As a newbie rank you can't add picture. Nice first shot, but a little bit "simple" i think. thanks for the feedback...I was actually shooting for simple...but u may be right about too simple...however, I think its important that everyone just start throwing out ideas about everything and eventually the community will hone the dagger to a fine point....I hardly have the skill to accomplish any of the following (there are plenty here smarter than I am) but I know that they must be done if this thing is to take off... -all who have the skill should be searching the code for flaws/weaknesses -whitepaper -qt wallet (I realize there is a gui, but the qt wallet is the easiest, most recognizeable form for mass adoption) with solo mining -blockchain explorer -migrate everything to the new daggercoin.org and, yes, I understand that I sound like dick asking everyone else to do this stuff...but being afraid to sound like a dick is what keeps things from getting done in the world |
|
|
|
a very rough idea  couldn't figure out how to make the image come up right here in the post |
|
|
|
|
so who was the one person that voted to close the project???
I hope it wasn't you cheato
|
|
|
|
|
XDAG!!!....
a star is born
|
|
|
|
How about CHT ?  Except that it doesn't have the wall street X  Maybe we will rename this damn coin to Dagger and the short name should be XDG? Where is Dizzlie?  Dagger is a good name! I agree....not sure who, but someone earlier said that they grabbed daggercoin.org.... ticker is still a problem though...xdg is doge on some markets....and dag coin is already out there...dag...so is dgr....how bout dagr.... I also propose dropping the "coin" from the name...just plain dagger or dagger pay to set it apart from the 18.5million "coins" out there apparently google is a function that is peculiar to my machine |
|
|
|
How about CHT ? Except that it doesn't have the wall street X Maybe we will rename this damn coin to Dagger and the short name should be XDG? Where is Dizzlie? Dagger is a good name! I agree....not sure who, but someone earlier said that they grabbed daggercoin.org.... ticker is still a problem though...xdg is doge on some markets....and dag coin is already out there...dag...so is dgr....how bout dagr.... I also propose dropping the "coin" from the name...just plain dagger or dagger pay to set it apart from the 18.5million "coins" out there |
|
|
|
|
ticker xct is already taken for c-bit coin
|
|
|
|
Bittrex announce it will be distributed to the users on january first,but didnt happen?they are just delaying it to become more less valuable.
just for the record....this is a quote from official bittrex statement (I added the boldface)... Dec. 20, 2017 Bittrex will make all reasonable attempts to credit our users IGNIS but until we have a fully supported wallet, we can neither guarantee tokens or consider creating a market. We will continue to monitor the state of the codebase and network |
|
|
|
if you use xfer [amount] to adress - how long does it take to arrive. I have tried transferring but the balance remains at one computer and not arriving at the other. The adress is correctly typed  it takes a few minutes...ive been xferring between wallets on diff machines, diff pools quite a bit....just to test it out |
|
|
|
rewards starting to slow down quite a bit....gone from hundreds per hour to 20/30 per hour since start up....of course im using junk cpus....but still a considerable decrease
Business is growing, as I see it.) My dears, I congratulate you on the successful launch of the network. Already a day as it works (with varying success). Thanks to each of you for your contribution to the common business. I will be glad to see you in the chito-world.) Dev true...hope it keeps growing.... congratulations are all for you.... nice work |
|
|
|
|
rewards starting to slow down quite a bit....gone from hundreds per hour to 20/30 per hour since start up....of course im using junk cpus....but still a considerable decrease
|
|
|
|
haha, wanna see how ppl develop real project? check semux 1) you run a team or at least try to find experienced contributors 2) you run lots of tests: alpha, beta, RC network 3) you discover problems/errors/vulnerabilities... and lots of other things wow!!....way to dance on the grave of someone who tried while deepthroating yourself...nice well, the idea is that if you run a project that is going to hold any value (and there is a lot of money in crypto right now), there are a lot of smart exploiters who will brake or cheat your project to get some income or just for fun. you need to keep it in mind when you start working on a crypto project. maybe it sounded a little bit salty, but it's true. tell me where I'm wrong? You need a team or at least some guys who help you. You need to be experienced or have such ppl in the team... If the project is really over I'm really angry at dev, because if he shuts it down, he should respect all the people following it and at least shut down OP post/site/ DL links or post a notice there... I think everyone understood what u meant...including dev who stated repeatedly that he was just in it to see if he could do it...not to make a score...I don't think it was the grave dancing that bugged me as much as the self-aggrandizement that accompanied it...sorry bout that |
|
|
|
haha, wanna see how ppl develop real project? check semux 1) you run a team or at least try to find experienced contributors 2) you run lots of tests: alpha, beta, RC network 3) you discover problems/errors/vulnerabilities... and lots of other things wow!!....way to dance on the grave of someone who tried while deepthroating yourself...nice |
|
|
|
Question about number 3: what are the two command to run either full node or just mining mode.
Full Node + mining (downloads large amount of blocks): >cheatcoin.exe -m 0 [after sync] cheatcoin> mining 1 Mining Mode only (no block downloads, recommended for the launch time): >cheatcoin.exe -m 1 pool:port for those getting ready to ask |
|
|
|
balance
not ready to show a balance. Type 'state' command to see the reason.
cheatcoin> state
Trying to connect to the mainnet pool.
cheatcoin>
But log shows still hashing away
same here...mainnet pool connection comes and goes....keep checking state |
|
|
|
cheatcoin> net host 8297452D 0 sec, T13.793, trust cheatcoin> net conn Current connections: cheatcoin> miners List of miners: NN Address for payment to Status IP and port in/out by tes nopaid shares -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- -1. V/OSbPngB4Ai8xLCG8Ixxxxx9kYGRlDC active 0.0.0.0:0 1440/3200 1.645704 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Total 1 active miners. cheatcoin> is this right?  not sure if its right, but I have balance on 3 different machines...that's got to be good news |
|
|
|
cheatcoin> net host 8297452D 0 sec, T13.793, trust cheatcoin> net conn Current connections: cheatcoin> miners List of miners: NN Address for payment to Status IP and port in/out by tes nopaid shares -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- -1. V/OSbPngB4Ai8xLCG8Ixxxxx9kYGRlDC active 0.0.0.0:0 1440/3200 1.645704 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------------- Total 1 active miners. cheatcoin> is this right? |
|
|
|
check port, thats incorrect, you missed the 4
cheatcoin -m 2 -d 52.5.32.68:13654
just leave it running, when mainnet goes live it should connect
hey....whats the "-d"?...had not seen that until now...ive just been running -t or -m -d is daemon mode used in linux. for windows just run cheatcoin.exe -m x poolip:port where x is 0 no mining 1-n mining threads (cpu core + Virtual Core minus 1 maximum) -t is for testnet only. ahhh...thanx for the quick response....one of these days im gonna get around to Linux...probably the day after my win 7 machine dies |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
