It didn't work out, but I don't think it was a scam. True I believe Ken to be largly incompetant, not a scammer The truly successful scams end this way. Successful scams are indistinguishable from failed businesses. They're structured that way. This has been pointed out more than once. ~Happy Investing! Indeed: HashFast was successful too, scam-wise. |
|
|
|
I didnt follow this here. Is there any hope to get compensations for shares? I stopped looking in here since i believed there is nothing left anymore. This didnt change did it?
Nope  |
|
|
|
Keep calm and INTELLIHASH!  |
|
|
|
Every single customer knows/feels he/she has been scammed by HashFast. Nothing can change that, not even you, iCEBREAKER. If any, you are making it worse The only thing a court ruling would reveal in this case, is whether it was a competent scam (well-executed scam, no evidence that it was a scam) or an incompentent scam (revealing the truth). So they will go down in history as competent scammers, at best. Cheers. |
|
|
|
It's not that "simple" but we understand that it may appear so to your simple minds. Business with valuable assets, promising technology, and multiple creditors do not just "go away." HF is in Chapter 11, which means they have the chance to turn the company around as that is in the best interests of their creditors. Your pouty attitude of 'they hurt my feelings and I want them to GO AWAY' is very immature and downright childish. Claims that HF are "scammers" or "incompetent" have already been heard and rejected by the bankruptcy court. Repeating that defamation won't make it true. I'd love to see you stamp your feet and throw your tantrums in front of Judge Montali; it would be entertaining to watch the bailiff put you in handcuffs and throw you in jail for contempt.  The sooner you grow up and face these facts, the sooner your butthurt will get better.  HAHAHAHAHA! A company which left almost all of its customers dissatisfied (in the sense that they are most likely to puke hearing the name HashFast), with many of them now being creditors in a bankruptcy case with no hopes of ever getting their money back. You're right, HashFast (puke) is clearly a successful company rather than being incompetent! What a load of shit(fall), dude! But hey, still funny! |
|
|
|
Still windfalling I see. If it's your thing to repeat a single word over and over, I'd recommend the following: INTELLIHASH  |
|
|
|
|
Sometimes something is funny when it's also true.
Josh's remark is neither.
|
|
|
|
Proof of claims should only be filed against Hashfast Technologies LLC (case 14-30725) and not the other HashFast company? Yes, but the deadline passed. The two cases were "substantively consolidated". If you don't disagree with them with your credit there wasn't any need to file anything. OK tnx. Still funny that I got the "substantively consolidated" notice (by mail) after the deadline for filing PoC had passed. |
|
|
|
|
If I understand correctly:
Proof of claims should only be filed against Hashfast Technologies LLC (case 14-30725) and not the other HashFast company?
|
|
|
|
|
Martin,
I know you are late in delivery, but I feel you are doing the best you can.
I don't think any of us will regret switching orders from BA, seen the situation there...
You are for one dealing with the issues on hand (coolers) and making it right, a man who knows how to do business.
So hereby a token of appreciation for your efforts in this impossible situation.
Keep it up!
Best,
HR
|
|
|
|
When HF promises BTC refunds, customers expect BTC refunds. They the fuck don't care how the company would manage to provide them, it's not of their business. For all they care maybe each time a HF employee takes a dump, one newly created bitcoin comes along with it. It's not of their concern, it's HF responsibility to live up to their part of the agreement, as we customers did ours. - Was there risk involved in pre-ordering from HashFast? Yes, as there is with many bitcoin investments. A lot of scammers, liars, mismanagement and incompetence out here. - Does that mean WE as customers are responsible for putting our trust and money in that company? Of course not, they are responsible for their own promises and mistakes. - IOW does it make us greedy bastards to demand BTC refunds as per our agreement? Absolutely not. So Icebreaker, you were told about the "Windfall" concept by some gal and you probably thought "Yes, that's something I can use", and now you use a million times it in all your replies as your only defense for your failed company. Yeah, I know that type of person. The words childish and ridiculous comes to mind, as does the expression "doesn't know what the hell he's talking about". So please, take you shitfall and go play elsewhere. It's time for you to invent a new scam. Kisses, HR PS: I paid in fiat. |
|
|
|
|
In any case, I'll be having plenty of court paper for my money to fire up the fireplace
|
|
|
|
Hi,
one of my S3 miners has an extreme low hashrate (80 GH/s).
It seems that it is not pulling the frequency data from the config file.
I've attached a picture, looking at the config file it shows that the frequency is supposed to be the standard 218.75.
Factory reset didn't help.
Anyone knows what to do about this?
You need to go to the miner configuration tab. Select advanced and choose a frequency. Save and apply. all better. I wonder what it is about the new FW that does this or maybe it's some sort of post lash protection but the same thing happened to me and was fixed just by "applying" everything from the new tab. Thanks, I'll try it. That did the trick indeed! Thanks both for your help. Cheers, HR |
|
|
|
Hi,
one of my S3 miners has an extreme low hashrate (80 GH/s).
It seems that it is not pulling the frequency data from the config file.
I've attached a picture, looking at the config file it shows that the frequency is supposed to be the standard 218.75.
Factory reset didn't help.
Anyone knows what to do about this?
You need to go to the miner configuration tab. Select advanced and choose a frequency. Save and apply. all better. I wonder what it is about the new FW that does this or maybe it's some sort of post lash protection but the same thing happened to me and was fixed just by "applying" everything from the new tab. Thanks, I'll try it. |
|
|
|
Hi, one of my S3 miners has an extreme low hashrate (80 GH/s). It seems that it is not pulling the frequency data from the config file. I've attached a picture, looking at the config file it shows that the frequency is supposed to be the standard 218.75.  Factory reset didn't help. Anyone knows what to do about this? |
|
|
|
Sending 2 invalid checks on purpose (as I am not the only one), is what I call scamming people.
What proof do you have that it was on purpose? I agree this would be questionable, if I would have been the only one. As there are many others he pulled this on, it can hardly qualify as being careless. |
|
|
|
|
Sending 2 invalid checks on purpose (as I am not the only one), is what I call scamming people.
|
|
|
|
|
Update:
Martin managed to setup colocation (I chose colocation with them) and the miners now started hashing.
They are not at full speed though, but this will be fixed by monday.
|
|
|
|
|
So how many received their order so far? More than one?
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
