Why do Max and Oliver both get 4 million Lisk? ICO funds not enough?  have you ever seen a valid proof of the ico funds.. |
|
|
|
|
and then we choose a random winner:
(who ever gets dumped big time!)
following distribution:
83,605,344.7663202 LSK - Validated ICO Accounts ( part of oliver/max hidden accounts)
1,394,655.23363505 LSK - Unvalidated ICO Accounts
4,000,000 LSK - Max’ Account
4,000,000 LSK - Oliver’s Account
4,000,000 LSK - Bounty Fund
2,000,000 LSK - Adviser Fund
1,000,000 LSK - Early Adopters Fund
0.00004472 LSK - Dust
|
|
|
|
basic prototype for lisk starters:  |
|
|
|
|
Average from Below: .0056 BTC/LISK = $2.45
Yobit - .012 BTC/LISK = $5.26
Bloombit - .0023 BTC/LISK = $1
Openledger - .0026 BTC/LISK = $1.1
guess where the pump goes on..
we will see $0.01 in the next days
there are more clones coming into the game
do i need to tell what it means?
|
|
|
|
My non insane guess is 30 cents. If it goes higher than $1 lets throw a lisk party.
If no party, at least we can buy more cheap.  yes. 1 day: $1.50 2 days: $0.50 5 days : $0.05 10 days : $0.005 a party but who will have it? |
|
|
|
|
854.20485924 lisks can be sold for 3.27245881 btc
if you dump it now at yobit.
|
|
|
|
i find it interesting that most of lisk supporters are Jr. Member or Newbies with new accounts..
who lost ico this crazy to the value is low , the lower value will be $ 2
thas the game people will not pay anymore to 20cent ico buyers most of ico holders are the so called dev team... They've already paid >$2, with millions of dollars of volume to ICO buyers who got their ICO LISK tradeable pre-launch. While these prices are likely inflated, I would be very surprised to see it go that low. we will see. i might be wrong but with this one i see pretty clear roadmap. and that is not a good one. next days will tell |
|
|
|
|
i find it interesting that most of lisk supporters are Jr. Member or Newbies with new accounts..
|
|
|
|
who lost ico this crazy to the value is low , the lower value will be $ 2
thats the game people will not pay anymore to 20cent ico buyers most of ico holders are the so called dev team... |
|
|
|
any one have a good educated guesses at the price 1 day , 2 days , 5 days after launch?
1 day : $2 each
2 days : $1
5 days : $6
1 day: $0.20 2 days: $0.22 5 days : $0.18 1 day: $1.50 2 days: $0.50 5 days : $0.05 10 days : $0.005 |
|
|
|
The hypers and the whales are too busy with ETH pump right now
Which has sputtered, by the way. I'm glad I got rid of my few ETH while it was still above $13, tho' I expect to regret it later.  For anyone new, there is a 99.99% scientific certainty that Lisk will ROI a much more than ETH going forward. That could well be, even for those who buy some at (say) Yobit. Ethereum is father down the development chain than Lisk, so it has less room to rise. Yep, no point to buy ETH at this time. I'm putting my money on Lisk, hopping to buy some cheap coins at launch from Lisk bounties sellers. Lisk price may just surprise us all and pass $13 ETH I think it will surprise us all and go directly to $26  I got my eye on $24.99 and the current price now is?? |
|
|
|
basically easy as this:  ?  |
|
|
|
|
+BIG dump coming after last push to pump.
the day is coming..
|
|
|
|
Wow, seriously? To the Bitcoin foundation? OUCH what happened to the rest of the coins? (145btc...) |
|
|
|
To be honest, it's the guy's fault that did this huge mistake (how the fuck do you not realize you are sending that insane amount for a fee?) I mean unless he was drunk, I have no idea how I would ever do this.
Bitcoin is about self-responsibility, so if you can't eve properly send a fee, that's your fault and the miners aren't forced to give this guy's money back, even tho it would be nice.
Yeah but in this case (like many others) the pool/site wants to give it back to the real owner. He/they should only prove the ownership of the input address ' 1QgTYzMYqStzZBQx8gguYaJQMjFRbagbh'. Lol no, the guy who started the "Bitclub is trying to return the coin" story was trolling. Everyone instantly believed him because desperate for news that doesn't involve bitcoiners robbing each other. Wrong. That's what the Coindesk article said. Now, Bitclub can go back on their word, but that will have significant negative repercussions on their business if they are recognized as untrustworthy. Link to Bitclub official statement plz? i think this will do the job: From: mining@coindesk.comDear Sir, we are currently waiting for someone to reach out to us and claim their mistake so that we can verify them and send their bitcoin back, but so far as of this posting nobody has been able to verify it. Blockchain : https://blockchain.info/tx/cc455ae816e6cdafdb58d54e35d4f46d860047458eacf1c7405dc634631c570dAnswer form : http://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7spoqTudJfWX01xdE1FYlRkQnMBest Regards. What am I looking at, and why is your second link asking me to download an executable?  Please provide a link to an official public statement made by Bitclub. ty. links are from coindesk. i have no idea what the google drive link has. this was sent from coindesk as email. |
|
|
|
To be honest, it's the guy's fault that did this huge mistake (how the fuck do you not realize you are sending that insane amount for a fee?) I mean unless he was drunk, I have no idea how I would ever do this.
Bitcoin is about self-responsibility, so if you can't eve properly send a fee, that's your fault and the miners aren't forced to give this guy's money back, even tho it would be nice.
Yeah but in this case (like many others) the pool/site wants to give it back to the real owner. He/they should only prove the ownership of the input address ' 1QgTYzMYqStzZBQx8gguYaJQMjFRbagbh'. Lol no, the guy who started the "Bitclub is trying to return the coin" story was trolling. Everyone instantly believed him because desperate for news that doesn't involve bitcoiners robbing each other. Wrong. That's what the Coindesk article said. Now, Bitclub can go back on their word, but that will have significant negative repercussions on their business if they are recognized as untrustworthy. Link to Bitclub official statement plz? i think this will do the job: From: mining@coindesk.comDear Sir, we are currently waiting for someone to reach out to us and claim their mistake so that we can verify them and send their bitcoin back, but so far as of this posting nobody has been able to verify it. Blockchain : https://blockchain.info/tx/cc455ae816e6cdafdb58d54e35d4f46d860047458eacf1c7405dc634631c570dAnswer form : http://drive.google.com/file/d/0B7spoqTudJfWX01xdE1FYlRkQnMBest Regards. |
|
|
|
To be honest, it's the guy's fault that did this huge mistake (how the fuck do you not realize you are sending that insane amount for a fee?) I mean unless he was drunk, I have no idea how I would ever do this.
Bitcoin is about self-responsibility, so if you can't eve properly send a fee, that's your fault and the miners aren't forced to give this guy's money back, even tho it would be nice.
Yeah but in this case (like many others) the pool/site wants to give it back to the real owner. He/they should only prove the ownership of the input address ' 1QgTYzMYqStzZBQx8gguYaJQMjFRbagbh'. no matter how this happened, human error or not. but bitcoin dev team has some serious updating to do, avoiding this happening never again. |
|
|
|
|
the most scary ones:
1. client bug.
2. service bug
3. third party client relaying payment found a way to swap fees/inputs(possible???)
we have no idea what client/service sender was using.
4. some rich guy having fun with us
|
|
|
|
|
is the gpu miner shared?
have no time to read all.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
