Without liquidating 2.0.1
it is worse than being delisted, may be.
Hope Crex24 will not open for deposit/withdrawal that way.

I think it's important to end relation with Conan.
The new Yenten 1.3.1 will need a clear distinction from the attacked and inflated one.
Maybe new ANN thread, Discord, Git and web page etc?

More than 14,100,000 Yenten on sale in 3 exchanges.
Current total supply should be around 13,100,000 that is 50 x block-height

Probably the last chance was when you released the  CVE-2018-17144-fixed version.
Community should have taken over the chain with that version cooperating with pools to assure 51% pow regardless of risk of loosing exchanges.

I'v been checking with bitcoin forums for negative balance cases.  It is a sign of double spending due to
CVE-2018-17144 inflation attack if not a bug in the explore.  The amount is just immense.

No need to be PM.  Put it down here for transparency so we can decide.

Exchange places have expressed their policy.  The moderator and follower members in the Discord community are preparing a request to exchanges to use their own version of wallet because of the fix to CVE-2018-17144, expressing the community has started to use the own wallet, whiles the  request is contradictory to exchange's policy.  Possible reactions of the exchanges will be: ignore the request and keep using the old wallet; make an exception to their policy and adopt the community version wallet; or delist Yenten to avoid any possible risk.

Apart from holding this coin, to me it became a very interesting case to observe.

The fix for CVE-2018-17144 was a good move.  For that,  I was buying back.  But the risk is still there in exchange and possibly in pools because of the “bug” as you mentioned.  I was kind of hoping that, just not releasing a modified version, the community takes the control of the chain and then development.  But the moderator even banned me from the discussion in the Discord.   The community is not very open and a whale is trying to rule it I guess.

IMAO,  community should take over the chain.  Otherwise, it is quite disappointing.

When I mentioned this in Discord, I was expelled from the topic server.   
Looks like the moderator blocks the opinion not favored by him. 

Anyway, I discovered at least the Discord Yenten community has no intention to take the chain over. 

Not applying the fix will leave the Yenten network in danger.
At cost of one Yenten block, anyone with good cryptcurrency knowledge can attack Yenten nodes and bring then down.
In other words, the attack will crash nodes, consequently exchanges and pools go down.  This is what I understood.

You are not a dev??  I noticed you provided CVE-2018-17144 security fix for Yenten wallet.
To my knowledge, it will close what they call "catastrophic" security holes in the wallet.
From your perspectives, when the change will be reflected in the new wallet and released?

I know Ytenten started with a piece of joke naming the coin after a scam incident in Japan. 
The developer just wants to fool people with the coin he develops.

The last joke really went bad.  “consensus.BIP65Height = 198765” and the line after in chainparams.cpp caused a big fork of blockchain in last August, then many miners, pools and exchanges suffered.  There are few more coming near future but hope nothing bad will happen.
There is a message left in the code.  The developer call himself a god, and that was written in Japanese.

It is imperative that the Yenten community takes over development and stop joking in the code.

The developer maybe still around.   What I know is he is totally unaccountable.  In that sense, the coin is dead.  Or maybe zombie.  Many people as well are still mining and supporting this coin like zombie.  I would say it is Mining Dead!!

There is a good bench mark list.
http://pool.elicoin.net/bench

I was mining PPTP with http://pptp.ukkey3.space/ for a while but discontinued as the site announced its closing down.   When I tried solo mining instead, I got 45 PPTP coins for block reward that is 9 coins more than what the pool was distributing.   I made an inquiry to the pool why only 36 PPTPs are distributed instead of 45 and got answer that 9 coins are for masternode reward.   

People have mined  around 7000 PPTP blocks with the pool so far.  The 9 PPTP coins per block, amounting over 60K PPTP coins were really distributed to the masternodes?  Why I am getting 45 PPTPs with solo-mining?  Is there any trick about it?  Can anyone tell?

Although the coin has no value at all,  I just wanted to clarify that out of my curiosity.

Whoever running PPTP master node,  are you getting any reward?

is the explorer https://explorer.cryply.io working correctly?
A transaction of few days ago is not reflected