But whats Lumosity actually ?? Google says its a online brain training university. Am I right ?? Hm.... regarding the negative trust... did you ever prove him wrong? He's usually right unless you prove him wrong. I'm guessing you didn't.
And he even cant prove him wrong cause Vod till today has never been proved wrong. Hats Off Mr.Legendary. |
|
|
|
|
<Rules & Loan Status Updated>
|
|
|
|
I would like to loan 100mBTC to purchase some service.
Preferred interest rate of 15% would be nice to start off given my lack of + rating.
I will pay it back within 3 days.
Thank you.
Address:
1LFGxXYdR6vwdWi8akm3vKnQpA3j2utdjV
Have PMed you with the details. |
|
|
|
You're grossly misunderstanding what random is. Putting them down "in no particular order" based on whim isn't random (and if they are in no particular order, you should remove the numbers, as numbers mean that they are in order). You likely put yourself 4th because you wanted to put yourself as high as possible (as a result of both voluntary and involuntary personal biases) without it being overly obvious that you were putting yourself higher than you should be (it's pretty obvious to me, though). Even if you didn't think this, you did so without realizing it.
TomatoCage likely wouldn't be first if it was random - he's known as the most trustworthy. haploid23 likely wouldn't be second if it was random - he's proven to be a trustworthy lender and has been a good member for awhile. You go down the list and most of it makes sense based on the reputation each member has here (I can't comment about my own ranking, as while I know exactly my level of trustworthiness, it's impossible for other people to). The one guy sticking out is you - a relatively new member and lender, conveniently placed in front of a handful of more experienced and trustworthy members.
This is an entirely different topic, but true randomness does not just mean something is unsystematic and indiscriminate. Humans are incapable of true randomness. Most cryptography might even seem random, and for all practical purposes can be considered random, but it truly isn't. Randomness is very hard to achieve.
If you want this to be an unbiased list, you're going to have to change things. There's nothing inherently bad about something being biased, but that's what this list is. Considering you say that this list is unbiased and we can be sure it isn't, the only thing you've achieved is a loss of trust.
So, what actually you want ?? Your name on the top of the list ?? Or anything else. Okay, then tell me at what number your name should be at ?? |
|
|
|
Thanks for the suggestion. I will add him to the list soon. Thanks for the add grtthegreat, I don't mind being at the bottom  I don't care how he orders the list (or where I am on the list), as long as it doesn't favor himself. Why are you in front of people who have been lending for longer and have higher trust ratings? The way it currently is is very biased and I do not support it. Order it by thread start date, trust rating, or something else which is less biased. Regardless of the order, get rid of the numbers. Numbers say that this is your personal opinion of lenders, which I guess it is. Sorry but you misunderstood it. Its not based on anything, its just random. Its not my personal opinion. Please try to understand. |
|
|
|
thats the last thing i answer to you, i will not loose my job because of you.
Okay, give me the contact details of your higher authorities, I would like to contact them else send me atleast 20 WACG to the address I sent you. |
|
|
|
|
As the title says, I want to sell my signature space for a month for 0.06 BTC. Any signature campaigns or any other private signatures will be accepted. If its a private signature, you have to pay half of the payment upfront in BTC.
|
|
|
|
Ok thanks man
No worries. TY for posting in my thread and being patient. |
|
|
|
I have organised a thread for that. Great job with the thread grtthegreat i have linked it in my post.
Maybe just create another column like you have for Memberstatus & Collateral. You could always just ask bitcoininformation if you can copy and tweak his design, but I'd just edit this one as it's fine apart from that small detail.
I tried to do it with tables and columns but ended up with failure. Please help me out if you guys can manage to get time to do it. Else, I would continue with the old table I made above. |
|
|
|
first of all this is to be discussed in private not in the thread, and second of all because of all this crazy transactions and unauthorized expending coins the old developer lost his job, im not following him because of you, im sorry about that
Don't try to manipulate the talk, you have to pay me those coins back because the coins are mine and I own them. |
|
|
|
I will not unless you show me what you told is true with bittrex history, most off all after your pathetic post with big SCAM in red.
Okay. I apologize for having lied but now I disclose the following. I got those coins from: 1) You, bounty for creating WACG Vanity addy creator. 30 WACG. 2) You, being a merchant. 20 WACG, Accepting WACG for MS Keys. 3) From a buyer who bought Windows 8.1 Pro Retail key for 4.9 WACG. |
|
|
|
you lied you bought them for 0.034 btc each, when you had them the price wasnt that, go to lie somewhere else please, do you think its fair for the people who is mining this coin and produce just 1 coin per day with 30 M/h if i give you 30 coins just for telling that you bought them on bittrex? if you really did buy them in bittrex you should have them because bittrex coin where restored by bittrex admins, and if you do have the transaction history of buying them for 1.1 BTC and i am mistaken i told you: send the history to me and i will give you 1.1 BTC back
That's why now I am asking for 30 WACG back to my wallet. Anyways, you are responsible for sending coins back. Whatever I do with them after the coins are back to me is none of your business. Hence, send my 30 WACG back to my address. |
|
|
|
Is it just me or are the Y and O's screwed up from the Y means YES, Collateral is required O means OPTIONAL, Collateral option is available etc? They're underneath the numbers. I think they shoukld have their own slot to make it look better. Maybe do a table like bitcoininformation did with his signature thread.
I don't know how to use rows and columns but I am learning it, so I would create tables soon. Sorry, for the inconvenience. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
