383
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BEN] [SHA] All About the BENJAMINS, Baby - NOW EXCHANGED - Still EARLY!!
|
on: February 12, 2014, 04:27:11 PM
|
not sure it's made a difference... I see it in there. Its givin hash rate just fine strange... my pool just shows the same rate net vs pool There were a few other changes to get it in, but this is the main part: Value GetNetworkHashPS(int lookup, int height) { CBlockIndex *pb = pindexBest; if (height >= 0 && height < nBestHeight) pb = FindBlockByHeight(height); if (pb == NULL || !pb->nHeight) return 0; // If lookup is -1, then use blocks since last difficulty change. if (lookup <= 0) lookup = pb->nHeight % 2016 + 1; // If lookup is larger than chain, then set it to chain length. if (lookup > pb->nHeight) lookup = pb->nHeight; CBlockIndex *pb0 = pb; int64 minTime = pb0->GetBlockTime(); int64 maxTime = minTime; for (int i = 0; i < lookup; i++) { pb0 = pb0->pprev; int64 time = pb0->GetBlockTime(); minTime = std::min(time, minTime); maxTime = std::max(time, maxTime); } // In case there's a situation where minTime == maxTime, we don't want a divide by zero exception. if (minTime == maxTime) return 0; uint256 workDiff = pb->nChainWork - pb0->nChainWork; int64 timeDiff = maxTime - minTime; return (boost::int64_t)(workDiff.getdouble() / timeDiff); } Value getnetworkhashps(const Array& params, bool fHelp) { if (fHelp || params.size() > 2) throw runtime_error( "getnetworkhashps [blocks] [height]\n" "Returns the estimated network hashes per second based on the last 120 blocks.\n" "Pass in [blocks] to override # of blocks, -1 specifies since last difficulty change.\n" "Pass in [height] to estimate the network speed at the time when a certain block was found."); return GetNetworkHashPS(params.size() > 0 ? params[0].get_int() : 120, params.size() > 1 ? params[1].get_int() : -1); }
|
|
|
391
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BEN] [SHA] All About the BENJAMINS, Baby - NOW EXCHANGED - Still EARLY!!
|
on: February 11, 2014, 08:47:15 PM
|
Don't mean to spam, but I sorta feel like part of the "Ben family" now I have another project in the works - RigHound - and I could really use some more alpha testers. It's a website designed for remote management of all your Scrypt/ASIC mining rigs, so you can view stats, change pools and monitor all from one place. Read more about it here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=459219I still have about 10 slots open for alpha testers, thanks in advance for your help! pretty cool. Is it just for cgminer right now? For now, yes. However, it's my understanding that BFGMiner has a very similar API, so I may add support for that in the future. Looks pretty sweet. I believe they are pretty similar as far as the calls go
|
|
|
392
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BEN] [SHA] All About the BENJAMINS, Baby - NOW EXCHANGED - Still EARLY!!
|
on: February 11, 2014, 07:37:33 PM
|
Ok, I've done some calculations regarding the difficulty adjustments today. We need roughly 2 more weeks before the true difficulty will be found. The adjustments are made on time periods that so far have had massive fluctuations in difficulty. Code changes will be done if found to be needed, but we will see in a few weeks how the network performance has gone. So far, nbo adjustments are foreseen
In about 1 week, we will pass the first major calculation, which will get us closer. The weeks following these corrections will get us back to our true difficulty to hashrate ratio
|
|
|
398
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BEN] [SHA] All About the BENJAMINS, Baby - NOW EXCHANGED - Still EARLY!!
|
on: February 11, 2014, 04:04:37 PM
|
Well I think we found where all the fake exchange votes are coming from. Got this PM a few days ago but we won't stoop to these low levels. BENJAMINS will take care of itself! We have discussed this internally and will NOT resort to cheap marketing tactics like this. Shady coins need this, we don't! 100/ 500/ 1000/ 1500( max) unique real users posting and voting on your "Add to cryptsy" freshdesk topic. This service targets 3 main goals:1)Getting people to believe in your coin's chance of getting traded on a major exchange 2)Getting cryptsy and other smaller exchange owners to notice you have a supporting community 3)steps 1 and 2 will naturally drive major hash power and hype to your coin multiplying your chances to get listed on both cryptsy and other smaller exchanges along the wayI have successfully delivered to 18 coins and counting, many are now traded on cryptsy. Customer confidentiality is promised! I will point no-one to your coin not even to "show my work", you can count on that. PM me what vote package you want and we will discuss details and price in BTC. Have doubts? What is there to lose? *You pay me AFTER I deliver the work*P.s I also offer services to bump bitcointalk threads [/center]
|
|
|
400
|
Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] [BEN] [SHA] All About the BENJAMINS, Baby - NOW EXCHANGED - Still EARLY!!
|
on: February 11, 2014, 05:14:11 AM
|
1 for address and 5 for private keys if that is what you're asking. If it's not working, though, let me know and I'll check it out
Still missing something... vanitygen makes Bitcoin addresses. With a value provided with teh -X flag, it can generate addresses for other networks. For example, 30 produces Dogecoin addresses, while 48 produces Litecoin addresses. No argument or a value of 0 will produce Bitcoin addresses. In Doge's source for base58.h, I find PUBKEY_ADDRESS = 30. In Litecoin, I find PUBKEY_ADDRESS = 48. In the benjamin source, I find it unchanged from slightly dated Bitcoin sources, which is PUBKEY_ADDRESS = 0. Here's something that I'm really not understanding... C:\vanitygen>vanitygen.exe -X 0 1BEN Difficulty: 77178 Pattern: 1BEN Address: 1BEN1A3cevyfWdKNdqFfMUcD7BB4EureiX Privkey: 5JmKiSnKfznhmqEFcuUbH8j71DRsNvSrH96A8bbADfC4jBjRcqL importprivkey 5JmKiSnKfznhmqEFcuUbH8j71DRsNvSrH96A8bbADfC4jBjRcqL test
listaccounts { "" : 0.00000000, "Mining" : 34.11599215, "test" : 0.00000000 }
getaccountaddress test 1P8suVWorBfswbPAYdFtdkJsacgn3d5iFm
dumpprivkey 1P8suVWorBfswbPAYdFtdkJsacgn3d5iFm
L2SCBkBHTWUmjEqVxxsSBRpQqGDceoxTMS65Ltky7gEXu2XAjLQk
Hrrmm... might be a whole 'nother issue not related to Vanitygen? Thanks for the details. I'll take a look at it this week and get back to you. I think I understand what the problem you're having is, now
|
|
|
|