|
honestly really surprised there has been this much selling and no buying leading up to the distribution....wtf?
|
|
|
|
|
Can I enter my Poloniex STR deposit address as Stellar ID for the giveaway?
|
|
|
|
I followed the steps. Now when running Electrum, it asked me to enter the password from Trezor, but after I did this, Electrum gave me: "Electrum cannot pair with your Trezor. Before you request bitcoins so be sent to the addresses in this wallet, ensure that you can pair with your device, or that you have it's seed... etc" EDIT: All this started when Electrum Mac asked me to split my wallet into 2 wallet files, now I can't connect any of them  Your USB cable or your USB port on your computer is going bad. Try it on another computer. You can have the same Trezor wallet with on mutiple computers. No, Trezor works perfectly, USB cable/port as well. I can open other Electrum wallets, just not this specific one that was split into 2 when updating Electrum |
|
|
|
I followed the steps. Now when running Electrum, it asked me to enter the password from Trezor, but after I did this, Electrum gave me: "Electrum cannot pair with your Trezor. Before you request bitcoins so be sent to the addresses in this wallet, ensure that you can pair with your device, or that you have it's seed... etc" EDIT: All this started when Electrum Mac asked me to split my wallet into 2 wallet files, now I can't connect any of them |
|
|
|
|
So I had an Electrum wallet on my Macbook that was linked to my Trezor. One day, after having opened the wallet, it urged me to update my Electrum wallet (it was a rarely used wallet so old version of Electrum). After I updated Electrum, I got the message that the new wallet doesn't support this wallet type, and that it would save it as 2 different wallets? Something like that, can't really remember.
Now the problem is that after this, I can see my balance, but the wallet can't connect to Trezor and therefore I can't move my coins. I have tried to export, and tried to connect on my PC, but I get the message "Connection failed" when trying to send, and the Trezor icon in the bottom right is red.
I'm using Win10, with the latest version of electrum. Anyone know how to get it to connect? I have tried with Trezor bridge both installed and uninstalled.
EDIT: I have the latest firmware on Trezor, and it works without problems on trezor.io
EDIT2: I tried to go File-New/Restore and chose Hardware Wallet, but Electrum can't even find my Trezor, even though it works perfectly on wallet.trezor.io. Again, Windows 10
|
|
|
|
|
This is a hidden pearl, with huge potential.
|
|
|
|
|
zzzzzz
meanwhile 3btc vol/day on topia...weird
|
|
|
|
1) We have generated a chain of 10 million sha256 hashes, starting with a server secret that has been repeatedly fed the output of sha256 back into itself 10 million times. The sha256 of the final hash in the chain is: c56c9fe892bd23ff6d20da0b505c86db9acecb6a257a2b79b23dfface1d4ea75, by publicising it here we are preventing any ability to pick an alternate sha256 chain. 2) Parabolic will play through that chain of hashes, in reverse order, and use the hashes to determine the crash point in a probably fair manner. 3) To avoid criticism that the Bitcoin address used in step 1 was carefully chosen to generate lots of "bad" crash points, each hash in the chain will be salted with a client seed, which we have no control of. The client seed will be the block hash of a Bitcoin block that hasn't yet been mined: block 465525. The reference code (javascript) is as follows: The method to create the hash chain is simply sha256: function genGameHash(serverSeed) {
return crypto.createHash('sha256').update(serverSeed).digest('hex');
}
The method to convert a game hash, mix it with the picked client seed to a game multiplier: function crashPointFromHash(serverSeed, clientSeed) {
function divisible(hash, mod) {
// We will read in 4 hex at a time, but the first chunk might be a bit smaller
// So ABCDEFGHIJ should be chunked like AB CDEF GHIJ
var val = 0;
var o = hash.length % 4;
for (var i = o > 0 ? o - 4 : 0; i < hash.length; i += 4) {
val = ((val << 16) + parseInt(hash.substring(i, i+4), 16)) % mod;
}
return val === 0;
}
var hash = crypto.createHmac('sha256', serverSeed).update(clientSeed).digest('hex');
/* In 1 of 101 games the game crashes instantly. */
if (divisible(hash, 101))
return 0;
/* Use the most significant 52-bit from the hash
to calculate the crash point */
var h = parseInt(hash.slice(0,52/4),16);
var e = Math.pow(2,52);
return Math.floor((100 * e - h) / (e - h));
}
The chain could be generated with code such as: var serverSecret = 'If you knew this, you could steal all my money';
var clientSeed = '0000examplehash';
var gamesToGenerate = 1e7;
var serverSeed = serverSecret;
for (var game = gamesToGenerate; game > 0; --game) {
serverSeed = genGameHash(serverSeed);
console.log('Game ' + game + ' has a crash point of ' + (crashPointFromHash(serverSeed, clientSeed) / 100).toFixed(2) +'x', '\t\tHash: ' + serverSeed);
}
var terminatingHash = genGameHash(serverSeed);
console.log('The terminating hash is: ', terminatingHash);
Using our chosen starting serverSeed, the hash terminating the chain is c56c9fe892bd23ff6d20da0b505c86db9acecb6a257a2b79b23dfface1d4ea75. That is to say, the first game's hash played under the new provably fair scheme, when hashed will be c56c9fe892bd23ff6d20da0b505c86db9acecb6a257a2b79b23dfface1d4ea75. Quoted |
|
|
|
Patiently waiting  |
|
|
|
Why wont my coins stake, I have had them in my wallet for over a week and when I open it it's always at the same balance. How come in not getting any coins?
Wallet needs to be open all the time in order to stake |
|
|
|
The mods deleted this post. I am now creating an copy of this page of this thread at archive.org. The mods are censoring the information that @coinling and others asked me to provide. A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by a Bitcoin Forum moderator. Posts are most frequently deleted because they are off-topic, though they can also be deleted for other reasons. In the future, please avoid posting things that need to be deleted. I'll reply one more time because there is something very important that needs to be stated and also to return the gratitude I was extended.
First let me warn again that perhaps you ought to consider selling some LTC now. I see a potential pattern developing that is a major pullback all the way back to 0.0095. But I can't be sure yet until we break down through 0.0113 on the current downwave. Because there are smaller patterns within larger patterns in play, so it becomes difficult to determine which pattern is in play at any given juncture.could you provide a graph for your analysis or anything where you rely on ? really appreciate it. although i would still prefer you working fulltime on bitnet  But i understand, gambling crypto is fun.
@Thenoticer et al, let's just see what comes. I need to be more focused. Hopefully it will work out well for everyone involved! I have deleted the above post and after getting some sleep, I am reposting with the chart requested by @coinling. Since that post above was made, some other censorship lolz occurred. This should be my final post in this thread. I think you guys can handle it on your own from here once you understand the following chart. Note that repeating pattern between the dark blue lines, also repeats at smaller scales within the larger patterns, i.e. the chart is a fractal affine transformation. I am excited to help all of you make gains in LTC, so hopefully you can invest some of your profits in Bitnet in the future. The following chart should be mostly self explanatory. Pay special attention to the purple line which is apparently has been the bottom for the prior two instances of the replica pattern that we are now in. The prior instance was on the March 30 correction. Bottom line is I will either go long now or wait for another pullback to the purple line and will remain long until at least 0.015 where that overhead thick blue line is. For the past 4 hours, there is a declining wedge pattern and I am not sure if we will break out higher or lower from it. If breakout to the downside, then we revisit the purple line below one more time. Edit@07:56pm (19:54UTC): final deadcat bounce now peaking before heading down to 0.0114, then it is a strong buy at the purple support line. Expect one more fakeout on the way down to ~0.0114. I am guesstimating 67% - 80% odds of this being the correct interpretation of the chart. Edit@9pm: 0.0117 is the lowest bottom as the purple line has risen.  (click to enlarge) |
|
|
|
My trendlines from the origin pattern matching analysis predicted the congestion and slight pullback in the 0.0124 area. I did not try to trade that one though because the probabilities were less favorable. Also I was incredibly sleep deprived from trading this so didn't want to enter any short positions while I slept 4 - 5 hours only.
There is a possibility of a significant pullback at either 0.0135 or 0.0146. with the latter being more likely. Otherwise ~0.02.
So with LTC now skyrocketing and Theymos and his other idiots whiners upthread are having their facepalm realization, this proves who is spamming and who is not.
Those who have made a lot of money buying LTC because of @iamnotadamnblack's correct and prescient analysis and predictions, could pay the most gratitude to him by voicing their displeasure at the Theymos' suppression of the truth, the experts, and free speech.
Wasn't Theymos also involved in the corruption of suppression of free speech over at Redditard r/BTC?
Or if y'all prefer, simply support BitNet when ever it is launched and decentralized forums on a blockchain in addition to other applications of decentralized databases.
This is warning to Theymos. Ban this account if you wish. But your days are numbered. I am going to remove your authority from our ecosystem. I win. We all win. You and your idiot cohorts/baggage lose.
One excellent way to voice your displeasure is by quoting this post (even with no comment). Also so this post can't be deleted by a moderator.
Let's see if those who appreciate, also have some balls.
Free iamnotback! |
|
|
|
|
Both LTC Top and LTC1BTC are signaling...so yes, u can trust them!
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks asphyxia for your great work and presence!
|
|
|
|
If this business model is so needed, then how come wikipedia works perfectly fine as it is? Can someone explain what Lunyr does that is advantageous over wiki?
Once you look deeper there are holes. Niche topics like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethereum or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ethereum_virtual_machine have very little or no content despite the enormous depth of information that could be written about them. There's no incentive to contribute. Having an incentive for writers would greatly increase the content size, content quality, and article coverage. umm, thanks but no thanks, i think wikipedia incentives seem to work fine in most areas...gl though |
|
|
|
Literally every ASIC manufacturer has done that. There are practically zero repercussions for anything in cryptocurrency. Pay a large sum, larger than you could ever hope to pay back mining, for a miner advertised arriving several months before it actually shows up that has been used to the point of failure and is no longer as profitable because they have used the order money to produce a new batch of asics for themselves. the difference here is that he is actively doing something that lowers the price of the coins the customer wants to mine...that is next level fucked up |
|
|
|
|
If this business model is so needed, then how come wikipedia works perfectly fine as it is? Can someone explain what Lunyr does that is advantageous over wiki?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
