Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 05:40:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 »
961  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Necronomicon thread: Altcoins which are dead. on: April 30, 2014, 06:23:30 PM
It's huge though.  I really am sort of counting on people contributing information to this thread.  Seriously, post whatever you know about any of these, or point at relevant threads, because this probably won't ever complete if I'm the only one doing it. 

For example, today I went to find out why Bellacoin died, and you know what?  As far as I can tell it shouldn't have.  Smooth fair launch, very small premine, valuable innovation in the windows wallet, and dead.  As far as I can tell, the only real strokes against it were that the developer is completely unknown (less than fifty posts when he announced) and coming from an account whose ID/email is hidden.  But hunting this down takes an hour, and I'm not going to be spending more than a couple hours a day on this project.  For the last couple of days, assembling the list, it's been much more than a couple hours a day.  But moving forward?  At a couple hours a day, this will take a long long time to do myself. 

So if you have knowledge to contribute, please -- help out!

962  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Necronomicon thread: Altcoins which are dead. on: April 30, 2014, 02:45:13 AM
I have spent way too much time on this - collating and correlating information from many sources is very time consuming and very picky.  There are inconsistencies and trouble even identifying some of these cryptocurrencies.  Anyway, I'm going to go read a book before I continue....
963  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Necronomicon thread: Altcoins which are dead. on: April 29, 2014, 11:45:28 PM

Wow! So many dead coins! Smiley
But maybe some of them will reborn Tongue

You need to talk to Doctor West about that....  It's possible, I guess; some of these blockchains are still running.  But as I said, the smart money is in betting against it (especially if you can bet the coins in question against their own success....) 

Quote
That is not dead which can eternal lie,
 And with strange aeons even death may die.

This graveyard will became huge in 1 year ... Smiley
Coins are dying like a bacteria in HCl.

Strange aeons indeed.

In the long run, there are very nearly as many deaths as there are births. 

964  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Necronomicon thread: Altcoins which are dead. on: April 29, 2014, 05:06:50 PM
29 April 2014: added Cannacoin, Credits, Extremecoin, and ORObit.
965  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Necronomicon thread: Altcoins which are dead. on: April 29, 2014, 02:41:59 AM
EDIT: I'm shutting this topic down.  I gave up on keeping track of this ages ago, because it just got too depressing for me and besides I couldn't keep up.   

People keep sending me messages asking me to take things off the list insisting that so-and-so isn't dead.  If you have successfully revived something, congratulations.  But this list is now a historical artifact and I'm not keeping it up to date. Nor am I interested in debating what "dead" means in terms of a block chain coin. 

Usually it turns out that they are just reusing the name of so-and-so, which is, yes, still dead.  Alternatively, they may have a live block chain of so-and-so which still does not appear on the significant exchanges, or which has still such an insignificant market value, that it is, yes, still dead.  And these points are just too tedious to debate and I don't even have time to research them all.

There are also messages I find particularly depressing, or which make me angry, and those are from people who are digging zombie so-and-so up for one more lurch around the gravestone, in a necromantic version of a pump and dump scam, using the fact that "so-and-so has been around a long time" to reassure their prospective bagholders.

Anyway:  To everybody reading this list:  These coins were what I considered dead, at the time I was maintaining the list.  Some of them may not have stayed dead, and that's okay.  Some of them may be in the hands of people now pretending they aren't dead, as part of a scam, and that's not okay.  I'm not going to help you decide which.

To everybody who has something that appears on this list and believes it isn't dead:  That's fine.  Maybe it isn't.  I am not updating the list, so consider this as information about its history, rather than information about its present.



The objective of this thread is to keep track of the death of altcoins.  My plan is to study how and why they die.  I'll be updating the entries, and posting more complete  notes next to each of these as I investigate and learn things.  Any contributions of information or pointers to it will be welcomed.

In some cases I will want to find and download a copy of their blockchain if it's still available -- often some blockchain archaeology will offer insights into how it all came apart (or how some scammer profited by it).

For purposes of this discussion, I'm going to count any coin as DEAD, even if its blockchain is still running, when it is currently either delisted from all exchanges, or when it ought to have been because its total market capitalization has wandered south of US$5000.  

Nothing will be taken off this list until or unless it claws its way out of the grave by having its market capitalization climb over US$5000 and stay there for 90 days.    

If a coin has never been on an exchange yet, I'm not going to bother counting it as dead, unless it gets listed on an exchange while its market capitalization is still less than US$5,000 (which I'll count as a stillbirth).  In fact I'm tempted to list *EVERY* new launch as a dead coin until 90 days of continuous market cap above US$5000.

I'm using coinmarketcap.com for coins that are still on some exchange somewhere, and counting all coins not currently traded on some exchange as having zero market capitalization.

So, here's a list of dead cryptocurrencies, in more or less alphabetical order.  There are probably a lot more that I don't know about yet, and the cryptocurrencies on this list will eventually be joined by dozens or hundreds more as the market does its magic.  Also, some of these may manage, for a while, to crawl around outside of their graves - though as with other dead things, smart money would be betting against it.  In many cases I don't even know the trading symbol that something used; additions and corrections are welcome.

2chcoin(2ch)
Quote
2chcoin was apparently a Russian clone of Quark, with a very fast block reward halving time.  It was announced on Bitcointalk on 6 Jan 2014 by 'Rocketron' (a new user whose email/ID information is hidden) with a giveaway thread.   On 9 January 'bazilko' announced a simple lottery game using 2chcoin.  This game ran, apparently picking a winner every hour, for at least ten days.  2chcoin was picked up by at least 3 exchanges.  As far as I can tell the developer never made any modifications to it whatsoever, and never communicated with anyone about it in English.  I can't read the Russian threads, so it may look from the other side of the language barrier like the dev was more involved .
66coin (66)
Quote
66coin was launched Jan 26 2014 by 'menzo' (email/ID hidden).  It was a scrypt coin with 66-second block time and a .000066 coin per block reward.  Total coin supply was supposed to be 66 coins.  It used a 'runway' launch, with the first 666 blocks worth 1/100 the nominal block reward (in order to let people get their mining settings sorted out before they started missing significant rewards).  Launch went fairly smoothly, but there was a failure starting around 12 Feb when hashing power went up and most users couldn't get wallets to sync.  'pikimunga' took the initiative to rescue the coin starting on 17 February, first fixing the sync issue by getting people onto the same chain, then putting up a mining pool and organizing an effort to bribe exchanges to list the coin.  Pikimunga apparently continued as a dev in partnership with menzo.  There were a couple of hard forks but they seemed to go fairly smoothly.  Despite these efforts, the price has declined to the point where the coin appears to be irrelevant.
8coin
99cents
Acros(ACRO)
AeroCoin(?)
Quote
in the 2013 timeframe, apparently a pure IPO scam.  The scammer accepted BTC in payment for AeroCoins, and then disappeared with the BTC.  Not to be confused with a different Aerocoin(AERO) which appeared in early July 2014.
Aircoin(AIR)
Quote
apparently there are at least two different things both named aircoin and both trading with the symbol AIR.  coinmarketcap is tracking one and cryptocoinrank is tracking the other.  One is effectively dead and the other apparently alive as of 12 July 2014.  It is not clear which the investigation below describes, nor whether it includes features of both.  
Quote
launched 20 Feb 2014,  Aircoin was launched by 'aircoin' (a new account with hidden ID/email) and featured a complicated scheme to adjust the block rewards in response to the exchange rate in order to target a gradually rising exchange rate.  There were MANY things wrong with this cryptocurrency on launch, but people treated it as though it were serious. They never explained how the feedback from exchange rate to block reward was supposed to work; in fact it did not.  Block reward adjustments were implemented by releasing a new version of the client and hard-forking rather than in an automatic way.  The coin supply was theoretically limited to a billion coins.  The reward halving time was supposed to be about once per five years, but that didn't make sense given the mining reward adjustments to target an exchange rate.  Seriously, the math didn't work, and nobody called them on it!  Also there was an initial premine of 2.5 million coins, and the 'nominal' block reward and block rate made that about 30 months worth of regular mining rewards - one of the larger premines I've ever seen, although when expressed as a percentage it was only 0.25%.  Anyway, it was claimed that the mining rewards ought to last for something between 100 and 1000 years given the dynamic adjustments.   The launch was botched, with source unavailable and the node server behind a NAT address where nobody else could get at it.  
Alcohoin(ALC)
Quote
Alcohoin was a scrypt coin with a 30million coin total coin supply, 1-minute blocks and a 150-coin block reward. It was launched 21 Jan 2014 by 'Alcohoin', a newbie account with hidden id/email information.  The 1% premine amounted to about 33 hours of block rewards at the nominal block rate.  There was a giveaway for high scores at a drinking-themed flash game.  The developer apparently abandoned the coin after selling the premine.
Alicoin(ALI)
AlienCoin(ALN)
Quote
Launched January 9 2014.  30s blocks, 40-coin block award. 'Alien420' made the announcement,  'Hendo420' is a dev.  Both accounts have ID hidden.  Appears to be largely a clone of 42coin - in fact the initial client attempted to use the same RPC port so you couldn't have both at once.  Launch announcement claimed there was a 1% premine and a 200M coin total money supply.  On Jan 11, block explorer revealed a 200M coin premine and source code revealed a 400M coin total money supply.  On Jan 12, the existing blockchain was abandoned and aliencoin was relaunched with a 2M coin premine and a 200M coin money supply.  Arrived at an exchange March 15 2014 when its market capitalization was about $1000.  Market cap most recently seen on 16 June 2014 was $4046  
AllAgesCoin(?)
Allahcoin(?)
Alphacoin(ALF)
Quote
I don't know what it is yet but I've seen from 6 through 12 July 2014 - always listed but not trading, with an apparent market cap of zero, on cryptocoinrank.  
AlphaOmegaCoin(AOC)
Altrocoin(?)
AmericanCoin(AMC)
Quote
Coingen was used to created something called 'americancoin' but this launched before coingen.io was registered so it may not be the same thing. The first 6500 blocks were mined before the cryptocurrency was announced.  Also, the wallets of this litecoin clone kept trying to connect to the litecoin network, with the predictable results; the blockchain was in a perpetual state of fork.
AmeriCoin(?)
Quote
created via coingen
AmKoin(AMK)
AminaCoin(?)
Quote
created via coingen
Apecoin(APE)
Quote
Announced by 'apecoin' (a new account with hidden ID infomation) on bitcointalk on 18 December 2013 - apparently a couple of days after it was announced on Reddit. About 3 and a half days worth of coins were gone before the bitcointalk announcement happened, and it's not clear how many of these were a premine held by the developer.  It was a scrypt coin with one minute blocks.  The initial announcement claimed a 6.84B total coin supply and a 'sinusoidally decaying' block reward, though neither was implemented; the source code revealed an unlimited coin supply and a block reward of 10K coins per block.  Ten days later there was a hard fork to implement these features. The coin was reannounced on March 14.  The relaunch earned lots of praise posts from obvious sockpuppet accounts, which was kind of humorous.
AphroditeCoin(APH)
Quote
created via coingen. Observed trading with market cap $3711 on 2 June 2014
Appcoin(APP)
AppleByte(ABY)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap US$4654 on 16 June 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Arkhash(ARK)
Armoredcoin()
AstroCoin(ASR)
Quote
created via coingen. Observed trading with market cap $3174 on 2 June 2014
AustraliaCoin(AUS)
Babycoin(BBC)
BaconBitsCoin(YUM)
Badcoin(BAD)
Basecoin(?)
BatCoin(BAT)
Quote
Batcoin was released on Jan 6 2014.  It had an anonymous developer (HUGE WARNING SIGN) and a 2% premine.  Also the community took up a collection to bribe an exchange in order to get Batcoin traded.  Its developer was anonymous so this information cannot be verified, but it is claimed that he was attacked during the night of April 3rd-4th in his home and hospitalized by an assailant intent on stealing the premined coins. If that's true, then clearly he was not anonymous to the assailant.  If that's false, then he made a small but respectable profit on the premine.  Either way, he dropped the development and support of Batcoin like a hot rock.  
Beatlecoin (BEA)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $139 on 2 June 2014
BeaoCoin(BEC)
BeeCoin(BEE)
BeerCoin(BEER)
Quote
I remember this; a premine was used in an attempt to hold the price stable relative to the price of beer.  It was created via Coingen.
BeliCoin(BELI)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $932 on 2 June 2014
BellaCoin(BELA)
Quote
BELA was a scrypt altcoin launched January 29 2014 by 'twoturtles' (whose ID/Email information is hidden).  It had 30s blocks, 50-coin block reward, and a premine that amounted to about 20 hours of coins at its nominal rates.  Its creator claimed that its purpose was to benefit children globally, be donated to charities involved in childrens' welfare, etc.  It is somewhat remarkable for its extended client/wallet software, which included such additional services as block explorer, news feed, network statistics, multiple pool status, and trading statistics.  I can't find any real reason why it died.  Although I don't think something like money can have any agenda beyond whatever people choose to use it for, this looks like it had a fair launch, real development work invested, and valuable innovation, and died anyway.  
Bells(BEL)
BestCoin(BSC)
Billaume(BLL)
Binarycoin(BIC)
Birdcoin (BRD)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $33 on 2 June 2014
Bitcoin2(BTC2)
Bitcoin2.0(?)
Bitcoin3.0(?)
Bitcredits(?)
Bitgold(?)
Bitinium(BTN)
Bitland(?)
Bitleu(BTL)
Quote
Observed on may 10 with market cap 2259.
Bitpeso(BTP)
Bitpug(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.
Bitquark(BTQ)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4733 on 24 June 2014
Bitraam(BRM)
Quote
first seen trading on 16 June 2014 with market cap $203.  

BitStar (BITS)
BiteCoin(?)
Quote
Because Bitcoin and Bytecoin were taken.
BlakeBitcoin(BBTC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4148 on 6 June 2014.
Blazecoin[BLZ]
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2935 on 12 July 2014.
BlobbyCoin(?)
Quote
Created via coingen.  Why did 'Blobby' seem like a good name?  To anyone?  Ever?
Blitzcoin(BLTZ)
Quote
Started trading March 29 2014 and appears to have stopped trading 20 May 2014. at a market cap of $US37.2K.   Its highest market cap was achieved on 4 April at $150K and its lowest from April 30 to May 10 at approximately US$5K.
Bluechip(BCH)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4798 on 12 July 2014.
Bones(BONES)
Quote
current status: boned
BonusCoins(BNS)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2019 on 12 July 2014.
Boomcoin(BMC)
Boringcoin(?)
Bosscoin(BOS)
Bountycoin(BOC)
Boxxycoin(boxx)
Quote
Apparently ended due to a cease and desist order.
Boycoin(BOY)
Brokebackmountaincoin(?)
BTCTalkCoin(BCC)
Quote
Observed trading at market cap $4112 on 16 Jun 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Bumbacoin (CLOT)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2409 on 2 June 2014
Burbucoin(BUR)
ButterflyCoin(BUR)
Cagecoin(CAGE) [/quote]Observed trading at market cap $2443 on 16 Jun 2014 at coinmarketcap.[/quote]
Californiacoin(CAC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $361 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Canada Ecoin(CDN)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2061 on 2 June 2014
Cancercurecoin(CCC)
Cannacoin()
Quote
observed 29 April 2014 with market cap less than $5K.  Apparently it had just launched at that time.  Market cap rose above $5K on May 4.  If it stays there until August 4, it may be taken off the list of the dead.  
Capitalcoin(CPTL)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $1728 on 24 June 2014
CataloniaCoin(CATC)
Catedoge(?)
Chaincoin(?)
Championcoin(?)
Charitycoin(CHA)
Chicoin(CHI)
Chichicoin(UUC)
Quote
Launched Feb 12 2014.  The client was malware; it contained a wallet stealer and key logger.
CHNcoin(CHN)
Quote
Observed trading 12 July 2014 at market cap $3613 at cryptocoinrank.
Chococoin(CCC)
ChoomCoin(?)
Quote
Created via coingen
ChuckCoin(?)
Quote
Created via coingen
ClockCoin(?)
Clockwisecoin(?)
CloudCoin(CDC)
Quote
There was a 'cloudcoin' generated via coingen.  CDC was launched before coingen.io was registered, so it may not be the same coin.    Launched 2013 July 24(?)
Cnote(CNOTE)
Citizencoin(CTZ)
Quote
Observed trading at market cap $4425 on 16 Jun 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Cococoin(COCO)
Quote
Observed trading 12 July 2014 at market cap $687 at cryptocoinrank.
Coffeecoin(CFC2)
Quote
Observed trading 12 July 2014 at market cap $3176 at cryptocoinrank.
Coiledcoin()
Quote
Launched by 'makomk' (id/email hidden) on Jan 5 2012.  It extended the scripting language available in Bitcoin with OP_EVAL, which allowed all sorts of interesting innovative new kinds of contracts/scripts and might have also opened it up to all sorts of interesting innovative new kinds of Denial-of-Service attacks had it lasted long enough for such attacks to be mounted.  It was launched as merge-mined with Bitcoin, however, and there are a couple of different ways to do merged mining.  Without going into cryptographic details, the way Coiledcoin did merged mining was vulnerable to a particular type of 51% attack, which could be launched by any miner mining Bitcoin provided that not very many other Bitcoin miners were participating in the merged mining of the merge-mined chain.   LukeJr, who operates the Eligius mining pool, launched that attack, producing Coiledcoin blocks containing no transactions while monopolizing the production of Coiledcoin blocks.  In order to do this, the Eligius Pool used the hashing power of many miners who did not know that the attack was being launched or that their hashing power was contributed to it.  As far as the miners knew they were just mining Bitcoin.  And in fact, the hashing power they contributed was also used for mining Bitcoin; none of the miners received less Bitcoin than they otherwise would have as a result of their hash power being used to attack Coiledcoin.  
Coin(COIN)
Quote
At least they picked a good name....
Coincoin(CC)
Quote
So good these guys picked it twice!
Coino(CON)
Coin2.0(NC2)
Quote
Appears to have stopped trading on May 21 2014.  Between March 12 and May 21, it traded with market cap ranging from US$23800 on April 3 to US$424400 on March 15.
CoinyeCoin(COYE)
ColbertCoin(CC)
Quote
The Colbert report is a hilarious spoof of American rightwing politics.  Observed trading with market cap $3026 on 2 June 2014
CollegeCoin(?)
Quote
Created via coingen
Cometcoin(?)
Compasscoin(CPC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2972 on 24 June 2014
Conspiracycoin (CYC)
Quote
observed trading with market cap $2997 on 16 Jun 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
Cooperationcoin(COOP)
CopperBars(CPR)
CopyCoin(COPY)
Quote
Launched Jan 4 2014.  The client was wallet stealing malware.  
CosmosCoin(CMC)
Counterpart(XCP)
Crapcoin (CRAP)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $41 on 2 June 2014
Crapplecoin(?)
Credits(CRD)
Quote
Created via coingen.  Observed with market cap 4615 on May 26
Creds (XXC)
Cross Generation Coin(XGC)
CryptoApples(CRA)
Cryptobits(CYB)
Cryptobuck(BUK)
CryptoEagle(CREA)
CryptoEscudo(CESC)
Cryptographic Anomaly(CGA)
Quote
observed with market cap 3118 on May 17 2014 down from 37760 on April 26 2014.
CryptoLoot(LOOT)
CryptoMeth(METH)
Quote
cryptometh was launched march 04 by _Heisenberg_, an account registered on the same day as the launch with ID/Email information hidden.  it used a Keccak/SHA3 proof of work and had an 0.9% premine amounting to a bit over 73 hours worth of mining rewards.  Their reward halving was at intervals of nominally 180 days. After a smooth launch, they couldn't get listed on Bittrex because bittrex objected to the drug reference in the name.  They were listed on allcrypt, but the price collapsed and miners abandoned the coin.  
Cryptonium(CRN)
CryptoStuds(?)
Cthulhucoin(OFF)
Cubits(QBT)
CuntCoin(?)  
Quote
Right.  This name didn't expect to be taken seriously so it was a very obvious non-starter.  Did anyone lose money on this?  If so were you waiting for someone else to go along with the gag for 'just a little bit longer than you?'  Created via Coingen.
Cyclecoin(CCC)
Cypherfunk(FUNK)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2552 on 6 June 2014
DeleteCoin(DEL)
Quote
current status: deleted.  The person or people behind this claimed that they were going to use their premine to destroy other altcoins.  They did not explain how they intended to go about that, why it would add value to the currency for other holders, or why it would work.  Deletecoin appears to have traded between 29 March and 23 May 2014, at market caps ranging from US$323K to US$39K.  
Detacoin(?)
Denarius(DRS)
Quote
observed trading at $4959 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap
Digital Commerce(DCM)
Quote
observed trading at $2642 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap
Dishercoin(?)
Quote
created via coingen.
Dobbscoin(BOB)
DodoCoin(?)
Quote
current status: dead as a ...  well, dead.  Created via Coingen.
Doggcoin()
Dollarpounds(DPZ)
Domecoin(DOME)
Donationcoin(DON)
Quote
Observed trading at market cap $1433 on 16 Jun 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Doubloons(DBL)
Quote
Created via Coingen.
Dougcoin(DOUG)
Dopecoin(DOPE)
Dragoncoin(DNC)
Dubstepcoin(WUBS)
DuckDuckCoin(DUCK)
Quote
current status: Duck Duck WENT.  Observed trading with market cap $1865 on 2 June 2014
DuckieCoin(?)
Quote
created via coingen
Dvorakcoin(DVK)
Quote
observed trading at $4274 on 12 July 2014 at cryptocoinrank
Eaglecoin(EGC)
Ecocoin(ECO)
EdisonX3(?)
E-Gold(?)
EKrona(KRN)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2915 on 2 June 2014
Electriccoin(VOLT)
Quote
Quote
(information thanks to 'galaxy')Started by "Deviant Two". The owner of mining pools, a self proclaimed Christian who was also involved in the Cryptorush exchange.
This is part of a trend in which a large number of altcoins were started by people who make their money from mining pools and exchanges.  There are various reasons for them to do so, most of which are not to the advantage of other miners or investors.
Electron (ELT)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2112 on 2 June 2014
Electronic Benefit Transfer(EBT)
Electronic Gulden(EFL)
Quote
Observed 17 May 2014 with market cap 2257
Elephantcoin(ELP)
Embargocoin(EBG)
Quote
observed trading with market cap $1088 on 16 Jun 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
Emerald(EMD)
EmuCoin(EMU)
Quote
observed with market cap US$2674 on 17 may.  
Entropycoin(ENC)
Quote
observed with market cap US$3321 on 12 July 2014 on cryptocoinrank
Eoncoin(EON)
Equestrianbit(EQB)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2336 on 2 June 2014
Ermahgerdcern(EMG)
Eternalcoin()
EToken(ETOK)
Quote
Created 7 Jan 2014 by 'Mogui', a newbie account with hidden ID/email information.  Etoken achieved a market cap of US$418K on Jan 17.  
http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=403597.0  
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=436750.0  
Mogui outlined a 'rare' coin with 1 reward per block, but used a 'fancy' reward schedule with bonus blocks.  There was an x2 bonus for the first 20K blocks, an x200 bonus on any block that was zero modulo 1000, and an x2500 bonus on any block that was zero modulo 10000.  Now, for those who aren't thinking deviously enough or haven't realized the implications of all those bonuses applying at the same time, that means that the ten thousandth and twenty thousandth block paid a cool million coins each.  So much for the 'rare' coin.  People who did figure this out (or who had known it in advance) piled on an acre of hashing power in a scramble to get the ten thousandth block, and then abandoned it once that block was mined.  This left the difficulty impossibly high and they had to hard fork the block chain in order to get it started again.  At about this point the original developer (who may or may not have mined the million-coin block) abandoned the project.  Those left amongst the wreckage restarted the blockchain and ran it for a while, but failed to excise the 'extra' coins from the blockchain, and they were sold on exchanges.
Observed trading with market cap $2624 on 2 June 2014
EuroCoin(?)
Quote
Created via Coingen
Exilecoin(EXN)
FAILCoin (FAIL)
Quote
Observed trading at market cap $3504 on 16 Jun 2014 at coinmarketcap.
FairBrix(?)
Quote
a clone of tenebrix, claimed to have a fairer initial distribution. See Fairquark.
FairQuark(FRQ)
Quote
A clone of quark, claimed to have a fairer initial distribution.  Claiming to have something people want is the first step in both introducing a valuable innovation and in promoting a scam.  Which was it in this case?  
FastoinSHA(FSS)
Fck Banks Coin(FCK)
Fellatiocoin(BLO)
Ferengicoin(FER)
Ferretcoin(?)
Firecoin()
Fireflycoin(FFC)
Fitcoin (FIT)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $183 on 2 June 2014
Floridacoin(FLC, (which it shares with Fluttercoin))
Forexcoin(FRX)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4869 on 24 June 2014
Fourchan(?)
Quote
Created via Coingen.  Now I want to see if the fourchan crowd actively attacked it.  They would, you know.
FourtyTwoCoin(42)
Foxcoin (FOX)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $1404 on 2 June 2014
Fragcoin(FRAG)
FraudCoin(?)
Quote
Seriously?  SERIOUSLY? How'd that work out for ya? Created via coingen.
Freedomcoin(FDC)
Frictionlesscoin(FLC)
Frozencoin(FZ)
Quote
observed with market cap US$4149 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Frycoin (FRY)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $960 on 2 June 2014
Furrycoin(FUR)
Galaxycoin(GLX)
Quote
A fast NVC clone with constant reward for 8 years.  Observed with market cap US$3613 on 12 July 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
Gaelcoin(GAC)
Quote
observed with market cap 4038 on 11 may, 3988 on 2 June,
Galleon(GLN)
Galtcoin(GLT)
Quote
Created via Coingen
Gamecoin(GME)
Quote
'gamecoin' appears on the list of coins created via coingen, but GME was apparently launched before the website coingen.io was registered, so it may not be the same thing.
GameLeageCoin(GML)
Quote
observed with market cap US$1995 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Gamerscoin (GMC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4022 on 2 June 2014
Gasolinecoin(DZL)
Gatescoin(GTC)
Gaycoin(GAY)
Quote
Created via Coingen
Genecoin(?)
Quote
Created via Coingen
Genesiscoin(GNS)
Geocoins(GEO)
Ghostcoin(GHC)
Quote
observed on 25 May 2014 trading with a market cap of US$4575.  
Giarcoin (GIAR)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $590 on 2 June 2014
GiftCoin(GFT)
Gil(GIL)
Girlcoin(GIRL)
Givecoin (GIVE)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $3560 on 2 June 2014
Globalboost(BST)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2315 on 24 June 2014
Global Denomination  (GDN)
Quote
Apparently a 'stillbirth' - this cryptocurrency was launched on 21 April 2014, and unwisely initially listed on exchanges while its market cap was still under $5000. (Investigate: What motivates an exchange to list a new issue whose market is so shallow it doesn't even have a wading section?)  It has a premine that amounts to about a half-day of block rewards at its nominal block reward and block rate.  It is using X11 hashing in an effort to appeal to CPU miners.  Observed trading at market cap $4510 on 2 June 2014.
Globecoin(GLOBE)
Quote
Don't confuse this with Globe (GLB), a later cryptocurrency with a confusingly similar name.  
Globe(GLB)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4712 on 10 June 2014
Goatcoin(GOAT)
Godcoin(GOD)
Quote
created via coingen.  observed with market cap US$89 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Gold Bars(?)
Goldcoin(GLD)
Gold Pressed Latinum(GPL)
Gollumcoin(GLM)
GoodCoin(GOOD)
Quote
created via Coingen.  Observed trading with market cap $3178 on 24 June 2014.
Goxcoin(GOX)
GeneCoin(?)
Grain(GRA)
Grandcoin(GDC)
Granitecoin (GRN)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $1868 on 2 June 2014
Graphene(GRP)
GravyCoin(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.
GreeceCoin(GRCE)
Quote
This was promoted as being to support the Greek economy.  Was the software even available in Greek?  Did the developers live there?  Or is this another case of somebody with no connection claiming to be a rescuer?   Observed trading with market cap $3177 on 2 June 2014
Groincoin(GXG)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $3128 on 24 June 2014
Growthcoin(GRW)
Guncoin (GUN)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $3749 on 2 June 2014
H2Ocoin(H20)
Quote
observed on may 10 2014 with market cap US$3616, and on 2 June with market cap US$1346.
HackerNewsCoin(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.
HashCoin(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.  Observed trading with market cap $814 on 2 June 2014
HawaiiCoin(HIC)
Quote
Seen trading at market cap US$1423 on 1 June, then at US$16018 - up by more than a factor of ten - less than an hour later.  This would be more impressive if the trades involved more than a sawbuck, but it's still interesting.  
Heisenberg(HEX)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2565 on 6 June 2014
Helixcoin(HXC)
Hellcoin(HLC)
HernCoin(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.
Highfivecoin(H5C)
Quote
Observed trading on 25 May 2014 with market cap of US$627.
Hobbitcoin(HBC)
Quote
observed trading may 29 with market cap US$277 and on June 2 with market cap $7035 - meaning it rose %2540 in four days.  It'll be taken off the list of dead & dying if it can maintain the valuation until September 2.    
HongKongCoin(HKC)
Quote
Launched by 'HongKongCoin' (a newbie account with hidden ID/email information) on March 16 2014.  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=518669.0  HongKongCoin was a SHA256 coin with 6K coins per block, 60-second block times, and a block reward halving every 50K blocks (every 35 days).   2.5% (1.7 days of coin generation at nominal rates) of the coin supply was premined "to be given away to the people of Hong Kong" and a faucet was set up, but the security was very bad and several people demonstrated the ability to get dozens or hundreds of rewards from it.  The rewards in turn were so large that the HKC would run out if 2% of Hong Kong's population got 1 reward each.  Here is a thread about some of its problems:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=523292.0   In addition to its regular reward schedule, additional "bonus" blocks were added with half-million coin bounties at blocks 40K and 50K.  Once these were mined, 'HongKongCoin' abandoned development.  A week later the coin was trading at 1 satoshi.  A week after that, it was delisted from all exchanges as HongKetoCoin launched in its place.
HongKetoCoin(HKC)
Quote
is a relaunch of HongKongCoin.  Launched by 'HongKetoCoin' (a newbie account with hidden ID/email info) on 17 May 2014.  First seen trading at market cap US$4272 on 22 May 2014.  Seen again at market cap $2850 on 2 June 2014.
Horsecoin (HORS)
Quote
observed trading with market cap $76 on 16 Jun 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
Hotcoin(HOT)
Quote
not so hot anymore....
HTMLcoin(HTML)
Huatecoin(HUC)
Huitong(HTC)
Huskycoin(HC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $3808 on 24 June 2014
Hypercoin(?)
Icoin(ICN)
Quote
observed 11 may with market cap US$2554, and on 2 June with market cap US$4971.
Imperial Coin(IPC)
Quote
observed with market cap US$2260 on 12 July 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
IncaCoin(NKA)
Quote
also often spelled IncaKoin
Informationcoin(ITC)
Quote
observed with market cap US$4445 on 12 July 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
Inkcoin(INK)
Insanitycoin(WOLF)
Instapay(IPC)
Quote
An IPO scam.  Gullible people pledged BTC to get Instapay coins, and the scammer disappeared with their BTC.
Inven(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.
IshaCoin(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.
Italycoin(ITC)
Ixcoin(?)
JasonCoin(?)
Jennycoin(JNY)
Jerkcoin(?)
Jerkycoin(JKY)
JesusCoin(JJC)(GOD)
Quote
 Apparently there have been at least two JesusCoin creations.  One traded under the symbol GOD and another under JJC.  At least one was created via coingen. Still... No.  Just ... no.  Something about a camel passing through the eye of a needle comes to mind - and also this episode with moneychangers in the temple...  but two different somebodies still thought this was a good idea.
JezusCoin(?)
Quote
and somebody else thought misspelling it was an improvement. Created via Coingen.
JoeCoin(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.
JunnonCoin(JNC)
Quote
Launched Jan 13 2014.  The client was malware; it contained a wallet stealer and remote desktop.
Kakacoin(KKC)
Karpcoin(KARP)
KarpelesCoin(KAR)
Quote
Mark Karpeles is the former CEO of Gox, and widely hated by many people who, in aggregate, lost nearly a billion dollars worth of assets in both Bitcoins lost by his exchange and bitcoins devalued by the shaken markets caused by the losses.  What connection this coin had to him I don't know, except perhaps to commemorate his shame.
KashmirCoin  (KSC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2014 on 2 June 2014
Keisercoin(?)
KhalsaCoin(?)
Kiffercoin(?)
Killercoin(KILR)
Kimdotcoin()
Kimcoin()
Kingcoin()
Koindashian(KOIN)
Klingon Empire Darsek(KED)
Krugercoin(?)
KrugmanCoin(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.
Kudos(KDS)
Kumacoin (KUMA)
Quote
observed trading with market cap $837 on 16 Jun 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
Kushcoin(KHC)
Leadcoin (LDC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $3982 on 2 June 2014
Lebowskis(LBW)
LegitCoin(?)
Quote
Darn, I was hoping someone would use that name for something that didn't wind up on this list....  Created via Coingen.
Lemoncoin(LMC)
LeproCoin(LPC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $63 on 2 June 2014
Levelcoin(?)
Lightvelocitycoin(LVC)
Limecoin(LC)
Quote
observed 11 may with market cap US$4406.
LimecoinLite (LCL)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2132 on 2 June 2014
Limecoinx(LIMX)
Quote
Observed trading at market cap $3786 on 16 Jun 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Liquidcoin(?)
Quote
LiquidCoin is dead.
Added 25 May 2014.
Litecoin Plus(XLC)
Quote
observed trading with market cap $4031 on 10 Jun 2014 (via coinmarketcap)
LiteCoinX(LTCX)
Quote
observed trading with market cap $4609 on 10 Jun 2014 (via coinmarketcap)
Livecoin(LVC)
Lolcoin(LOL)
Lottery Tickets (TIX)
LoveCoin(LOVE)
Quote
Something named "Lovecoin" was created via Coingen.  As with most coingen coins, there are people who claim this isn't the one that was made via coingen.  It might be, or it might not.  LOVE was a Scrypt PoW/PoS hybrid coin launched March 30 by 'Lovecoinproject' (a newbie account with hidden email/ID info) that distributed 3 Million coins in an IPO sold by the developer, and reserved another 1 Million coins for the  developer.  This premined amount corresponds to about 1.5 months of coin production at nominal rates.  After the IPO coins were sold to investors and the premine sold on exchanges, the developer abandoned the project.  A 'relaunch' with a new dev ('Johnny Non,' whose email/id information is also hidden) was announced on 19 May 2014.  The relaunch will apparently be proof-of-stake only.  
Lucky7coin(LK7)
Lycancoin(LYC)
Machinecoin(MAC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $591    on 2 June 2014
MagicCoin(MGC)
Quote
created via Coingen.Observed trading with market cap $1298 on 2 June 2014.  Don't confuse this with Magicoin(MAGIC), a different cryptocurrency with a confusingly similar name.
Magicoin(MAGIC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4313 on 24 June 2014
Maki(MAKI)
Malecoin(?)
Maplecoin(MPL)
Mariocoin(?)
MediaCoin(?)
Mediterraneancoin(MED)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4950 on 8 May 2014.
Megcoin(MEG)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $1083 on 16 June 2014.
Melange(SPICE)
Quote
launched Jan 24 2014 by 'Blazr', a junior member account with email/ID hidden.  Named for the plot device in the 'Dune' series by Frank Herbert.  Released on the scificointalk forum 30 minutes before release on bitcointalk, which led to some talk of an 'instamine',  although it looks like even people who first saw it on bitcointalk were able to get in on some of the first 400 blocks or so.  18 coins per block, 4 minute block intervals, block halving every 20K blocks.  The launch was smooth and the software apparently worked fine, but the dev, for whatever reason, was never heard from again after launching the coin.  
Memecoin(MEM)
Metiscoin(MTS)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap US$320 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Milancoin(MLC)
Millionairecoin(MIL)
Quote
observed trading with market cap $2972 on 16 Jun 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
Mjollnircoin(MNR)
Quote
observed trading with market cap $234 on 16 Jun 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
MmjCoin(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.
Molecule(MOL)
Moneyenom(MYM)
MouseCoin()
Quote
it's been called a "wallet stealing scamcoin" - I haven't had time to look closer than that.
MtGoxcoin(GOX)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $552 on 2 June 2014
Muniti(MUN)
Quote
Muniti is launched March 29 2014.  It went on exchanges within days, before its market cap had risen above the level of being a dead coin.  The launcher is 'radi324' who, for a refreshing change of pace, does NOT have his email address hidden.  The intent is to introduce cryptocurrency to the nation of Malta and to promote Maltese tourism.  The developers are apparently actually IN Malta, which is another refreshing change of pace for people who introduce country coins.  A 32% premine is reserved for the distribution.  Radi324 claims that nearly all of this money will be distributed door-to-door to the Maltese people, with 1% being reserved for a promotional charity donation at a traditional event right after Christmas.  Meanwhile they've been actively promoting the coin in Malta, and there is evidence that they're getting active coverage by local media and recruiting volunteers for their door-to-door paper wallet distribution.   It is unfortunate that they went for exchanges so quickly, before there was any market capitalization to distinguish them from the thousands of dead coins; I sincerely hope to be taking this off of the list in a bit over 90 days.
Mutcoin(MUT)
Naanayam(NYM)
Nakacoin(NKC)
Nanotoken (NAN)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $3440 on 2 June 2014
Nbcoin(NBC)
Nerdcoin(NERD)
Networkcoin(NWC)
NewStatesmanCoin(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.
NeonCoin(?)
Quote
Evidently a pure IPO scam.  The scammer accepted BTC, LTC, and NXT from people who thought they were buying NeonCoins, then disappeared with the money.
Nerdcoin(NERD)
Quote
Launched 11 Jan 2014.  The client was malware; it contained a keylogger and wallet stealer.  
Networkcoin(NWC)
NexusCoin(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.
NightCoin(?)
Quote
created via Coingen.
Niuecoin(?)
Noahcoin(NOAH)
Quote
observed trading at market cap US$4250 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Noodlyappendagecoin(NDL)
Nucoin(NUC)
Nutcoin(NUT)
Quote
market cap $857 on June 14 2014 via cryptocoinrank
NXO(?)
Quote
Fork of NXT
NXR(?)
Quote
Fork of NXT
ObamaCoin(?)
Quote
In America, you can use the name of a 'public figure' such as a politician, without permission -- but if you mention a certain Mouse, you'll get sued into oblivion.  So this is something people were allowed to do, but I don't think it helped them. Created via Coingen.
Obama_bin_lotteryCoin(?)
Quote
Um.  So what was this, a play to appeal to pro-gambling political cranks who wanted to compare Obama with Bin Laden? Created via Coingen.
Ocoin(OSC)
OilCoin(OIL)  
Quote
I remember this, it was an attempt to create a cryptocurrency for the vertical market of crude-oil shipping and dealing - but made absolutely zero penetration into that market.  
OneCoin(?)
Quote
There was a 'onecoin' created via Coingen.  But this coin apparently launched before coingen.io was registered, so it may not be the same thing.
Onioncoin(ONI)
Onlinegamingcoin(OGC)
Orbitcoin(ORB)
Orcacoin(ORCA)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $1215 on 2 June 2014
Oreocoin(OREO)
Quote
Launched Feb 21 2014.  The client was malware; it contained a remote desktop exploit.
ORObit(ORO)
Quote
died 29 April 2014.  Created via coingen
Ottomancoin(OTC)
Quote
observed trading at market cap US$4494 on 12 July 2014 at cryptocoinrank
Paccoin(PAC)
Pandacoin(PAND)
Quote
There have been at least three different Pandacoins.  This one was launched by 50Cent_rapper here:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=399127.0   It was launched 4 Jan 2014 and appears to have died sometime in early June.  It's not entirely clear yet how much the other two Pandacoins had to do with its demise.
Pandacoin(PANDA)
Quote
observed trading with market cap $4820 on 10 Jun 2014 (via coinmarketcap)
Pangucoin(PGC)
ParallaxCoin(PLX)
Quote
Observed 25 May trading with a market cap of US$3260.  
Patriotcoin(USA)
Paycoin (PYC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $3792  on 2 June 2014
Peacecoin(PEC)
Peerpay(?)
Penguincoin(PENG)
Quote
observed trading at market cap US$4473 on 12 July 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
Pennies(CENT)
Peoplecoin (PPL)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $3733 on 2 June 2014
Phcoin(PHC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4856 on 24 June 2014
Phicoin(PHI)
PhotonCoin(PHO)
Quote
Apparently traded briefly on May 23 2014, at market cap ranging from US$6750 to US$7050.  Not known to have traded on open markets on any other date.  The trading symbol is now used by something called 'Photon'.  
Picoin(?)
Pieces(?)
Pikacoin(PIK)
Quote
Created via coingen.
Piniumcoin(PNC)
Piratecoin(PIR)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $291 on 2 June 2014
PixelCoin(PXL)
Quote
They accepted payment in PXL for pixels of advertising on their webpage.  They called it a "million dollar webpage", regardless of the fact that the same advertising exposure could be elsewhere purchased for pennies.  As of 28 April 2014 this cryptocurrency is still on the market, its value is still dropping, and its 'backing' has not yet reached parity with the market price of internet advertising.  Checked again on May 26 and at some point in the intervening time it has been delisted from every exchange.  
Platinum Bars(?)
Quote
from the same dev who brought us silver bars and gold bars, reputedly.
Platinumcoin(PT)
Quote
Created via coingen.
Playtoken(PLT)
Pokercoin(POK)
Quote
Created via coingen.
Polcoin(PLC)
Quote
observed 11 may with market cap US$3802.
Polishcoin(?)
Polycoin(?)
Popcoin(POP)
Quote
Do not confuse this with popularcoin, a later cryptocurrency also called Popcoin and also traded under the symbol POP.  
PopularCoin(POP)
Quote
There is a Popularcoin(POP) on the list of coingen coins.  The dev of this currency paid coingen to create it, but after having a look at the code says he based the version of Popularcoin that was actually released on a different codebase. Popularcoin was observed trading with a market cap of $4185 on 6 June 2014.
Poundcoin(PUK)
Powercoin(POW)
Quote
Created via coingen.  Observed trading with market cap $97 on 2 June 2014
Primcoin(?)
Quote
was this a scammer counting on people mistyping the name of primecoin when they made buy/sell orders?
Preminecoin(PMC)
Quote
Observed trading at market cap 3400 on 23 may 2014.
Procoin(PCN)  
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $811 on 2 June 2014
Prospercoin(PRC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $1545 on 2 June 2014
Protoshares(PTS)
Pwnycoin(PWNY)
Pxlcoin(PXL)
Quote
created via coingen.  Do not confuse this with Pixelcoin, which had a very similar name and traded using the same symbol. Observed trading on 6 June 2014 with market cap $13.  
QuackCoin(?)
Quatloo(QTL)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4222 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Qubitcoin(Q2C)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $3496 on 24 June 2014
Quebecoin(QBC)
Quote
Observed trading at market cap $1639 on 16 Jun 2014 at coinmarketcap. Simultaneously observed trading with market cap 41767 at cryptocoinrank.  The only way that can happen is if the amounts being traded are so insignificant that the coin is dead regardless.  
Quick Quick Coin(QQC)
Quora (QUORA)
Rabbitcoin(?)
Radioactivecoin(RAD)
Rainbowcoin(LGBT)
Quote
observed on 10 May with a market cap of US$4223.
Rainbowgoldcoin(RAIN)
Rapidcoin(RPD)
Rastacoin(RTC)
Quote
Created via coingen.
Ratcoin (RATC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $322 on 2 June 2014
Realcoin(REC)
RiceCoin(?)
Quote
Created via coingen.
Richcoin(RCH)
Rightcoin (RTC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $1280 on 2 June 2014
RiseCoin(?)
Quote
Um.  It didn't. Created via coingen.
Rocketcoin(ROC)
Romancoin(ROM)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $935 on 12 July 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
Rosecoin(?)
Rotocoin(RT2)
Quote
Launched March 15 2014 by 'rotocoin' - a new account with hidden ID/email information.  Thread: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=516138.0  It looks like people gave the dev 50 BTC for coins.  It was an n-factor scrypt coin with a halving time of 60 days.  There was a premine that amounted to about two days of coin production at nominal rates, which was sold for 50BTC in an IPO.  (1 BTC per 28.8 RT2).  Rotocoin was observed on May 10 2014 to be trading at US$0.18 per coin, with market cap under $5K, and on 17 may at 0.092 per coin with market cap US$2552.  
Rubycoin(?)
Royalcoin(RYC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $3315 on 2 June 2014
Rupaycoin(RUP)
Saffroncoin (SFR)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4185 on 2 June 2014
SailCoin(?)
SambaCoin(SMB)
Sapphirecoin (SPH)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $84 on 2 June 2014
Savecoin(SPC)
Quote
observed trading may 29 with market cap US$1853
Savingcoin(SAV)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $177 on 2 June 2014
Saw(SAW)
Quote
Created via coingen.
Scamcoin(SCC)
Quote
It had what the announcement thread called an "innovative proof of scam system."  
Scoin(SCO)
Scotcoin(SCOT)
Secondscoin()
Securecoin (SRC)
Quote
Apparently at least two different things with the name securecoin and the trading symbol SRC exist.  One is being tracked at coinmarketcap and is live.  Another is being tracked at cryptocoinrank, and is dead.  On 2, 6, 16, and 24 June, and 12 July 2014, these had market cap  196914/174524/136979/117285/106617 and $112/140/165/165/101 respectively.  The one being tracked at coinmarketcap has about 100x the market cap of the one being tracked at cryptocoinrank, but has lost a greater fraction of its value over this period.
Seedcoin(SDC)
Serracoin (SRR)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $2968 on 2 June 2014
Sha1coin(SHA)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $23 on 2 June 2014
Shares(?)
Quote
Apparently a pure IPO scam.  45 BTC were sent to the scammer by people who believed they were buying Shares.  And disappeared.
Sherlockcoin(SHC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4750 on 20 May 2014
Shibecoin(SHIBE)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4956 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Shillingcoin(?)
Siamesecoin(SIS)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4664 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap
Sifcoin(?)
Quote
Sifcoin used a series of SHA3 candidates for hashing.
SiliconValleyCoin(XSV)
Quote
(information thanks to 'galaxy') - Claimed sending out a mailer that said "free money" to people in Silicon Valley would spark mass adoption. The pitch was that someone influential would get their junkmail invitation to receive 600 worthless coins, then head right to their computer and start downloading the wallet from some website that would be completely foreign to them. Then said person would say WOW, Im going to talk to my friends and get this thing going. Not a joke. The early investors/miners, dev, and his sockpuppets were dead serious. The thread is a classic example of a pump and dump attempt.
Silkcoin(SILK)
Quote
The name is a reference to the defunct (or first) "silk road" market place.  
Silver bars(?)
Quote
Reputedly from the same dev who brought us gold bars and platinum bars.
Silvercoin (SRC, before Securecoin had it)
Quote
Created via coingen.
SilvioBerlusCoin(?)
Quote
Silvio Berluscioni is a very wealthy Italian Businessman and Politician.  His lifestyle is notoriously lavish and scandal-ridden at a time when Italy itself is going through a fierce financial contraction, so he's not well liked.  But somebody liked him enough to name a cryptocurrency after him, evidently. Created via coingen.
Singularity(SING)
Quote
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=670533.0   Observed trading 12 July 2014 at market cap $3925 on coinmarketcap.
Skeincoin(SKC)
Quote
Launched Nov 1 2013, by 'Red Kendra' (a newbie account with no ID/email information) Skeincoin was a coin with 32-coin block reward and a 2-minute block time.  The Proof-of-work was a two-round hash, with the first round using the Skein hashing algorithm and the second round using SHA-2.  Because there are no ASICs that do Skein, that made Skein the limiting factor in proof-of-work.  Accordingly, many coins were donated to Botnet operators.  Launch was apparently smooth.    
Skycoin(SYC)
Quote
This is one of at least 3 different "skycoin" that have been launched.  Its announcement thread is at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=219550.0
Skycoin(SKY)
Quote
This is the second "skycoin" to be launched.  Its announcement thread is at  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=380441.0  
Skynet-coin(SNC)
Quote
This was initially launched with the name "skycoin" (the third coin by that name) but the dev changed the name to skynet-coin when he learned that there had been a previous skycoin (already dead by that time) and a second skycoin (still active at that time).  Its announcement thread is https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=492014.0
Slendercoin(SNC)
SlothCoin(SLOTH)
Quote
died 29 April 2014
Smartcoin(?)
Snowcoin(SNC)
Soapbar(SOAP)
Sochicoin(SOCHI)
Socialcoin (SOC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4171 on 2 June 2014
SolCoin(SOL)
SolidCoin(?)
Speedcoin(SPC)
Quote
observed 17 May 2014 with market cap 2153.  Speedcoin appears to have started trading on 28 April 2014 and stopped trading on 22 May 2014.  Its highest market cap was US$28M on April 28 and its lowest was apparently US$2K on 17 May.
Spirecoin()
Spodermancoin(SDM)
Sprout(?)
Stackedcoin(?)
Stacycoin(?)
Quote
Stacycoin was apparently a fork of DRK.  Although Stacycoin itself was apparently legit, it got re-announced in a second thread by 'werrty', and in 'werrty's announcement the link to the precompiled windows wallet was replaced with a link to a windows wallet containing a trojan.  It doesn't look like the developers had anything to do with this, but people still wound up downloading malware.  
Stalwartbucks(SBX)
Starcoin(STR)
StarvingArtistCoin(?)
Quote
Another coin name chosen specifically to eliminate it from consideration as any kind of serious effort.  Created via coingen.
STLcoin(STL)
Quote
observed trading with market cap $1030 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
StockCoin (STC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $1169 on 2 June 2014
Stop(?)
Quote
A fork of NXT
Storagecoin(?)
Stories(STY)
Quote
observed 17 may 2014 with market cap US$1490, again on 2 June with market cap US$348.  
Streamcoin(STRC)
SupercalifragilisticexpialidociousCoin(?)  
Quote
If nobody wants to say it, nobody is going to trade in it. Created via coingen.
Suncoin(SUN)
Quote
Observed 25 May 2014 trading with a market cap of US$4070
Supercoin(SUPER)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $1893 on 2 June 2014
Superherocoin(?)
SurgeCoin(SRG)
Quote
I think I remember talk about supporting the "troop surge" - the latter phase of American Interventionism in Iraq.  I don't think I remember any action having anything to do with that goal ever taking place.  Surgecoin apparently traded from April 8 2014 to May 23 2014, reaching a market cap of US$31K on April 9 and US$240 on May 23.
Swagcoin(SWAG)
Swisscoin(?)
Quote
Created via coingen.
Switchcoin(SWITCH)
Syncoin(SYN)
Tacocoin(TCO)
Takcoin[TAK]
Quote
observed trading with market cap US$3197 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Takeoutcoin(?)
Techcoin(TECH)
Quote
observed trading with market cap US$1794 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Teddycoin(TDY)
Quote
observed trading with market cap US$3026 on 12 July 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
Tenebrix(?)
Quote
according to 'boymilk' Tenebrix was the first scrypt coin.
TenFiveCoin(10-5)
Teslacoin(TES)
Quote
Observed with market cap $4999 on April 19 2014
ThaiCoin(?)
Quote
Did the people who created this even speak Thai?  Was the software available in that language?  Created via coingen.
Thebotcoin(TBN)
Thcoin(THC)
Thecoin(?)
Quote
Thecoin was malware; the wallet contained a keyboard recorder, and the dev apparently hoped to get the passwords people were using for their wallets.  It's unknown how often that scam succeeded, or how many suckers were using the same passwords for their Thecoin wallet that they used for their Bitcoin wallets.  But probably quite a lot was stolen.
Thebotcoin(TBN)
TheSmurfscoin (TSC)
Quote
It'll be interesting to see whether this one limps along until the cease & desist order arrives, or finishes dying before then.  Observed trading with market cap $3221 on 2 June 2014.  No longer visible on any market on 16 June 2014.
Thundercoin(?)
Tigercoin(TGC)
Timekoin(TK)
Titanium(TTN)
Tittiecoin(TTC)
TokeCoin(?)
Quote
Serious investors don't smoke weed, people.  It makes them lose money. Created via coingen.
Tomatocoin(?)
TomScottCoin(?)
Quote
Created via coingen.
TraceCoin(?)
TraderCoin(TDC)
Quote
Tradercoin was malware.  It contained a keylogger to try to get passwords, and a wallet stealer to try to get files to use the passwords on.  
Traincoin(XTN)
Trollcoin(?)
Troptions(?)
Truckcoin(TRK)
Quote
observed trading with market cap US$4458 on 12 July 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
Turbocoin(XTP)
UFOcoin(UFO)
Ultimatecoin(ULT)
UniteCoin(UNI)
Quote
  Unitecoin was a scrypt coin retargeting every 60 blocks, awarding 50 coins per block, with 2-minute block times.  It launched halving the block reward every 840000 blocks.  The announcement made on Bitcointalk at https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=372707.0 says every 84000 which would have been about 3 months, but the source code at https://github.com/unitecoin-org/Unitecoin/blob/master/src/main.cpp says 840000 which is about 3 years.  Its nominal block time was two minutes according to the source.

It was released initially on December 1, 2013 with an announcement on cryptocointalk, and was not announced on bitcointalk https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=372707.0  until 16 December.  About 3 weeks worth of coins at nominal block rates were already gone by the time it was announced here, so Unitecoin was considered by some to have been premined.  The blockchain shows that the first 3 thousand blocks or so - about a week's worth at nominal rates -  was mined very fast, but that's likely due to ordinary launching at low difficulty.  

Trading in Unitecoin appears to have started at a market cap of $196 on April 16 2014 and ended at a market cap of $28 on May 27 2014.  During that brief time it had four peaks in market cap, to US$591, $1136, $1141, and $635.  Between these peaks, it crashed to $38, $75, and $62. The trading history is truly remarkable in that it appears to have gone through FOUR separate pump-and-dumps, each capable of transferring up to 90% of the bagholders' remaining money into the pockets of the dumpers.  This doesn't usually happen, if only because after one or two pumps all the sufficiently gullible bagholders are broke.
Unitedscryptcoin(USC)
United Federation Credit(UFC)
Unitedscryptcoin(USC)
Unitycoin(UNT)
Universitycoin(UVC)
Quote
observed trading may 29 with market cap US$3226
Vadercoin(VADR)
Valuecoin(VLC)
Vampirecoin(VMP)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $332 on 2 June 2014
Vanillacoin(?)
Vcoin(?)
Vegascoin(VGC)
Quote
Created via coingen.
Veilcoin(VEIL)
Quote
observed trading with market cap US$1629 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Velocitycoin(VEL)
Vendettacoin(VAC)
Venividivicicoin(VVV)
Quote
observed trading with market cap US$1963 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Also observed trading with market cap US$14856 on 12 July 2014 at cryptocoinrank. It's not clear whether they are tracking different issues, or whether the volume is so thin that a few minutes trading can swing the market by a factor of seven.
Verncoin(VRN)
VeroCoin(VRO)
Quote
Apparently a pure IPO scam.  8(?) BTC were sent by people who thought they were buying VeroCoins to someone who simply disappeared with them.  
Version(V)
VirtualMiningCoin(VMC)
Quote
Observed 2014 may 19 with a market cap of 3843.  
Viruscoin(?)
VisaCoin(VISA)
Quote
This did not last long enough to warrant a cease and desist order from VISA, although the prospect of one should have warned off any investors who thought about it.  VISA was apparently a pure IPO scam; 135 BTC were sent by people who thought they were buying VisaCoins.  The BTC simply vanished.  
VisnCoin(VISN)  
Quote
Another IPO scam.  People sent BTC to the scammer who claimed he would sell them VisnCoins.  The scammer and their money disappeared.
Vodkacoin(?)
Votecoin(?)
Watcoin(?)
Wavecoin(WVS)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $4592 on 24 June 2014
WeAreSatoshi(WAS)
Webcoin(WEB)
Wecoin(WEC)
Wikicoin(WIKI)
Wincoin(WIN)
Quote
Observed with market cap $2213 on 10 June 2014
Wolongcoin(WOL)
World Football Coin(?)
Wpcoin(WPC)
Xcoin(XCO)
X11coin(?)
X13coin(?)
X14coin(X14)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $228 on 12 July 2014 at coinmarketcap.
Xedoscoin(XDC)
Quote
Observed trading with market cap $68 on 2 June 2014
Xencoin(XEN)
Xivra(xiv)
XXLcoin(XXL)
Quote
Observed with market cap $1213 on 13 June 2014
YACcoin(YACC)
Yamashitacoin (YMC)
Quote
observed trading with market cap $2332 on 16 Jun 2014 at cryptocoinrank.
Yangcoin()
Yincoin()
YinYuanCoin(YYC)
Quote
Launched Dec 27 2013.  The client was malware; it contained a key logger, wallet stealer and remote desktop.
Yuan Bao(YBC)
ZCoin(?)
Quote
Created via coingen.
Zedcoin(?)
Zenithcoin(ZTC)
Quote
observed trading may 29 with market cap US$2284 and on 2 June with market cap US$791.  
Zeuscoin(ZEU)
Zodiaccoin(ZOD)
Zombiecoin(ZMB)
Zurcoin(ZUR)
966  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Operation Shitcoin Cleanout and Clean Up Has Begun- Join the Revolution on: April 28, 2014, 11:19:52 PM
More in the interests of dancing on their graves than putting them there, is anyone keeping a list of all the altcoins that have passed into memory, delisted from their last exchanges after their per-coin price dropped south of 1 Satoshi? 

I mean, I know a lot of coins are considered "dead", but for most of them, there is still a blockchain out there (or even more than one!) that you can catch up to if you load up a client and find a peer.  I'm talking about coins that are _DEAD_, meaing Coins whose blockchains are now available only from archives, and where nobody can even find a peer if they set up a wallet.

 
967  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: BANK RUN! - P2P Fiat-Bitcoin Exchange on: April 25, 2014, 06:30:21 PM
You know, back in 2008 that was my response to Bitcoin itself. 

"Wait, every node is getting every message?  Can't scale..."

"Every node has to check encrypted signatures on every message?  Can't scale...."

Scale is still my biggest technical concern with Bitcoin, but when you actually figure out how much data you're talking about bitcoin scales fine.

968  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Proof of Storage to make distributed resource consumption costly. on: April 25, 2014, 02:45:07 AM

You don't ask them for (2^(2^t)) (mod n),  you give them H((2^(2^t)) (mod n)) and ask them for t.  

You're absolutely right.   Instead of having Alice give Bob R and ask for t, you want her to give him H(R) and ask for t.  When Bob doesn't have R he can't start successively squaring R -  therefore he has no successor function for R, thus no way to construct a rainbow table.


Nope, darn.  There's still a Bloom filter shortcut.  Bob can still construct a rainbow table if he uses Bloom filters rather than successor functions to select the band.

Here's how it works; each band of the table stores a bloom filter that selects hashes which result from 't' in that band, plus the starting (t, R) pair.  When Bob gets H(R), he goes to see which bloom filter it matches, then starts on that band with the starting (t, R) pair and does successive squares until he gets R such that H(R) matches - at which point he knows the corresponding t.   

969  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Proof of Storage to make distributed resource consumption costly. on: April 25, 2014, 02:38:25 AM
Downside of this is you can't do a publicly verifiable version, e.g. where you have just one piece of storage per identity but one piece per identity,peer pair (which was what I wanted in the motivation for this post; but there are other applications, e.g. like making a hidden service identity costly).


Wait...  I thought that was exactly what we were talking about. 

Could you explain in more detail what you mean by a 'publicly verifiable version'?

I was thinking of a system where each peer has to keep one table in memory per peer that it's connected to.  The table, in turn, is constructed from a 'seed' which lasts as long as that peer doesn't change its key.  Now, I had assumed that Alice's key for each connection would be different, but it doesn't have to be...  Alice doesn't have to use a different key for each connection; would it suit your purposes if she didn't?  In principle, Alice could publish 'n' while keeping its prime factors secret.  People would still have to construct an 'Alice' table in order to bring up a connection to the 'Alice' node. 

970  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Proof of Storage to make distributed resource consumption costly. on: April 25, 2014, 02:23:21 AM
If you don't play it straight, there is probably a way to use a hash function or 'salt' to defeat rainbow tables; I'll have to think about it.

You don't ask them for (2^(2^t)) (mod n),  you give them H((2^(2^t)) (mod n)) and ask them for t.  

You're absolutely right.   Instead of having Alice give Bob R and ask for t, you want her to give him H(R) and ask for t.  When Bob doesn't have R he can't start successively squaring R -  therefore he has no successor function for R, thus no way to construct a rainbow table.


You could still extract some parallelism by first computing T sequentially and then saving way-points along the way, though that requires you to store elements of n which are large compared to the hashes... but probably reasonable enough for extracting some parallelism. Hm.


I see it.  Say you've got a nice GPU that lets you do a thousand operations in parallel.  So instead of storing the _whole_ table you store a thousand widely separated starting points for your search.  Then instead of searching a million-element table when you get a request, you have a thousand threads that each work on building a thousand-element table until one of them finds the answer.   It uses a thousand times the processing power of a straight rainbow-table implementation, but it can be just as fast as a thousand-element rainbow table. 

But here is a good way to defeat that.

We're dealing with arbitrary 't', right? What if Alice starts out by saying that she will never ask for any 't' except a 't' that's evenly divisible by some factor X?  You can skip storing the result of all but one out of every X squaring operations. The result is that constructing the million-element table now costs a factor of 'X' more nonparallelizable operations.  Say X is 4300.  Now Bob can save a thousand starting points in his million-element table, but each thread is going to have to do 4300 squarings to get the 'next' element in its thousand-element subtable.  You can favor lookups over table construction by essentially any work factor. 

Of course this makes it compute-expensive to initiate a connection as well as storage-expensive to keep one going.  But if the connections last longer than an hour, that probably isn't a problem.

971  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: will the bitcoin reach $1000 one day...? on: April 24, 2014, 11:19:58 PM
I think they're gonna buy in for the same reason I bought in.

Bitcoin solves a trillion-dollar problem (how to transfer value online) better and more cheaply than anything else solves that problem. 

A bunch of people who "think it's gonna go up" is meaningless in business terms.  That way you only get tulips.   A specific widespread problem that it can solve, in a way that will measurably and immediately save people money starting in the same month they adopt it, is a very different thing.

People could be talking up its future value all day, pointing out exponential growth, etc, and I'd be yawning and walking away if I didn't see it as something that can deliver genuine immediate commercial value.  It cannot deliver that value merely as an investment, but it can do so as a medium of exchange.

972  Other / Off-topic / Re: Let's Count to 21 Million with Images on: April 24, 2014, 08:05:26 PM


973  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Proof of Storage to make distributed resource consumption costly. on: April 24, 2014, 07:45:31 PM
Use Rivest's time lock puzzle.  It's asymmetric in that the person with the key can random-access it but the person without the key has to compute it linearly.  Here's a linky:

http://people.csail.mit.edu/rivest/lcs35-puzzle-description.txt

Mathematically, it works like this:  You're trying to compute R=(2^(2^t)) mod n for some arbitrary 't' and an 'n' which is a product of 2 large primes.  If you actually know the primes, you can do this quickly; if you don't, the fastest way to get the result is to either (a) compute 't' successive squarings modulo n, or (b) look it up in a dictionary because you already computed those successive squarings.  This is important because the successive-squarings operation cannot be done in parallel. It is strictly linear computation.

Your storage-requirement then looks like this:  Alice transmits 'n' to Bob.  Bob builds a table of (t, R) pairs and an index by 'R'.  Whenever Alice wants proof that Bob is still holding this table, she picks a 't' at random, calculates the corresponding 'R' which takes her constant time, then transmits 'R' and asks Bob what 't' it corresponds to.  Bob must either look up the 't' value in his table, or recompute the table until he hits it.

With that description played straight, Bob could build a rainbow table to trade off space for computation: if he stores every millionth (t, R) pair, he can just start squaring when he gets Alice's 'R' and within a million squaring operations he'll get a (t, R) pair that's in his table, whereupon he can subtract the number of squaring operations he did to find the 't' that Alice started with.  You can reduce Bob's benefit from rainbow tables by asking for many different 't', but  the annoying part of this is that the rainbow table approach *is* parallelizable.  If Alice is asking for fifteen different 't', Bob can have fifteen different threads all being simultaneously useful in searches for a 't'.  

If you don't play it straight, there is probably a way to use a hash function or 'salt' to defeat rainbow tables; I'll have to think about it.
974  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: I am pretty confident we are the new wealthy elite, gentlemen. on: April 23, 2014, 04:06:20 AM
I will soon have a premium hotel. How to make as many as possible bitcoin transactions out of it?

- Give 5-10% off of advance room reservations when paying bitcoin (wpb)?
- Give 20% off of restaurant bill if it's over $100 per person wpb?
- QR-code room service menus with one click ordering?
- In bars, also direct ordering from tables wbp?
- All staff wears/carries QR-codes for tipping?


You could wrap up speed and convenience in a way that people will notice.  You could have restaurant, bar, or room service menus with scancodes.  Your customer can just scan the code and touch the 'confirm payment' button that appears on his phone, to order and pay for an item in one step.  Done.  No waiting for waitstaff, no need to call roomservice, no mistranscribed orders, no messing about with the bill, etc. 

Likewise any 'extras' that the hotel might provide as convenience services, such as hair salon or spa appointments, dry cleaning or laundry, conference rooms, A/V equipment, stay extensions, and the thousand other things in your hotel service directory -- Scan once, and done. 

I can even picture the hotel pushing the 'convenience payment' for services outside of the hotel itself; for example cut a deal with a cab company that allows them to put some predefined scancodes into your hotel's service directory.  Then, if someone wants a cab to the airport/downtown, they can pay for it the same way they pay for things in the hotel itself, and it's absolutely seamless as far as the customer is concerned. 

Or, you know, they could use that old-fashioned phone number thing, go through the hassle of talking to a human, then go through later hassle of getting out their wallet and paying for the ride in a separate step, etc....  that's in the service directory too, but it's a pain in the ass by comparison, right?

975  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Regarding Auroracoin TW exploit (Fix included) on: April 23, 2014, 12:42:38 AM
You can adjust difficulty every block, but you should take more than one block of history into account when you do.  Here's a simple algorithm for rapid emergency adjustment; you could use this in addition to a periodic fine-tuning adjustment, if you want. 

For a rapid emergency adjustment, look at the five, nine, and seventeen block average times.  If they are *all* too short (say, 3/4 of your desired interval or less) then adjust difficulty 20% upward.  If they are *all* too long (say, 4/3 of your desired interval or more) then adjust difficulty 20% downward.   You can make an adjustment every block, and the miners can lie about block completion times as much as they do now, but it won't be possible for them to drive the difficulty down while getting blocks faster than the interval time. 

Five, Nine, and Seventeen - because none of them divides any other, guaranteeing that no short repeating pattern of timestamp lies exposes a harmonic that will repeatedly allow them all to be mistaken in the same direction at the same time. You could use a different set, or more than three intervals, but whatever.  I'd advise against using something smaller than 5 as your smallest interval, if you're keeping the median-of-last-11-blocks rule.  Also, because although the shortest interval is your reaction time in *stopping* adjustments once the right difficulty level is reached, shortening it also increases the frequency with which natural time variation will stop a needed adjustment from being applied and how often someone lying about blocktimes can deliberately *prevent* a needed adjustment from being applied. 

20% adjustments up  or down because the 6:5 or 4:5 ratios of speed are closer to 1 than the 4:3 or 3:4 ratios that trigger the adjustment - so adjustment is guaranteed to 'damp' automatically rather than entering hysteresis (alternately overshooting in both directions).

When burst miners jump on with massive hashing power, there's a slight delay before the reaction starts as enough too-short intervals build up to 'tip the scales' of the averages.   But then block adjustments start happening *OFTEN,* and there is no pattern of timestamp lies that can do more than slow it down a little bit.  When difficulty reaches the "right" level, the adjustments quickly stop when the shortest interval saturates with appropriate-length blocks, and there is no pattern of timestamp lies that can keep it on average more than one adjustment off of where it's supposed to be.

Likewise when they jump back off again, there's a delay as enough too-long intervals build up to tip the scales of the running averages, but then difficulty adjustments start happening *OFTEN*, and once again there's no pattern of timestamp lies that can do more than slow it down slightly.  Again, when difficulty reaches the "right" level, the adjustments quickly stop because the shortest interval quickly saturates, and there's no pattern of timestamp lies that can hold it more than one adjustment off of where it's supposed to be.

If with any set of timestamp lies you can generate more blocks than the rest of the network with this adjustment algorithm in less time, you're within a few percent of being able to mount a "real" 51% attack anyway. 

976  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: will the bitcoin reach $1000 one day...? on: April 18, 2014, 04:22:44 PM
As I see matters, holders who can be scared into selling have already sold so I don't expect them to drive prices down from here.  Those (like me) who buy as the market moves lower are now mostly fully invested, so we're not putting very much new money into the market now to drive prices higher. 

That leaves as the primary mover of price the interplay between miners and new investors. 

Miners will not make new coins available for less than the price of electricity to mine them plus amortized hardware cost, so I don't see miners selling coins for under $400-$450 anytime soon; under $450 they can't pay for their existing hardware, and under $300 they can't even pay for the electrical power.   Some of them will gamble by pointing mining rigs at the altcoin markets to try to get some leverage on that expense rate, but the underlying equilibrium is driven by Bitcoin.  As measured in Bitcoin, the alts are essentially an artificial options market where every winner has an equal and opposite loser.  So there's not a long-term winning strategy there unless you're just plain better than average at picking the right time to mine the right alt, and because "better than average" implies the existence of equal and opposite "worse than average" the effect of alt gambling on bitcoin prices ought to be neutral.  So, based on the miners' expenses to mine, I'm seeing the current price as a supply side bottom and an excellent buying price.

So, finally, the remaining potential price mover is new investors.  New investors can't drive the price down, but they can drive it up.  How much? How fast?  It depends on what they want to do and how much bitcoin they need. 

I'm particularly interested in new investors who want to use it as a payment medium because that kind of investment gives bitcoin a sustainable value.  But they're a bit hard to predict in terms of effect.  The amount of bitcoin they need is inversely proportional to the speed at which they can move it around their systems, and although the ten-minute blocktime does impose a "soft" limit, they're already quite experienced moving fiat currencies around in conditions that are very similar to bitcoin moving faster than that limit.  The problem with that is, when moving bitcoin around faster than that speed limit, they don't realize any advantage from bitcoin's decentralized security network, so at those speeds it's not any better for them than dealing in fiat.  They want to move the coins around *slower* than the blockchain speed limit if possible, to mitigate risks and minimize expenses allowing them to realize an advantage from bitcoin, and that means they need more coins. 

There are also traditional investors who want to use it as a store of value.  They are drastically more dangerous in terms of making the market unstable.  The amount of coin they need is easier to guess at, but they're sweating bullets about SEC regulations, potential lawsuits, and repercussions.  Bitcoin is a fairly small and very artificial market.  If somebody who has put together a mutual fund including bitcoins moves ten billion dollars into this market this week, of course the bitcoin holdings of the early holders will double, largely at the expense of later investors.  And the following week, they can do the same thing again with more money providing a handsome profit to those who invest this week, and so on... moving the bitcoin price up at a superexponential rate until it collapses horribly and they wind up facing lawsuits about Ponzi scams and SEC fines about market manipulation.   They want in, but they are terribly afraid of the results of the Ponzi-like effect they'll have on the market when they get in.  They need a strategy that gives them some kind of agreed-on rules about how to get into the market without becoming its primary price drivers and therefore inevitably inflating-and-collapsing it.

Anyway, I don't know how they're going to work it out.  If the store-of-value investors adopt a strategy of holding no more than, say, a tenth of what the payment-processing investors hold, then money will enter the market at some reasonably controlled rate and they probably won't become the effectively-a-Ponzi-scam that they justly fear becoming.  But I don't know if they can do that, and whether they can or not I don't know whether they can accurately assess their ability to do that.

977  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Regarding Auroracoin TW exploit (Fix included) on: April 18, 2014, 03:27:09 PM

 Almost every single one block difficulty adjustment algorithm contains a flaw with regard to timestamps, and if miners are not mining to secure the network, the coin will be forked.

Absolutely, it seems as if finally somebody understands this.


Anything where someone has 51% or more of the hashing power will go down to a 51% attack, of course.

But with timewarp, specifically, doesn't the attacker depend on being able to fool the code that estimates the hashing power in a chain?

If that code were producing an accurate estimate, then it shouldn't matter where you can get the difficulty via timewarp or anything else.

978  Other / Off-topic / Re: Let's Count to 21 Million with Images on: April 16, 2014, 05:51:40 PM
979  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Regarding Auroracoin TW exploit (Fix included) on: April 14, 2014, 05:34:58 PM

The issue is a bug in branch difficulty evaluation, IMO.

BCX, can you check the logic here?  Isn't the real vulnerability to time warp due to it being possible to create a branch using less than 51% hashing power that the current code believes has more hashing work in it, than a branch created using more than 51% hashing power?  And doesn't that depend on the existence of a bug in the code that estimates how much hashing has gone into a branch?

Time warp exploits really oughtn't be possible if you can accurately pick the highest-work branch. 

If you pick a 'threshold' difficulty just high enough to ensure that any block meeting that threshold could appear in either branch regardless of when it was mined, and then you count the blocks meeting *that* difficulty, you get a very good comparison of the real hashing power used.  The one with the most such blocks is the one with the most hashing work.  Award no partial credit for blocks mined at lower difficulty as the current code (IMO erroneously) does, and I think you wind up with no time warp vulnerability. 

980  Other / Off-topic / Re: Let's Count to 21 Million with Images on: April 14, 2014, 05:56:29 AM
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 [49] 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!