Avenger... Die 0 was addressed with the 0.98.1 beta firmware, and most machines were fixed with it. Other than you, I don't think there are more than a handfull more out there..MAYBE. So to call that the "Biggest issue" is Total Crap. okay we have... 1. Avenger (Assuming he really has a machine) 2. Edgar.... 3....?
i found only this diff: (inside 98.1) - initc.sh v=56 i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xb 0x73 i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xe $v i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xb 0x73 i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xe $v
i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xb 0x6c i2cset -y 1 0x24 0x11 0x86 i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xb 0x6c i2cset -y 1 0x24 0x11 0x86 If you have an dieed die and it works on 98.1 then ist will also working on 0.99 Are these voltage mods? This code comes from beta 98.1 /etc/init.d/initc.sh file. Voltage, I think it confuses only the spm bus a little bit.
|
|
|
i figured out something, i think it will be an part of KNC-Tuner 1.0 This is my JASON file = the output of this command: usr/bin/waas -d { "asic_1_voltage": { ??? "die1": "-0.1121", "die2": "-0.1121", "die3": "-0.1121", "die4": "-0.1121" }, "asic_2_voltage": { "die1": "", "die2": "", "die3": "", "die4": "" }, "asic_3_voltage": { ??? "die1": "-0.1121", "die2": "-0.1121", "die3": "-0.1121", "die4": "-0.1121" }, "asic_4_voltage": { ??? "die1": "-0.1121", "die2": "-0.1121", "die3": "-0.1121", "die4": "-0.1121" }, "asic_5_voltage": { ??? "die1": "-0.1121", "die2": "-0.1121", "die3": "-0.1121", "die4": "-0.1121" }, "asic_6_voltage": { "die1": "", "die2": "", "die3": "", "die4": "" }, "spi_frequency": "201442", ;D "spi_voltage": "1.95" ::) } When you run this command: usr/bin/waas you get this error: "/config/advanced.conf" not found! ok: touch /config/advanced.conf vi /config/advanced.conf paste your jason output in there, but do NOT change any value befor we here from KNC Supporthow it works! Then restart your box, hmm, when you make no chnages inside advanced.conf it is not nessesary to reboot! The file will be loaded on reboot only (i think)
|
|
|
this firmware blows. back to 98.1 beta....
Agreed. Killed die 0 again. Back to 98.1 Beta... you can use the new 0.99 fw can you try to add this lines to the end of this file (reboot) vi /etc/init.d/initc.sh v=56 i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xb 0x73 i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xe $v i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xb 0x73 i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xe $v i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xb 0x6c i2cset -y 1 0x24 0x11 0x86 i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xb 0x6c i2cset -y 1 0x24 0x11 0x86 :wq It it is not working, can you send the output of this command: /usr/bin/waas -d
|
|
|
Avenger... Die 0 was addressed with the 0.98.1 beta firmware, and most machines were fixed with it. Other than you, I don't think there are more than a handfull more out there..MAYBE. So to call that the "Biggest issue" is Total Crap. okay we have... 1. Avenger (Assuming he really has a machine) 2. Edgar.... 3....?
i found only this diff: (inside 98.1) - initc.sh v=56 i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xb 0x73 i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xe $v i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xb 0x73 i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xe $v
i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xb 0x6c i2cset -y 1 0x24 0x11 0x86 i2cset -y 1 0x24 0xb 0x6c i2cset -y 1 0x24 0x11 0x86 If you have an dieed die and it works on 98.1 then ist will also working on 0.99
|
|
|
this fw seems to enable/disable cores with greater frequency... cool
If you use bertmod 98 then some fixes inside the new frimware will lost, because, the old bertmod 0.98 will change the /etc/init.d/cgminer.sh for example !!! New for me is the job of this file: /usr/bin/waas ! Can not parse JSON in config file %s: %d asic_%d_voltagespi_frequency%dspi_voltage%fdie%d{ "asic_%d_voltage": { "die%d": "%1.4f", "die%d": "%1.4f" "die%d": "", "die%d": "" }, "spi_frequency": "%d", "spi_voltage": "%s" } /dev/i2c-%dError opening %s: %m Error setting slave device address: %m /sys/class/gpio/gpio76/directionCan not open /sys/class/gpio/gpio76/direction: %m lowhighTPS65217 error: Bad ID 0x%02X TPS65217 error: Bad status 0x%02X TPS65217 OK. Modification %c, revision 1.%d Wrong ENABLE value 0x%02X Wrong SEQ4 value 0x%02X Wrong SEQ1 value 0x%02X Wrong SEQ3 value 0x%02X Can not read ENABLE register Can not read SEQ4 register Can not read SEQ1 register Can not read SEQ3 register /sys/class/gpio/gpio49/directionCan not open /sys/class/gpio/gpio49/direction: %m Wrong DEFDCDC1 value 0x%02X Wrong DEFDCDC3 value 0x%02X Wrong DEFSLEW value 0x%02X Wrong DEFLDO1 value 0x%02X Wrong DEFLDO2 value 0x%02X Wrong DEFLDO3 value 0x%02X Wrong DEFLDO4 value 0x%02X Write failed to /sys/class/gpio/gpio49/direction Waiting PGOOD for too long /config/.wa3.3v.down0 ?Can not open file %s:%m Can not read file %s Wrong value (%s) in file %s Failed to connect to I2C bus %d spi_transfer: ioctl error on SPI device: %m FPGA I2C error: read data 0x%02X (expected 0x%02hhX) from reg %u:%u spi_new: Out of memory! /dev/spidev%d.%dCan not open SPI device %s: %m spi_new: ioctl error on SPI device %s: %m Can not write file %s Write failed to %s spitop_bitrev_pad.rbfCan not open RBF file spitop_bitrev_pad.rbf:%m /sys/class/gpio/gpio67/value/sys/class/gpio/gpio66/valueCONF_DONE is HIGH when nCONFIG is LOW /sys/class/gpio/gpio69/valuenSTATUS is HIGH when nCONFIG is LOW CONF_DONE is HIGH when nCONFIG is HIGH nSTATUS is LOW when nCONFIG is HIGH SPI transfer failed after %d bytes nSTATUS is LOW during the configuration Can not read RBF file spitop_bitrev_pad.rbf:%m CONF_DONE is LOW at the end of configuration FPGA I2C error: Bad ID 0x%02X SPI transfer failed %02hhXCorrect SPI answer when expecting wrong one! Wrong SPI answer:Wrong data from ASIC: num_cores = %hu, revision = 0x%04hX
/config/advanced.conf (here you can find it: cat /usr/bin/waas) I think it is for the next fw release or the NEW: KNC-Tuner 1.0 Run this command to see some stats: /usr/bin/waas -d (it is new inside monitordcdc) here is my output: (I have an avg. 549 Gh/s) (now with my 4 RMA boards) 1. Coin on 14. november from september batch { "asic_1_voltage": { "die1": "-0.1121", "die2": "-0.1121", "die3": "-0.1121", "die4": "-0.1121" }, "asic_2_voltage": { "die1": "", "die2": "", "die3": "", "die4": "" }, "asic_3_voltage": { "die1": "-0.1121", "die2": "-0.1121", "die3": "-0.1121", "die4": "-0.1121" }, "asic_4_voltage": { "die1": "-0.1121", "die2": "-0.1121", "die3": "-0.1121", "die4": "-0.1121" }, "asic_5_voltage": { "die1": "-0.1121", "die2": "-0.1121", "die3": "-0.1121", "die4": "-0.1121" }, "asic_6_voltage": { "die1": "", "die2": "", "die3": "", "die4": "" }, "spi_frequency": "201442", "spi_voltage": "1.95" } Can anyone send me an complete diff between 0.98 and 0.99 (i don´t know how) Thx a lot!!!
|
|
|
All November batch boxes have a new PCB board New Asic-Board or controller board. If new controller board? Does it hast 4 or more ports? If more then 4 ports + and inside the miner are 4 asic-boards! Can I use the old asic-boards from oktober batch inside the novbatch? If yes to all, send me an pm if anyone need my old controller borad of batch october i will send it after receiving novbatch. here are the sunglasses . Sorry me for my signature, you can switch it off ore ignore me from now to the 07 dec i have to win the hf babyjet, because my knc oct batch starts working before 2 day´s. All four board´s are faulty from first day.
|
|
|
Namacoin hot wallet?!
Where can i get one?
Compiling namecoin on osx, have anyone an good how to, inside the src is one, but not exact step for step.
thx very much
|
|
|
Hallo Zusammen, habe heute morgen um 6:44 eine Nachricht von BlockChain erhalten über den Eingang von rund 0,17 BTC. Auf Eligius habe ich gesehen, dass diese überwiesen wurden. Kurz darauf habe ich meine BlockChain Wallet mit Passwort und TFA Code geöffnet und es war nichts drin! Auch wurde kein Eingang heute in der Wallet angezeigt? Seltsam!!! Jetzt bin ich nochmal auf Eligus und da ist die Ausgangszahlung verschwunden, es wird nur eine von vorgestern angezeigt! Dafür aber ein höherer unpaid BTC Betrag, als Gesamtsumme würde das dann wieder stimmen. Irgendwie komisch. Was ist da passiert? Kappiere es nicht! Danke für Eure Hilfe! Hat jemand ähnliches erlebt? Habe auf Bitcoin.de ein Konto https://www.bitcoin.de/de/r/a7esbb, dort hin überweise ich es dann eigentlich im Anschluß. Hat jemand Erfahungen mit https://www.bitcoin.de/de/r/a7esbbBitcoin.de
|
|
|
Any news of delivery / production second batch?
They will start shipping today, got anyone an tracking no?
|
|
|
Hier mal eine Rechtsberatung von mir.
Ich bin Dr.Dr.med.dent.HC.Prof. Speichellecker aus der Kanzlei (Abwahn Prämie und Co.)
Da C-Coins nicht als Währung gelten, kann ich diese auch nicht in der Steuer eingeben, es fehlt das Feld Bitcoin (oder hat es schon jemand gefunden)
Mal angenommen, so wie ich, kaufe für 30.000 Euro Miner, erzeuge damit Bitcoins und tausche diese gegen Waren ein. Diese Ware tausche ich dann wieder gegen bitcoins ein. So und mehr mache ich nicht immer wieder das gleiche von vorne.
Die 30.000 kann ich bei der Steuer angeben als Ausgabe, und den Rest der Geschäfte.
Ich verkaufe nix, ich tausche.
Erst wenn ich Geld für Essen, Haus, Hobby, Urlaub, Auto etc. mir in Euro umtausche, Beispiel: 30.000 Euro, dann stellt dies eine Einnahme dar.
Beispiel 1: Ausgabe = 30.000 (Miner) Einnahme = 30.000 (Bitcoins in Euro getauscht) Gewinn= 0 Steuern = 0
Beispiel 2:
Ich kaufe 100 Hühner, diese legen am Tag 100 Eier, nach 17 Tagen kommt einer und sagt: "Ey Du, wir zwei mache Geschäft, du gucke ganze Tag nach Hühner und bringe mir alle Eier, dafür du bekomme: Essen, Haus, Hobby, Urlaub, Auto? Wieviel Steueren muß ich zahlen?
|
|
|
worked also for me! I saw the red bann banner at the top, then i told my hw firewall box to change the node from sweden to norway and the banner disappears!
thankx
|
|
|
how long will it take to find one block with 5 Th/s, 7 days ago the last block !? I have 10% (550 Gh/s) of the hash power, so that when an block is found, i will earn +- 2,5 BTC with in 7 to 10 day´s I believe there is anyone who sucks our shares? Ok Eligius = 500 Th/s ...... Time for on block = +- 2 hours 500 / 100 = 5 Th/s ... Time for one block = +- 200 hours / 24 = 8,33 days What do you all think about this calc? Problem: I have no stats about: shares, accepted, st, rejected and so on. How can we trust in what we can not measure? Or can verify what happen in the background?
|
|
|
Big News! HashFast Signs Exclusive Deal with CIARA Technologies
Hi, HF
have you booked the ciara staff for production? What do you think when they can start building the first miner?
|
|
|
Have a look to your HF the receipt footer, copy this text and post it here.
On the receipt If HF did not deliver until the 31.Dec.2013, i can request an refund, which must be made inhalf 15 day, no later than the 15.jan 2014.
Problem: 1. you also throw your MPP away (Batch one customer) 2. KNC did not deliver miner in JAN - March 3. upgrades as cheep at the moment (1500 USD / 400 Gh/s)
|
|
|
can you here publish some stats about the block.
How much shares did we all together deliver?
Do you have an estimated time?
|
|
|
Hi HF, do you have an update before the day is ending?
|
|
|
Also with automatic payout?
Will it be possible, to see:
Number Validity Finder Found Reward Your reward 268,406 Confirmed! slayersher 6 days ago 25.0091 0.367409 268,055 Confirmed! vovik 8 days ago 25.0022 N/A
|| Amount of Shares for the block || My accepted Shares xxxx = 100 % xxx = xx,xx %
|
|
|
Hi to all,
I´m on mining BTC at the CoinEx pools, now the pool has 4 Th/s, how long will it take to find the next block?
What will happen, when the difficulty will change with the accepted shares?
How much shares are needed for one Block?
Where can i verify how many shares i delivered?
So many question about coinex...
|
|
|
|