Why not credit Grin on your webpage as well, which will get a lot more eyes than either GitLab or white paper?
Looks like you want to leave some people with the false impression that Epic Cash is original work.

https://grin.report/d/xoo9N43iz/chain?orgId=1&from=now-6M&to=now

is another accurate one with full history...

No; it hasn't. See https://grinscan.net/charts for accurate graphrates.

Here's a moral bug:

https://www.epic.tech/ fails to acknowledge use of Grin's codebase...

Feel free to send bug bounty to

https://grin-tech.org/general_funding

Simple counting shows that at most a fraction of 2^-8 (about 0.25%) of all files can be compressed by 1 or more bytes.

And at most 2^-32 or 0.000000024% of all files can be compressed by 4 or more bytes.

This is why we say that random data is incompressible.

As shown in

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/d0f81a96d9c158a9226dc946bdd61d48c4d42959/src/arith_uint256.cpp#L213-L214

the rest of the bits remain 0. So that one is indeed rejected.

Indeed; this is essentially BitGrin (Grin + Bitcoin emission + mining tax) minus the Grin acknowledgement.

When asked earlier what distinguishes this project from BitGrin, they claimed it has no mining tax, which it now does.

That's an official non-feature :-)

https://github.com/mimblewimble/docs/wiki/No-this,-no-that

The NaS problem arises not on 2 separate chains, but on different branches of a single chain. If two blocks at the same height are found on top of the current block with the most work, then in PoW you must split your computing resources to work on both branches. But on PoC there is negligible cost to extend both.

Is Electrum a partner of BITCOIN and is Electrum an official wallet?

The answers would be the same.

I misread your post as "Apple to run an Elixxir Node!" :-(

Reminder: PLEASE DON'T FEED THE TROLLS

Please read all of https://www.grin-forum.org/t/scheduled-pow-upgrades-proposal
Single chips are not bad, but I thought that if you're happy with single chip ASICs you might as well use a more straightforward PoW like bitcoin's instead of a memory hard one.
With a memory hard PoW, forcing a memory IO bottleneck seemed more interesting.

Maybe my actual proposal on the Grin Forum

https://www.grin-forum.org/t/grin-improvement-proposal-1-put-later-phase-outs-on-hold-and-rephrase-primary-pow-commitment

clarifies the issues.

This looks like a great form factor for home mining!

Do I understand correctly that the PCB houses 3x9 chips underneath that big heatsink?
I wonder how you lay out 27 chips in a square space...

Did you do the ASIC design in-house?

Any plans to branch out to other PoWs in future?
Several other memory oriented PoW have daily issuance comparable to scrypt,
like Equihash and Cuckoo Cycle.

And the king of copycurrency is Litecoin.

This argument strikes me as rather bogus.

LTC has way higher marketcap because it has had 2701 days of issuance, where Grin had only 44 days.

That in no way explains why Litecoin's daily issuance should be higher than Grin's.

Rather, it begs the question of why Litecoin deserves such a high daily issuance.

Make that 1800 BTC (12.5 BTC per 10 minutes) ...

How much memory should scrypt have required in order not to fit on GPU?
And how long would it take to verify then?

Do you mean a coin that can only be mined?
With no premine, instamine, ICO, mining tax, or any kind of compensation for the coin developers?
With a launch announced widely and long in advance?
With a genesis block that was provably generated just before launch?
With an initial difficulty set so high that the first few dozen blocks take much longer than average?
With reasonably optimized GPU miners available for multiple platforms from launch?

Is that the kind of altcoin you're looking for?