Bitcoin Forum
May 14, 2024, 06:45:57 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 1080 »
81  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Tokens (Altcoins) / Re: ⚡⛏️[ANN] Giga Watt: Best Home for your Mining. Starts today! on: October 09, 2019, 12:29:17 PM
Good news. I listed WTT token on mr Mc Afee DEX.
Just look here. Now we wont depend on Yobit....
Please move all your operations from Yobit into Mc Afee Dex..... if you consider Mc Afee Dex is better.
https://mcafeedex.com/?#WTT-ETH
There are only 6.7 mill Tokens in circulation.
I am sure one day we will make it 1$ a piece...
WTT is a symbol for our hopes, our greedy, our stupid minds... a symbol of miners that sacrifice themselves for a couse.
 P.S. You do not need to install metamask. MC Afee Dex works on any browser...it general an ETh public and prv keys.
You need to send a small quantity of ETH to that address to pay the gas for transactions... and WTT tokens or WTH to buy tokens.


Excellent! Please inform us when you list RateCoin on McAfeeDex, for that's where the real money's at.
82  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: October 07, 2019, 04:37:01 PM
While this thread is more about CSW's ongoing attempts to defraud the cryptocurrency community, I was interested in reading more about what Ray Dillinger (Cryddit) had to say about the block size debate, and found some interesting tidbits. Here's a few of his musings on big block forks, from an interview last year:

Quote
Technically speaking, there is not much wrong with any of these forks. They address certain problems in different ways slightly favoring the interests of different groups, but not seriously to anyone’s disadvantage.  None of them was entirely without technical merit.

On the other hand none of them make more than a tiny amount of difference.  None helped with the bandwidth or transaction volume by anything more than a small constant factor, so the problem they were supposedly about solving was not in fact solved, nor even very much affected.

So while none of the proposed changes were objectionable in themselves, there was really no *very* compelling reason for any of them to be implemented.  Each of those ideas is merely a stopgap that pushes the rock down the road another foot or two without moving it out of the way. If you want to move that rock out of the road, you will need a much more powerful idea.

Hint: the "much more powerful idea" isn't limitless blocks.

According to CSW, a "much more powerful idea" is a weather rock in the middle of the road ...


The BSV archives the weather results each second from around the world on its blockchain. Genius! Madness!
83  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: October 04, 2019, 04:23:27 PM
Rusty STAPLES.


Well if CSW's handiwork in the fraudulent evidence department so far is anything to go by they'll likely be proven to have come out of the factory in 2014.

And the coffee stain will be from a Starbucks blend not introduced until 2015.


"My guess would be [Bitcoin] ORANGE pumpkin spice."
84  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: October 04, 2019, 04:21:25 PM
Bump, Craig is a fraud.

I see him rather catching all the anno and anarcho frauds who try to do all sorts of illegal stuff with crypto

No wonder they hate him and want him to be called out...



Like impersonating Satoshi
Like plagiarism
Like tax fraud
Like faking diplomas
Like contempt of Court
Like Perjury
Like using fake emails from dead people
Like writing shit about Hal Finney, Martti Malmi and other people
Like filling a blockchain with BS data, the weather blockchain
Like promoting a fork as being Bitcoin

Which blockchain has stored child pronography? -> Bitcoin SV

Well said, except that the last point is an issue that can happen to any blockchain, it's not entirely their fault.
The unnecessary high size limit of blocks surely helps such situations, but just a low quality image would be store-able in most blockchains I suppose.

You are right, as long as the data fits the block size you can put shit in any blockchain. BUT, as you said, on some blockchains you can put 1MB of shit if you can afford the TX cost (very costly on the real Bitcoin), on BSV you can fit 2GB of trash, and they're planning for trash unlimited with their unlimited block size.



Notice that Cryddit employs two spaces after a full stop. Cryddit's goes by Edward as in Snowden.

Cryddit is Ray Dillinger. I am sure you know who that is.



Color me confused ...


Assuming you're Ray Dillinger - is that conversation public anywhere? I don't recall reading it on http://www.mail-archive.com/cryptography%40metzdowd.com/msg10005.html

Uhh, I don't remember ever agreeing to keep it secret, but we didn't talk about it on the list either.  At that time Hal was elbows-deep in the transaction scripting code, and I was checking Satoshi's work on the crypto on the blockchain architecture.  

Finney had a lot to worry about with the transaction scripting and wound up blocking out about a dozen more opcodes than Satoshi had wanted to, but I found essentially nothing wrong with the block structure.  I am still freakin' amazed how tight he got that blockchain design.  

And, yeah, I'm Ray Dillinger.



Interesting - thanks for posting. I always assumed that all of those initial-state decisions had been made *before* Satoshi posted the whitepaper. I guess because of that comment he made in that list thread to the effect of "I'm almost ready to post the code."

It's a little amusing - if bitcoin continues to grow, economists will no doubt be horrified by the levity (relative to an econ committee mtg) with which these decisions were made. Not saying that's a bad thing, or that they weren't rationally through - it actually shows how strong the system is in that there were many possible "reasonable" initial conditions that could've been selected, since the system is largely self-equilibriating anyway.

Re Finney - if he was blocking bitcoin op-codes, I wonder what he would've thought of Ethereum's scripting lang. Smiley


(and I had to ask if you were Ray cuz your early posts on here were signed "Edward")

85  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: October 04, 2019, 04:16:15 PM
Wow. Shit just got a whole lot realer, kids. Whatever doubts there were are certainly looking way, way shakier now.



Where do we go from here?

Rusty STAPLES.



Principle of law: one can not create its own evidence.

Satoshi's original WP complete with coffee stains, rusty staples and penned in invisible ink ...

86  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: October 03, 2019, 09:20:28 PM
Satoshi never meant to create an on-chain weather data storage.

Au contraire:

Markov Chain for a Simple Weather Model

87  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: October 03, 2019, 03:57:31 PM
Bump, Craig is a fraud.

I see him rather catching all the anno and anarcho frauds who try to do all sorts of illegal stuff with crypto

No wonder they hate him and want him to be called out...



Like impersonating Satoshi
Like plagiarism
Like tax fraud
Like faking diplomas
Like contempt of Court
Like Perjury
Like using fake emails from dead people
Like writing shit about Hal Finney, Martti Malmi and other people
Like filling a blockchain with BS data, the weather blockchain
Like promoting a fork as being Bitcoin

Which blockchain has stored child pronography? -> Bitcoin SV

Well said, except that the last point is an issue that can happen to any blockchain, it's not entirely their fault.
The unnecessary high size limit of blocks surely helps such situations, but just a low quality image would be store-able in most blockchains I suppose.

You are right, as long as the data fits the block size you can put shit in any blockchain. BUT, as you said, on some blockchains you can put 1MB of shit if you can afford the TX cost (very costly on the real Bitcoin), on BSV you can fit 2GB of trash, and they're planning for trash unlimited with their unlimited block size.



Notice that Cryddit employs two spaces after a full stop. Cryddit's goes by Edward as in Snowden.
88  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: October 02, 2019, 10:58:57 PM

"Allow".
Gee, thanks doc.





Extraordinary Claims require Extraordinary Evidence
89  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: September 28, 2019, 07:14:39 PM
Note that Bitcoin SV are also still also using this account to promote Craig Wright nonsense: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=2558986
Hence there is a now a flag to support (don't know why there wasn't before): https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=777
Same reason, different account.
Good catch. Supported.

Taxing my memory, this may have been first of my supports. The next jackoff I'm going to support as a scam is that goat fucker Bruno. Oh, wait!
90  Other / Meta / Re: Theymos vs Roger Ver (2:0) on: September 26, 2019, 04:29:27 PM
Ok, makes sense, order is restored to the universe. I was worried for a minute that Roger lost his only friend.

Please set me straight. Was the above link BS?
91  Other / Meta / Re: Theymos vs Roger Ver (2:0) on: September 26, 2019, 02:50:16 PM
Apparently they are running BitcoinDotCom without any of the required licenses: https://twitter.com/JihanWho/status/1176232390987059202?s=19

Ooch!

Aside: This is my 22,000th post with this user account. I'm da man!
92  Other / Meta / Re: Theymos vs Roger Ver (2:0) on: September 25, 2019, 04:23:37 PM
Roger Ver posted new video regarding Bitcointalking forum
and moving this topic to Archival: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=93140

Quote from: Roger Ver
Theymos is one of the worst things that happened to Bitcoin...

source video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hU7343Ji8GI
 

I wonder what motives Ver has now
other than to promote his own 'liberal' forum and Bcash altcoin Roll Eyes

I don't think Bitcointalk forum is some kind of Library that will keep all history of Bitcoin,
and that MemoryDealers post should never be moved to Archival section.




Maybe it has something to do with issues of his own Games gambling website being accused of SCAM
as you can see on multiple Scam topics:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5179906.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5173010.0




I love Ver and respect theymos, but to be frank (not Frank, my uncle), Ver's forum is a ghost town. That said, I'm sure this forum will double to over 4M users once the new forum is completed within the next ten years (humor at theymos' expense).
93  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: September 22, 2019, 08:58:01 PM
I fear we re running (again)  into the age of

User

Activated

Satoshi

Fakes

 Grin

Craig started a trend.

You see how hard it is to go against first mover advantage

He must be true Satoshi


 Grin  Grin



"And the that's the weather, now archived in the ever-growing BSV blockchain."


"BSV scales the weather. Now to sports."

94  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: September 21, 2019, 08:39:52 PM
Latest development in the Craig Wright case.

Claim by : Jurgen Etienne Guido DEBO





Interesting, even if barely legible, and ultimately just nonsense.

That is a very unscientific expression. Emotional talk you have to do at a pub. Not to express blunt statements without proof.


I spent a bit reading through the guy's tweets and his English isn't as good as Satoshi's. He makes basic grammatical mistakes whereas Satoshi's English was near flawless, indicative of a native speaker.

If is never stated I am a native speaker of the English language. My wjhite paper was reviewed by Hal himself. Surprised.
As the person who did write the first prototype did use my shared account.
Do you really thing all talent is born in regions they do speak English or we all speak perfect English. Well visit India and talk to IT engineers.

One of the reasons I did use @gmx in Germany was the fact I am from Belgium, besides the point I do not trust Google or Microsoft.

But I understand Your mistakes. You assume all, the one who did code, before Gavin Andreesen, is the same guy as me.
You are really sure ?  Cool

And then you have these reply tweets from a couple prominent bitcoin developers, regarding the PGP key offered up by Debo:

@orionwl
Quote
FWIW, there are no known messages signed by that key, but it was distributed along with early bitcoin, so it could be satoshi's real key
mind the uncertainty: my signing it was a mistake about how gpg web of trust is supposed to work at the time, and I revoked it later


If You doubt pgp key PGP key: 0x18C09E865EC948A1 is the valid key of Satoshi Nakamoto, then You need to read again bitcoin.it
and You should study the history of bitcoin. I think You lack basic knowledge of the history of bitcoin. It was trust signed not only by
all core developers but also by Hal Finney himself, as the Bitcoin Foundation was informed of this key. It was more then 10 years on the net.
That is a fact. So please, legendary here to spend your time, but you spread nonsense.

@peterktodd
Quote
I signed it based on circumstantial evidence that I still believe; PGP WoT isn't a strict protocol; use your common sense in interpreting it.

Pete Todd is not God. I did speak a few times with him only, mainly about, hm, ethics, values and points of view. Not that much technical things.
Oh yes, and his bitstamp stuff or something. And he was one of those who did warn me about the interview Gavin had with the authorities, I think.
But he was not that close to me like Hal Finney. I did talk only a few times, with Gavin as well, directly.


That said, I have no reason to think that the Twitter account @realSatoshiN is really Satoshi Nakamoto.

He said nothing wrong here. I did not yet provide conclusive proof, but nobody else but me did write the court in Florida to counter the statements of Craig Wright.
I saw nobody else do the same to counter his perjury.

And I said since 2014, the final proof is to digitally sign.

If You did read my tweets, all my tweets since 2014, You would also have seen since that day,
I did insist any claimant would digitally sign with the Genesis block, the PGP key and I tell You even more.

You all look to the first transaction to Hal Finney. But everyone is very silent about the full content of the hardcoded hash.

Beside the fact I did register the white paper before publishing it on the internet at a Belgian notary, I also did encoded personal data.

So in worse case scenario, I only need to replicate the process to generate the hash, step by step, and You will all read my personal data.
And I assure You all, this is not the name Craig Wright You will read.

I say this to those big mouth, some 'legendary' here, some of them became famous because I did talk to them here on my old account.

Be really carefull what You state. Because when I digitally sign, for sure You will look like a fool.

If You are smart, You consider everything possible, until it is proven wrong or right.
But to talk like in a pub, that is not a mature and proper scientific attitude.

I remember, when I did spread my idea, I had mockery from the p2p community, coders, hackers.
That attitude is not constructive. Those who did mock those days, they can be ashamed now, because bitcoin, blockchain became
a great project, wordwide success. It is a hive project, the queen is as important as every bee. It is a blueprint for cooperation and
a model to show the world, people can work together. Not in competition but by cooperation.

But those who always start to criticize, to mock, the spread emotional statements (without proof), like pub talk,
You are the guys who kill very often beautiful idea's. The worse parts in this story is, You claim yourself 'experts'.

Well put Your real name here, when I digitally sign, people will have some reference to Your ' expertise', so You can join the group,
You did mock, did try to poison my invention in the early days.

All the Best,


Satoshi Nakamoto
@realsatoshin








Since Hal is passed, it seems that the wolves are in the field to bring down bitcoin.

This will fail as my current wealth is still in the blockchain. Unmovable.
Some people here on this board,  do notice that I used my whale account to stabilize bitcoin
and suggested, my coins should be confiscated. Even destroyed.

Thank you for that suggestion. I remember those words when the time is right.
You better do not mess with people who have a huge wallet. Right ?!

What a lack of faith I see, that some people did forget I made a promise.

Not to mention some silly comments of people who try to control bitcoin itself or fake claims
to steal identities. It is simply pathetic to see people, who are triggered by the suggestion of
a noble price for the invention, they make false claims, but are not able to digitally sign
by the genesis block or a simple pgp key.

This said. If you feel the need to claim the work of somebody else, well be sure you have the digital keys.
And I assure You all, you do not have them.

No doubt this is all about an agenda to bring down bitcoin as a project.

It is sad to see, there are altcoins that abuse the name bitcoin.
There is only ONE bitcoin. That is XBT, BTC. This is Bitcoin Core run by Wladimir.

Sorry to say, Gavin, but You lost my trust. I had only a few times conversation with you, but when Hal did inform me,
later on Pete the issues with the FBI, I destroyed my accounts and traces.

Right now I am in the shadow but I make my claim. Because I am so bold to say, I am. Because nobody has the keys but me.
Sad for You all.


All those attempts to create Bitcoin Unlimited, Bitcoin Gold, Bitcoin cash are just ways to derail the project.

No doubt bitcoin core will survive, regardless the financial markets at the moment.
There is no valid alternative to the fractional banking problem. This answer is bitcoin.

People can state, we need to go back to the gold standard. However in my perception, there is not enough
gold for that. Gold can be better used for other cases, such as jewels, industrial, medical...use.

So I predict and You will see.

Bitcoin will rise up again in value. Mainly because it is the only, valuable and alternative for fiat money. It can not be forget,
it can not be controlled. Not even by me.

I give myself a few months, years to digitally sign. And well, I decided to invest 93 percent of my wealth to a foundation to promote
arts, science, innovation, artists, education or in general terms, the improvement of human society.

7 percent I will use for my family and own business.

I will not support those who did took or did try to take by violence, credits on my work, except a handful of people who were loyal
to the original principles, moral and standard, that I set in the early days, some are pretty aware, how I think, how I am.

This statement, will be online for a short time, I presume, but we see. As currently I have more faith in twitter as on this board
that does not follow exactly the right principles of free speech.

But this said. again, do not mess with me. I have a lot of patience, but those who did harm in any way my project, my child, who did
try to fool people to claim identity or credits.

Be assured, I will go after you.

All the Best,

Well, You know who I am, if not, that's fine too.




From the desk of I Speak Out of Both Pie Holes at the Same Time:

https://cointelegraph.com/news/craig-wrights-hidden-treasures-court-order-to-unlock-the-tulip-trust

Quote
Wright maintains that he and Kleiman put some 1 million BTC they’d mined together into what they called the “Tulip Trust,” a storage unit secured by the two men’s cryptographic signatures.

Although Wright lost access to the funds when Kleiman died, the self-proclaimed Satoshi Nakamoto says that the missing keys needed to unlock the trust will be somehow delivered to him by a bonded courier. The distrustful judge responded with a literary allusion: “Apparently, dead men tell no tales, but they (perhaps) send bonded couriers.”

Here's the deal, fucktard. If you are Craig Steven Wright behind the quoted used account, then sue my scammy ass for stating that you ARE NOT Satoshi Nakamoto. Feel free to PM me if you want my currently mailing address so that you can have your lawyer serve me some course toilet paper.

Bruno Kucinskas
95  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: PrimeXBT - High chance of being a scam on: September 20, 2019, 02:36:59 PM

Says the guy promoting Minter in his sig, an entity depicting its Team as ... wait for it ... cartoon characters: https://www.minter.network/#team

I understand your attitude to cartoon characters. It looks weird. Honestly I have no idea why Minter decided to show their team in cartoons.

But in CIS they have biggest community and everyone is aware of Minter. A lot of people are buying something for their currency and develop different projects based on Minter. They do a lot for adoption.
Probably they won't change game, I don't know, but they are trying and it is something more than cartoons and typical scam. Anyway DYOR.

Speaking about my signature, the fact wearing signature of specific project doesn't mean I am a big fan of it. It is about money.

So promoting a scammy ICO is fine but wearing a casino signature isn't?

To be fair, Minter seems like a legit venture sans digging deeper sans cartoon characters depicting its Team.

Bruno Mars Sans
96  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: PrimeXBT - High chance of being a scam on: September 19, 2019, 03:48:26 PM
Hey.

Why are you confusing people, trying to accuse a completely legitimate platform?
The platform is building its solid presence and it seems that you are wrong Mr Sherlock. You made a wrong research, and wrong accusation, admit it. At least now, when its clear that the company is super legit

1)   Here is a great explanation how your research went wrong: https://medium.com/@tech_banterist/primexbt-scam-or-trustworthy-platform-c12ec07dcff7 It also explains that Seychelles register doesn’t have all the companies for public records. Bitmex is run by HDR Global Trading Limited - and it CAN’t be located in the public register where you tried to find PrimeXBT. Is bitmex a scam? Funny.
2)   They have fixed the T&C typo. Obviously the mistake was done by one of the content writers. Just look how binance was spotted on rewriting Bitmex futures guide: https://twitter.com/BitMEXdotcom/status/1169120530554900482?s=20 . Does it mean binance a scam? I doubt.
3)   Fake twitters? Go look for fakes in Binance, Bitfinex, Bitmex etc. Full of bots! Does it mean it’s a scam? It’s just ridiculous
4)   PrimeXBT confirmed that there is no official presence in BTT long time ago: https://twitter.com/PrimeXbt/status/1102918283332931585?s=20
5)   It is obvious that it was not PrimeXBT who tried to fake the numbers and build a story of a successful trader. Its one of the affiliate/referral agents who was trying to make himself a success story and bring some referrals

It’s really funny how you are promoting a scammy casino and trying to blame a legit platform of being a scam. Don’t confuse people man.


Says the guy promoting Minter in his sig, an entity depicting its Team as ... wait for it ... cartoon characters: https://www.minter.network/#team


More 'bout Minter here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4986549.msg46537774#msg46537774.

Translated: Hey, dudes, an anon guy here to say that the anon entity PrimeXBT is NOT a scam. Please visit the link in my sig about another anon entity that's not a scam.
97  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: September 15, 2019, 01:21:24 PM
See, these trolls have just passed the threshold to bare fear and nonsense. This is just disgusting and shows ur stupidity in public

 Tongue

It's worst than that. I just realized that I, you, and the rest of the world's population looks orange under energy-saving light bulbs.

True, just to not be distinguishable from the guys wearing prisoners orange. Cheesy


"The lighting here makes my Brioni suit look orange."
98  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: September 14, 2019, 07:05:40 PM
See, these trolls have just passed the threshold to bare fear and nonsense. This is just disgusting and shows ur stupidity in public

 Tongue

It's worst than that. I just realized that I, you, and the rest of the world's population looks orange under energy-saving light bulbs.
99  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: September 14, 2019, 02:58:19 PM
"The organizer behind Philadelphia’s biggest blockchain conference is using a city billboard in one of the most highly-trafficked areas to call out Craig Wright as a fraud"
- https://twitter.com/alistairmilne/status/1172752754516910080

 

That's awesome. I think I found the theme image for this thread. Going to update the OP with it.

Any Photoshop geeks reading this want to try their hand in changing Lamar (billboard company; red arrow below) to Laszlo (pizza dude [follow link])?

100  Economy / Scam Accusations / Re: SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper on: September 13, 2019, 02:56:07 PM
Not even *Satire*

BSV soon to be featured here ...

- https://www.shitcoingraveyard.com/

...

- https://youtu.be/OXjCQSksteI *NSFW* *Explicit Lyics* *fully clothed goats, oh my*

Added info in red ...
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 1080 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!