There is nothing wrong. Confirmed balance is how much coin you have available for withdrawal (assuming that balance meets or exceeds the pool's minimum withdrawal amount). Unconfirmed balance is coins that are not yet available because the block from which you were rewarded them has not yet matured. When the pool finds a block, your unconfirmed balance will go up by however much your portion of block reward is. Once the block matures, your unconfirmed balance will go away and your confirmed balance will go up by that amount.
|
|
|
Let's have a block party weekend . Everyone who finds a block this weekend will get a 1 BTC bonus from me. Runs from now until 23:59:59 EDT on 5/1/2016.
|
|
|
For you guys that are using Rozo's referral... did you create a new NH account? If not, is there a way to use his referral with your current account? Obviously I rent from time to time and if I can help out, I will The failover are at expected times, it doesn't lose connection. It just does not come back when the pool comes back online.
I'll check the firmware, but it has never been a problem before. It is not really a big deal, but it is just strange. I just need to keep an eye on it a make sure it is working where it is supposed to.
Weird... I've seen that happen quite a bit with the Bitmain hardware, but haven't ever experienced with my Avalons. Phil, you've got some experience with the Avalons as well... any ideas?
|
|
|
I'm sorry....i have one more question. What does variance percentage say? User Name Round Shares Round % PPLNS Shares PPLNS Round % Variance Amount
dennishh 3,285,907,700 1.65 9,536,908,973 1.12 67.68 0.28103430
Most miners have 100% and i have less, while others have +200%
What does this say about my miner/hashes? Thanks in advance! No rush....just like to learn:-) Dennishh
Sure... the variance is a reflection of shares to find the block, total PPLNS shares, your round shares and your round PPLNS shares. You can calculate it yourself from the information provided on the round statistics page as follows: (100 / ((( 100 / Block Shares) * Your Valid Round Shares) / (( 100 / total PPLNS shares) * Your valid PPLNS round shares)))
If I use your specific numbers: (100 / ((( 100 / 199,254,758,327 ) * 3,285,907,700) / (( 100 / 854,454,685,924 ) * 9,536,908,973 ))) = 67.67967218880735
Hope that helps
|
|
|
NH is simple. You choose either the WH proxy (located in San Jose, CA) or the NH proxy (located in Amsterdam). Then you choose the algorithm (SHA256). Now, you just plug in how much you want to spend in total, how much you want to pay for the hash, and how much hash you want. Put in the pool details and create the order.
The primary difference between NH and MRR is in the way you get your hashing power. On NH, there is no guaranteed hashing time. Your order can be outbid and go to zero speed. Your order might never get to the hash you want. Or, it might be way over the speed you want. The point is, with NH you pay for a number of hashes. How long it takes to get to that number is not relevant to them.
With MRR, you pay for time. You rent a rig for a set amount of time. If that rig happens to hash higher than expected, lucky you. If not... well, hopefully either the rig owner increases your rental time, or MRR refunds you for the difference.
Each has their own advantages. MRR for when you know "I want exactly X hashing for exactly Y time". NH for "I want to get N total hashes and don't care how long it takes to get them".
One advantage I will give to NH - your order is very mutable. What I mean by that is you can cancel it at any time. You can refill it at any time. You can change the price you're paying, or the hash limit. On MRR, once you've picked your rig and rented - that's it unless something catastrophic happens and either the order is auto-canceled because it didn't give you advertised hash in the first 20 minutes, or you complain loudly enough to MRR support and they cancel it.
|
|
|
The A6 that I have mining here shows the pool dead occasionally, and won't reconnect to it unless I restart cgminer. It stays on the failover pool. Anyone have any idea why?
That I don't know... I have 8xA6 pointed here and they reconnect and stay connected without issue. For example, the last time they failed over to my backup pool was on Monday when I shut down the stratum servers because my datacenter had the switch issue. When I fired them back up, all of my A6 came right back. When was the last time your A6 showed the pool as dead and didn't fail back over properly? Are you on the latest firmware? Hi, I notice that the "est. earnings" is missing from the pool.....will it come back? i like to look at it from tim to time :-) not that i would like to sound greedy, but is there a bonus at this time?
Anyhow, love this pool, been aboard since block 2, now ony with rented hash, since my miner broke down. Been renting @MRR, could someone advice on renting @NH? is it better? how does it work? Thanks for any tips or tricks!
Keep u the good work. dennishh
You notice correctly. I took it away because it needs to be fixed. Until I get that done, it remains gone. The problem was that it determined your estimated earnings by only considering shares since the previous block was found. That works out great for a PROP pool, but not at all for PPLNS. Too many people would PM me or email me or hit me on IRC asking why their payment was "X" when the estimated earnings said it would be "Y". It will be fixed eventually, I just haven't had the time to dedicate to it (stupid real-world job ). There was a bonus of 1 BTC if you found the block before the diff change. That didn't happen, unfortunately. I would have loved to have seen it. At any rate, there will be another bonus... I just haven't figured out what it'll be yet . Probably going to do some iteration of the contest we ran last round. As soon as I finalize the details, I'll post it.
|
|
|
Block 409094 has matured and your balances are available for withdrawal. If you have auto-payouts set, your payments have already been sent and confirmed. Onto block 9! Remember, if you find that block before the diff change, I'll send you a 1 BTC bonus
|
|
|
I haven't started the "pick the range" contest back up yet... mostly because I have neither finalized how I want to run it this time, nor on the prize for winning. Right now, the currently running promo is that if somebody finds a block before the diff change, they get 1BTC.
When I do start the "pick the range" contest again, the chances are extremely slim the prize will be as high as it was this time. It may get there over time if people don't win for a few rounds... but starting off it's not going to be a possible 3BTC win.
|
|
|
^Just in case others were confused (as I was)...
I've found that if you go to statistics - round (on the pool website) -- it will show you your variance based on the 5N for the last round -- thus, making the math work...
I hope that he can make the math work -- to put that button back up on the main dashboard -- as it WOULD BE useful information if accurate...
As you can see from the statistics page, the math works out once the block has been found. That's because the payout code is accurate . Yes, I spent my time ensuring miners were paid appropriately. Funny, that . The problem with the estimated earnings is that the calculations and code are all completely wrong. They completely assume a round is never more than since the previous block was found. Works great for PROP. Not so much for PPLNS. I reported this on the MPOS github repo. Anyway, since the code exists to properly calculate the payouts, it really shouldn't be too hard to port that over to the UI. I'm currently working on it, although I don't have a whole lot of time to dedicate to it since my real job continues to interfere... lol. In a nutshell, there are a few places I need to make changes (getting the proper number of your payable shares for the round), and ensure that's written to cache, because the live SQL queries are painfully slow to execute. I might have to disable the live view (i.e. no more magically updating dashboard) in lieu of this change for performance reasons.
|
|
|
OK... once again I find myself explaining PPLNS payouts. I've tried using examples of glasses of water. I've tried using math. I really want you guys to feel comfortable and understand how this thing works, so how can I best help you understand it?
Let me try to break it down in sections to see if that helps, and maybe you can ask about particular sections for further clarity.
What the hell is "N"? N represents a rolling window of payable shares. It can be any value a pool operator sets. It can be a set value, or it can be dynamically adjusted. The bigger the N value, the bigger the payable window is.
What is ramping up? This is a phrase commonly used to indicate a miner has just started mining on the pool. Because they have just started mining, they do not have a full set of shares in that "N" window. This is important: your payouts during this time will be lower than you think they should be.
How long does it take to ramp up? This completely depends on the size of "N" and the hash rate of the pool. The larger the "N", the longer it takes. How long that is is variant depending on the pool's hash rate. For example, if a pool sets an N value of 500,000,000,000 shares, and the pool averages 1PH, it will take just about 25 days. If the pool averages 40PH? About 15 hours.
What does this mean to me? As stated above, it means that during your ramp up time, your payments will be lower than you think they should be. They will gradually increase, assuming a constant hash rate, as you get closer and closer to being fully ramped up. Let's look at an example. If a pool chooses a window of 5 times the current network difficulty as "N", then statistically, your first payment will be about 1/5 of what you expect. Your second payment will be about 2/5. Your third payment will be 3/5. Your fourth will be 4/5. Your fifth payment will be what those mining calculators say you should be making.
WTF, why did I get paid so little? This is completely normal and expected behavior when ramping up.
Mining with a full clip Ok... you've been mining for a while and N shares have passed. Congrats! All things being equal, your payouts should reflect what an estimated earnings calculator shows.
What does luck have to do with it? Remember that "N" thing I've mentioned a few times? Well, because "N" is a rolling window of payable shares, any share you have in that "N" window can be paid multiple times! If the pool has good luck, which my pool most certainly has, then your shares get paid multiple times! Typically, with a 5N pool, you expect each share to be paid five times. If the pool finds more blocks in that window than it expects to, you reap the benefit and make more coin.
I love mining, but I have to stop Well, firstly, sorry to see you go. But, there's good news for you. Remember that whole discussion of ramping up? Guess what... there's ramping down, too! Even though you're shutting down your miners, you're still going to receive payments!
Wait... what? I'm getting paid even though I'm not mining any more? Yes! Remember, "N" is a rolling window of payable shares. Even if you're not submitting any more shares, those shares are still viable and payable until they are no longer in the window of "N".
How does that work? Just like ramping up, you ramp down. All things being equal, on a 5N pool, once you stop mining, your next payout will be about 4/5 of expectations. The one after that will be about 3/5. The next one 2/5 and the final one 1/5.
I really hope this has helped you understand PPLNS. Please feel free to ask any questions about any portion of it, and I'll do my best to help you.
|
|
|
All,
Because the "Estimated Earnings" shown on the dashboard page is causing all kinds of confusion, I have removed it until such time as I can fix the underlying formulas for calculating it.
Why did I do this?
Because the estimated earnings as currently working calculates your earnings based upon the current round only. In other words, if this were a PROP pool, that estimated earnings would be correct. However, since this is a PPLNS pool, your estimated earnings and payout are based upon your total payable shares over "N".
I will update the thread when I complete development work and bring the estimated payouts function back.
|
|
|
Congrats on the block and the prize. Maybe I'll get a referral fee for turning you on to Jonny's pool. Jonny, Since diff change in about 20hours maybe do a find a block before diff change bonus! You know what? Absolutely. If anyone finds a block on the pool before the diff change (about 198 blocks from now), I'll send you 1 BTC.
|
|
|
Congrats to borachinua on finding block 409094 containing 893 transactions with a value of 25.17913002 BTC! What a nice way to wake up 2016-04-27 04:36:58 UpdateTip: new best=00000000000000000221f83bbfcc75292635fc50b592214a2df832330d7fa5f8 height=409094 log2_work=84.557626 tx=125025477 date=2016-04-27 04:36:18 progress=1.000000 cache=48.3MiB(13946tx)
2016-04-27 04:36:59 [Pool] [bitcoin] (Thread 7) Submitted Block using submitblock successfully to daemon instance(s) 2016-04-27 04:36:59 [Pool] [bitcoin] (Thread 7) Block found: 00000000000000000221f83bbfcc75292635fc50b592214a2df832330d7fa5f8 by borachinua.NHR20160418 2016-04-27 04:36:59 [Pool] [bitcoin] (Thread 7) Share accepted at diff 582542.22222222/515542715077.98516846 by borachinua.NHR20160418
A nice 515G share by the rental. Now, onto the contest.... The block was found at 111.52% of expected shares. According to the table, that range belongs to borachinua. Yup... you guessed it... borachinua receives the 3 BTC!!! 2 for having the correct range and 1 for being the block finder during the range. I have sent the bonus winnings to the BTC address you have registered with the pool. TxID: d0659de93222fa64d34dac2a4127d50363435aef282b1562cad3aba76479fd09 Once again, congrats!!!
|
|
|
I would like 104
We're at 108... you probably want a higher pick than 104 Everyone, please note: the updated list and latest picks will be updated in the second post of this thread to avoid constantly bumping. You can find the latest picks there.
|
|
|
120%
User Name | Low Percentage | High Percentage | justchillz | 49.90% | 50.89% | Songminer | 61.28% | 62.27% | bit5norba | 90.00% | 90.99% | dennishh | 91.00% | 91.99% | mikestang | 93.00% | 93.99% | philipma1957 | 94.00% | 94.99% | bctmke | 96.30% | 97.29% | GoJonnyGo | 98.00% | 98.99% | controlhosting | 99.00% | 99.99% | abmonstein | 103.00% | 103.99% | vh | 105.00% | 105.99% | LASERminer | 106.00% | 106.99% | YuenglingDude | 107.00% | 107.99% | carlsberg112 | 108.00% | 108.99% | rozo | 109.00% | 109.99% | apederzoli | 110.00% | 110.99% | borachinua | 111.00% | 111.99% | wardie | 112.00% | 112.99% | traxor | 113.00% | 113.99% | dsppage | 114.00% | 114.99% | eghigo | 115.00% | 115.99% | OneInchWonder | 118.00% | 118.99% | zachmonroe | 120.00% | 120.99% |
|
|
|
I guess 113% for my new guess... I have NO IDEA how I MISSED my 100% zone -- it FLEW by before I even thought possible... The pool is ON FIRE!!! new guess is 115% please Please put me down for 114%
Thanks
User Name | Low Percentage | High Percentage | justchillz | 49.90% | 50.89% | Songminer | 61.28% | 62.27% | zachmonroe | 85.30% | 86.29% | bit5norba | 90.00% | 90.99% | dennishh | 91.00% | 91.99% | mikestang | 93.00% | 93.99% | philipma1957 | 94.00% | 94.99% | bctmke | 96.30% | 97.29% | GoJonnyGo | 98.00% | 98.99% | controlhosting | 99.00% | 99.99% | abmonstein | 103.00% | 103.99% | vh | 105.00% | 105.99% | LASERminer | 106.00% | 106.99% | YuenglingDude | 107.00% | 107.99% | carlsberg112 | 108.00% | 108.99% | rozo | 109.00% | 109.99% | apederzoli | 110.00% | 110.99% | borachinua | 111.00% | 111.99% | wardie | 112.00% | 112.99% | traxor | 113.00% | 113.99% | dsppage | 114.00% | 114.99% | eghigo | 115.00% | 115.99% | OneInchWonder | 118.00% | 118.99% |
|
|
|
109% is my new one pls
Sigh... 112%
User Name | Low Percentage | High Percentage | justchillz | 49.90% | 50.89% | Songminer | 61.28% | 62.27% | zachmonroe | 85.30% | 86.29% | bit5norba | 90.00% | 90.99% | dennishh | 91.00% | 91.99% | mikestang | 93.00% | 93.99% | philipma1957 | 94.00% | 94.99% | bctmke | 96.30% | 97.29% | GoJonnyGo | 98.00% | 98.99% | controlhosting | 99.00% | 99.99% | traxor | 100.00% | 100.99% | dsppage | 102.00% | 102.99% | abmonstein | 103.00% | 103.99% | eghigo | 104.00% | 104.99% | vh | 105.00% | 105.99% | LASERminer | 106.00% | 106.99% | YuenglingDude | 107.00% | 107.99% | carlsberg112 | 108.00% | 108.99% | rozo | 109.00% | 109.99% | apederzoli | 110.00% | 110.99% | borachinua | 111.00% | 111.99% | wardie | 112.00% | 112.99% | OneInchWonder | 118.00% | 118.99% |
|
|
|
ok - new range for me.
111% to 112%
rule question - we are doing ranges now, but does it have to be only 1% or could I do something like 111% to 113%?
For now it's a 1% range. This will likely change during the next iteration of this contest (rules on which I am still working). The issue is in finding the balance. Too small a range, and it blasts right by with a larger rental. Too large a range and it could stick there for a while if the miner doesn't rent big during that slot. User Name | Low Percentage | High Percentage | justchillz | 49.90% | 50.89% | Songminer | 61.28% | 62.27% | zachmonroe | 85.30% | 86.29% | rozo | 88.00% | 88.99% | bit5norba | 90.00% | 90.99% | dennishh | 91.00% | 91.99% | mikestang | 93.00% | 93.99% | philipma1957 | 94.00% | 94.99% | bctmke | 96.30% | 97.29% | GoJonnyGo | 98.00% | 98.99% | controlhosting | 99.00% | 99.99% | traxor | 100.00% | 100.99% | wardie | 101.00% | 101.99% | dsppage | 102.00% | 102.99% | abmonstein | 103.00% | 103.99% | eghigo | 104.00% | 104.99% | vh | 105.00% | 105.99% | LASERminer | 106.00% | 106.99% | YuenglingDude | 107.00% | 107.99% | carlsberg112 | 108.00% | 108.99% | apederzoli | 110.00% | 110.99% | borachinua | 111.00% | 111.99% | OneInchWonder | 118.00% | 118.99% |
|
|
|
Just passed my range. My new guess is 110%
User Name | Low Percentage | High Percentage | justchillz | 49.90% | 50.89% | Songminer | 61.28% | 62.27% | zachmonroe | 85.30% | 86.29% | rozo | 88.00% | 88.99% | bit5norba | 90.00% | 90.99% | dennishh | 91.00% | 91.99% | borachinua | 92.00% | 92.99% | mikestang | 93.00% | 93.99% | philipma1957 | 94.00% | 94.99% | bctmke | 96.30% | 97.29% | GoJonnyGo | 98.00% | 98.99% | controlhosting | 99.00% | 99.99% | traxor | 100.00% | 100.99% | wardie | 101.00% | 101.99% | dsppage | 102.00% | 102.99% | abmonstein | 103.00% | 103.99% | eghigo | 104.00% | 104.99% | vh | 105.00% | 105.99% | LASERminer | 106.00% | 106.99% | YuenglingDude | 107.00% | 107.99% | carlsberg112 | 108.00% | 108.99% | apederzoli | 110.00% | 110.99% | OneInchWonder | 118.00% | 118.99% |
|
|
|
Just means more fees for us when we hit it If we hit right now... 2273 tx and .32 in fees Crap... wasn't ours
|
|
|
|