I re-uploaded it.

It's actually moving up on Bter. The whole dump thing was mostly on poloniex and always in small numbers. Like someone tried to make the price appear lower than it actually is.
Well, can't blame whomever it was. Some cheap COMM will be hard to get in the future.

On another note:
The addition of a second private key for cold store minting might open up the possibility to experiment with another solution for a pure POS problem. It's an inherent problem that attacks on a POS system are very inexpensive calculation wise. A second crypto algo might offer a tool to stop application level attacks on POS coins.
All of this is pretty academical, but important for the future of the POS system and a central point as to why POS is not the main modus of proof throughout the crypto world.

 yes, but I think it will be strong one day.

 the more exchange , the better for our community coin.

I sent him an e-mail so be on the look out for a post from him

yes, time is the only one who will prove it,

i hope i am luck, and I will hold some comm, holding it,

fly to the mooooooooooooooon...

holders with faith will be rewarded. 

Maybe Gator is somehow involved with Sharecoin? He was the first to promote it in this thread and now he is defending the Sharecoin thread from another troll  

First, I want to emphasize that I am huge supporter for the coin and still keeping my stake. However, I must admit that I would like hear some more about this: "The development team, consisting of 8 people, received 40m, which included some payment to professionals who otherwise would have required $$$." This is the first time I hear that the dev team consists of 8 people and that they all got like 5M.

@Majormax @samysamy1, do you know anything about this?

No

Gives me what they can't hold cheap, even the 160Satoshi Price is cheap 

I don't need to keep saying old material, the Dev gives us new lies and material to laugh at every day.

The development team, consisting of 8 people, received 40m, which included some payment to professionals who otherwise would have required $$$.

Looks like ShareCoin is going to steal COMM cake and let this scam coin fade into oblivion, don't feel bad it isn't your fault your Dev stole 100+ million and sank the coin.

And it always takes a few tries to get things perfect, now all run go sign-up for ShareCoin!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=587051

there are dozens of coins copiing comm now. you can sell a stake for 1 BTC.....COMM is a an incredible sucess....unfortunatly there are some problems of transperency....imagine without this?

The development team, consisting of 8 people, received 40m, which included some payment to professionals who otherwise would have required $$$

So samysamy1 or Majormax can either of you come up with any type of story from the Dev to justify this statement in the OP on a coin that had no pre-mine and was supposed to be equally distributed amongst all members including the Dev, the one Dev, not this imaginary 8 he came up with.

And what professional services exactly that would eat up $20,000 in coins?  I assume the Dev paid for a service to create his coin since he needed Adriano to fix it for him but those services only cost about half a BTC at most.  All the other work forum, website, reddit, twitter etc. was done through member donations.

Or are you just completely over making up bad excuses for the Dev's lies, or listening to the nonsense that comes in the Dev's replies and this question will get no response.

And I missed all the non-reply replies and community collusion/delusion geared to protect a thief Dev and his scam coin.  

Even the majority of the diehard COMM bagholders will admit the Dev stole coins and deviated far afield from the original distribution plan but they will then say they don't care and pls just let us move forward with our scam coin and hide its past to new suckers/investors.

Hey

we missed you

Dev never in any way accounted for his distribution to members, he released two distribution lists that accounted for 723 one million distributions, that alone close to a 100 million shortfall, but those are not matched up with member names and never will be, so the Dev simply had to create as many wallets as he wished, that number only capped by his greed and distribute to himself.

Now even in the OP they have completely changed the rules as to how this coin was promised to be initially distributed,

The development team, consisting of 8 people, received 40m, which included some payment to professionals who otherwise would have required $$$

The original and promised plan was for all members to receive 2 million shares equally including the "Dev" who it is fairly obvious is a single individual not a team of 8 + professional services, what professional services?

Sure not hard drive recovery.  Or getting on CNN.

If "Dev" if he had not been so greedy could have made plenty alone just off the millions in unaccounted for interest (staking) from the distribution wallets but obviously he felt the need to dip deep into member's stakes and make buckets of money at the community expense.