i am thinking of ways to fix it but all i get is bashed
ways to fix it? so instead of contacting those you owe, you vanish for weeks/months, then you create a new account and try to rip people off again. i hardly doubt, that you (anonymously) tried to sell mobile-minutes and php-codework to me, just to pay me back, that makes no sense at all. give me those mobile-minutes for free, work for me for free, that would make sense to pay me back, to play hide and seek doesn't.
|
|
|
I did not mean to scam anyone
then where is my money? you still owe me 600+BTC
|
|
|
no multiple choices so here's my vote: Which Windows version?
|
|
|
your story somehow sounds familiar, i can't help it, but i get the feeling this guy is our old 'friend' sabbers, he also started with very small trades to gain some 'reputation', before he started to beg for loans and this smells just like him.
|
|
|
Just because *you* are able to spend it without a loss doesn't mean *anybody* can (due to using the default client)
|
|
|
it's fine running multiple miners with a single address. your choice to use a single address, or one for each miner.
|
|
|
Or do you mean you just want your client to warn you before wasting .009 BTC?
IF sub-cent-transactions are implemented, this is a must. the average newbie won't even notice that he's losing sub-cents, when he can only see 2digits in his GUI. also a bad idea to tell people, they first have to configure stuff right to not lose any coins. why not stick with amounts that you are able to send without a loss?
|
|
|
say i got a balance of 0btc. i receive 1.009btc from mining on a pool. now i wanna buy a coffee for my first 1btc, but i can't without losing .009btc.
my vote: as long as it's possible to lose sub-cents, one shouldn't be able to send them.
|
|
|
another (offtopic)question - are u accepting lindens for bitcoins :-) of course i do.
|
|
|
i can try Alice runs a pool. Bob's miner gets 500khash/s, which earns him about 1share every 2hours. Bob's miner is connected to Alice's pool. Alice's pool is that big, that it creates ~1block per hour. Bob only gets a share of half the blocks created by Alice's pool, although he's connected 24/7.
|
|
|
it sure is, when you connect to the server, your miner asks for some data and starts hashing that data, all found "winning-hashes" are automagically sent to the server.
|
|
|
this server is (just like slush's pool) running at a difficulty of 1, so you should be able to find a matching hash every hour or so even on slower CPUs.
you get paid for each and every hash you submit (and that has been accepted), it doesn't matter if anyone solves a block or not and it also doesn't matter how many others use the system, you get a fixed amount (0.00173091) for each hash you submit.
i've been running a miner on bitpenny for >16hours now with a performance of ~87.8%, sure, it's less than "average" solo-mining, but a stable, steady income that you can count on (no need for luck) and it's paid instantly.
great service, especially for very slow miners that might not find a single hash within pool-round-duration-time, guess they'll lose more on pools (the more the bigger a pool gets) than the ~12.5% on this server.
i'll keep testing it for a while
|
|
|
how about this: $mtg_url='http://mtgox.com/code/data/ticker.php'; $handle = fopen ($mtg_url, "r"); $output = fread($handle, 1024); fclose($handle); $obj = json_decode($output); $bid = $obj->ticker->buy; $ask = $obj->ticker->sell;
echo "bid: ".$bid." | ask: ".$ask;
|
|
|
Will I start again from scratch or does the mining continue where it left off?
Yes and yes. it's not that you're making any "progress" that could be lost, you start from scratch with any single hash, like drawing lottery-tickets a few thousand/million times a second, you either get a winning-ticket, or a loser. won't help you to keep the loser in your pocket.
|
|
|
But there is also not any 'time on current round'. but you tell us when the last block was found, not hard to guess the current round duration.
|
|
|
Unfortunately, slush had to do what he did. Good call.
i still don't get the point, a "cheater" would just change it's behaviour from switch-after-X-shares to switch-after-Y-hours, what's the big difference? yet for me the difference is quite big, i don't get ANY useful stats at all anymore.
|
|
|
well, it's a bit hard to count them, if you can't be sure they've been 'accepted' (i have to run at least 1 outdated miner-version that doesnt tell me).
and why do you think slush needed to? if i want to cheat, i can still take the time since last block and current approx.cluster performance and calculate shares-this-round that way, can't i?
|
|
|
i really dislike your decision to remove all the useful stats and only keep those that don't really matter to me anyways.
it doesn't matter how many blocks my workers found, won't get me anything more or less if they found a lot or none, but what i want to know is the number of shares that a given worker got, makes tweaking and debugging a lot easier.
right now i can't tell which worker (or miner-version) is performing good or bad.
|
|
|
In what average time my Found Blocks and Current shares may change from "0" to another count ?
don't expect your "Found Blocks" to ever change, at current difficulty and with your hash-count it would take an average of ~3years to solve a block, difficulty will rise in those 3years, so you'll have to be very very lucky to win the race, ever. on the pool, at ~800khash/s, you should find a winning-hash and get a share every ~1.5hours, should add up to about 0.04BTC a day on average.
|
|
|
I can provide you with details of his bitcoin to enable you to log on to his account to confirm this balance. please do so, i'd really like to see "$48.550 Million bitcoin" (is it $ or bitcoin now, choose 1 please) with my own eyes, besides that, i'd like to know how to log on someones bitcoin account. I will also write to the Bitcoin central bank as the legal representative of my client good luck with that You can as well reach me by sendig 10 BTC to guess you'll have to send some coins to the Bitcoin central bank too, to reach them, it's probably easier to reach your dead client. don't try to scam a system you don't understand, read some papers first.
|
|
|
|