First: You're a dumbass shit.
Second: what you're posting is COMPLETELY out of the topic.

Yeah oh my god no people actually fleeing from the shitty countries we created and coming for a better life how terrible they are!!!

Ok would you care to detail a bit? I didn't understand you at all xD

What's the diff?

Americans Trump idiots, would you care to explain how you believe Trump can be good to you if he isn't to his employees?

Trump hotels workers are currently asking for better work conditions. In Las Vegas they got the worst pay of the city and the hardest work. Why would Trump act any differently upon you all?

We try to understand how flawed your reasonning is. And believe me it's hard to understand how dumb you can be.

You're actually saying that it's not because the same experiment made 1500 times give the same result that this result is correct?

DID YOU JUST TALK ABOUT NEANDERTHALS?

So it means you DO believe and consider evolution then BADecker! Or is Neanderthal also a creation of God? xD

And even though you still haven't proved why carbon datation is wrong...

Ice sheets more sensitive to climate change than thought

A team of scientists from New Zealand, the United States, Italy, and Germany has determined that Antarctica’s large land-based ice sheets may be more vulnerable to increasing global temperatures than previously thought.

The research, led by Richard Levy of GNS Science, Edward Gasson of the University of Massachusetts, David Harwood of the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, and Fabio Florindo of the Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia, confirms that Antarctica’s marine-based ice sheets (those connected to the ocean) are vulnerable to climatic warming.

It also shows that land-based ice will melt if these warm temperatures are maintained into the future. This would have significant consequences for future sea level rise.

“This research gives us a look into Earth’s potential future if greenhouse gas levels continue to rise and temperatures continue to climb,” says Dr Levy.

“Basically, large parts of Antarctica, particularly around the coast, will become ice-free. Melting of Antarctica’s massive land-based ice sheets will likely take thousands of years, but observations certainly suggest ice sheet melt is well underway.”

“I would like to think that we can slow down this glacial retreat or even stop it. I certainly find it hard to imagine Antarctica without its majestic ice sheets.”

How the research was conducted Scientists examined a one-kilometre-long drill core that contained layers of rock and sediment deposited during an interval in Earth’s past when atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) concentrations reached 500 parts per million, levels similar to those projected for the next several decades.

This amount of atmospheric carbon dioxide last occurred over 15 million years ago during an episode of global warmth known as the Miocene Climatic Optimum, a period when global average temperatures were at times up to 3 to 4 °C
higher than today.

What the researchers found "We found plenty of evidence for relatively warm conditions in Antarctica. Shellfish that today are unable to live south of our sub-Antarctic Islands flourished along the shorelines at the foot of the Transantarctic Mountains.

“Trees, shrubs, and grasses that are similar to those that grow in New Zealand’s alpine tundra regions were able to thrive in Antarctica’s Dry Valley’s, an area that is presently devoid of higher plant life. We also found evidence that the glaciers retreated far from the coast.”

Importantly, these intervals of past warmth occurred when atmospheric CO2 concentrations were similar to levels projected to occur within the next several decades in all but the most aggressive greenhouse gas mitigation scenario.

“We were able to link the environmental data from Antarctica to information gathered from other locations around the world. Our analysis showed that the episodes of peak warmth and ice sheet melt occurred when CO2 was at about 500ppm, only slightly higher than today.”

The researchers also found that Antarctica’s ice sheets grew larger when climate cooled and CO2 dropped to pre-industrial levels.

“Clearly the ice sheets are highly sensitive to relatively small changes in CO2 and temperature,” says Dr Levy.

At the same time, Dr Levy’s colleagues at the University of Massachusetts used computer models to simulate Antarctic ice sheet response to climate change. Led by Dr Edward Gasson, the research examined how the ice sheet changed in response to different levels of atmospheric carbon dioxide and incoming energy from the sun.

When CO2 concentrations were held at 500 parts per million, regions of the ice sheet that sit in the ocean disappeared.

This result was similar to previous modelling studies. However, Dr Gasson’s new simulations showed that large portions of land-based ice also retreated a great distance inland contributing tens of meters to sea level rise during episodes of peak warmth in the Miocene.

“Fifteen million years ago West Antarctica had a lot more area sitting above sea level, so it held much more land-based ice than it does today. Therefore we would not expect the same amount of sea level rise from land-based
ice melt under similar temperature increase in the future. But the outcome certainly suggests that land-based ice in Antarctica is more susceptible to melt than we previously thought,” says Dr Levy.

Details of their studies will be published this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Yep, climate change on the move.

An international team of scientists dug into two dozen locations across the globe, including a salt marsh and coastal wetland in Newfoundland, to chart gently rising and falling seas over centuries and millennia. Until the 1880s and the world's industrialization, the fastest seas rose was about three to four centimetres (1 to 1.5 inches) a century, plus or minus a bit. During that time global sea level really didn't get much higher or lower than eight centimetres (three inches)  above or below the 2,000-year average.

But in the 20th century the world's seas rose 14 centimetres (5.5 inches). Since 1993 the rate has soared to 30 centimetres (a foot) per century. And two different studies published Monday in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, said by 2100 that the world's oceans will rise between 28 to 131 centimetres (11 to 52 inches), depending on how much heat-trapping gas Earth's industries and vehicles expel.

"There's no question that the 20th century is the fastest," said Rutgers earth and planetary sciences professor Bob Kopp, lead author of the study that looked back at sea levels over the past 3,000 years. "It's because of the temperature increase in the 20th century which has been driven by fossil fuel use."

To figure out past sea levels and rates of rise and fall, scientists engaged in a "geological detective story," said study co-author Ben Horton, a Rutgers marine scientist. They went around the world looking at salt marshes and other coastal locations and used different clues to figure out what the sea level was at different times. They used single cell organisms that are sensitive to salinity, mangroves, coral, sediments and other clues in cores, Horton said. On top of that they checked their figures by easy markers such as the rise of lead with the start of the industrial age and isotopes only seen in the atomic age.

When Kopp and colleagues charted the sea level rise over the centuries — they went back 3,000 years, but aren't confident in the most distant 200 years — they saw Earth's sea level was on a downward trend until the industrial age.

Mostly man-made

Sea level rise in the 20th century is mostly man-made, the study authors said. A separate, not-yet-published study by Kopp and others found since 1950, about two-thirds of the U.S. nuisance coastal floods in 27 locales have the fingerprints of man-made warming.

And if seas continue to rise, as projected, another 45 centimetres (18 inches) of sea level rise is going to cause lots of problems and expense, especially with surge during storms, said study co-author Stefan Rahmstorf of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany.

"There is such a tight relationship between sea level and temperature," Horton said. "I wish there wasn't, then we wouldn't be as worried."

The link to temperature is basic science, the study's authors said. Warm water expands. Cold water contracts. The scientists pointed to specific past eras when temperatures and sea rose and fell together.

The Kopp study and a separate one published by another team projected future sea level rise based on various techniques. They came to the same general estimates, despite using different methods, said Anders Levermann, a co-author of the second paper and a researcher at the Potsdam Institute.

If greenhouse gas pollution continues at the current pace, both studies project increases of about 57 to 131 centimetres (22 to 52 inches). If countries fulfil the treaty agreed upon last year in Paris and limit further warming to another 1 C (2 degrees Fahrenheit), sea level rise would be in the 28 to 56 centimetres (11 to 22 inch range).

Jonathan Overpeck at the University of Arizona, who wasn't part of the studies, praised them, saying they show a clear cause and effect between warming and sea level rise.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/sea-level-rise-1.2951884

I had to wait the whole night for my tx to go through. First time I need to wait so long :-/

And you do realize that the current president of Turkey is a Muslim extremist, manipulating the media and transforming the democracy into a dictatorhip?

Ahah

Well I say you should accept all and study them.
A good study isn't a study made by an independant organization (there is no such thing) but a study that can be easily criticized, giving precisely the used methodology and the percentage of error.

Of course but you can't just take that into account, else you never take any study into account!

Any study has to be made by people, those people have to be paid. Hence there is no truly independant study.

It would indeed be a solution.

Napoleon would probably cry given how France bow in front of parasites like Ireland, Luxembourg or Switzerland given our current power.
But no, as our politicians are all corupted and weak they prefer continue to steal the French to give money to some big companies and small countries...

Yeah cause Germany is so wonderfull, so great! Take example you all filthy countries who try to limit the power of private sector!!!

And without EU we would probably already have a WWIII, but who cares?

Stay under your bed not seeing how the world is changing and continue to think you can preserve your old way of life

Depends on how you see the world. IMHO they could all get killed that wouldn't be a bad thing, we would do better thing with their money.

Yeah but it was the EU who asked to open Greek borders :-/