Bitcoin only.
Apparently we aren't allowed to demonstrate agreement with an opinion or add emphasis to a fact with a simple " +1". I've recently had my " +1" posts removed. Therefore, I'm typing out this message to indicate that I believe the quoted information needs extra emphasis to avoid being unnoticed in the rest of the chatter in this discussion. I may (or may not) also have added bold or underline tags to the text in the quote above to further emphasize the parts that I think are important to understand or be aware of. Gotta love those rules, now ain't that right? Also, +1.
|
|
|
Are there not people trying their luck... Gosh.
|
|
|
I don't think you're allowed to do that. Anyway, how accurate is that thread? If it isnmt accurate then you shouldn't worry about it. I don't think anyone would notice that thread since it is probably buried in the forums already.
|
|
|
I think this may have been abandoned.
|
|
|
How much is an FRK valued at right now?
|
|
|
You do know that this is nothing new, right?
|
|
|
Take the tainted coins. They're just as good as other bitcoins. You can tell by the way the FBI chose to keep them, not burn them. At an individual level, concern over the source of every satoshi of your funds is too much for human processing capabilities.
It would, on the other hand, please and amuse me greatly if exchanges already had code in place to: • detect coins from the FBI purse in accounts deposits • relieve those accounts of those coins • destroy the coins by sending them to an impossible address (range)
But my my they'd have to have some titanium testicles. And a go bag ready.
Clearly, you have totally ignored the few previous posts on why it wouldn't be able to do this due to how most bitcoins in existence would eventually be tainted.
|
|
|
What is the default bonus? I couldn't find it anywhere in the site. Edit: I believe it is 10%, but I am not completely sure. Can someone confirm?
|
|
|
we can call this spamming as one already replied and other doing same this its not acceptable need to stop this type spamming
It wasn't there when I started writing. After you finish writing, though, it alerts you saying that somebody else posted and to check your post.
|
|
|
Could I have some clarification from Stunna? The font size I have had has seemed conpletely reasonable to me and IMHO makes the sig look better and less spammy.
Just PM him about it. He did say to one user that we can't change them but the user in question's sig was tiny lol. Yours seems reasonable, but obviously Stunna is the boss. I will go ahead and do that and edit this post after I find out.
|
|
|
Well I'm glad I saw this thread so I know who's willing to pay me well as I'm still looking for options
Well Primedice and Bit777 / PeerBet are the highest payers at 0.0002 each per post, but you need to get the money sent to your account on thier website for the latter. I think it's clear which is the better deal IMO. Not even taking into account Bit777's / PeerBet's horrible sigs.
|
|
|
Cool. I enjoy it when people are not dead. I also enjoy not being dead. One of my favourite pastimes actually. I must admit, I had assumed the the worst from this. Don't know whether that makes me a cynic or a realist . Given that this is the bitcoin world and stuff like this has happened before (TradeFortress comes to mind) I would say you're a realist.
|
|
|
Roughly 90% of all US paper currency has trace amounts of cocaine on it. If you don't want those bills, I'll gladly take them.
How's that even possible? Are they snorting tons of coke at the money printing factories? It really does surprise me that you didn't know about this. It happens with most paper currencies. To add the the argument, if you receive a single satoshi from anyone that got at least a satoshi from somebody who got at least a satoshi (you get the idea) from the FBI, all of your bitcoins at the receiving address will be tainted, not only that single satoshi.
|
|
|
He did post a follow-up which seems much more reasonable. The link is somewhere towards the bottom of the article.
|
|
|
I just hope that with this move people will start spamming [even more]. I can see many people who aren't really spamming, but their posts are simply not constructive.
Btw it is not allowed to change the font size. Stunna has got rid of the big sized ones now, so you might be able to make them a bit smaller. I guess we need clarification from him. Nope, only if it have 2 lines it have smaller font. again and again talk about size he just clear all in OP you can add your btc address so during this process if you are using small font its not problem I thought it was allowed. Has he said anything to anyone else? I just feel like every time I see this sig with the original size it just feels too "bloated." Signatures you may choose from [Feel free to change colors and tweak style a bit!]
Could I have some clarification from Stunna? The font size I have had has seemed conpletely reasonable to me and IMHO makes the sig look better and less spammy.
|
|
|
I just hope that with this move people will start spamming [even more]. I can see many people who aren't really spamming, but their posts are simply not constructive.
|
|
|
What gweedo is saying simply makes too much sense. Buying this would be pointless.
|
|
|
The John K tracking device, for the needy escrow user Make it standard-issue for treasurers/escrows, and require "I'm ok" bursts. Or it could be escrow duos. Two escrows working together, both with access to the privkeys, so that if one dies of sudden plane crash, money is not lost. Duos? How about 2 of 3s? Have each of the parties to the transaction be one of the three key holders. ok, how about everyone here is part of the escrow? Bam! Problem solved!
|
|
|
You should also remember that not everybody approved of what DPR did (me included). But that is more onto the moral perspective.
|
|
|
Why are they significantly more expensive than other card sellers?
|
|
|
|