A "Begginging"? What am I reading?
A 30 dollar swing in Bitcoin is not exactly cause for alarm. I disagree that its the start of some larger move. You didn't expect all up-to-the-right action without some kind of retrace, did you?
My longer-term target is ATH 1,350's (Bitstamp). It will get there even if we have some stumbles on the way.
|
|
|
Oh good, another article on this wallet thief.
They already know that statistically trawling the address keyspace is a wasted effort, but they keep doing it because in their words "it nets more money than mining". The TRUE reason they're doing it is to crack crappy wallets (the puzzle addresses), and they've already stolen the funds from a number of those due to a shitty design.
LBC claims to be doing this for research, but they're really out for the money and after they've taken all the easy stuff, they'll probably stop bothering since the law of numbers precludes any real profit after that.
This guy also has a remote-code exploit in his client, so it may be setting up people to panic and try it out, only to have their BTC stolen at a later date.
Do NOT trust this software, and do NOT run it on your machine.
|
|
|
Unlike the Large Hadron Collider - the Large Bitcoin Shakedown is a brute-force attempt on addresses and known scripts (such as the puzzle addresses) to extract money. They've admitted as much, seeing how they're trying to brute-force the easy pickings. For the rest of "real" wallets out there, they are out of luck - but it won't stop them rattling each door knob sleazy robber style until they chance upon something.
The odds of doing so are very, very, very remote - which brings to mind - why are they doing this at all? Oh that's right, a lack of moral compass and the "if you can do it, you should" mindset. This has nothing to do with "testing" security, the statistics are already out there that show the keyspace is mind-bogglingly large. The real effort here is to exploit some badly made wallets so they can profit from it.
They're thieves in "researchers" clothing.
|
|
|
"Start fleeing"?
Hell no, they've been fleeing for a while, which is why we have a premium between BFX and other exchanges in price. Their open interest is plunging as well, with only 91,270 BTC in one of their wallets, down quite a bit over the past few days.
Price premium over Bitstamp is 4.7% as of this posting.
Get the 'eff out, or you are going to end up holding a rather large bag.
|
|
|
Jihan "cabbage head" Wu is desperate to appear relevant. So I'm not surprised he's inserting himself in the Chinese gov't controversy.
But he's just a cog, and doesn't really help anything. If you think he's the only one to point out governments flip-flop, you'd be wrong. He adds nothing new to the conversation except his attempts to pump his PR value.
|
|
|
Hi Timmmmm, would you like to revise your concept of reality now that Gmax has renounced UASF? I didn't get unplugged, did you?
R3KT M8
Oh look, he's still here. How's BU - Barely Unusable - doing? Great? Not from this angle. As for UASF, what does that have to do with anything? Or is this yet another distraction from your alignment with "cabbage head" Wu.
|
|
|
Jihan Wu is hardly a good source for what the Chinese government will or will not do.
He's a charlatan that pumps his own agenda, based on his mining concerns and chip-fabbing business. Naturally, he can only see an outcome where he can keep being a monopolist.
|
|
|
This is turning into Gox 2.0 - and people have been warned since the last "hack", but all the useful idiots here (Oh hi, BurtW) have been adamant that BFX is "just fine".
Keep watching for it, the next thing will be forced liquidation as they prepare to do a runner on their remaining user base.
|
|
|
Needs Date Formatting fixed to be in the News Section...
Thanks
|
|
|
Read it twice still don't understand it, I think its just beyond me.
Question, what kind of support does this BIP have? Will it really help?
I really don't know how to help you. First you wanted a "detailed and technical description of how ASIC-boost works", and when one is provided you can't "get it". Be sure to ask for what you really want? You confuse me.
|
|
|
Greg Maxwell should post a detailed and technical description of how ASIC-boost works. To my understanding they reorder transaction IDs and create lots of fake transactions, reordering them to create lots of different merkle root values and thus lots of different yet acceptable blocks so they can hash all of them at the same time not just one. Someone refereed to it as increasing the key space. So instead of building just one block and hashing it till you find an output that meets the difficulty level you build 100 or 1000 acceptable blocks and then hash all of them simultaneously. But this is detrimental to the network as a whole. It creates massive and unnecessary bloat in the blockchain. It will lead to higher costs for full node operators and lead to consolidation of the mining community.
This is pretty comprehensive -- https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/pipermail/bitcoin-dev/2017-April/013996.html
|
|
|
Wow, that's a lot of useless alt-coinage.
They actually had a vote on it? Funny how that worked out. Do they get to vote again when they lose all of their money? lololol
|
|
|
Goatpig - Serious question that I hoped you might be able to briefly address. This project - "Large Bitcoin Collider" - https://lbc.cryptoguru.org/stats - is searching keyspace and trying to find funds. While the statistics say their success is going to be very small, I was wondering if there were any features in Armory that might make their "rattle every doorknob until we find money" strategy that much more difficult. Just curious what you think. Thanks in advance...
|
|
|
“I never alleged that I could prove they were using it on mainnet, only that their hardware secretly supported it. They've admitted to putting it in their hardware and to using it on testnet. They claim that haven't used it on mainnet "for the good of the network"-- but the constantly produce empty blocks (a potential asicboost sign) and argued that it was fine because the protocol permits it, when people complained,” Maxwell said in a separate statement.
Are there statistical data published anywhere on which pools do produce these empty blocks? IP's should be geolocateable. That could shine some light onto things. Or maybe that has been a typo and Maxwell wrote "they constantly produce" and can prove that by data? The data is out there - and yes, while most pools can produce empty blocks, the Chinese mining concerns are the ones pumping out empty blocks above the statistically expected norms. They're complicit and its been discussed in depth elsewhere.
|
|
|
This is disturbing news cause all my transactions have confirmed within the first 15 minutes. If I put more than 0.0006btc they always do! Alright this is very helpful, but one this and one question. I want to know the minimum transaction for a faucet like because 0.00047btc froze my electrum wallet. So is 0.0006btc the minimum transaction size? or the fee? Its a small transaction, 55 cents. Unless you have a PRESSING NEED FOR THAT HALF-DOLLAR, just push it through and wait. Why is it there's someone talking about a "dust" transaction like this as if it was $1,000 bucks or something? Boggles my mind...
|
|
|
You sound so bitter. How much did you lose in the Bitfinex hack? How much did you lose in the MTGOX debacle? For me it was:
MTGOX: Lost everything Bitfinex: Lost just the appreciation of the BTC. Got back the USD value of all BTC at the time of the hack.
Call me stupid all you want. I prefer the Bitfinex outcome to the MTGOX outcome.
I lost nothing from Gox because I PAID ATTENTION TO WHAT WAS GOING ON. I've lost nothing from BFX, because I recognized the same SCAM behavior patterns. I suggest you PAY ATTENTION to what is happening at Bitfinex, beyond your simple-simon goal of "I'm all good, kthx". And yes, I'm direct, because its people like YOU, that keep trading with THEM, that allows THEM to spring their next con-artist inspired "hack" on the userbase. Get the hell out of there, or you will regret it financially.
|
|
|
India is a corrupt shit-hole that will most likely try to align with Prime Minister Modi's directive to de-emphasize cash and make sure that banks have a direct cut of any action, crypto or otherwise.
I'm sure their issued rules will favor the government insistence on capital controls and making it as painful as possible to move funds outside the country. They will reap what they sow, of course.
The only real problem is the majority of poor people that don't have a choice, sitting on piles of non-redeemable notes that once were their life savings. I'm surprised there hasn't been an uprising over the demonitization push. It has destroyed many people's lives.
|
|
|
Thanks for your reply. It's interesting to see how you think about an exchange that can't proof it was really hacked. In that regard, I find it dangerous to see you taking such a stance in this whole situation. I can't deny that Bitfinex offers a great set of tools, liquidity, etc, but is that really worth the risk you expose yourself to? I personally find not, but you apparently do.
BurtW is just another fool in a long line of fools that allowed Gox to happen, allowed other exchange heists to happen. They ignore all warnings, think things are "good enough" and don't care about where the money came from - as long as they were "paid back" they're "just fine". If people fled BFX after the first "hack", there wouldn't be anything left for them to scam - but willing investors like BurtW here keep scam-artists alive, because they allow their hope to override their common sense. Its sad, but I guess the final lesson is incoming, when BurtW finds out that he can't get his money out - yet again - and BFX is saying "no problem, just wait two weeks".... Just watch....
|
|
|
it's a no brainer in my opinion. if openbazaar is open to everyone then vendors and buyers should be able to use whatever currency they want as long as it can be technically accommodated. there's no question bitcoin is too expensive to use for the little stuff now.
That is correct. What is needed is a means to transfer value. If Bitcoin is going to take 5-10% off my transaction value for a microvalue transaction, then it doesn't make sense at all. I would happily shift to any alt (whose value is relatively stable). You're both mental. Yeah, lets transfer value using a poorly used alt-coin to "save money". Are you even listening to what you're saying? I suppose not, seeing how you're willing to embrace transactional risk with an illiquid asset to "save" money. Please, sell all of your Bitcoin and stay with alts, they are more your speed.
|
|
|
Yet-another-alt-coin.
Pardon me while I yawn so loudly windows shake and crack out of their frames.
What is notable about this latest copy-cat attempt? No executive summary?
|
|
|
|