Come on lazy kids, vote on mintpal, with a little effort Pink can be listed within 2 weeks, it is a very big community, not a few people talking but a lot of different people talking.........

Yeah, well, that's you. If you've got the power to move markets and make this coin supremely valuable then I will stand down on my request for the dev team to release full Bios.

Until then I would ask that you avoid the tiresome references to Satoshi's anonymity, on the basis that the software is open-source, it is not a mystery how it works, just one of who Satoshi was. You start spouting DARPA and you're just part of the tin-foil hat brigade with just as much credibility.

VRC is going gangbusters because the market can trust that they are putting themselves in the firing line. They can make mistakes and all they have to contend with is people getting impatient and a little trollish. The market doesn't collapse on them though, unlike when the devs are anonymous and mistakes lead to rapid escalation of scam accusations until, it turns out, it was a scam and everybody gets burned, again.

Just because you are happy to trust forum avatars, doesn't mean the market is anymore.

Guys and gals,
I think you are doing this small name change to a big issue..

I am also thinking of when someone implements PinkCoin to there shop there will be an option like:

Pay with PinkCoin
or
Pay with PINK

Which sounds best?

PinkCoin soundsbetter then PINK in that case... and by time more and more shops will implement PinkCoin and it sounds much better if its name was PinkCoin and not PINK in this case, dont you think so?

Good, sell then and  miss out some nice opportunities.

Guys..
is there any poker game for PINK?

If not, is there any poker game for other coins?

"No more after this one. No more after this one. No more after this one."

Yet you have some of the best graphic design and presentation I have seen in crypto. It just needs to translate into a matched degree of utility.

Anon transactions aren't actually that desirable after all it would seem, so you need to broaden the appeal of your coin instead of narrowing it down to the type of people who seem to want Anon, if you get what I mean.

Your willingness to post bios and show the community who you are speaks volumes for the likely validity of the project. So, after earning the community's trust this way, you should be able to talk freely about the planned development schedule along with inviting ideas and suggestions that can be considered. They don't all have to work, most of them might not move the market much, but your openness will allow you the time and freedom to try new things until you find the 'killer feature' that captures the market's attention.

Put it this way, I'm certainly willing to risk losing a few BTC on a dev team that might or might not succeed, if I know that they did so openly and with every intention of trying to bring this coin out of the doldrums. I think you'll find more people will give you the chance to work unencumbered by suspicion if they see that you are genuine in your good intentions.

I absolutely agree, but if a coin dev team are open about who they are then they can make mistakes as the project goes forward and recover from them because people are less inclined to believe they are trying to scam everyone.

Look at Litecoin, Dogecoin, Darkcoin and Vericoin. None of them have been flawless projects from the outset but if their devs had been only anonymous forum usernames the projects would have collapsed at the first problem they encountered because everyone would be assuming it was a scam.

Being open about who you are will bring a lot more tolerance and willingness to grant the benefit of the doubt when and if problems arise.

What would help this coin, as would most that want to be seen as legit, is having a known Dev team who are willing to be open about who they are and what their background is.