Bitcoin Forum
May 02, 2024, 09:24:42 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 »
921  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Will X11 save us from the ASIC vultures? on: March 24, 2014, 04:37:16 PM
Which of the 11 hash functions in X11 do you suppose is ASIC resistant?

If you can make an ASIC for each of the 11 hash functions, then you can trivially make an ASIC to do all of them at the same time...
922  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / Re: [PROFITABLE CPU MINING] Mine from home / work! Tutorial on: March 24, 2014, 02:58:05 PM
What about people who have CPU with no AES-NI support. I have 20 x Core2Quad without AES-NI and MMC is unprofitable for me...
Quark, PTS some time ago was very profitable...

Wait for a Cuckoo Cycle coin to come out (https://github.com/tromp/cuckoo).
That will run very well on your system...
923  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: List of CPU-ONLY AltCoins on: March 18, 2014, 04:04:22 PM
Please add Particle,Quark algorithm
the new wallet

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=392804.0

particle was removed after gpu miner for quark became widely available

I think you shouldn't even bother listing coins that use hashcash with some alternative,
easily computed hash function (or combination thereof), where there's no reason
whatsoever to think that it couldn't be implemented on a GPU...
924  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Best Amount Of Total Coins? on: March 16, 2014, 10:15:32 PM
same as current us dollars
500 trillion

Same as eventual us dollars.
Unlimited.
925  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: What would you want in a Alt-Coin on: March 16, 2014, 10:14:09 PM
Maybe a new algorithm?

Like Cuckoo Cycle (https://github.com/tromp/cuckoo) ?
926  Other / Archival / Re: delete on: March 14, 2014, 10:27:18 PM
Keep in mind, anything that is limited to the cpu level of mining will totally owned by the botnetters as soon as any coin becomes profitable.

I made a killing with XPM.

Not "anything". Just things that can run well on the average hardware and stay under the radar.

A proof-of-work system that uses 4+GB of memory will send the vast majority of botnet computers into swap-hell, resulting in

1) negligable hashing power
2) their owners realizing something is very wrong
927  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Cuckoo Cycle: a new memory-hard proof-of-work system on: March 14, 2014, 04:10:18 AM
The verifier is done; I should have the solver ported soon as well.

Try "make java" on the latest version...
928  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Cuckoo Cycle: a new memory-hard proof-of-work system on: March 11, 2014, 05:28:13 PM
I will write a Java version eventually, but it's pretty low on my list of priorities,
and I'm busy with many other things. Perhaps you can find some other Java programmer
to port it sooner. I will have more time in March...

Notice any changes to https://github.com/tromp/cuckoo lately :-?

The verifier is done; I should have the solver ported soon as well.
929  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: poll concerning the airdrop of auroracoin on: March 05, 2014, 03:37:06 PM
Where is the option

I would claim all Icelander's coins as fast as possible to dump all of them immediatley.

? Why limit it to friends and family ?
930  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The True Value of Auroracoin on: March 03, 2014, 06:22:42 PM
lol did you see that up to 0,16 BTC  Shocked  ?WTF?

Just a few more days of doubling in value and #1 Bitcoin will be toast :-)
931  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The True Value of Auroracoin on: March 03, 2014, 04:47:43 PM
Every criticism of Auroracoin can apply to Bitcoin

Uhm, no.
Bitcoin never claimed to have a way of distributing millions of coins to a large population for free.

That is Aurora's main claim to fame. And it looks like an empty promise,
since as far as I can tell, such a distribution scheme is not actually feasible.
932  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: The True Value of Auroracoin on: March 03, 2014, 02:55:04 PM
People usually scream bloody murder to premine (even as *low* as 10%!), but some guy comes along and says "give me 50% premine, I promise to distribute it, trust me" and suddenly everyone is convinced.

The big puzzle to me is: how can the airdrop possibly be implemented without government support?

How does he deal with a thousand people who all claim to be
Sigrun Gudmundsdottir with kennitala (national id) 120174-3389?

Have them all send in a copy of their passport and manually verify it?
I'm really curious how this is supposed to be implemented.

They only way I can see this working is if each Icelander has been issued a private key
and there is a public list of public keys (and each Icelander has been professionally
trained how to properly handle keys and keep their computer secure. Yeah right)
933  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: Myriad coin may be the most innovative coin of 2014 thus far on: February 26, 2014, 07:31:45 PM
On February 23rd, Myriad coin, which is proof of work, was released.  It may very well be the most innovative coin of 2014 thus far.  How so?  Myriad is essentially 5 coins in one.  There are 5 separate proof of work algorithms to choose from (Scypt, SHA256D, Qubit, Skein and Groestl).  Each algorithm has its own independent difficulty and any algorithm can find the next block.  All the algorithms use the same difficulty adjustment method and on average, each algorithm has the same chance of finding the next block. 

Truly innovative.

This is not a new idea. See
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=257135.0
934  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: help me measure parallellizability of new memory-hard proof-of-work scheme on: February 25, 2014, 03:03:05 AM
Oh I get it now! Thanks a lot for the info and sorry!

As far as Amazon Web Services goes, a dual-cpu with each cpu having 8 hyper-threaded cores seems to be the best they can offer. So I cannot get beyond 32 threads with Amazon.

Some dual-cpus like the Xeon E7-2880 have as many as 15 (hyper-threaded) cores, which could provide 60 threads. To get beyond 60 threads requires a machine with a quad-cpu (Xeon E5-4XXX, E7-4xxx) or octa-cpu (E7-8xxx). Are any cloud computing providers offering these?
935  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: help me measure parallellizability of new memory-hard proof-of-work scheme on: February 24, 2014, 07:59:44 PM
1 with 16

You mean 1 machine with 16 threads?
I'm sorry but that's not enough for my purposes.
I already tested up to 32 threads...

it looks like this
I doubt it has 1275 Threads

That's the number of runnable threads. The image shows 16 cores (real or virtual).
So out of those 1275, at most 16 can be running at any one time...
936  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: help me measure parallellizability of new memory-hard proof-of-work scheme on: February 24, 2014, 07:49:27 PM
1 with 16

You mean 1 machine with 16 threads?
I'm sorry but that's not enough for my purposes.
I already tested up to 32 threads...
937  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Mining (Altcoins) / help wanted testing new proof-of-work on: February 24, 2014, 07:23:56 PM
I'm trying to determine how parallelizable my Cuckoo Cycle proof-of-work is. See this thread for details if you have access to a computer with more than 32 threads:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=485170.0
938  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / help me measure parallellizability of new memory-hard proof-of-work scheme on: February 24, 2014, 07:16:19 PM
As developer of the Cuckoo Cycle proof of work, I'm trying to determine the maximum number of threads that can effectively work together on a single problem instance.

The largest machine I have access to has 32 threads (dual 8 core hyperthreaded) which yield a speedup of 16.7 over single-threaded runs. I'm very curious to know how many threads it takes to saturate the memory IO, so that additional threads bring no benefit.

The Makefile provided at https://github.com/tromp/cuckoo contains a basic speedup test
  make speedup.25
that only goes up to 8 threads, using 128MB instances (size 25).

If anyone has access to a Linux machine with more than 32 threads, could you please run a variation of that test with instances of size 28 (using 1GB) and as many threads as your system supports, and post a summary of your results?

For instance, if your system supports up to 60 threads, and you only want to try a subset of thread counts, you could do

for i in 1 2 8 16 32 48 52 56 60; do echo $i; cc -o cuckoo.spd -DNTHREADS=$i -DSIZEMULT=1 -DSIZESHIFT=28 cuckoo.c -O3 -std=c99 -Wall -Wno-deprecated-declarations -pthread -l crypto; time for j in {0..9}; do ./cuckoo.spd $j; done; done

Each single threaded run at size 28 takes about half a minute, so the entire test above should take under 15 minutes.

Any help is appreciated!







939  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: "Failure to Understand Bitcoin Could Cost Investors Billions" (Bitcoin's flaws) on: February 20, 2014, 02:19:08 PM
You just try to find one finite bound of anything in the universe. You won't be able to find it. Even if you count the number of a certain species, you can't guarantee with 100% certainty it will remain less than some bound

This quote is attributed to Einstein:

"“Two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not yet completely sure about the universe.”"
940  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Altcoin Discussion / Re: MemoryCoin 2.0 Proof Of Work on: February 20, 2014, 02:03:10 AM
Defeating those high-end server CPUs was another of my objectives (and I think I succeeded).

When can we expect a publication detailing your PoW?

If you want to call Cuckoo Cycle a memory-only PoW rather than a CPU-only PoW,
that suits me fine.

To be more specific, not a personal computer cpu-only. As you pointed out, the high-end server CPUs from Oracle, etc could be used.

But the latter is not as cost effective; it costs way more per thread and per GB of memory,
and thus gets handily beaten by a farm of pc's of the same total cost.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 [47] 48 49 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!