Bitcoin Forum
May 13, 2024, 06:35:45 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 »
681  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: June 01, 2013, 03:27:47 PM
Are these going to be fixed?

18321 is still incorrect, 18317 and 18 are way off too.
682  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: June 01, 2013, 01:47:28 PM

Same here also very big variance in the reward ...One week ago all my reward was 0.0015-0.0020 now 0.0010-0.0015 ...


exactly 1 week ago the difficulty changed from 11,187,257 to 12,153,412 too

If there aren't any issues I have +-0.01-0.015 variance.
683  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: June 01, 2013, 01:39:25 PM
Well you were lucky Tongue

18321   2013-06-01 13:18:14   1:35:10   14691906   452   0.00000081   239063   25.20347868    99 confirmations left

it should be 0.1 so I don't feel myself too lucky Cheesy
684  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: June 01, 2013, 01:32:23 PM
18321   2013-06-01 13:18:14   1:35:10   14691906   33414   0.00004932   239063   25.20347868    99 confirmations left

685  Economy / Auctions / Re: bitcoinclock.com (domain + website) on: June 01, 2013, 07:22:11 AM
Damn! I have fallen asleep :S

3.0 Tongue
686  Economy / Auctions / Re: bitcoinclock.com (domain + website) on: May 31, 2013, 09:30:00 PM
2.6
687  Other / Off-topic / Re: SELLING: Working Avalon ASIC miner (NOT a preorder) on: May 31, 2013, 08:41:56 PM
Paid $1300
Mine ~100 BTC (guesstimated)
Sell for 220 BTC

Riding the ASIC buyer's wave ~

Good decision placing that batch 1 order!

+1 Cheesy
688  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: What is the best country to start an exchange in? on: May 31, 2013, 06:24:17 PM
Give all the FINCEN Regulation and lack of clarity - where can a US entrepreneur go to start an exchange?

I would get in contact with a lawyer specialized in offshore companies and consider the options.

Ireland seems a good candidate too due to the lower than average taxes.
689  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: I've never been into ALTCOINs, but would it be wise to convert some BTC to LTC? on: May 31, 2013, 12:02:18 PM
LTC at this point is no more than GPU miner speculation in my opinion. Having said that I mined 20LTC a while back which I hold onto long. I think of it as gambling Smiley
690  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 31, 2013, 11:57:35 AM
That is completely understandable, but I think it's not balanced or well designed if 10 minutes downtime due to connection problem causes 50+% loss on the actual rewards.  :O
691  Economy / Auctions / Re: bitcoinclock.com (domain + website) on: May 31, 2013, 09:28:24 AM
2.4
692  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 31, 2013, 09:25:02 AM

OK so that is what happens to block 18290. It looks like you were mining only first 3 minutes of that block. So this is normal. But I don't get it why you got double from block 18291 since you didn't increase hashes... Did you change anything? The only thing I can think of that could be is a difficulty error in a score system and you change it from 2 to 1. But I guess someone would report that already... Looks really strange...

I haven't changed anything. so it's kind of confusing. Also, I'm on difficulty 6

Losing most of my reward for a short disconnect seems to be very unfair in my opinion. I would really appreciate if slush would explain what happened.
693  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 31, 2013, 09:07:13 AM
So I guess the last problematic blocks will not be fixed in terms of rewards? Why there's no comment about these?

...snip....

Shares are off. I guess it was an error on your side or stratum error... Only calculation errors are commented since it happens to all of miners. This was probebly just you... Did you double your hashpower or was that another error?

Hash is still the same. I had approx 10mins offline due to internet connectivity issues.
694  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 31, 2013, 07:34:19 AM
So I guess the last problematic blocks will not be fixed in terms of rewards? Why there's no comment about these?


695  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: Bitcoin Farm on: May 30, 2013, 08:42:50 PM
Nice list. I've been examining the subject of sustainable farming. Soon I'll start my own experiment with all the essential plants (only).

Would you care to share some of your resources used? (links, pdf, books)?

thanks
696  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 30, 2013, 03:20:38 PM
same thing here, but I haven't changed anything:



I have got some disconnect because of bad weather too at the same time :S

Is it possible that my rewards degraded this much because of  ~10min(overall) spent offline?

697  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 29, 2013, 11:38:11 AM
Lost a little on some block a while back, gained some on a block a while back

Worked out exactly where it was supposed to be

Complaining about pennies just so you know they are discontinued (in Canada) Eat my shorts!

I have had nothing but good times on Slush's pool.

That's great.  So if your bank randomly starts charging you for purchases you didn't make, but then makes phantom deposits at other random times, you're okay with this as long as it seems like it evens out in the end.  The problem is, how do you know if it's really evening out?  If the accounting algorithm is broken, there is no way to know if someone is skimming off the top or not.  Not saying Slush is doing that at all, but just that it would be impossible to know for sure.  

Why would it be impossible to know? Everything is on the blockchain and can be reviewed if concerns arise.

Perusing the last 10-15 pages of this thread, you guys can't even agree on which blocks were missed.  I really doubt someone is going to go through the trouble of a REAL audit when they can simply change pools until all these bugs are fixed.  Those that are content with the bugs won't bother, and those that aren't simply move on.


These are not missed blocks but invalids, also, it's quite apparent which one had trouble.  namely block 238386 and 238247 (the last 2) Shocked

You must have missed a page or two.  There were a few missed blocks as well.  I've since moved on to btcguild, but for a split second I thought about coming back.  Noooope.  Good luck with the bugs though.

I have written that these were the last 2. not that 2 were all that proved invalid.
698  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 29, 2013, 11:15:14 AM
Lost a little on some block a while back, gained some on a block a while back

Worked out exactly where it was supposed to be

Complaining about pennies just so you know they are discontinued (in Canada) Eat my shorts!

I have had nothing but good times on Slush's pool.

That's great.  So if your bank randomly starts charging you for purchases you didn't make, but then makes phantom deposits at other random times, you're okay with this as long as it seems like it evens out in the end.  The problem is, how do you know if it's really evening out?  If the accounting algorithm is broken, there is no way to know if someone is skimming off the top or not.  Not saying Slush is doing that at all, but just that it would be impossible to know for sure.  

Why would it be impossible to know? Everything is on the blockchain and can be reviewed if concerns arise.

Perusing the last 10-15 pages of this thread, you guys can't even agree on which blocks were missed.  I really doubt someone is going to go through the trouble of a REAL audit when they can simply change pools until all these bugs are fixed.  Those that are content with the bugs won't bother, and those that aren't simply move on.


These are not missed blocks but invalids, also, it's quite apparent which one had trouble.  namely block 238386 and 238247 (the last 2) Shocked
699  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [8500 GH/s] Slush's Pool (mining.bitcoin.cz); TX FEES + UserDiff; ASIC tested on: May 29, 2013, 10:49:42 AM
Lost a little on some block a while back, gained some on a block a while back

Worked out exactly where it was supposed to be

Complaining about pennies just so you know they are discontinued (in Canada) Eat my shorts!

I have had nothing but good times on Slush's pool.

That's great.  So if your bank randomly starts charging you for purchases you didn't make, but then makes phantom deposits at other random times, you're okay with this as long as it seems like it evens out in the end.  The problem is, how do you know if it's really evening out?  If the accounting algorithm is broken, there is no way to know if someone is skimming off the top or not.  Not saying Slush is doing that at all, but just that it would be impossible to know for sure.  

Why would it be impossible to know? Everything is on the blockchain and can be reviewed if concerns arise.
700  Economy / Auctions / Re: bitcoinclock.com (domain + website) on: May 28, 2013, 06:59:03 PM
Some other trivia:

- When this site was linked to from a Slashdot summary, it got 22,000 hits in 3 hours.
- During the change-over from 50 to 25 btc, the site was getting about 2000 uniques a day.


Would you care adding a countdown clock to your auction? Smiley
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 [35] 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!