Bitcoin Forum
May 22, 2024, 04:29:30 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »
41  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin the enabler - Truly Autonomous Software Agents roaming the net on: December 06, 2011, 08:42:21 PM
Maybe an early iteration will be an autonomous busker - living off of donations, synthesizing music, fractal movies, or stange haikus.
42  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Who is willing to create on: December 01, 2011, 03:25:40 AM
Can somebody draw a Captain Bitcoin! ?

He fights for liberty in a world awash in decay and fraud.

He wears a mask, a cape, and a large Bitcoin emblem on his chest.
43  Economy / Marketplace / Re: This is why Bitcoinica users must wait in line for withdrawals on: December 01, 2011, 02:18:03 AM
, and you have a wonderful cesspool of shady dealings, slightly mangled laws, and wanna-be gangsters all over the place.

Yes some of that... but mostly just free people engaging in businesses without asking for permission from clowns with badges. Thank god there are people who just move forward without pleading with the gatekeepers. Heroes all.

EVorhees, I really like what you say. Thank you or taking the time to speak your mind so succinctly. I think it's important work.
44  Economy / Economics / Re: The Bullion Report For Nov 23, 2011: Holiday Volatility on: November 25, 2011, 09:08:39 PM
Happy thanksgiving to you too, asshole.

 Huh

 
45  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: More Bits on freetalklive.com on: November 25, 2011, 07:24:00 PM

StrongCoin seems very safe.


here's the thing.... if you hack StongCoin you get everyone's bits!

not a half bad incentive to hack away

StrongCoin only stores your private keys in encrypted form. They never even see the unencrypted keys.


if some points a gun to the owner of StrongCoin and says, "give me all the bits Bitch!"... the owner wont be able to give your coins for his life?

No, he won't.


True. StrongCoin doesn't encrypt the private keys - the users do.
46  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: A proposal for a scalable blockchain. on: November 25, 2011, 06:47:47 PM
Fascinating idea - if I understand it. It sounds like this proposal is sort of like an "oral history" of a block chain - as long as enough recently-connected clients are around to testify as to the "recent" history. Is that an accurate description?

So I'm sure that I understand this:

a) when would it be "safe" to "forget" a genesis block from such a blockchain? As soon as all coins generated by it have been spent, and 51% of clients have learned of these spends (received the blocks they're contained in)?

b) IF 51% of the network were forced offline for 2+ weeks, could a malevolent actor with 51% hash power step in and present a complete two-week false history?
47  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin commercial on: November 11, 2011, 04:47:33 AM
I like the life-stages idea, btc_novice. It's similar to the "You Will" commercials in how it evokes emotions.
  (thanks CBeast for reminding us about "You Will")
I don't think Satoshi should be mentioned in any commercials - at least for 5 years.
Keep It Simple, Satoshi. Go short on details. Fill it with imagery and emotion.
48  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: My new bitcoin world ;-) ... on: November 11, 2011, 04:23:36 AM
+1
49  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Let the NFC games begin on: October 26, 2011, 02:34:47 AM
Quote
If the payment is to another CBA customer, the money is transferred instantly to the nominated account. If the person is a customer of another bank, the usual processing time of one to two days applies.

Bitcoin can compete with this.
50  Other / Meta / Re: A modest proposal - BTC as noise filter and quality incentive on: October 24, 2011, 07:52:58 PM
Is that what witcoin does?

 https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Witcoin

Can anyone comment on its effectiveness?

51  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: A P2P Exchange(s): putting this out there on: October 20, 2011, 02:18:54 AM
Is this the kind of thing you(OP)'re thinking about?

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=27055.60
52  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Ideas for a Bitcoin 2.0 on: October 19, 2011, 02:51:32 AM
I want the last 5 minutes of my life back Sad
53  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Ideas for a Bitcoin 2.0 on: October 15, 2011, 01:06:58 AM
1.  The limit on the total of Bitcoins that may ever exist is, numerically speaking, much too small compared to the world money supply, which leads to a significant psychological barrier - since it is very difficult for a normal "man on the street" to believe that 1 BTC could someday be worth $100,000 or more (as it would have to be if Bitcoins ever became as widely adopted as the US dollar, say).

A dollar is divisible to 2 decimal places ($0.01). A bitcoin is divisible to eight decimal places (0.00000001). If you express the total number of bitcoins to two decimal places, you get 21,000,000,000,000.00 (21 trillion).


Exactly. Let's call it Bitcoin 2.0, with 7-letter currency symbol "satoshi". There will only every be 2.1 quadrillion of them. Then the common man can really get behind it.
54  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: How would online Bitcoin commerce work? on: October 12, 2011, 04:02:18 AM
How about an online bitcoin wallet with generally much higher fees (in line with Visa/Mastercard) but which has customer protection in the form of insurance for the online wallet provider.

1 -- Customer purchases something via SuperDuperWallet(tm)
2 -- merchant doesn't ship the product
3 -- Customer puts in a dispute at SuperWallet and they return his coins.
4 -- SuperWallet covers the loss by pre-arranging some kind of insurance against the certain % of cases where this is going to happen.


This, and Peter Lambert's #5, might not be far off. If trust is needed, why can't the marketplace provide it? Isn't this a business opportunity?

Imagine a "BitTrust" working to help bitcoin businesses establish themselves - like a credit rating agency geared toward bitcoin.
1) new businesses "register" with them to whatever degree they're willing:
  - participate in recorded video conference interview
  - provide valid photo ID, proof of address
  - submit to a credit check
  - submit to site security audits
  - post a bond, pay a periodic fee
  - attend face-to-face recorded interview with BitTrust employees
  - provide passports, fingerprints, social security numbers
2) BitTrust rates them and discloses their level of trust
3) BitTrust insures transactions with them for a price commensurate with their rating

Now, clearly one would have to trust BitTrust itself, but if they were a registered bricks and mortar operation themselves, maybe it could work (people could trust them enough to use their services). There'd always be the chance of collusion with an evil business, but if business were profitable, honesty might be their best policy - if BitTrust CEOs were on the line.


Sounds expensive, right? Maybe that's why credit cards charge such a high fee Tongue


It makes me think that the MOST important function of bitcoin has nothing to do with avoiding credit card fees - but more to do with it's Fed-proof nature.

EDIT:
... And the great thing about providing consumer protection in a bitcoin context is that you can do it without having any of the issues associated with stolen credit cards (which I would guess is responsible for the vast majority of credit card charge reversals).
Nice
55  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Alternate Cryptocurrencies Rewiew on: October 08, 2011, 02:42:01 PM
Bitcoin - gold
Namecoin - maybe silver one day
Others - need a raison detre that innovates, and makes sense, the way these two do.

Briefly, I thought solidcoin might have a future as an edgier, more experimental coin. I was wrong.
56  Economy / Economics / Re: Utah monetary declaration friendly to bitcoin, possibly more states will follow on: October 07, 2011, 02:58:42 AM
This is great news. I imagined the law was written for gold (and maybe silver) alone.

News like this gets people thinking about money - about what it really is. And that's the glimmer of hope in these times of decay and decline.
57  Economy / Economics / Re: Let's end one debate: Commodity vs Money on: October 07, 2011, 02:51:51 AM
ended

bc you've got a very handsome avatar there  Wink


Aw, shucks. Roll Eyes
58  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Mappers vs Packers. Why Most People Don't Get Bitcoin on: October 07, 2011, 02:49:00 AM
If OP is right, bitcoin won't get widespread adoption by general consumer Packers until there's been a pattern drawn out for them by general consumer Mappers (for several years).


But, elicit drug consumer Packers might exhibit a different time preference when they see a pattern drawn out for them by elicit drug consumer Mappers - and take it up a little quicker.

And organizations that find themselves on the wrong side of governmental pressure on Paypal might find they need fresh ideas or leadership in a hurry - and spot the pattern drawn out for them by organizations headed by Mappers.

And Packers in a country with a hyper-inflating currency will feel a fire under their posteriors - to spot the pattern drawn out for them by flight-to-safety Mappers that figured it out.


These and other niche groups, stroke by stroke, will help to paint a picture that challenges the pre-conceived notions of general consumer Packers.

The time frames we're dealing with are clearly historically short. They're just longer than we would have hoped - having lived through the big run-up of June.
59  Economy / Economics / Re: Let's end one debate: Commodity vs Money on: October 07, 2011, 01:46:30 AM
ended
60  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Impressive bitcoin one liners for non bitcoiners on: October 01, 2011, 01:08:49 AM
Bitcoin: Because your money belongs to you.

+1
Pages: « 1 2 [3] 4 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!