What orphaned blocks? P2Pool hasn't orphaned a block in a very long time. Yes we are having a run of bad luck, but that's just what it is: bad luck. It happens.
I look at my stats http://crypto.office-on-the.net:9332/static/What is it?: Total: 305 (Orphan: 28, Dead: 25)
|
|
|
Finds blocks very rarely. Why is that? Age Found Block # Block Hash Reward Miners Share Luck 6d 9h 1m 58s 2015-11-16 02:09:55 383770 00000000000000000055c0b4c9d8efb7ccc25a7425bab77c75bf91bca2a8477e 25.08297515 237 a2a8477e 147.14% 8d 7h 50m 34s 2015-11-14 03:21:19 383473 00000000000000000ee7628fbd822560b7bb206bfc4926090289c8c86992c12f 25.06613403 256 6992c12f 33.46% 15d 21h 12m 17s 2015-11-06 13:59:36 382316 000000000000000000d82908dea0384c57649f6ff5ff7faae93e53eaed06f597 25.00020420 265 ed06f597 89.21% Until last month (for a year) mining on p2pool was the most profitable. Now I only heat the planet. Should it be so? Perhaps there is an error in the source code? There are a lot of orphans and no blocks on all nodes.
|
|
|
I'm here still thinking maybe we have cutting low-fee transactions on nodes for nothing? mintxfee=0.00001 minrelaytxfee=0.00001 Someone cuts more. Maybe we should not reject the blocks with a low-fee transactions with these cuts? But everyone turned these parameters on because afraid of spam. Do I understand correctly? Transactions go with the block and if we have limited low-fee transactions - the block goes to other pool which is not limited these sums. You can refuse these limitations when used pypy and reduce the ammount of connections due to the relay network. The tx fees currently add up to not much however, the higher you set the tx fee the more money miners get when the pool finds a block i.e. a block full of 10 satoshi spam transactions vs. a block full of 0.0005 BTC transactions. Since the fees add up to so little it currently matters not if the block is empty or full. Also, the tx fee has nothing to do with blocks going to other pools, your understanding of the Bitcoin protocol is incorrect in that regards. I see that the block includes transaction, or does it mean something else: 2015-11-10 23:39:21.175614 New work for worker! Difficulty: 5934.627313 Share difficulty: 10661044.589070 Total block value: 25.204985 BTC including 1259 transactions 2015-11-10 23:40:07.750110 New work for worker! Difficulty: 3965.507154 Share difficulty: 7407297.860059 Total block value: 25.213353 BTC including 1293 transactions Rejecting these transactions I do not receive a share containing the transaction.
|
|
|
I'm here still thinking maybe we have cutting low-fee transactions on nodes for nothing? mintxfee=0.00001 minrelaytxfee=0.00001 Someone cuts more. Maybe we should not reject the blocks with a low-fee transactions with these cuts? But everyone turned these parameters on because afraid of spam. Do I understand correctly? Transactions go with the block and if we have limited low-fee transactions - the block goes to other pool which is not limited these sums. You can refuse these limitations when used pypy and reduce the ammount of connections due to the relay network.
|
|
|
Добавьте параметр --no-extranonce sgminer -k Lyra2REv2 -o stratum+tcp://crypto.office-on-the.net:9171 -u YourVTCPayoutAddress -p x --expiry 1 --scan-time 1 --queue 0 --no-extranonce
|
|
|
when EMD became a POS coin, we will see him dead
|
|
|
Sorry but i am selling my coins , no activ dev no future Sell, who's stopping you? Good luck.
|
|
|
Ваш пул работает как "дочка" чего большего? Собственно не проясните ситуацию, маню crypto.office-on-the.net:8336 по статистике еще пара манеров общая скорость 100мн мои 40. По статистике нахоим 2 блока, на кошель падает всего 0.24NVC смотрю статистику на p2pool.novaco.in - опа- а там мой кошелек и сымма выплаты 0.24NVC, куш снимает чувак с большой мощностью с p2pool.novaco.in.
Просто по другим манеткам например вознагрождение 12 монеток, на пуле трое, нашли блок, вознагрождение делится между этими тремя пропорционально мощностям, а с НОВОКОИНОМ это как то иначе работает ?
Или вы есть часть p2pool.novaco.in пула?
Да, моя нода NovaCoin связана с другими такими нодами и вместе составляют единый р2р пул. Определить связана эта нода с другими легко на странице статистики: Node peers: 13 / 6 ,- видно что нода имеет 13 входящих и 6 исходящих соединений с другими нодами. Программное обеспечение п2пулов сделано таким образом что ноды могут работать в двух режимах: как одиночный пул или как нода сети пулов (п2пул). Вот пример одиночной ноды BQC: http://crypto.office-on-the.net:8900Node peers: 0 / 0 ,- 0 входящих/исходящих подключений. Т.е намайненные на этой ноде блоки BQC будут распределяться только между теми, кто копает на этой ноде. Величина награды определяется количеством шар полученных вашим майнером и полученный блок распределяется пропорционально между майнерами всех нод. Из награды вычитается Fee (комиссия ноды) на адрес указанный владельцем пула. Величина комиссии на каждой ноде произвольна и определяется владельцем ноды (у меня комиссия 0, что видно в строчке "Node fee / donation:" на странице статистики). Необходимость объединить ноду с другими нодами зависит от сложности монетки. При текущей сложности новакоинов отделять ноду от п2пула нецелесообразно, так как тогда значительно вырастет время на получение блока. Т.е. если сейчас при глобальной скорости п2пула более 200MH/s время получения блока 20 часов, то на одиночном пуле для 40MH/s время увеличится до 7-10 суток.
|
|
|
For synchronization to be correct I made this config in bitcredit.conf: rpcuser=(leave old) ... port=(It's necessary to set any free port, but not 8877. The port number must be different from previous. It is for wallets with the wrong blockchain not connected to your wallet as they remember your previous IP and p2p port) irc=0 connect=41.191.238.189 connect=82.211.1.181:8877 connect=91.230.123.101:8877 - connect, but not addnode. This method does not give the wallet to exchange nodes, it will only connect to the specified nodes. Make a backup file of wallet.dat Before starting a wallet from a directory with blockchain delete all files except bitcredit.conf and wallet.dat. Run wallet and wait until the full synchronization will be finished. Unless we can find someone to modify p2pool code to create payouts , then p2pool blocks will be invalid after next update. Probably first you need to completely restore the blockchain, block explorer and exchanges. And only then think about p2pool. I am sure you will succeed.
|
|
|
For synchronization to be correct I made this config in bitcredit.conf: rpcuser=(leave old) ... port=(It's necessary to set any free port, but not 8877. The port number must be different from previous. It is for wallets with the wrong blockchain not connected to your wallet as they remember your previous IP and p2p port) irc=0 connect=41.191.238.189 connect=82.211.1.181:8877 connect=91.230.123.101:8877 - connect, but not addnode. This method does not give the wallet to exchange nodes, it will only connect to the specified nodes. Make a backup file of wallet.dat Before starting a wallet from a directory with blockchain delete all files except bitcredit.conf and wallet.dat. Run wallet and wait until the full synchronization will be finished.
|
|
|
My node http://crypto.office-on-the.net:8776 working again. I separated my node from the others nodes. If there is a wish to mining in it, must be added to hosts file the following entry: 82.200.205.30 p2pool.website Then run miner, for example: clpts -o 1 -u BCR_ADDRESS -d 0-1
|
|
|
Sawa , can you check the time on your server? seems there is a 6 hour short fall somewhere and i can't find it on our side. Meanwhile, everyone who is upgrading, please YOU MUST RE-SYNC. Many peers are still broadcasting invalid blocks because they did not re-sync since we passed block 199999.
Please ensure you re-sync and are using 0.30.16.9 (or 0.30.17.0 for devs and testing) with 70009
I think we need to fast track the move to BN only mining because noone has managed to modify the p2pool code to handle the bidding process.
DATE/TIME is correct, timezone too. ntp daemon takes time from several ntp servers. In addition, more work pieces 30 different coin wallets without problems and a dozen nodes p2ools. Latest version of the wallet from https://github.com/bitcreditscc/bicreditsnew.git/usr/local/src/bicreditsnew# git pull Already up-to-date. I deleted all the files except wallet.dat and bitcredit.conf and loaded blokchain again. # bitcredit-cli getinfo { "version" : 301609, "protocolversion" : 70009, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : "darksend_balance" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 201385, "timeoffset" : 0, "moneysupply" : 19649228.99810293, "connections" : 13, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 0.00001502, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1441604161, "keypoolsize" : 2, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "relayfee" : 0.00001000, "errors" : "" } I see the difference in the number of my blocks and in block explorer: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/201 385 and 200 740 respectively. Probably block explorer: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/bcr/ and bittrex fall in one tree of the fork, since the funds on deposit bittrex not translated. Synchronization was held from these peers: http://pastebin.com/hXtzY4mZ
|
|
|
Wallet crashes: ~$ /usr/local/bin/bitcreditd Bitcredit server starting ~$ bitcredit-cli getinfo { "version" : 301609, "protocolversion" : 70009, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : "darksend_balance" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 200245, "timeoffset" : 0, "moneysupply" : 19598726.99810301, "connections" : 2, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 0.00000903, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1440690955, "keypoolsize" : 2, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "relayfee" : 0.00001000, "errors" : "" } ~$ bitcredit-cli setgenerate true -1 ~$ terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::runtime_error' what(): CTransaction::GetValueOut() : value out of range
|
|
|
... I see that there are problems with blockchain. Probably he reports that the number of blocks more than it actually is. Solo miner: 2015-09-05 00:13:28 | clpts failed (Bitcredit is downloading blocks...) P2pool: 2015-09-05 00:14:28.346264 > p2pool.util.jsonrpc.NarrowError: -10 Bitcredit is downloading blocks... Make sure your p2pool is updated and has downloaded shares, it should kick off from there. P2pool updated. But he can not start work because not all blocks are loaded: 2015-09-05 01:06:30.864102 p2pool (version 13.4-139-g08b4998) 2015-09-05 01:06:30.864340 2015-09-05 01:06:30.864489 Testing bitcoind RPC connection to ' http://127.0.0.1:8878/' with username 'bitcreditrpc'... 2015-09-05 01:06:55.045926 > Error getting work from bitcoind: ... 2015-09-05 01:06:55.054777 > p2pool.util.jsonrpc.NarrowError: -10 Bitcredit is downloading blocks... This is not a p2pool of problem. The same message from the RPC miner (not pool miner): sleep 10s... GPU0: 0 c/m | ART: inf ms (-nan/-nan/-nan) GPU1: 0 c/m | ART: inf ms (-nan/-nan/-nan) 2015-09-05 01:20:55 | 0 c/m | blocks found: 0 | rejected blocks: 0 2015-09-05 01:21:05 | clpts failed (Bitcredit is downloading blocks...) sleep 10s... This from debug.log (wallet mining with gen=1): 2015-09-04 19:21:46 Running BitcreditMiner with 1 transactions in block (265 bytes) 2015-09-04 19:21:52 testHash 6905236125aab65a9f68304c74b25dcea9c2cc3fc994cdc86f70389f7b238d0e 2015-09-04 19:21:52 Hash Target 0000ad6900000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 2015-09-04 19:21:52 CreateNewBlock: Failed to detect banknode to pay 2015-09-04 19:21:52 CreateNewBlock(): total size 1000 2015-09-04 19:21:52 nActualTimespan = 22 before bounds 2015-09-04 19:21:52 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET 2015-09-04 19:21:52 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60 nActualTimespan = 22 2015-09-04 19:21:52 Before: 1f01d8f2 0001d8f200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 2015-09-04 19:21:52 After: 1f00ad69 0000ad69cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc 2015-09-04 19:21:52 nActualTimespan = 22 before bounds 2015-09-04 19:21:52 GetNextWorkRequired RETARGET 2015-09-04 19:21:52 Params().TargetTimespan2() = 60 nActualTimespan = 22 2015-09-04 19:21:52 Before: 1f01d8f2 0001d8f200000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 2015-09-04 19:21:52 After: 1f00ad69 0000ad69cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc 2015-09-04 19:21:52 GetSpork::Unknown Spork 1427803200 2015-09-04 19:21:52 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks 2015-09-04 19:21:52 CheckBlock() : Is initial download, skipping banknode payment check 200107 2015-09-04 19:21:52 GetSpork::Unknown Spork 1427803200 2015-09-04 19:21:52 CheckBlock() : skipping transaction locking checks 2015-09-04 19:21:52 CheckBlock() : Is initial download, skipping banknode payment check 200107 2015-09-04 19:21:52 Running BitcreditMiner with 1 transactions in block (265 bytes)
|
|
|
I am now compiled the new wallet: bitcredit-cli getinfo { "version" : 301609, "protocolversion" : 70009, "walletversion" : 60000, "balance" : "darksend_balance" : 0.00000000, "blocks" : 200060, "timeoffset" : 0, "moneysupply" : 19595414.99810301, "connections" : 3, "proxy" : "", "difficulty" : 0.00000140, "testnet" : false, "keypoololdest" : 1441386823, "keypoolsize" : 4, "paytxfee" : 0.00000000, "relayfee" : 0.00001000, "errors" : "" } bitcredit-cli getpeerinfo [ { "id" : 1, "addr" : "198.52.160.59:8877", "addrlocal" : "82.200.205.30:60670", "services" : "0000000000000001", "lastsend" : 1441390563, "lastrecv" : 1441390563, "bytessent" : 43993, "bytesrecv" : 5119906, "conntime" : 1441388394, "pingtime" : 0.16722000, "version" : 70009, "subver" : "/Section 32:0.30.16.9/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 200046, "banscore" : 0, "servicesdesc" : "MSG RELAY ASSETS ESCROW IBTP BANK BRIDGE", "synced_headers" : 200064, "synced_blocks" : 200064, "inflight" : [ ], "whitelisted" : false }, { "id" : 2, "addr" : "198.52.160.64:8877", "addrlocal" : "82.200.205.30:57035", "services" : "0000000000000001", "lastsend" : 1441390556, "lastrecv" : 1441390562, "bytessent" : 1601, "bytesrecv" : 3667, "conntime" : 1441388394, "pingtime" : 0.15530600, "version" : 70009, "subver" : "/Section 32:0.30.16.9/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 200046, "banscore" : 0, "servicesdesc" : "MSG RELAY ASSETS ESCROW IBTP BANK BRIDGE", "synced_headers" : 200064, "synced_blocks" : 200064, "inflight" : [ ], "whitelisted" : false }, { "id" : 3, "addr" : "198.52.160.60:8877", "addrlocal" : "82.200.205.30:43330", "services" : "0000000000000001", "lastsend" : 1441390556, "lastrecv" : 1441390562, "bytessent" : 16741, "bytesrecv" : 1831151, "conntime" : 1441388395, "pingtime" : 0.23267000, "version" : 70009, "subver" : "/Section 32:0.30.16.9/", "inbound" : false, "startingheight" : 200046, "banscore" : 0, "servicesdesc" : "MSG RELAY ASSETS ESCROW IBTP BANK BRIDGE", "synced_headers" : 200064, "synced_blocks" : 200064, "inflight" : [ ], "whitelisted" : false } ] I see that there are problems with blockchain. Probably he reports that the number of blocks more than it actually is. Solo miner: 2015-09-05 00:13:28 | clpts failed (Bitcredit is downloading blocks...) P2pool: 2015-09-05 00:14:28.346264 > p2pool.util.jsonrpc.NarrowError: -10 Bitcredit is downloading blocks...
|
|
|
|