|
Well, if anyone got any to spare:
1Nx4J24mE55yKbchoUsWtevCWbGiSWmBii
|
|
|
|
Yes, it would be really nice to hear an update from the dev.
syswt come on, say something :-)
You are getting very much support from the community (e.g. ypool integration) and now you could help with a plan of your next steps and the future of this coin.
It would be great when exchange pools like cryptsy would support MTC. We should fight for it! :-)
I Think Cryptsy will pick up on it sooner rather then later, seeing all the shouts for trades....and thus all the transaction fee's that cryptsy is already missing with ya'll trading already....  That is an absurd statement. Cryptsy will never pick this up. Well, why not? There is a large community behind this coin even without great marketing moves from the dev. The most important factor is the acceptance of the coin to the people. And that is definitely given at MTC. Let me have a guess why no exchange should touch this coin: It is 3 days old and diff is already through the roof. A handfull of people that instamined have really big amounts. Why should anyone else except for theese few people care for this one? What a joke. Relaunch or the coin is dead. Well, I could list you a handful of coins that have the features that you criticize and yet made it to exchanges... |
|
|
|
|
I would have 170 Cryptonium to trade against PMC, pm me if interested.
|
|
|
|
mmmmhhh everybody cares just about dump their instamined coins here or anybody is looking at community growth?? mmhhhh
As if anyone would actually treat an altcoin as a currency in this subforum. Don't act like there was any morale here. |
|
|
|
|
This and the block distribution made for an instamine.
|
|
|
|
Meteiscoin(MTC) has stamped .003BTC per coin in China.
Source? |
|
|
|
|
Erm, I think soloming is over for me:
{
"blocks" : 18932,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 16384.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
|
|
|
|
Not going for the signature part but I am on frozentalk with the same nick as in here  FHBWCRkht5VThr18M5mqZQJSiaNURSsNfJ Thank you for your giveaway! Edit: Aaaand received. |
|
|
|
freezer.kvvs.nl Check the Frozen Freezer for some free FZ too get you started! Current payout : 0.1~0.5Fz Neat, although I would say that the payout right now seems to be pretty high. A fifth of it would still suffice in my opinion. |
|
|
|
ANOTHER SCAM! Since when does BTC38.com ask for coins for a coin to be listed?DO NOT DONATE TO THIS! +1 Don't trust any claims like these, here is the new official topic for those who don't know yet. |
|
|
|
|
So yeah, with the difficulty now being at a moderate level, what are your plans that you have in mind for this coin, dev?
|
|
|
|
RPC port for solo mining?
Ebp75tLDHW19rkkH9QGtEp8v5VpYixXVna
Nvm, { "blocks" : 2680, "currentblocksize" : 0, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 1.00000000, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "networkhashps" : 23016973, "pooledtx" : 0, "testnet" : false } |
|
|
|
|
RPC port for solo mining?
Ebp75tLDHW19rkkH9QGtEp8v5VpYixXVna
|
|
|
|
|
WTS 175 CRN, pm me with offer.
|
|
|
|
|
4% premine - keep dreaming. I don't like Quark either wit its instamine, but this amount of premine is just ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
I have not abandoned this project therefore there can't be a community takeover. Is it me or did you seriously copy-pasted the first post of the community takeover-thread? As my giveaway, for example, wasn't in this thread when the community takeover happened and now the information is in here 1/1. @Everyone: Block_Erupter is a known scammer and should no longer be associated with Frozencoin. While it is true that he has created this coin, this doesn't mean that he owns it. The community has decided to abandon any association with him for the sake of the coin and thus this thread was abandoned. Please refer to TheFourthSaint's post above for the new, official topic. |
|
|
|
Sorry, I am going a bit off-topic here, but I have seen you post your statement, that any coin that doesn't possess 51% of the world's hashing power (I guess you are going for the actual computing power that every household/company could potentially deliver) is to be treated as potentially highly insecure in several threads by now. While on a hypothetical basis this sounds all neat, dandy and logical, you don't seem to take into account that this kind of percentage will never _actually_ flow into cryptos by a level of even 5% or so. Your argument seems to follow the thesis that everyone that knows about cryptos and is probably even accepting them as a daily feature in the yet-to-be-seen future would actually bother putting a relevant level of personal computing power into it.
Don't get me wrong - I am not trying to say that your point is invalid - 51%-attacks are currently an easy option as the overall hashing power of the whole cryptocurrency scene is still laughable at, but the actual issue to me would be a relevant spreading of the _actual_ hashing power that is currently pointed at cryptos.
TL;DR: My point is that "world's hashing power" is a term that bothers me when you are using it. No offense intended.
You don't seem to realise how much massive advantage ASICs have over general purpose gear. Try computing how many household GPUs it would take to match the power of just the tiny little amount of ASICs we already have in place. Then for a laugh check how little difference all the household CPUs would make. Basically the stuff that is not specifically designed as dedicated crypto mining gear hardly counts, and if it still counts that is only because we have only just a few months ago even started to actually deploy serious "not all that terribly clunky/ancient feature-scale" ASICs. -MarkM- You are correct with that, but especially your point about the superiority of ASICs bothers me when talking about a "world's hashing power". We won't be talking about the power of individual PC's or neat little mining rigs, but about professional hardware that is produced and used for the purpose of mining. This exactly isn't the world's hashing power, it's the world's potential hashing power in the form of specialized and thus more potent mining hardware. I am not trying to be a smartass here, your term just doesn't seem to reflect what you seem to be trying to address and creates the impression that you are indeed talking about every single piece of hardware that could be used for the sake of mining. |
|
|
|
The so called development team are a bunch of pie in the sky idiots who have not enough hashing power between them to even match DOGE's hashrate.
They are just scamming everyone like all the others, heck maybe they are even scamming themselves.
It has nothing to do with blocks, it has to do with what percent of the world's hashing power is defending/securing the coin.
Less than 51% of the world's hashing power and pretty much any world power or alliance of world powers could PWN it easily.
Only bitcoin is anywhere near being reasonably secure, and even it might not yet have enough ASICs dispersed among enough different interest-groups / demographics to be secure yet.
-MarkM-
Sorry, I am going a bit off-topic here, but I have seen you post your statement, that any coin that doesn't possess 51% of the world's hashing power (I guess you are going for the actual computing power that every household/company could potentially deliver) is to be treated as potentially highly insecure in several threads by now. While on a hypothetical basis this sounds all neat, dandy and logical, you don't seem to take into account that this kind of percentage will never _actually_ flow into cryptos by a level of even 5% or so. Your argument seems to follow the thesis that everyone that knows about cryptos and is probably even accepting them as a daily feature in the yet-to-be-seen future would actually bother putting a relevant level of personal computing power into it. Don't get me wrong - I am not trying to say that your point is invalid - 51%-attacks are currently an easy option as the overall hashing power of the whole cryptocurrency scene is still laughable at, but the actual issue to me would be a relevant spreading of the _actual_ hashing power that is currently pointed at cryptos. TL;DR: My point is that "world's hashing power" is a term that bothers me when you are using it. No offense intended. |
|
|
|
Price is still rising, and difficulty seems to be stabilizing >6000 { "blocks" : 117325, "currentblocksize" : 0, "currentblocktx" : 0, "difficulty" : 6553.90001831, "errors" : "", "generate" : false, "genproclimit" : -1, "hashespersec" : 0, "pooledtx" : 1, "testnet" : false, "blockreward" : "18.36694" } |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
