Did we actually really land on moon?

[Spendulus]

^^^ How else would you render the lunar surface? Without a computer you'd have to use 1960's movie special effects. NASA destroyed that technology and they claim it would be a painful process to build it back again.

Yeah, rendering a 3d animation of the lunar surface would really be hard. It couldn't possibly have been done in 1969-1972.

they would have had to actually go to the moon to take pics of guys walking around the moon.

For that they'd just need the orbital mechanics equations, and a sextant to use to sight stars.

And a big fucking rocket.

[1714981358]

1714981358

[1714981358]

1714981358

[1714981358]

1714981358

[BuxCoin]

i think no humans landed on moon , ok lets see this way if any of them landed on moon why not do it again if its done in past they would be technology and all ,

[Spendulus]

i think no humans landed on moon , ok lets see this way if any of them landed on moon why not do it again if its done in past they would be technology and all ,

You mean, there would be a big fucking rocket?

[josephsonand]

Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

Aliens were always on Earth, they are among us. And it’s normal, believe me. In addition, we ourselves are aliens from another planet. There is a lot of information about this, so whoever seeks will find the truth.

We landed on the moon. But no one tells us that on the moon there are remnants of other civilizations (the destroyed foundations of buildings, etc.)

The world has a lot of surprising things, about which 99 percent of people do not even know.

[BADecker]

Ok, don't throw me into the same basket for the believers of conspiracy theories.

I believe Earth is NOT flat. I don't believe there are aliens in Area 51.

But this question is factually not very convincing and it is, did we actually land on moon in 1969.

There are many compelling evidences, facts etc that proves that indeed we landed on moon.

But even in 21st century where there an accident with Kalpana Chawla who merely went to space and came back, it sounds too good to be true that in 1969, we landed on the moon which is around 300000 kms or 186000 miles from the Earth with those time of technologies and successfully came back. Remember, the first apple computer was launched in 1976.

I'm not saying we didn't, I'm just saying that it's not really a question that can be debunked like other theories which says Earth is flat.

Aliens were always on Earth, they are among us. And it’s normal, believe me. In addition, we ourselves are aliens from another planet. There is a lot of information about this, so whoever seeks will find the truth.

We landed on the moon. But no one tells us that on the moon there are remnants of other civilizations (the destroyed foundations of buildings, etc.)

The world has a lot of surprising things, about which 99 percent of people do not even know.

But how can we know that you are right? I mean, notbatman says the earth is flat, and the moon is only plasma reflected holographicly off some kind of a mirror (or something), but he can't prove it. So, what do you offer as proof for what you say? There are loads of science fiction writers out there, who have written about almost everything imaginable.

Documentation regarding going to the moon is pretty solid. Where is the solid documentation for what you say?

[Spendulus]

I also thought that technology back then isn't more develope to support the landing on the moon. I mean it is possible as of today but at that time I think its impossible

Accidentally successful... landing on the moon. Not impossible.

Six times in a row?

[notbatman]

@BADecker I can prove the moon is evenly lit, this is consistent with the moon being a projected holographic disc of plasma. It also debunks the idea the moon is a solid sphere reflecting sunlight.

Rainbows prove there's a concave mirror above us, they can't form without a reflective surface and the theory they're caused solely by the internal reflections of suspended water droplets can be debunked via experiment.

What do Astrophysicists have to say about this? They stick their fucking head in the sand and pretend it doesn't real:

   "The best possible explanation for the Moon is observational error – the Moon doesn’t exist." -- Irwin Shapiro, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

A good example of an impossible observation of the moon is:

   Two people, one in NY and one in LA making simultaneous observations of the moon will see exactly the same face. This is consistent with observing a projected disc above a plain while completely debunking the idea we're on a globe observing another globe.

[Spendulus]

...
A good example of an impossible observation of the moon is:

   Two people, one in NY and one in LA making simultaneous observations of the moon will see exactly the same face. This is consistent with observing a projected disc above a plain while completely debunking the idea we're on a globe observing another globe.

No they don't see the same thing.

Actually what they do see proves it's a globe.

[Negotiation]

Whether we actually landed on the moon there is no strong evidence for this Because everyone's opinion is different No one can say right I heard that long ago but it was an ancient rocket usually on the moon. It's hard to be real but in many countries it is talked about.

[notbatman]

...
A good example of an impossible observation of the moon is:

   Two people, one in NY and one in LA making simultaneous observations of the moon will see exactly the same face. This is consistent with observing a projected disc above a plain while completely debunking the idea we're on a globe observing another globe.

No they don't see the same thing.

Actually what they do see proves it's a globe.

You believe bullshit or you're a liar, the hypothetical observers in a LA and NY both see exactly the same lunar face all-be-it rotated due to the two observers differing perspectives. Everybody sees the same face no matter what their location on earth is.

[Spendulus]

...

You believe bullshit or you're a liar, the hypothetical observers in a LA and NY both see exactly the same lunar face all-be-it rotated due to the two observers differing perspectives. Everybody sees the same face no matter what their location on earth is.

No, they do not see the same thing.

[notbatman]

^^^ All observers see the same face, you're wrong or you're lying.

[Cryptotourist]

^^^ All observers see the same face, you're wrong or you're lying.

You are dead wrong, and you are definitely lying, so there is that.

[notbatman]

"...Everyone sees the same phases of the Moon..."

Pack that into your pipe and smoke it.

inb4 NASA lies about everything. They do lie but, the fact everybody sees the same moon is so painfully obvious they won't touch it.

Losers.

[Cryptotourist]

"...Everyone sees the same phases of the Moon..."

Pack that into your pipe and smoke it.

You can smoke a dick for all I care.

Everyone sees the same phases of the Moon, but people south of the equator who face North to see the Moon when it is high in the sky will see the Moon upside down so that the reverse side is lit.

The keyword is phase - overall phenomena - you dickhead.

[ðºÞæ]

Same face but upside down and back to front

[notbatman]

@Cryptotourist if two observers see different moon faces then they're not observing the same phase, cocksucker.

[Cryptotourist]

@Cryptotourist if two observers see different moon faces then they're not observing the same phase, cocksucker.

My apologies, I forgot for a second that you're completely dumb.
Same phase (moon's position relative to the sun), but different part of the moon, depending where the observer is located (earth's hemisphere).

I know it's hard for you Batty, have a banana.

[notbatman]

@Cryptotourist,

   "The lunar phase or phase of the Moon is the shape of the directly sunlit portion of the Moon" -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_phase

Different face, different shape, different phase; you lose.

NASA started this semantic pissing contest by changing 'face' to 'phase' so their propaganda agents could "work it", but they lose when a strict definition is used, as is the case when the scientific method is applied. The best part of their fail is confirmation, when all observers document the same lunar image (rotation and refraction not withstanding).

What they've attempted and failed to do is change their claims from what's observed i.e. the face, to what is theorized i.e. the sphere.

NASA is a deception and they're NOT A SPACE AGENCY but a propaganda agency, that's why it's NEVER A STRAIGHT ANSWER with them.

This classic NASA footage will help you understand the process better. | https://youtu.be/N-4BFfdGufo

[Sadlife]

In the 1950's two nations we're competing to achieve the first country to obtain space flight capabilities, of course it wasn't easy as expected, there were numerous trials and errors even russia decided to send a dog to space just to test out their rocket ship and what could be the complications in space, unfortunately the dog died and got burned while in the stratosphere and decided to give up and settled for earth orbital missions.
But after many years of experimenting and failures in 1969 US finally manage to be able to land on the moon.

Spaceflight and the apollo mission is real, if it isn't then we wouldn't learn how the galaxies and the solar system really works.