev/null 2>&1 Also this (it is the same): # restart die
if [ "$failed0" = "1" ] ; then
if [ "$failed_non0" = "1" ] ; then
i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 0
usleep 200000
failed1=1
failed2=1
failed3=1
fi
fi
if [ "$failed1" = "1" ] ; then
i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 1
usleep 200000
fi
if [ "$failed2" = "1" ] ; then
i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 2
usleep 200000
fi
if [ "$failed3" = "1" ] ; then
i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 3
fi to this: # restart die
if [ "$failed0" = "1" ] ; then
if [ "$failed_non0" = "1" ] ; then
#i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 0
usleep 200000
failed1=1
failed2=1
failed3=1
fi
fi
if [ "$failed1" = "1" ] ; then
#i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 1
usleep 200000
fi
if [ "$failed2" = "1" ] ; then
#i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 2
usleep 200000
fi
if [ "$failed3" = "1" ] ; then
#i2cset -y 2 0x2$channel 0xe5 3
fi Also you can set the [s]INTERVAL=5[/s]
INTERVAL=15 Enablecores (All) works on every cgminer start! AND every 15 Minutes /* Keep core disabled for no longer than 15 minutes */
#define CORE_DISA_PERIOD_US (15 * 60 * 1000000) What i doesn´t know is, how can i make my changes permanent, so that I have not to do this every reboot. thx |
|
|
|
|
Frage 1:
Die Omma wird vom Enkel Paulchen beschißen, dieser klaut der Omma den Ausweis macht bei Fidor ein Konto auf
besticht die Postbeamtin oder Bankschalterangestellten und zieht das PostbringtnixIdent durch.
Dann kauft Paulchen bei mit 100 Bitcoins, ich sehe ahh Geld ist da, Rufe bei der Bank an ob alles safe ist und, dann schiebe ich Paulchen die Coins rüber.
Wer haftet und wie lange.
Also
01. Tag bis 61 Tag: Ich
61. Tag bis 365 Tag: die Omma
365. Tag bis 365* 30 Tag: die Bank
Bitte mal um ganz klare Aufschlüsselung, und bitte keine Angela Merkel oder sonstige Politiker Antworten, denn die Antworten auch nie
auf das was Sie gefragt werden.
Danke
|
|
|
|
|
Which value is fair?
Pool Management: % (Default: 0.00%)
Stats Development: % (Default: 0.00%)
Pool Hosting: % (Default: 0.00%)
|
|
|
|
What's the general recommendation for running the "enable all cores" patch? Is it wise to run if a Jupiter is running average / just below average hash speeds? Any glitches encountered?
If you ar on fw 0.99, then no! Enable cores is inside the cgkncminer! Here is an unofficial photo from bitcoinorama i reveived it at this moment: January Batch!!!!  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
